uray
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:43:10 AM |
|
New client Update 1.1.0Backend is caught up to date with nxt 1.2.8. Nxt new APIs are usable. Hard fork on block 11800 to enable new nxt features(encrypted messaging, DGS). UI is not yet updated for new features. Move your burst_db folder from 1.0.3 into the new folder to avoid a resync. Db upgrade will take a few minutes though. https://mega.co.nz/#!3xZ2DIwR!QQnamRK_JCz-QvFwb_A9gS6_tWCxAiFtVoqI8Unqlhgsha256: f9d2a2d199993088eb9a03f1cb282ecbb36e704a4b7c609d5e878573752dad30 Good work It needs work. Transactions are backasswards. yeah its not recent row first
|
|
|
|
alphateam
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:44:25 AM |
|
Why does everyone keep talking about GPUs? I thought this was a hard drive capacity-"mined" coin? correct - the mining process is scraping over your plot files. The amount of storage devoted for plot files is equal to your chances of finding a block. It also defines the amount of CPU power you need to scrape, because you need to read 1/4096 of your plotted volume. In most cases this is not important and can easily run on a single core, in the background, not hurting other processes running. The actual "plotting" involves a CPU-intensive process and may take a day for a Terabyte. The i7-3930K I used for plotting yielded 2 TB/day. Lots of people buy a couple 4TB disks and don't want to wait 2 weeks to plot them, hence the development of a gnu-plotter. Its the same problem. I am buying 1000 TB and it will take weeks to plot. Having only CPU i will not think of getting 1000 TB. GPU only make people scale up and everything end up the same but people have to spend more money. 1000 tb are you serious?
|
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:46:27 AM |
|
Why does everyone keep talking about GPUs? I thought this was a hard drive capacity-"mined" coin? correct - the mining process is scraping over your plot files. The amount of storage devoted for plot files is equal to your chances of finding a block. It also defines the amount of CPU power you need to scrape, because you need to read 1/4096 of your plotted volume. In most cases this is not important and can easily run on a single core, in the background, not hurting other processes running. The actual "plotting" involves a CPU-intensive process and may take a day for a Terabyte. The i7-3930K I used for plotting yielded 2 TB/day. Lots of people buy a couple 4TB disks and don't want to wait 2 weeks to plot them, hence the development of a gnu-plotter. Its the same problem. I am buying 1000 TB and it will take weeks to plot. Having only CPU i will not think of getting 1000 TB. GPU only make people scale up and everything end up the same but people have to spend more money. 1000 tb are you serious? That is only 250 4TB drives. Ok 275 4 TB Drives after microdick finishes messing with them.
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
alphateam
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:48:01 AM |
|
Why does everyone keep talking about GPUs? I thought this was a hard drive capacity-"mined" coin? correct - the mining process is scraping over your plot files. The amount of storage devoted for plot files is equal to your chances of finding a block. It also defines the amount of CPU power you need to scrape, because you need to read 1/4096 of your plotted volume. In most cases this is not important and can easily run on a single core, in the background, not hurting other processes running. The actual "plotting" involves a CPU-intensive process and may take a day for a Terabyte. The i7-3930K I used for plotting yielded 2 TB/day. Lots of people buy a couple 4TB disks and don't want to wait 2 weeks to plot them, hence the development of a gnu-plotter. Its the same problem. I am buying 1000 TB and it will take weeks to plot. Having only CPU i will not think of getting 1000 TB. GPU only make people scale up and everything end up the same but people have to spend more money. 1000 tb are you serious? That is only 250 4TB drives. Ok 275 4 TB Drives after microdick finishes messing with them. Yes i know but time to plot them risk to take a while, unless plotting on multiple computer
|
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:48:47 AM |
|
The dev's 2.0 Pool is not updating. 2 shares submited and recieved in last 20 minutes - neither recorded.
My BURST has not changed in a while but my share count is changing. It goes up and then it goes down. Shares are not something that I understand yet. When the share count goes down where did they go? I just got paid.
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:51:04 AM |
|
Why does everyone keep talking about GPUs? I thought this was a hard drive capacity-"mined" coin? correct - the mining process is scraping over your plot files. The amount of storage devoted for plot files is equal to your chances of finding a block. It also defines the amount of CPU power you need to scrape, because you need to read 1/4096 of your plotted volume. In most cases this is not important and can easily run on a single core, in the background, not hurting other processes running. The actual "plotting" involves a CPU-intensive process and may take a day for a Terabyte. The i7-3930K I used for plotting yielded 2 TB/day. Lots of people buy a couple 4TB disks and don't want to wait 2 weeks to plot them, hence the development of a gnu-plotter. Its the same problem. I am buying 1000 TB and it will take weeks to plot. Having only CPU i will not think of getting 1000 TB. GPU only make people scale up and everything end up the same but people have to spend more money. 1000 tb are you serious? That is only 250 4TB drives. Ok 275 4 TB Drives after microdick finishes messing with them. Yes i know but time to plot them risk to take a while, unless plotting on multiple computer Well yeah it would be multiple computers. Also the GPU plot generator has to be there. It takes time but this coin is something that anyone can scale up just by reinvesting the coin. Hopefully this is a winner winner chicken dinner!
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1069
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:52:18 AM |
|
Why does everyone keep talking about GPUs? I thought this was a hard drive capacity-"mined" coin? correct - the mining process is scraping over your plot files. The amount of storage devoted for plot files is equal to your chances of finding a block. It also defines the amount of CPU power you need to scrape, because you need to read 1/4096 of your plotted volume. In most cases this is not important and can easily run on a single core, in the background, not hurting other processes running. The actual "plotting" involves a CPU-intensive process and may take a day for a Terabyte. The i7-3930K I used for plotting yielded 2 TB/day. Lots of people buy a couple 4TB disks and don't want to wait 2 weeks to plot them, hence the development of a gnu-plotter. Its the same problem. I am buying 1000 TB and it will take weeks to plot. Having only CPU i will not think of getting 1000 TB. GPU only make people scale up and everything end up the same but people have to spend more money. 1000 tb are you serious? That is only 250 4TB drives. Ok 275 4 TB Drives after microdick finishes messing with them. lol "only", you need multiple rig for that, and you can't dump the amount produced by that, not worth it right now even 100tb are not worth it
|
|
|
|
fanepatent
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:53:32 AM |
|
with the last burst wallet version, the payment list is fucked up? start from the older one to the new one at the bottom???
confirm, the same status with last wallet, lost last day transactions!!! Wait for blockchain to update. Mine came back. It has nothing to do with the blockchain. I can see the transactions, only they are arranged from oldes to newest.
|
BURST - BURST-58XP-63WY-XSVQ-ASG9A
|
|
|
victorteoh
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 334
Merit: 250
🌟 æternity🌟 blockchain🌟
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:59:06 AM |
|
Anyone facing a problem when a miner suddenly shuts off? I'm plotting and mining at the same time. This happens like twice in a day. After launching back I'll see "dead letters encountered. This logging can be turned off or adjusted with configuration settings akka.log-dead-letters."
|
|
|
|
alphateam
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:01:57 PM |
|
Don't know why, but when i'm minning with simlinks and only one miner, hdd del activity blink really less then if i mining with one miner for each disk
|
|
|
|
HoldTheLine
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:03:50 PM |
|
Anyone facing a problem when a miner suddenly shuts off? I'm plotting and mining at the same time. This happens like twice in a day. After launching back I'll see "dead letters encountered. This logging can be turned off or adjusted with configuration settings akka.log-dead-letters."
Frequently. It does seem to impact daily average payouts - they are around half what the calculator says I should get over 24 hours for X TB of plots. - over 5 days of mining recording the expected vs actual payouts. Don't understand it, can't be bothered deciphering it lol It still works (although perhaps not efficiently) and I still get coins so it will do for now.
|
|
|
|
duncan_idaho
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:05:42 PM |
|
Why does everyone keep talking about GPUs? I thought this was a hard drive capacity-"mined" coin? correct - the mining process is scraping over your plot files. The amount of storage devoted for plot files is equal to your chances of finding a block. It also defines the amount of CPU power you need to scrape, because you need to read 1/4096 of your plotted volume. In most cases this is not important and can easily run on a single core, in the background, not hurting other processes running. The actual "plotting" involves a CPU-intensive process and may take a day for a Terabyte. The i7-3930K I used for plotting yielded 2 TB/day. Lots of people buy a couple 4TB disks and don't want to wait 2 weeks to plot them, hence the development of a gnu-plotter. Its the same problem. I am buying 1000 TB and it will take weeks to plot. Having only CPU i will not think of getting 1000 TB. GPU only make people scale up and everything end up the same but people have to spend more money. 1000 tb are you serious? That is only 250 4TB drives. Ok 275 4 TB Drives after microdick finishes messing with them. lol "only", you need multiple rig for that, and you can't dump the amount produced by that, not worth it right now even 100tb are not worth it For that price you can better buy burst on market and wait for pump. for 250 hdd you need min. 30 computers every computer with good PSU and good GPU if you want GPU plotting. This is INSANE and in my opinion never ROI.
|
|
|
|
Avaahnaa
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:06:06 PM |
|
I can not get the GPU generator to work with R9 290X
On this drive, the only files present are the PlotGen Application, a kernel and plots folder and a batch file which I wrote with the following command:
gpuPlotGenerator.exe plots <ID> 41000000 10250000 4096 128
Command window opens to this before 'Stopping Working'
G:\GPU Generator>gpuPlotGenerator.exe plots <ID> 41000000 102500 00 4096 128 GPU plot generator v1.1.0 Author: Cryo Bitcoin: 138gMBhCrNkbaiTCmUhP9HLU9xwn5QKZgD Burst: BURST-YA29-QCEW-QXC3-BKXDL -------------- Path: plots Nonces: 41000000 to 51252288 (2503 GB) Process memory: 1024MB Threads number: 128 -------------- Retrieving OpenCL platform Retrieving OpenCL GPU device Creating OpenCL context Creating OpenCL command queue Creating CPU buffer Creating OpenCL GPU generation buffer Creating OpenCL GPU scoops buffer Creating OpenCL program Building OpenCL program
I have the AMD SDK whatsit now and just upgraded drivers to 14.7 beta. On previous driver install the cmd window simply closed with no info. I am also confused as to why it is showing 2503 GB
|
|
|
|
enta2k
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 101
The Future of Security Tokens
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:10:40 PM |
|
So DHL mailed me, that my 6TB HDD will arrive today. Yesterday i overclocked my old CPU, hopefully i can generate 1TB+ a day. But more important i hope i can geht everything running, i really suck at things like that, but motivation and coffee will get it done
|
|
|
|
5m4ru
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:10:46 PM |
|
confirmed ! ati 14.7 program crashed ati 13.9 program work fine
|
ha ha ha
|
|
|
mig6r
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:10:58 PM Last edit: September 09, 2014, 01:12:48 PM by mig6r |
|
Gpuplotter does not work for me with 280x someone to help me? Catalyst 13.2 + app SDK installed
|
|
|
|
newuser01
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:12:25 PM |
|
confirmed ! ati 14.7 program crashed ati 13.9 program work fine 280x or 290x?
|
|
|
|
Dzus1k
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:12:39 PM |
|
Dev pool v2 seems to be broken or under ddos. It lose connection in miner randomly so minner shut down and also instead of 500 burst I got payment of 400.
|
|
|
|
HoldTheLine
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:15:07 PM |
|
Dev pool v2 seems to be broken or under ddos. It lose connection in miner randomly so minner shut down and also instead of 500 burst I got payment of 400.
Motherfuckers! seriously - why can't people just leave others property the hell alone.
|
|
|
|
5m4ru
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:17:39 PM |
|
confirmed ! ati 14.7 program crashed ati 13.9 program work fine 280x or 290x? 280x
|
ha ha ha
|
|
|
|