crowncoin_knight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 09, 2017, 12:01:06 PM |
|
Awesome! Looking forward to the iOS version ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Johnny00
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 02:31:56 AM |
|
Great app. Must admit CROWN team are very knowledgeable and friendly. So many great features. Very long term hold
|
|
|
|
crowncoin_knight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 04:18:25 AM |
|
Alright I am boarding my plane to the Dev meeting in Amsterdam now. See you all soon guys. Excited ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
secousa
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 06:40:06 AM |
|
followed the upgrade guides, got this ~/.crown# crown-cli masternode status { "vin" : "CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase )", "service" : "[::]:0", "status" : "Not capable masternode: Hot node, waiting for remote activation." }
local wallet is able to start the masternode just fine, no errors given. should i be concerned?
|
|
|
|
secousa
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 06:53:25 AM |
|
followed the upgrade guides, got this ~/.crown# crown-cli masternode status { "vin" : "CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase )", "service" : "[::]:0", "status" : "Not capable masternode: Hot node, waiting for remote activation." }
local wallet is able to start the masternode just fine, no errors given. should i be concerned? Strange. Forcing shutdown of the masternode and starting it back up got it working again
|
|
|
|
stonehedge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1002
Decentralize Everything
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 09:58:30 AM |
|
Please bare with us. The entire development team are currently in an all day meeting. Somebody will be along to help soon. You might find that you get more rapid help in http://mm.crownlab.eu.
|
|
|
|
Cassius
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 10:39:07 AM |
|
followed the upgrade guides, got this ~/.crown# crown-cli masternode status { "vin" : "CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase )", "service" : "[::]:0", "status" : "Not capable masternode: Hot node, waiting for remote activation." }
local wallet is able to start the masternode just fine, no errors given. should i be concerned? Strange. Forcing shutdown of the masternode and starting it back up got it working again I had this. Turns out I hadn't updated properly. Check protocol version with crown-cli getinfo - should be 70051, not 70050. I also added a bunch of addnodes to crown.conf on VPS and local, but that might not be so important any more.
|
|
|
|
WrongCrocodiIe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 10:56:25 AM |
|
Simply because bitcoin is simpler also simple for use within the web world. Numerous store shops provide our needs utilizing bitcoin. Bitcoin can save a little bit of expense, simply because texas fee is very small.
|
|
|
|
LaoShuha
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 11:27:59 AM |
|
why do you need blockchain for this project?
|
|
|
|
Cassius
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 12:42:21 PM |
|
Simply because bitcoin is simpler also simple for use within the web world. Numerous store shops provide our needs utilizing bitcoin. Bitcoin can save a little bit of expense, simply because texas fee is very small.
The Maine thing to remember is that the Texas fee is smaller for Crown. I'm not sure Hawaii you bring this up though.
|
|
|
|
|
calnaughtonjnr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 01:42:27 PM |
|
Simply because bitcoin is simpler also simple for use within the web world. Numerous store shops provide our needs utilizing bitcoin. Bitcoin can save a little bit of expense, simply because texas fee is very small.
The Maine thing to remember is that the Texas fee is smaller for Crown. I'm not sure Hawaii you bring this up though. Texas fee is quite important, Belize it or not
|
|
|
|
LucD88
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 10, 2017, 07:22:08 PM |
|
Howdy, great to see you still around mate! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) But yes sir, there will. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sometime next week, CrownCentral.net will receive quite a big update which includes adding/monitoring Systemnodes as well as the ability to calculate earnings for Systemnodes. Peace!
|
|
|
|
M8BWNNRFMNdak68c
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 11, 2017, 08:33:20 AM |
|
The new code doesnt compile. any ideas? CXX test/test_test_crown-rpc_tests.o CXX test/test_test_crown-sanity_tests.o test/prevector_tests.cpp:12:31: fatal error: test/test_bitcoin.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c table/table.cc -o table/table.o make[2]: *** [test/test_test_crown-prevector_tests.o] Error 1 Makefile:6476: recipe for target 'test/test_test_crown-prevector_tests.o' failed make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c table/table_builder.cc -o table/table_builder.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c table/two_level_iterator.cc -o table/two_level_iterator.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/arena.cc -o util/arena.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/bloom.cc -o util/bloom.o util/bloom.cc: In member function 'virtual void leveldb::{anonymous}::BloomFilterPolicy::CreateFilter(const leveldb::Slice*, int, std::__cxx11::string*) const': util/bloom.cc:50:26: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] for (size_t i = 0; i < n; i++) { ^ g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/cache.cc -o util/cache.o At global scope: cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option '-Wno-self-assign' g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/coding.cc -o util/coding.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/comparator.cc -o util/comparator.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/crc32c.cc -o util/crc32c.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/env.cc -o util/env.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/env_posix.cc -o util/env_posix.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/env_win.cc -o util/env_win.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/filter_policy.cc -o util/filter_policy.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/hash.cc -o util/hash.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/histogram.cc -o util/histogram.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/logging.cc -o util/logging.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/options.cc -o util/options.o util/logging.cc: In function 'bool leveldb::ConsumeDecimalNumber(leveldb::Slice*, uint64_t*)': util/logging.cc:58:40: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] (v == kMaxUint64/10 && delta > kMaxUint64%10)) { ^ g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/status.cc -o util/status.o g++ -I. -I./include -std=c++0x -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -DLEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-self-assign -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c port/port_posix.cc -o port/port_posix.o At global scope: cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option '-Wno-self-assign' rm -f libleveldb.a /usr/bin/ar -rs libleveldb.a db/builder.o db/c.o db/db_impl.o db/db_iter.o db/dbformat.o db/dumpfile.o db/filename.o db/log_reader.o db/log_writer.o db/memtable.o db/repair.o db/table_cache.o db/version_edit.o db/version_set.o db/write_batch.o table/block.o table/block_builder.o table/filter_block.o table/format.o table/iterator.o table/merger.o table/table.o table/table_builder.o table/two_level_iterator.o util/arena.o util/bloom.o util/cache.o util/coding.o util/comparator.o util/crc32c.o util/env.o util/env_posix.o util/env_win.o util/filter_policy.o util/hash.o util/histogram.o util/logging.o util/options.o util/status.o port/port_posix.o /usr/bin/ar: creating libleveldb.a make[3]: Leaving directory '/root/crowncoin/src/leveldb' make[2]: Leaving directory '/root/crowncoin/src' Makefile:6836: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/crowncoin/src' Makefile:570: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
|
|
|
|
stonehedge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1002
Decentralize Everything
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 11, 2017, 09:03:48 AM |
|
The new code doesnt compile. any ideas?
One other person has reported this problem. Because the whole core team is at a community meeting in Amsterdam, we haven't had a chance to find out why our build environment compiles it fine but you guys have seen this error: test/prevector_tests.cpp:12:31: fatal error: test/test_bitcoin.h: No such file or directory However, while we haven't had time to diagnose the exact problem, you will find that this config option will do enough to bypass the issue to compile successfuly. ./configure --disable-tests I'll make sure that we add this bug to the list to be squashed.
|
|
|
|
mgpeng
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 11, 2017, 10:04:23 AM |
|
How long will systemnode take to get first reward? mine 11 hours, no rewards
|
|
|
|
Sweetsparrow
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 11, 2017, 10:16:17 AM |
|
its due to stress sell due to chine information about prevent bitcoin and crypto, so watch for what? go buy some bitcoin now, relax and relax ,, bitcoin to the MOOON
|
|
|
|
dex1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 11, 2017, 11:28:31 AM |
|
How long will systemnode take to get first reward? mine 11 hours, no rewards
The one I've got has been running for 34 hours and still no reward.
|
|
|
|
M8BWNNRFMNdak68c
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 11, 2017, 12:06:09 PM |
|
./configure --disable-tests yes, it now works. thank you!
|
|
|
|
Vivacia
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 11, 2017, 06:55:26 PM |
|
How long will systemnode take to get first reward? mine 11 hours, no rewards
The one I've got has been running for 34 hours and still no reward. Once the miners have updated, the systemnode will start giving rewards. Deadline for the miners will be 20-11-2017. The team expects them to update before the deadline.
|
|
|
|
|