JCPoon
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 11, 2014, 07:19:28 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two +1 like the last 500 test, so can you idiots please stop backstabbin your own dev for once. We aren't backstabbing anything. ATCSecure put a test out there. Actually I didn't put that test out there, that was done by evtrmm So far nobody has provided the source address for any test I have done +1 anyone care to provide an address just to get this pissing match over with please |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
acseric
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:19:52 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
Critics (or testers) arent supposed to help. they are supposed to point out problems. Once you are aware of the problems, you them fix them. Development 101 correct but when you make a statement and then just show the mixer address and claim that links w/ the sender address without showing the sender address - how does that help? He isnt just showing the mixer address. He is able to tie the transaction to a specific wallet. That is a problem. |
|
|
|
|
sukottosan_d
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:20:28 PM |
|
Whitepaper? Design doc?
I'd like to research this stuff....but I don't see anything. I may be looking in the wrong places though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:20:39 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
He is famous for being a HUGE DRK FANBOY look at their threads... and ATCSECURE love to see the fire in you calling him out FUCK THESE FUDDERS XC FTW He doesnt appear to be fudding, he appears to have an actual point. Address the point he is making and explain why it isnt an issue. If you can do that, there wont be and Fear, Uncertainty or Doubt. what is his point? the mixer address [output] used for this transaction is visible? well of course it yes, we aren't using quantum physics to send the coins, the issue is the mixers input address and original senders output address since we provided the "last leg"of the TX, he can only back trace to the mixer itself, so far he has NOT Proven anything else |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:20:59 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
Critics (or testers) arent supposed to help. they are supposed to point out problems. Once you are aware of the problems, you them fix them. Development 101 correct but when you make a statement and then just show the mixer address and claim that links w/ the sender address without showing the sender address - how does that help? He isnt just showing the mixer address. He is able to tie the transaction to a specific wallet. That is a problem. that wallet is the MIXER wallet.. not the original senders wallet |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:21:23 PM |
|
new fuds are coming!
do you have whitepaper, open-source?
|
|
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:21:30 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
Critics (or testers) arent supposed to help. they are supposed to point out problems. Once you are aware of the problems, you them fix them. Development 101 correct but when you make a statement and then just show the mixer address and claim that links w/ the sender address without showing the sender address - how does that help? He isnt just showing the mixer address. He is able to tie the transaction to a specific wallet. That is a problem. Where? all i see are mixer addresses. Thats the hole idea behind a mixer |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:21:39 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
Critics (or testers) arent supposed to help. they are supposed to point out problems. Once you are aware of the problems, you them fix them. Development 101 correct but when you make a statement and then just show the mixer address and claim that links w/ the sender address without showing the sender address - how does that help? He isnt just showing the mixer address. He is able to tie the transaction to a specific wallet. That is a problem. that wallet is not the original wallet |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
Artoodeetoo
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:21:44 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
He is famous for being a HUGE DRK FANBOY look at their threads... and ATCSECURE love to see the fire in you calling him out FUCK THESE FUDDERS XC FTW He doesnt appear to be fudding, he appears to have an actual point. Address the point he is making and explain why it isnt an issue. If you can do that, there wont be and Fear, Uncertainty or Doubt. oh his best dtk mate is back, what issue has he raised or shown other than that he cannot work out the challenge.. Which as it stands suggests that rev 1 is err rather anonymous... |
DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:22:22 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
He is famous for being a HUGE DRK FANBOY look at their threads... and ATCSECURE love to see the fire in you calling him out FUCK THESE FUDDERS XC FTW He doesnt appear to be fudding, he appears to have an actual point. Address the point he is making and explain why it isnt an issue. If you can do that, there wont be and Fear, Uncertainty or Doubt. oh his best dtk mate is back, what issue has he raised or shown other than that he cannot work out the challenge.. Which as it stands suggests that rev 1 is err rather anonymous... correct, the wallet it points back to is the not the original senders wallet |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
IMJim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:22:27 PM |
|
I have had my Xnode up and running now for over 24 hours, nothing is happening which leads me to believe it is not working. Now losing out on staking too:-(
Anyone have any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:23:15 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
Critics (or testers) arent supposed to help. they are supposed to point out problems. Once you are aware of the problems, you them fix them. Development 101 correct but when you make a statement and then just show the mixer address and claim that links w/ the sender address without showing the sender address - how does that help? He isnt just showing the mixer address. He is able to tie the transaction to a specific wallet. That is a problem. that wallet is the MIXER wallet.. not the original senders wallet Exactly this. |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:25:44 PM |
|
I have had my Xnode up and running now for over 24 hours, nothing is happening which leads me to believe it is not working. Now losing out on staking too:-(
Anyone have any ideas?
not many are using anon transactions at this point - so you may not see them. once it picks up you will. |
|
|
|
|
|
phosphorush
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:26:34 PM |
|
Alright, time to move on?
|
Your account locked, please contact support.
|
|
|
GrGr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:27:58 PM |
|
Thank you for an entertaining evening  |
|
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:29:00 PM |
|
Alright, time to move on?
One sec, let me enjoy the moment  Fck ATC, how did you realize this in so little time? |
|
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:29:17 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
Critics (or testers) arent supposed to help. they are supposed to point out problems. Once you are aware of the problems, you them fix them. Development 101 correct but when you make a statement and then just show the mixer address and claim that links w/ the sender address without showing the sender address - how does that help? He isnt just showing the mixer address. He is able to tie the transaction to a specific wallet. That is a problem. that wallet is the MIXER wallet.. not the original senders wallet Exactly this. Okay, case closed. Everyone can resume their panic buys now. |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:30:14 PM |
|
I really don't see chaeplan as here to help, i think he is a paid drk troll, purely here for fud. Luckily we have a pto active dev who is on the forums and here to show him up.. Great job atc.. You have the drk boys very worried
Critics (or testers) arent supposed to help. they are supposed to point out problems. Once you are aware of the problems, you them fix them. Development 101 correct but when you make a statement and then just show the mixer address and claim that links w/ the sender address without showing the sender address - how does that help? He isnt just showing the mixer address. He is able to tie the transaction to a specific wallet. That is a problem. that wallet is the MIXER wallet.. not the original senders wallet Exactly this. Okay, case closed. Everyone can resume their panic buys now. Or panic hold? heheh |
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:30:25 PM |
|
Dev can deny. Here is point. Mixer address XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb is used for sender.
One time. Every input to mixer got NEW address. Matched....  |
|
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
June 11, 2014, 07:30:58 PM |
|
that wallet is the MIXER wallet.. not the original senders wallet
Exactly this. Okay, case closed. Everyone can resume their panic buys now. yup |
|
|
|
|
|
