Scientific proof that God exists?

[Vod]

So man should not try to know everything because he cannot?

Then what use is the knowledge of God's word to you? You will not even try to know it.

God says,
"Read it all so you can judge in wisdom"!

Holy cult man....

I answered your question... please answer mine.

I don't answer questions for people who do not seek knowledge.

Typical cult answer.   

My priest growing up couldn't answer these questions either.  That's why I broke free of his brainwashing and gained independent thought.

What good is a religion that promotes ignorance and encourages theft?

[bl4kjaguar]

What good is a religion that promotes ignorance and encourages theft?

All earnest religions promote the golden rule.

You are encouraging ignorance by failing to desire knowledge; you should read it all and then judge in wisdom; remember that the opposite of wisdom is ignorance.

And knowledge is the opposite of presumption!

The closer a man gets to knowing everything, the closer he is to his Creator.

[Vod]

So man should not try to know everything because he cannot?

Then what use is the knowledge of God's word to you? You will not even try to know it.

God says,
"Read it all so you can judge in wisdom"!

Holy cult man....

I answered your question... please answer mine.

I don't answer questions for people who do not seek knowledge.

Typical cult answer.   

My priest growing up couldn't answer these questions either.  That's why I broke free of his brainwashing and gained independent thought.

What good is a religion that promotes ignorance and encourages theft?

All earnest religions promote the golden rule.

You are encouraging ignorance by failing to desire knowledge; you should read it all and then judge in wisdom; remember that the opposite of wisdom is ignorance.

So you are OK with promoting ignorance and encouraging theft?  Lead by example and all that?  Does your god promote theft too?

[bl4kjaguar]

So you are OK with promoting ignorance and encouraging theft?  Lead by example and all that?  Does your god promote theft too?

0.05 BTC for every question answered; you need my address?
 I have creditors to pay, dude! They are embarrassed that I am wasting so much time with a presumptive ignoramus who is not interested in reading even the agnostic Spencer.

All earnest religions promote the golden rule; all atheism is based on presumption, knot now-ledge.

[Vod]

So you are OK with promoting ignorance and encouraging theft?  Lead by example and all that?  Does your god promote theft too?

0.05 BTC for every question answered; you need my address?
 I have creditors to pay, dude! They are embarrassed that I am wasting so much time with a presumptive ignoramus who is not interested in reading even the agnostic Spencer.

All earnest religions promote the golden rule; all atheism is based on presumption, knot now-ledge.

So by your basic failure to answer any of my questions, I guess you lose?

But hey, you still have your god and your 2,000 year old book and your willingness to steal from others.  SCORE!

I'll stick with my morality and my intelligence.  

[bl4kjaguar]

I'll stick with my morality and my intelligence.  

You are not interested in knowledge, so you will fall for false presumptions.

A man should try to know everything if he is interested in knowledge. At least, he should know something about everything.

I am glad that you are happy where you are, but your intelligence will never be superior to Spencer's so long as you fail to read his treatise.

[bl4kjaguar]

and your willingness to steal from others.

It's funny that you attack me personally. Even my creditors aren't doing that! 

[Vod]

I'll stick with my morality and my intelligence.  

You are not interested in knowledge, so you will fall for false presumptions.

A man should try to know everything if he is interested in knowledge. At least, he should know something about everything.

I am glad that you are happy where you are, but your intelligence will never be superior to Spencer's so long as you fail to read his treatise.

My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.  

[bl4kjaguar]

My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.  

You are operating under a religious belief yourself:

"the beliefs which Science has forced upon Religion, have been intrinsically more religious than those which they supplanted."

I am glad that you are happy where you are, but your intelligence will never be superior to Spencer's so long as you fail to read his treatise (quoted above).

 

[Vod]

My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.  

You are operating under a religious belief yourself:

"the beliefs which Science has forced upon Religion, have been intrinsically more religious than those which they supplanted."

I am glad that you are happy where you are, but your intelligence will never be superior to Spencer's so long as you fail to read his treatise (quoted above).

 

My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.  (quoted above)  

Come on - doesn't your cult give you the lines to combat common sense??

[Vod]

Tell us how your god created a MALE and FEMALE of every animal.

Then, when it came to the most important, he created ONLY MALE.   He then saw man was lonely and created a female, as an afterthought.

Talk about Misogyny 

Do you hate women as well, or is that an aspect of your god that you ignore?

[bl4kjaguar]

My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.  

You are operating under a religious belief yourself:

"the beliefs which Science has forced upon Religion, have been intrinsically more religious than those which they supplanted."

I am glad that you are happy where you are, but your intelligence will never be superior to Spencer's so long as you fail to read his treatise (quoted above).

 

My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.  (quoted above)  

Come on - doesn't your cult give you the lines to combat common sense??

That's not relevant to our discussion--you failed to prove it.

A 2,000 year old book.  You took it as truth.  

Prove it.

[Vod]

My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.  

You are operating under a religious belief yourself:

"the beliefs which Science has forced upon Religion, have been intrinsically more religious than those which they supplanted."

I am glad that you are happy where you are, but your intelligence will never be superior to Spencer's so long as you fail to read his treatise (quoted above).

 

My intelligence is superior to anyone that believes in a 2,000 year old book written by stoners.  (quoted above)  

Come on - doesn't your cult give you the lines to combat common sense??

That's not relevant to our discussion--you failed to prove it.

A 2,000 year old book.  You are gullible and took it as truth.  

Prove it.

Again, I don't need to prove the tooth fairy exists.  YOU ARE THE ONE CLAIMING IT..

Why do you keep repeating the same arguments and ignoring the same questions?  Have you not been to a cult meeting in a while?  No new lines?

[bl4kjaguar]

Again, I don't need to prove the tooth fairy exists.  YOU DO.

Why do you keep repeating the same arguments?  Have you not been to a cult meeting in a while?  No new lines?

I keep repeating Spencer's arguments; you keep repeating the presumption that I believe in the Bible or the Tooth Fairy.

Read Spencer or pay me 0.05 BTC for each question answered.

[Vod]

Again, I don't need to prove the tooth fairy exists.  YOU DO.

Why do you keep repeating the same arguments?  Have you not been to a cult meeting in a while?  No new lines?

I keep repeating Spencer's arguments; you keep repeating the presumption that I believe in the Bible or the Tooth Fairy.

Read Spencer or pay me 0.05 BTC for each question answered.

Nope.  I'm going to stick with common sense.  You lose.

[bl4kjaguar]

Nope.  I'm going to stick with common sense.  You lose.

Agnosticism is not common sense?

Spencer's "First Principles" is not common sense?

Could you quote the statement of mine which justifies your negative trust?

I am afraid that I will have to call you an abusive liar if not.

[Vod]

Nope.  I'm going to stick with common sense.  You lose.

Agnosticism is not common sense?

That is what I have been posting about...

Could you quote the statement of mine justifies your negative trust?

Sure, answer my question first:

Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?

(lol - arguing with intelligent people sucks, eh?   Try going to a picnic on sunday instead and chatting with people not in your cult)

[bl4kjaguar]

Sure, answer my question first:

Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?

Well, to answer that I will need either 50 BTC for the link or removal of the negative trust.

In return for one of these, I will not call you an abusive liar for failing to prove that I deserve your negative trust.

 

[Vod]

Sure, answer my question first:

Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?

Well, to answer that I will need either 50 BTC for the link or removal of the negative trust.

In return for one of these, I will not call you an abusive liar for failing to prove that I deserve your negative trust.

 

You can't answer it.  I'll answer it for you. 

There has been zero writings of any god in over 2,000 years.  When people believed in your god, they also believed the world was flat, and the sun moved around the earth.

[bl4kjaguar]

Are you tacitly admitting that you are an abusive liar?

If not, prove that I deserve your negative trust. It sounds to me like you dis-trust on the basis of a religious discussion and not any particular statement that I made.

Here, I am answering your question for free:

Do you have any proof that your god has given you different instructions within the last two millennium?

When it comes to God's messengers, there can be no proof; adequate understanding is encompassed by something called the "content-source problem", and also depends on the wisdom of the one absorbing the content, i.e. that one's ability to recognize truth.