|
520Bit
|
 |
June 03, 2014, 01:56:08 PM |
|
I would say that it may be some one is doing the test about xnode, I would like to list all the xnode transactions through my wallet, hope this is helpful for the analysis:
#1
Status: 53 confirmations
Date: 2014/6/3 18:51
From: unknown
To: XXPAnJ6aCxtem1Na56QAA3ZrvxKVrPpkz9 (own address)
Credit: 0.265879 XC
Net amount: +0.265879 XC
Transaction ID: bddd0956da8e35f9c11b207bcc1fd9f75fc0f01a58ab672533bf9837a233201c
#2
Status: 53 confirmations
Date: 2014/6/3 18:51
From: unknown
To: XXPAnJ6aCxtem1Na56QAA3ZrvxKVrPpkz9 (own address)
Credit: 0.734121 XC
Net amount: +0.734121 XC
Transaction ID: 265442a1bc7e99114f62b4f6c2215104943b0a0cfb7130d747fca56d2894bf09
#3
Status: 52 confirmations, broadcast through 7 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/3 19:28
To: XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8
Debit: -0.99999 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -1.00 XC
Transaction ID: 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
#4
Status: 51 confirmations
Date: 2014/6/3 19:37
From: unknown
To: XYsXQPwLjHn3J1BetvXdNSAAeakxcSJx5K (own address)
Credit: 1.310119 XC
Net amount: +1.310119 XC
Transaction ID: 7d0398100b4e24dbd1a90d543e848de4e5effba43773e27f3116b157271a892f
#5
Status: 51 confirmations
Date: 2014/6/3 19:37
From: unknown
To: XYsXQPwLjHn3J1BetvXdNSAAeakxcSJx5K (own address)
Credit: 0.289881 XC
Net amount: +0.289881 XC
Transaction ID: a2912b52999ef2995a3febff5685e2fabfb19d40efeab547697341b63a59b1ea
#6
Status: 49 confirmations
Date: 2014/6/3 20:00
From: unknown
To: XKZENsMLYcEWgo6qoFuum9PxBX47td5qqU (own address)
Credit: 0.095313 XC
Net amount: +0.095313 XC
Transaction ID: f7a4a36e150e49740b743781bb4fc098ec7495baaaaad7d16398103d4d0fa181
#7
Status: 49 confirmations
Date: 2014/6/3 20:00
From: unknown
To: XKZENsMLYcEWgo6qoFuum9PxBX47td5qqU (own address)
Credit: 0.700915 XC
Net amount: +0.700915 XC
Transaction ID: cd35331512ca703e1084db084a8b1363ed3288afbd03504eb22815489812c40b
#8
Status: 49 confirmations
Date: 2014/6/3 20:00
From: unknown
To: XKZENsMLYcEWgo6qoFuum9PxBX47td5qqU (own address)
Credit: 1.003772 XC
Net amount: +1.003772 XC
Transaction ID: 89718b2a68ddc5aca0fcb6c8e96ecee2b7ab0a26f70230cc2c0bd5c7a17e7d8a
#9
Status: 48 confirmations, broadcast through 7 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/3 20:03
To: XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8
Debit: -1.59999 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -1.60 XC
Transaction ID: b62d1001a329f6df8112dbf9db84fb72dded44fd61988e6fb1d42e3eb1e6e449
#10
Status: 48 confirmations
Date: 2014/6/3 20:04
From: unknown
To: XYRHzczySY1diQWMtCNwVCizQ9py44f8tM (own address)
Credit: 0.843108 XC
Net amount: +0.843108 XC
Transaction ID: bbbcf0dc6f678e494de9bd1ac76fc0b4feb76cf01ec659647220831b3c227519
#11
Status: 17 confirmations, broadcast through 2 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/3 20:34
To: XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8
Debit: -0.843098 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.843108 XC
Transaction ID: e1d30dab6ccac0a858a3964629540d2326ff349aa2409a049623467da31095f1
#12
Status: 17 confirmations, broadcast through 2 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/3 20:34
To: XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8
Debit: -1.79999 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -1.80 XC
Transaction ID: 27affebd18c614e4a0e9c783c5553cb7e980f914f4fddd09092f0f7e6a33fce1
#1+#2=#3
#4+#5=#9
#6+#7+#8=#12
#10=#11
Can you explain how you have set up your xnode because mine is setup but O transaction for now more than 12h ?I have enter the rpcusername=rpcbitcoin and the rpcpassword=(getting from the first launch) , entered "reservebalance=20" and the three node : addnode=east01.xcnode.xc-official.com addnode=west01.xcnode.xc-official.com addnode=west02.xcnode.xc-official.com The X11Coin.conf changed to read-only then started the wallet with run-xc-xnode-mainnet.bat ,synced,transfered 15xc and then encrypted wallet and unlocked it. I have made all of this on another computer but on the same internet IP that's used on my main computer with my normal wallet. Your steps are correct, but the only different between you and me are: 1) I set reservebalance=100 2) I set up a new wallet with only one address and transferred 100 XCs to the wallet. How do you setup a new wallet without conflict from your existing wallet? I have my existing wallet with all of coins in it, how do I setup the new wallet so I can transfer coins to it but I can't start it because the current wallet is active and that is the one I need to transfer coins from?? Also both wallets are using the same appdata/folder/ so they both use the same wallet.dat? I am cornfused Your wallet files are locked when you launch it so you cant run 2 XC wallet at the same time on the same computer and right now xnode is for testing so dont risk to run it with all your coin .. You can do it by doing a backup of your wallet on another location then delete it from your appdata/X11Coin/ and run your xnode from here (recreating a new wallet.dat with 0xc) and then withdraw some coin (15xc) to it with a exchange (poloniex,cryptsy,mintpal...). OR You need another computer or laptop and run xnode on it (more safe). Correct. |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 03, 2014, 01:57:42 PM |
|
I have warned you. I have tiped you. How Dare... You Risk Your Community, Your Coin, Your Dev. This input of my md5 : =XXsooVipMmHBaRenWhQv4ZVwmRvMV2yKGK= What is your Dev satatement to current rev1 ?? This ip tip to you. user@sv2:~> x11coind listtransactions "" 100 0
[
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "XXsooVipMmHBaRenWhQv4ZVwmRvMV2yKGK",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -1.23400000,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 63,
"blockhash" : "5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f",
"blockindex" : 4,
"blocktime" : 1401789270,
"txid" : "c6c9e757332829e1f1d7ef52de10acd99238e6218cdd1e8c9d4b70418495b779",
"time" : 1401788925,
"timereceived" : 1401788925
},
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "XHu6Tht3i2Gxaman7tSzSzJ3pyFXgk4zKa",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -0.12340000,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 63,
"blockhash" : "5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f",
"blockindex" : 5,
"blocktime" : 1401789270,
"txid" : "00373ce3dfd1fed5d67f6f8b97f5420fd7f6226e2340430799dd5bfd369506d8",
"time" : 1401788962,
"timereceived" : 1401788962
}
]
1. you could not identify prior to him releasing his information. 2. I believe your assumption is far from correct. |
|
|
|
|
gadgetnerd
Member
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
|
|
June 03, 2014, 01:58:22 PM |
|
do md5 =XXsooVipMmHBaRenWhQv4ZVwmRvMV2yKGK=
6a39f4f9744d83dc5de9c14d87914c0f
So you actually found his wallet? When was your post about this before he announced it? Or do I understand things wrong? Guys, what's up? Did he find it or not? Let's not hurry any posts until we are absolutely sure!! |
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 03, 2014, 01:58:49 PM
Last edit: June 03, 2014, 02:10:42 PM by chaeplin |
|
user@sv2:~> x11coind listtransactions "" 100 0
[
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "XXsooVipMmHBaRenWhQv4ZVwmRvMV2yKGK",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -1.23400000,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 63,
"blockhash" : "5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f",
"blockindex" : 4,
"blocktime" : 1401789270,
"txid" : "c6c9e757332829e1f1d7ef52de10acd99238e6218cdd1e8c9d4b70418495b779",
"time" : 1401788925,
"timereceived" : 1401788925
},
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "XHu6Tht3i2Gxaman7tSzSzJ3pyFXgk4zKa",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -0.12340000,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 63,
"blockhash" : "5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f",
"blockindex" : 5,
"blocktime" : 1401789270,
"txid" : "00373ce3dfd1fed5d67f6f8b97f5420fd7f6226e2340430799dd5bfd369506d8",
"time" : 1401788962,
"timereceived" : 1401788962
}
]
1. you could not identify prior to him releasing his information. 2. I believe your assumption is far from correct. [/quote] I sent him 1.23400000 + 0.12340000 check block 5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f check time. |
|
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:05:14 PM |
|
6a39f4f9744d83dc5de9c14d87914c0f
well done. You deserve the bounty. |
| BINTEX | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| | | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| |
Powered by,
|
|
|
|
|
kopam
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:10:12 PM |
|
If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ? After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty. Lets wait and see IF this is true at all  |
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:11:51 PM |
|
If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ? After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty. Lets wait and see IF this is true at all No luck, pattern. XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine. |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:13:13 PM |
|
I have warned you. I have tiped you. How Dare... You Risk Your Community, Your Coin, Your Dev. This input of my md5 : =XXsooVipMmHBaRenWhQv4ZVwmRvMV2yKGK= What is your Dev satatement to current rev1 ?? This ip tip to you. user@sv2:~> x11coind listtransactions "" 100 0
[
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "XXsooVipMmHBaRenWhQv4ZVwmRvMV2yKGK",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -1.23400000,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 63,
"blockhash" : "5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f",
"blockindex" : 4,
"blocktime" : 1401789270,
"txid" : "c6c9e757332829e1f1d7ef52de10acd99238e6218cdd1e8c9d4b70418495b779",
"time" : 1401788925,
"timereceived" : 1401788925
},
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "XHu6Tht3i2Gxaman7tSzSzJ3pyFXgk4zKa",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -0.12340000,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 63,
"blockhash" : "5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f",
"blockindex" : 5,
"blocktime" : 1401789270,
"txid" : "00373ce3dfd1fed5d67f6f8b97f5420fd7f6226e2340430799dd5bfd369506d8",
"time" : 1401788962,
"timereceived" : 1401788962
}
]
1. you could not identify prior to him releasing his information. 2. I believe your assumption is far from correct. check block 5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f check time. Transaction 1 - http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/1fc7f91683c47e0c5085a6b2d0204ae7bdc34400d302f7fbc9023c261200bfa9 (2014-06-02 04:29:02) your alleged http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c6c9e757332829e1f1d7ef52de10acd99238e6218cdd1e8c9d4b70418495b779 (2014-06-03 09:54:30) wow. that took forever quite the time difference. Show a transaction in the right time frame. not trying to be a dick, but what you showed proves nothing. We really want serious investigation. And it will not harm community or coin, only make it stronger. also remember, this is less than a month old and not yet a finished product. but keep digging |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:15:31 PM |
|
If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ? After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty. Lets wait and see IF this is true at all No luck, pattern. XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine. The main point though is 2 things 1. This XNode was setup before v1.35 2. XNodes require a fresh wallet, with 1 address, and then make deposit to that new wallet and this is the first public release of the code, to get feedback from the community and testers on potential bugs. Lets have another bounty/test on the v1.35 code... ATCSECURE |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:15:58 PM |
|
You don't get it ? I sent him 1.234. |
|
|
|
|
|
kaene
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:16:17 PM |
|
1. you could not identify prior to him releasing his information. 2. I believe your assumption is far from correct. I sent him 1.23400000 + 0.12340000 check block 5cb8f9086f9aa3b81b4e9f0026f71432ca3c54a4fcd7f5c64b88da82a7c1a90f check time. hope they guys have the balls and pay chaeplin the bounty!
6a39f4f9744d83dc5de9c14d87914c0f
well done. You deserve the bounty. +1 |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:16:37 PM |
|
6a39f4f9744d83dc5de9c14d87914c0f
well done. You deserve the bounty. did he use sendfrommixer command?  and he did not identify his wallet prior to release of actual wallet anyhow. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:17:28 PM |
|
If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ? After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty. Lets wait and see IF this is true at all No luck, pattern. XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine. The main point though is 2 things 1. This XNode was setup before v1.35 2. XNodes require a fresh wallet, with 1 address, and then make deposit to that new wallet and this is the first public release of the code, to get feedback from the community and testers on potential bugs. Lets have another bounty/test on the v1.35 code... ATCSECURE If you say so, I will post my test result. to mixer + 3, done ? Proceed ? |
|
|
|
|
Grifftech
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:17:46 PM |
|
Hey guys got a tech question for ya. My internet connection can be flaky and one of my miners doesn't seem to want to start back up. I just get Pool Interrupted and it then appears to hang. My other rig will start up but not sure what to do with the one that won't. Anyway I can have a script or something that will run to see if the miner is running properly and if not restart it?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Minotaur26
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:18:05 PM |
|
^^ Whatever, you were all celebrating, going to publish the success of your experiment because your anon was working, it only took one person who actually has a clue to prove you wrong, now you are coming up with excuses. Lame.
|
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:18:11 PM |
|
I do get it. but did you use send from mixer You don't get it ? I sent him 1.234. did you use "sendfrommixer" label sendtoaddress? and if so where are the screenshots. video shortly |
|
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:18:23 PM |
|
I will be home in an hour.
I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.
I will post the TX ID
I will want both send and receive address.
Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.
I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.
Everyone agree?
|
| BINTEX | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| | | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| |
Powered by,
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:19:32 PM |
|
If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ? After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty. Lets wait and see IF this is true at all No luck, pattern. XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine. The main point though is 2 things 1. This XNode was setup before v1.35 2. XNodes require a fresh wallet, with 1 address, and then make deposit to that new wallet and this is the first public release of the code, to get feedback from the community and testers on potential bugs. Lets have another bounty/test on the v1.35 code... ATCSECURE If you say so, I will post my test result. to mixer + 3, done ? Proceed ? give a half hour. Video, plus needed info and let's pull it from code |
|
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:20:22 PM |
|
6a39f4f9744d83dc5de9c14d87914c0f
well done. You deserve the bounty. did he use sendfrommixer command? and he did not identify his wallet prior to release of actual wallet anyhow. HE posted the MD5 hash of the receive address hours before it was released. The challenge was 'what is the receive address' As far as I see he cracked it. He should be rewarded, not only that but it helps the development process to have people trying this. |
| BINTEX | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| | | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| |
Powered by,
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:22:30 PM |
|
6a39f4f9744d83dc5de9c14d87914c0f
well done. You deserve the bounty. did he use sendfrommixer command? and he did not identify his wallet prior to release of actual wallet anyhow. HE posted the MD5 hash of the receive address hours before it was released. The challenge was 'what is the receive address' As far as I see he cracked it. He should be rewarded, not only that but it helps the development process to have people trying this. did he use sendfromixer? |
|
|
|
|
|
