|
phosphorush
|
 |
June 09, 2014, 05:28:55 PM |
|
If XC was dead there would be no need for these DRK FUDers to be always here... You wouldn't need to kill what is already dead. So the conclusion I must take is that they see XC as strong competition  |
Your account locked, please contact support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
June 09, 2014, 06:24:12 PM |
|
You're making yourself and DRK look pathetic at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 12:23:01 AM |
|
You're making yourself and DRK look pathetic at this point. Well, txs to XM9Bt9j46JUZ9JMGNVfg7R6mvMePJhMpNs should send to real payee. You can't read block explorer. If this txs was fee, I will stop to posting here. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 01:22:07 PM
Last edit: June 10, 2014, 02:30:17 PM by chaeplin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 02:54:18 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 02:56:51 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC |
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
June 10, 2014, 02:57:16 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. lol...bet all u drk boys are shaking in your boots now, well even more then u already were, pretty obvious, you feel very threatened by XC..don't blame you really, if i held drk still, i would too... |
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:00:39 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. BTW, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC is NOT my address. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:01:55 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide |
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:03:29 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. BTW, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC is NOT my address. let him guess some more, just to show everyone reading how far off he is |
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:05:06 PM |
|
ignore me all you want, drk is still going to be forgotten when XC is finished, enjoy your glory while it lasts, it's almost over |
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:06:36 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
|
|
|
|
|
|
predatorkill
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:08:57 PM |
|
ignore me all you want, drk is still going to be forgotten when XC is finished, enjoy your glory while it lasts, it's almost over lol for the respond, since you are ignored he can't see your reply! lol |
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:10:36 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. |
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:11:59 PM |
|
ignore me all you want, drk is still going to be forgotten when XC is finished, enjoy your glory while it lasts, it's almost over lol for the respond, since you are ignored he can't see your reply! lol yes but if he decides to click un-ignore just to see what i said he will see, i have done this to people who i have ignored, just out of curiosity, i am aware how the system works, i'm not an idiot it's just how they dress me.... |
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:15:25 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. |
|
|
|
|
benthach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:17:58 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. he have many addresses to choose from but he's already chose the wrong one, which is XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC |
reddit btcwriter1 - twitter kingpininvestor
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:22:27 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. Well, do listaddressgroupings at debug console. You didn't send from specific address, but send from account. An account has a lot of address(change address). Do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC at debug console. |
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:38:21 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. Well, do listaddressgroupings at debug console. You didn't send from specific address, but send from account. An account has a lot of address(change address). Do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC at debug console. Well, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC have 0 balance in my account. |
|
|
|
|
|
