Griffith (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 01, 2014, 03:39:22 PM |
|
that is good news. thank you for the update on another note. checking the exchanges. ECC is up to 5 satoshis in the ECC/BTC trading pair on comkort
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 01, 2014, 11:53:43 PM Last edit: September 02, 2014, 12:13:31 AM by cryptonit |
|
why we have such a high POW diff
 { "proof-of-work" : 37.53923539, "proof-of-stake" : 0.00053198, "search-interval" : 1 }
are we under attack? be carefull that can be easy a 51% attack did ya activate POW in code again?
and we found no block in 50 min
do u have timewarp fixed in ur code
it looks like we got attacked and blockchain stuck
u know there people who know the weakness of the code ECC is based on
and not all of that people are nice......
u have to fix all the known weakness in code and be prepared to discover unknown ones.....
|
|
|
|
Griffith (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 02:24:52 AM |
|
why we have such a high POW diff
 { "proof-of-work" : 37.53923539, "proof-of-stake" : 0.00053198, "search-interval" : 1 }
are we under attack? be carefull that can be easy a 51% attack did ya activate POW in code again?
and we found no block in 50 min
do u have timewarp fixed in ur code
it looks like we got attacked and blockchain stuck
u know there people who know the weakness of the code ECC is based on
and not all of that people are nice......
u have to fix all the known weakness in code and be prepared to discover unknown ones.....
dude. calm down. your post is 100% FUD. i know what im doing. POW is completely disabled. that number doesnt update because the update was disabled when PoW ended. it has been at that difficulty since the last PoW block was mined. dont worry about it. once again, the blockchain is stuck because there are only about 1-2 bil ECCoins in wallets that are online and staking (exchanges dont stake) at a time compared to the 18 bil total so sometimes it takes a while to stake. its fine. as the coin becomes more used with future updates, this will continue to get better and better. relax, and yes. the nodes are set to reject time warped blocks.
|
|
|
|
imaru
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 09:19:10 AM |
|
This is great! Now the only missing thing is some buyers....
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 09:51:04 AM |
|
the blockchain is stuck because there are only about 1-2 bil ECCoins in wallets that are online and staking (exchanges dont stake) at a time compared to the 18 bil total so sometimes it takes a while to stake. its fine. as the coin becomes more used with future updates, this will continue to get better and better. relax, and yes. the nodes are set to reject time warped blocks.
that shouldnt happen pos diff adjust to adapt towards the amount of try to pos coins
|
|
|
|
renbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 11:26:39 AM |
|
any working ecc multipool ?
|
|
|
|
mdtspain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 03:03:28 PM |
|
Am i on the right chain? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Will update shortly. { "version" : "v1.8.2.1", "protocolversion" : 60006, "walletversion" : 60000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 226150, "moneysupply" : 17557454915.34460068, "connections" : 4, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 37.53923539, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1395752770, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "unlocked_until" : 0, "errors" : "Info: Minting suspended due to locked wallet." } You should update.
|
|
|
|
Griffith (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 04:26:13 PM |
|
the blockchain is stuck because there are only about 1-2 bil ECCoins in wallets that are online and staking (exchanges dont stake) at a time compared to the 18 bil total so sometimes it takes a while to stake. its fine. as the coin becomes more used with future updates, this will continue to get better and better. relax, and yes. the nodes are set to reject time warped blocks.
that shouldnt happen pos diff adjust to adapt towards the amount of try to pos coins maybe not for DMD, which this coin is not. but that is how this PoS system works. actually its also how the original PPC system worked. its a working system and its fine. any working ecc multipool ?
i am working on this, i need a few more days. Am i on the right chain? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Will update shortly. { "version" : "v1.8.2.1", "protocolversion" : 60006, "walletversion" : 60000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 226150, "moneysupply" : 17557454915.34460068, "connections" : 4, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 37.53923539, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1395752770, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "unlocked_until" : 0, "errors" : "Info: Minting suspended due to locked wallet." } you are close to the right chain. but i would update because your wallet will start to get rejected soon by a soft fork i have set to come up in the short future
|
|
|
|
|
Griffith (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 05:34:23 PM |
|
sheeps server seems to have up and down days. i will repost the link to my pool, which for ECC also has a block explorer. Mind you the website is NOT DONE (this is the multipool im working on). my block explorer is always online. ' www.primetimepool.net is the pool website. if you want a more specific link to the BE instead of navigating the site. it is http://129.21.141.139:3000/
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 05:40:58 PM |
|
there are only about 1-2 bil ECCoins in wallets that are online and staking (exchanges dont stake) at a time compared to the 18 bil total so sometimes it takes a while to stake. its fine. as the coin becomes more used with future updates, this will continue to get better and better. .
please fix windows wallet crashes and u will have more 24/7 staking wallets for block generation
|
|
|
|
renbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 06:37:44 PM |
|
there are only about 1-2 bil ECCoins in wallets that are online and staking (exchanges dont stake) at a time compared to the 18 bil total so sometimes it takes a while to stake. its fine. as the coin becomes more used with future updates, this will continue to get better and better. .
please fix windows wallet crashes and u will have more 24/7 staking wallets for block generation mine hangs up too runtime error
|
|
|
|
Griffith (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 09:30:01 PM |
|
there are only about 1-2 bil ECCoins in wallets that are online and staking (exchanges dont stake) at a time compared to the 18 bil total so sometimes it takes a while to stake. its fine. as the coin becomes more used with future updates, this will continue to get better and better. .
please fix windows wallet crashes and u will have more 24/7 staking wallets for block generation mine hangs up too runtime error once i can figure out the origin of the segfault. i can fix it. unfortunately segfaults dont give you a line or file. it just says error. gotta love that. im looking for it though
|
|
|
|
pamises
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2014, 11:55:38 PM |
|
i think we could change eccoin logo, and make a modern one.
if we changed our focus, then we should tell people about this new age.
what do u think?
|
Vincere cor proprium plus est quem vincere mundum.
|
|
|
Griffith (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 03, 2014, 12:00:23 AM |
|
i think we could change eccoin logo, and make a modern one.
if we changed our focus, then we should tell people about this new age.
what do u think?
Agreed, i am now open for new logo suggestsion, a new wallet is practically done. submit your logos / color designs in the thread and by the end of the week with the new wallet i will announce a winner (picked by me and mdtspain, community input will count too) and release the new wallet. i will actually probably put up a poll after the first few submissions come in that people can vote on. on another note. i understand what is causing the runtime errors. there seems to be a slight memory leak with one of the functions. i never noticed it on my computer because i have 32 gigs of ram and my server has even more, but i have tested it on a smaller computer with 4 gigs and i see the problem. the runtime error occurs when c++ has used up all of the memory asigned to it. i will be looking for the origin over the next day ro two to see if i can fix it. I CANT WAIT TO SEE YOUR DESIGN SUBMISSIONS!!!
|
|
|
|
renbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 03, 2014, 02:08:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
allen wong
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 03, 2014, 02:41:53 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
kostya.ash
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 03, 2014, 05:56:15 AM Last edit: September 10, 2014, 08:55:04 PM by kostya.ash |
|
|
|
|
|
Remy_5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 03, 2014, 03:21:55 PM |
|
So I'm pretty curious about what you intend to do about the Clear Send, or how you choose to call it.
there were two things that were do be done with that. one was that, if you click on your transaction tab in the wallet it will list everything you have done. your personal ledger. i plan on building in a function that when you enter a wallet address it will give you that persons ledger. it makes it easier to see what everyone has and what they have been doing. the other one was a better way to sotre data in the chain. but i havent worked out the details. i will have a multipool being started up pretty soon. working on the python for that this weekend. i will post more updates soon. i am going to adjust the first post in the thread to add a section to tell what is ging to be the next thing that will be put out so it is more clear As an idea it might be interesting. If I understand, the first function should be fairly easy to obtain, personal transaction data should be already registered in the wallet, or by set up in an appropriate manner the filters that are on the page of transactions.. But if you are talking about, every single address external, then I think it may be more complicated, it becomes a kind of blockexplorer integrated into the wallet. The first ideas that come to mind to me to get this, they are costly: 1) to get the data without archiving them, you should re-examine all the blockchain to every interrogation, and may be very costly in terms of time. 2) If you intend to use another database with all transactions, then you should create two indexes sorted for both recipient and sender, and update them every block incoming or transaction. IMHO, it would be a database, which in turn become costly in terms of cpu usage, ram, and disk space, and then ultimately so would result in excessive energy consumption. Soon become a wallet that can run only on a few large systems, and very little green. Do not you think it would be more functional, prepare in wallet an integration with one or more external blockexplorer? The block explorer would continue to do their heavy work on their side and the wallet would be lighter and greener. Maybe we'll talk later, after which it will be settled on multiPool and thanks for the updates.
|
|
|
|
Remy_5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 03, 2014, 03:55:02 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FpQwMV0s.jpg&t=665&c=BTshFnkFOMj7FA) ECC: EQyDfG55Ke1m8MuRTvsehXvPs9zviTnLrW This one looks pretty good ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Well .. I do not know. Yes, it is done well, but it seems to me a logo a bit indecisive, does not know which way to go. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I do not have the time to realize it, but I would suggest a different idea, something reminiscent of the theme of the new currency, but showing it as an evolution of the old logo and idea. For example, you could take the old logo of the leaf (maybe even the very first logo) but simplify it and make it into a transparent material such as glass, with all its points of light and reflections internal and external (with slight nuances of of green) . Or a coin of glass with incorporated inside a leaf. It would be difficult to achieve, especially to maintain the right level of balance between sophistication and "special effects", but IMHO if done very well could be interesting and representative. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|