Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 11:25:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 [416] 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 ... 1310 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]  (Read 2375263 times)
Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 07:51:32 AM
 #8301

On a similar note, if running a CPU miner at 75% or more, how dangerous is extended usage? A simpler question would be: how long could I run at 100% before my processor bursts into flames?

And on the topic of XMG itself: how do we achieve our dream of landing on the moon? A space walk, perhaps? Maybe build ourselves an O'Neil cylinder?

There is no chance that the processor will ever burst into flames Wink

With modern CPU thermal limiting, there is virtually no way to fry a CPU other than by dropping it into a frying pan with a little hot oil and seasoning.

The most important thing is to keep an eye on CPU temperature and to keep cooling fans and heatsinks free of dust to keep things running sweetly. This is certainly more important during hot weather.

The safe operating temperature for CPUs differs from model to model.

I am currently working on a CPU temperature limiter for XMG mining on Windows which works in conjunction with my Speed Controller. It is possible to limit the speed of the miner to keep the CPU temperature below a threshold level set by the user. I have this in Alpha testing at the moment. It uses SpeedFan for the temperature sensing.

As for landing on the Moon and building O'Neill Cylinders, that is somewhat beyond my abilities right now. Maybe next week eh? Wink

1714605955
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714605955

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714605955
Reply with quote  #2

1714605955
Report to moderator
1714605955
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714605955

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714605955
Reply with quote  #2

1714605955
Report to moderator
1714605955
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714605955

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714605955
Reply with quote  #2

1714605955
Report to moderator
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714605955
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714605955

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714605955
Reply with quote  #2

1714605955
Report to moderator
th3.r00t
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 312
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
April 28, 2015, 07:53:16 AM
 #8302

What is better, having 1 worker with all the hash power or more workers sharing the hashes?
I made some little tests but cannot figure out if it changes something or not (I guess if it does, it's small)
I dont know. I always use one worker.
Maybe someone else can give an answer on this.

In PoM pool I use only one worker.
In other pools I use one worker per CPU.

I don't think that there is a difference in hashrate between one and multiple workers - each miner receives different share diff from pool based on his hashrate and submit share rate.
Just when you use multiple workers, it's easier to spot a CPU problem, overheat, rig down, etc.

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Your Digital Network | 10MB Blocks
Algo: XEVAN | DK3 | Masternodes
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
CoinPayments | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
z0n0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 09:21:10 AM
 #8303

I wonder...what can be expected XMG value in future (near or long)? I'm aware its almost impossible to predict price in crypto world, but still I'm wondering. Maybe 111magic, Joe can predict something ? Smiley
Let's say now 1 XMG = 0,00008 BTC. Is it reasonable to expect that XMG can reach 0,008 some day?
TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 10:25:03 AM
 #8304


 Roll Eyes
TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 10:33:18 AM
 #8305

What is better, having 1 worker with all the hash power or more workers sharing the hashes?
I made some little tests but cannot figure out if it changes something or not (I guess if it does, it's small)
I dont know. I always use one worker.
Maybe someone else can give an answer on this.

In PoM pool I use only one worker.
In other pools I use one worker per CPU.

I don't think that there is a difference in hashrate between one and multiple workers - each miner receives different share diff from pool based on his hashrate and submit share rate.
Just when you use multiple workers, it's easier to spot a CPU problem, overheat, rig down, etc.

I think so.
TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 10:44:49 AM
Last edit: April 28, 2015, 11:30:11 AM by TonySon
 #8306

What is better, having 1 worker with all the hash power or more workers sharing the hashes?
I made some little tests but cannot figure out if it changes something or not (I guess if it does, it's small)
I dont know. I always use one worker.
Maybe someone else can give an answer on this.

In PoM pool I use only one worker.
In other pools I use one worker per CPU.

I don't think that there is a difference in hashrate between one and multiple workers - each miner receives different share diff from pool based on his hashrate and submit share rate.
Just when you use multiple workers, it's easier to spot a CPU problem, overheat, rig down, etc.


you're right
Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 11:24:56 AM
 #8307

I wonder...what can be expected XMG value in future (near or long)? I'm aware its almost impossible to predict price in crypto world, but still I'm wondering. Maybe 111magic, Joe can predict something ? Smiley
Let's say now 1 XMG = 0,00008 BTC. Is it reasonable to expect that XMG can reach 0,008 some day?

Almost impossible? More like utterly impossible Cheesy

It makes for an interesting discussion though. Did anybody ever think that the value of a Bitcoin would reach 1000 dollars? Did anybody ever think it would plummet over the next year to under 200 dollars?

Ultimately, the price of anything is what somebody is willing to pay for it, should they desire to possess it for whatever reason.

While we are comparing the price of XMG against BTC, what will happen if/when BTC becomes old hat and XMG takes over as the "gold standard" cryptocurrency? It is the price of XMG against fiat currencies that we should be comparing. Currently, whenever I wish to calculate the value of my XMG holding in UKP I have to factor-in the value of a Bitcoin against the UKP. One day soon, maybe I will not have to worry about that step.

One thing that I do know for sure is that cryptocurrencies and other local currency schemes are here to stay and are the way of the future, here today. One very interesting project going on very near to me is The Brixton Pound. Fascinating stuff and it works really well.

Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 11:30:01 AM
 #8308


 Roll Eyes

Make that bid 0.00074810 and we have a deal Wink

TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 11:33:14 AM
 #8309

I wonder...what can be expected XMG value in future (near or long)? I'm aware its almost impossible to predict price in crypto world, but still I'm wondering. Maybe 111magic, Joe can predict something ? Smiley
Let's say now 1 XMG = 0,00008 BTC. Is it reasonable to expect that XMG can reach 0,008 some day?

Almost impossible? More like utterly impossible Cheesy

It makes for an interesting discussion though. Did anybody ever think that the value of a Bitcoin would reach 1000 dollars? Did anybody ever think it would plummet over the next year to under 200 dollars?

Ultimately, the price of anything is what somebody is willing to pay for it, should they desire to possess it for whatever reason.

While we are comparing the price of XMG against BTC, what will happen if/when BTC becomes old hat and XMG takes over as the "gold standard" cryptocurrency? It is the price of XMG against fiat currencies that we should be comparing. Currently, whenever I wish to calculate the value of my XMG holding in UKP I have to factor-in the value of a Bitcoin against the UKP. One day soon, maybe I will not have to worry about that step.

One thing that I do know for sure is that cryptocurrencies and other local currency schemes are here to stay and are the way of the future, here today. One very interesting project going on very near to me is The Brixton Pound. Fascinating stuff and it works really well.
Grin
Definitely!
CoinMagi ( XMG ) to the Moon
light85bit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 11:34:53 AM
 #8310

Ohhhh, talking about wallet, my wallet version is 1.2.1.1, how do i update my wallet? Is there any problem if i make it wrong? lol

Joe mentioned that he has yet to update the binaries on the website from 1.2.1.1 to 1.2.1.2 some time last week. I suspect that's partly due to the personal matters he has had to deal with lately, partly because of the Berkeley Database stuff that I've kept bringing up, and probably for a few other reasons as well. In short, though, he said there were no significant changes between 1.2.1.1 and 1.2.1.2 that require you to update. So it's alright to wait for the next official release, unless you're really itching to have the newest version (which would require you to compile it yourself).
Thanks mate Smiley
TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 11:44:11 AM
Last edit: April 28, 2015, 12:04:10 PM by TonySon
 #8311


 Roll Eyes

Make that bid 0.00074810 and we have a deal Wink
wow bid 0.00074810  Cry
TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 11:46:41 AM
 #8312

 Grin


thanks
Lotuswalker
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 1


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 01:34:31 PM
 #8313

Ohhhh, talking about wallet, my wallet version is 1.2.1.1, how do i update my wallet? Is there any problem if i make it wrong? lol

Joe mentioned that he has yet to update the binaries on the website from 1.2.1.1 to 1.2.1.2 some time last week. I suspect that's partly due to the personal matters he has had to deal with lately, partly because of the Berkeley Database stuff that I've kept bringing up, and probably for a few other reasons as well. In short, though, he said there were no significant changes between 1.2.1.1 and 1.2.1.2 that require you to update. So it's alright to wait for the next official release, unless you're really itching to have the newest version (which would require you to compile it yourself).
Thanks mate Smiley

It is allready compiled on the website: http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-release/m-wallet-1.2.1.2-win.zip
TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 01:40:41 PM
 #8314

Ohhhh, talking about wallet, my wallet version is 1.2.1.1, how do i update my wallet? Is there any problem if i make it wrong? lol

Joe mentioned that he has yet to update the binaries on the website from 1.2.1.1 to 1.2.1.2 some time last week. I suspect that's partly due to the personal matters he has had to deal with lately, partly because of the Berkeley Database stuff that I've kept bringing up, and probably for a few other reasons as well. In short, though, he said there were no significant changes between 1.2.1.1 and 1.2.1.2 that require you to update. So it's alright to wait for the next official release, unless you're really itching to have the newest version (which would require you to compile it yourself).
Thanks mate Smiley

It is allready compiled on the website: http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-release/m-wallet-1.2.1.2-win.zip

THANKS
TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 02:04:01 PM
 #8315

magi v1.2.1.1
download : http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-release/m-wallet-1.2.1.2-win.zip
ElMacho20000
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 02:19:24 PM
 #8316


Almost impossible? More like utterly impossible Cheesy

It makes for an interesting discussion though. Did anybody ever think that the value of a Bitcoin would reach 1000 dollars? Did anybody ever think it would plummet over the next year to under 200 dollars?

Ultimately, the price of anything is what somebody is willing to pay for it, should they desire to possess it for whatever reason.

While we are comparing the price of XMG against BTC, what will happen if/when BTC becomes old hat and XMG takes over as the "gold standard" cryptocurrency? It is the price of XMG against fiat currencies that we should be comparing. Currently, whenever I wish to calculate the value of my XMG holding in UKP I have to factor-in the value of a Bitcoin against the UKP. One day soon, maybe I will not have to worry about that step.

One thing that I do know for sure is that cryptocurrencies and other local currency schemes are here to stay and are the way of the future, here today. One very interesting project going on very near to me is The Brixton Pound. Fascinating stuff and it works really well.

I guess a stable value for XMG would be something like 0.2 USD, so lets say 10 times what is it now. I don't think it could go up till 1 USD or more for all the reasons we all know (essentially no exponential difficulty)

Proud and humble member of MAGI community.
95Pyk32MRzSaMsv2hmzxu9NSxnydUQDgxG
TonySon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 03:43:06 PM
 #8317


Almost impossible? More like utterly impossible Cheesy

It makes for an interesting discussion though. Did anybody ever think that the value of a Bitcoin would reach 1000 dollars? Did anybody ever think it would plummet over the next year to under 200 dollars?

Ultimately, the price of anything is what somebody is willing to pay for it, should they desire to possess it for whatever reason.

While we are comparing the price of XMG against BTC, what will happen if/when BTC becomes old hat and XMG takes over as the "gold standard" cryptocurrency? It is the price of XMG against fiat currencies that we should be comparing. Currently, whenever I wish to calculate the value of my XMG holding in UKP I have to factor-in the value of a Bitcoin against the UKP. One day soon, maybe I will not have to worry about that step.

One thing that I do know for sure is that cryptocurrencies and other local currency schemes are here to stay and are the way of the future, here today. One very interesting project going on very near to me is The Brixton Pound. Fascinating stuff and it works really well.

I guess a stable value for XMG would be something like 0.2 USD, so lets say 10 times what is it now. I don't think it could go up till 1 USD or more for all the reasons we all know (essentially no exponential difficulty)
0,1 USD  Grin
Arah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 03:50:27 PM
 #8318

Any tips to gain fast the "member" rank? :/
I think it's quite hard.
light85bit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 03:55:36 PM
 #8319

Any tips to gain fast the "member" rank? :/
I think it's quite hard.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.0
Read this and you'll know there is no fast way, lol
Lotuswalker
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 1


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 04:01:13 PM
 #8320

Any tips to gain fast the "member" rank? :/
I think it's quite hard.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.0
Read this and you'll know there is no fast way, lol


You need a activity of 60.

light85bit almost made it there Cheesy
Pages: « 1 ... 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 [416] 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 ... 1310 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!