MrUnzO
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 01:49:24 PM |
|
64bit win minerd https://mega.co.nz/#!4sExQTIb!2qnIHVaylsmUAsL7NDhvnSimgqSq-Xg0CVNQSpoBTQM i7 and e3 work fine e3 1230V3 use https://mega.co.nz/#!Mk1jHCaT!oSiR5sUXWv8i-OHS8PEeM3oMkcz-hfduaA1keLZNpjM if your pc have 8threads,use 4 threads or open 2 bat use 4 threads my i7 4930K can't run these minerds it open and close immediately ... any idea? What are your settings in the .bat file? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-xpf1%2Fv%2Ft35.0-12%2F10711981_726148527464325_732273294_o.jpg%3Foh%3D2b2ecdc0ea1806d5c9677bde11ce96c4%26oe%3D541A9E47%26__gda__%3D1411004570_29863481bda816c8d749e53b0630e7f3&t=665&c=KIM0os8a8vrYXg)
|
|
|
|
karimdr2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:00:45 PM |
|
No one wants my Mac miner and wallet? To the Trash then ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:03:06 PM |
|
pool and stratum is ready - but no (stratum) miner yet
what's that pool? look at my twitter for the url.. currently testing though ah that pool. What's the point without stratum miner. Also why your mail system does not work for ages?
|
|
|
|
Nixss
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:23:06 PM |
|
First 64bit win minerd work ok for me (but with no blocks found), and the second one (for e3 1230V3) not at all. Your settings looks ok, but try with --threads 6. I only found blocks when mining within wallet. Nevertheless, it is obvious that Linux miners have a huge advantage over the windows miners.
|
|
|
|
2cV5S3zAuz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:33:51 PM |
|
well i think someone is testing a cpuminer that can connect to pools, because someone is connected right now and spitting a ton of rejected shares..
share rejected: error: ntime out of range
if that helps whoever it is.
Its me.. Got the same error on your pool than on mine.. Hmm strange the fact that it connected shows you are getting closer at least. im pretty sure my stratum is configured correctly, so im guessing yours is too.. probably the miner =\ i will keep it live for you to test oc Check your pool log, when you are awake please. I assume, I've successfully connected your pool with the release minerd over/through proxy_miner and done some jobs already (found block due to low diff??) Please check any logging with the givin address: 95di6Qt3Ly9EhLTYoPuN7j6ehGLvqHY6cY I've also droped you a msg in irc.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:38:27 PM |
|
pool and stratum is ready - but no (stratum) miner yet
what's that pool? look at my twitter for the url.. currently testing though ah that pool. What's the point without stratum miner. Also why your mail system does not work for ages? You can still use the cpu miner and use stratum proxy - it works sort of. It should be working as long as you are logged in, but I get too many mails - contact me here (PM), via IRC, Twitter or E-Mail directly
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009
Coin of the Magi!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:41:32 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.
Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:44:35 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.
Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.
There is no decent/native stratum miner right now, but we're working on it.
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:50:31 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.
Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.
You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready. miner v3 has a malware call... etc. So what's fair here?
|
|
|
|
don_ahmedt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:52:29 PM |
|
i have good idea create pool for small miners to 100khash ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009
Coin of the Magi!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:54:42 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.
Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.
You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready. miner v3 has a malware call... etc. So what's fair here? I understand your concern about the miner. For your notice, 3907 XMG is mined so far, and I will expect at least 5 million deliver to miners in next 1~2 months, will issue fix to that. Hope that sounds 'fair' by the time.
|
|
|
|
dida
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:55:19 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.
Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.
You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready. miner v3 has a malware call... etc. So what's fair here? ..it is a bullshit coin ready to be instamined...that what it is...nothing fair about it
|
|
|
|
salinas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 02:57:20 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.
Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.
You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready. miner v3 has a malware call... etc. So what's fair here? ..it is a bullshit coin ready to be instamined...that what it is...nothing fair about it wtf dida ? do u really think anybody is concerned about what u think? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009
Coin of the Magi!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 03:00:30 PM |
|
..it is a bullshit coin ready to be instamined...that what it is...nothing fair about it
Hope you realize some numbers we're talking: ... 3907 XMG is mined so far, and I will expect at least 5 million deliver to miners in next 1~2 months...
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 03:02:30 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.
Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.
You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready. miner v3 has a malware call... etc. So what's fair here? I understand your concern about the miner. For your notice, 3907 XMG is mined so far, and I will expect at least 5 million deliver to miners in next 1~2 months, will issue fix to that. Hope that sounds 'fair' by the time. Then you yhink that network will have more hashrate. I think it;s bad that guy with 24 cores didnt mine a single block. also i dint mine single block since start. So what with that? Do you recommend me to relax and let CPUs mine this for month? Will you pay my bills if i mine nothing?
|
|
|
|
lionheart78
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1153
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 03:04:40 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
......
.... ....... wtf dida ? do u really think anybody is concerned about what u think? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) lol don't step down at dida's level he clearly dont understand what he is saying, just ignore him
|
| | Peach BTC bitcoin | │ | Buy and Sell Bitcoin P2P | │ | . .
▄▄███████▄▄ ▄██████████████▄ ▄███████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀
▀▀▀▀███████▀▀▀▀ | | EUROPE | AFRICA LATIN AMERICA | | | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
███████▄█ ███████▀ ██▄▄▄▄▄░▄▄▄▄▄ █████████████▀ ▐███████████▌ ▐███████████▌ █████████████▄ ██████████████ ███▀███▀▀███▀ | . Download on the App Store | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
▄██▄ ██████▄ █████████▄ ████████████▄ ███████████████ ████████████▀ █████████▀ ██████▀ ▀██▀ | . GET IT ON Google Play | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ |
|
|
|
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009
Coin of the Magi!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 03:08:12 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.
Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.
You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready. miner v3 has a malware call... etc. So what's fair here? I understand your concern about the miner. For your notice, 3907 XMG is mined so far, and I will expect at least 5 million deliver to miners in next 1~2 months, will issue fix to that. Hope that sounds 'fair' by the time. Then you yhink that network will have more hashrate. I think it;s bad that guy with 24 cores didnt mine a single block. also i dint mine single block since start. So what with that? Do you recommend me to relax and let CPUs mine this for month? Will you pay my bills if i mine nothing? Allow us to issue a fix for that.
|
|
|
|
salinas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 03:12:24 PM |
|
[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]
......
.... ....... wtf dida ? do u really think anybody is concerned about what u think? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) lol don't step down at dida's level he clearly dont understand what he is saying, just ignore him agreed for what its worth: i'm really looking forward to poolmining this sob coin ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) i really appreciate the work ur putting into this one! seriously!!
|
|
|
|
|
salinas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2014, 03:31:43 PM |
|
roughly 10 XMG for almost 1 BTC ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) good luck with that ^^
|
|
|
|
|