kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 18, 2017, 08:04:02 AM |
|
Block! 20 mins ago by dsjif 14.94BTC
|
|
|
|
DarKSm0ke
|
|
July 18, 2017, 09:11:52 AM |
|
Some nice green action for the last 2 days! Let's keep on cracking these blocks!
|
|
|
|
Biffa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1220
|
|
July 18, 2017, 10:09:03 AM |
|
This just showed up on my Core...can anyone shed a light on just what it means? I've never seen it before. EDIT: Didn't take long to find it's probably encountering a Segwit block? Consensus says no worries? Tru dat? It's a full node, BTW. I have it on my mac 0.14.2 core are you running linux, mac or windows version of 0.14.2 core 0.14.2 on Ubuntu 16.04LTS. I guess it's a "normal" msg...but sure could be worded better. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2027513.0
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 18, 2017, 10:25:07 AM |
|
This just showed up on my Core...can anyone shed a light on just what it means? I've never seen it before. https://i.imgur.com/T7WsLE2.jpgEDIT: Didn't take long to find it's probably encountering a Segwit block? Consensus says no worries? Tru dat? It's a full node, BTW. I have it on my mac 0.14.2 core are you running linux, mac or windows version of 0.14.2 core 0.14.2 on Ubuntu 16.04LTS. I guess it's a "normal" msg...but sure could be worded better. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2027513.0Heh I was just there writing a post
|
|
|
|
Looarn
|
|
July 18, 2017, 10:42:45 AM |
|
Hi, Any plans on supporting SegWit ? version 0x20000002 Thanks for your answer.
|
If my post help you, you can tip me in FeatherCoin here: 6wgNso1AWVuGy5P5Rpc2bBoVaNaKzbxmyi
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 18, 2017, 11:01:37 AM Last edit: July 18, 2017, 11:24:48 AM by kano |
|
Block by jimmy That was a short network block - only 46 seconds - seems the transaction overload is clearly disappearing ... before segwit activates ... sounds suspicious if you ask me Anyway it was an 'almost' full block 984608 bytes, but not many high paying transactions. Edit: oh cool, also the 476266 payout got into the block in time also
|
|
|
|
GAMORA
|
|
July 18, 2017, 11:02:19 AM |
|
Rain from blocks straight
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
July 18, 2017, 12:30:35 PM |
|
Block by jimmy That was a short network block - only 46 seconds - seems the transaction overload is clearly disappearing ... before segwit activates ... sounds suspicious if you ask me Anyway it was an 'almost' full block 984608 bytes, but not many high paying transactions. Edit: oh cool, also the 476266 payout got into the block in time also Oh my gosh! This is our 4th of BLOCK TUESDAY!
|
|
|
|
tholmes4005
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2017, 12:35:28 PM |
|
I have been mining here for about 2 years and am a frequent stalker of this board. I am sure Kano and clgrissom3 have had a response to the upcoming activation of SegWit. I just haven't seen it. If someone could link it I would appreciate. I know this isn't the correct thread for this, but most people here seem WAY more level headed and thoughtful then rest of the community about this issue. I have been reading about some of the vulnerabilities of SegWit and how it opens up Bitcoin to security problems ( https://calvinayre.com/2017/06/19/bitcoin/risks-segregated-witness-opening-door-mining-cartels-undermine-bitcoin-network/ and how it seems to me that we as miners will be losing transaction fees as most transaction will be done on side chains, then crammed into our at most 2MB block. So why in the hell are we activating SegWit? And a follow up question then, if we are activating SegWit, when one of these security vulnerabilities is taken advantage of won't it completely destroy the reputation of Bitcoin? If I am misinformed please link me to the correct info. Educational material is always appreciated. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
July 18, 2017, 12:45:34 PM |
|
I have been mining here for about 2 years and am a frequent stalker of this board. I am sure Kano and clgrissom3 have had a response to the upcoming activation of SegWit. I just haven't seen it. If someone could link it I would appreciate. I know this isn't the correct thread for this, but most people here seem WAY more level headed and thoughtful then rest of the community about this issue. I have been reading about some of the vulnerabilities of SegWit and how it opens up Bitcoin to security problems ( https://calvinayre.com/2017/06/19/bitcoin/risks-segregated-witness-opening-door-mining-cartels-undermine-bitcoin-network/ and how it seems to me that we as miners will be losing transaction fees as most transaction will be done on side chains, then crammed into our at most 2MB block. So why in the hell are we activating SegWit? And a follow up question then, if we are activating SegWit, when one of these security vulnerabilities is taken advantage of won't it completely destroy the reputation of Bitcoin? If I am misinformed please link me to the correct info. Educational material is always appreciated. Thanks! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg16868494#msg16868494Kano is the Master, I'm not quite up to the grasshopper level yet!
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
July 18, 2017, 01:25:22 PM Last edit: July 18, 2017, 02:46:20 PM by clgrissom3 |
|
Is there a way to configure alerts so that when our hashing value drops by x amount we can get an email?
I was on vacation and there was a storm that knocked out the power. The fix was to reboot a router, but I went about 4 hours without Internet access before I noticed it, and by then it was too late, I had to wait until the next morning to get my neighbor to go to my house and reboot the router.
I'll be picking up a battery back up for my router and Internet modem tonight.
From Kano's first post on page 1 of this forum topic:
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8768
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
July 18, 2017, 02:57:37 PM |
|
Hi kano. 1 August with BIP 148, do we have anything to worry about? Us miners in kano? I'm a bit stressed. I've read alot of OPINIONS, and I would rather want to know what you have to say. Regards!
Ignore BIP148 - it's simply an attempt by a bunch of users to take control of Bitcoin away from miners - mining is the design of Bitcoin and it will stay that way. Miners are paid by the network to secure it. You don't control it. You're just employees of the network. And if you don't do your job, we fire you. It's as simple as that. Yeah you can do that. You can bend and twist the rules of btc as much as you want.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 18, 2017, 03:14:54 PM |
|
Hi kano. 1 August with BIP 148, do we have anything to worry about? Us miners in kano? I'm a bit stressed. I've read alot of OPINIONS, and I would rather want to know what you have to say. Regards!
Ignore BIP148 - it's simply an attempt by a bunch of users to take control of Bitcoin away from miners - mining is the design of Bitcoin and it will stay that way. Miners are paid by the network to secure it. You don't control it. You're just employees of the network. And if you don't do your job, we fire you. It's as simple as that. LOL Edit: post deleted - no sig spam wanted here.
|
|
|
|
Seccour
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1619
Merit: 1004
Bitcoiner, Crypto-anarchist and Cypherpunk.
|
|
July 18, 2017, 04:55:07 PM |
|
Hi kano. 1 August with BIP 148, do we have anything to worry about? Us miners in kano? I'm a bit stressed. I've read alot of OPINIONS, and I would rather want to know what you have to say. Regards!
Ignore BIP148 - it's simply an attempt by a bunch of users to take control of Bitcoin away from miners - mining is the design of Bitcoin and it will stay that way. Miners are paid by the network to secure it. You don't control it. You're just employees of the network. And if you don't do your job, we fire you. It's as simple as that. LOL Edit: post deleted - no sig spam wanted here. It's not sig spamming wtf. There is no Ledger Signature campaign as far as i know. I did put it as a sig because i have nothing else to put. Someone share your post on a slack group (CryptoFR) and i disagree with it so i did reply. Deleting my reply for shitty reason because you don't agree doesn't change the fact that i'm right. Miners are paid by the network to secure it. You're not here to rule anything. Oh and i've remove the signature so you will not have any legit excuse to delete this post this time.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8768
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
July 18, 2017, 05:33:25 PM |
|
Hi kano. 1 August with BIP 148, do we have anything to worry about? Us miners in kano? I'm a bit stressed. I've read alot of OPINIONS, and I would rather want to know what you have to say. Regards!
Ignore BIP148 - it's simply an attempt by a bunch of users to take control of Bitcoin away from miners - mining is the design of Bitcoin and it will stay that way. Miners are paid by the network to secure it. You don't control it. You're just employees of the network. And if you don't do your job, we fire you. It's as simple as that. LOL Edit: post deleted - no sig spam wanted here. It's not sig spamming wtf. There is no Ledger Signature campaign as far as i know. I did put it as a sig because i have nothing else to put. Someone share your post on a slack group (CryptoFR) and i disagree with it so i did reply. Deleting my reply for shitty reason because you don't agree doesn't change the fact that i'm right. Miners are paid by the network to secure it. You're not here to rule anything. Oh and i've remove the signature so you will not have any legit excuse to delete this post this time. Like I said you are right BTC Developers can fire the miners BTC developers can lower the tx fees for the miners. They can do whatever they want to squeeze out more profits. I think of them as Chris Christy governor of NJ shutting down the George Washington Bridge for four days a few years back. He got away with it. Should be fun to see the results of the change.
|
|
|
|
wantjokull
|
|
July 18, 2017, 05:47:06 PM |
|
Hmm I see a remarkable study about Kano pool here. The hash rate is pretty high and hope to see you get the success. Nice work.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 18, 2017, 11:07:53 PM |
|
Block! by moecarrimNEW and 3 payouts
|
|
|
|
usernamehere
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2017, 11:08:06 PM Last edit: July 19, 2017, 12:18:16 AM by usernamehere |
|
Block by moecarrimNEW!!!
|
|
|
|
bit2255
Member
Offline
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2017, 11:08:46 PM |
|
Block by Moe!!
|
|
|
|
|