sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
February 27, 2015, 01:25:41 PM |
|
Looks like the 12% increase in whirlpool can get faster. The current implementation gives bankconflicts in shared mem access. I need to duplicate the tables,. Then I need to add my bfins adress hack to make the table lockup run in 2 instructions instead of 4
Will be interesting to see if it beats Wolf0's SBox+Bitslice
Wirlpoolx is currently running at around 210MHASH on the gtx 980
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
February 27, 2015, 01:29:43 PM |
|
Yes, the next release of the spreadcoinminer will be with sourcecode. It will still be private for a while if anyone doesn't publish it.
that would be good sp ... I think that ive missed the boat in the optimization stakes with spreadx11 anyway - BUT I appreciate that the miner will be released so I can compile it directly ... will it be incorporated into the current ccminer fork? ... and as far as the cryptonight optimization is concerned - is that part of the process? ... as I am quite eager to compile these optimizations as readily as you have them available ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
February 27, 2015, 08:42:35 PM |
|
I have sendt version 6 of the spreadcoin miner to the donators. With sourcecode this time.
Only 0.5%-1.5% faster than version 5.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 04:22:54 AM Last edit: February 28, 2015, 04:35:20 AM by chrysophylax |
|
I have sendt version 6 of the spreadcoin miner to the donators. With sourcecode this time.
Only 0.5%-1.5% faster than version 5.
sp - how much do i send you for the files? ... edit - just read back and found it - 0.1btc ... sending now mate ... tanx again ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 05:09:21 AM |
|
sent to your btc wallet ...
transaction id - ab9cf607a4983fdf9cfa83d76f6e9e3877dcac6ed2f72068e921aa588123f02c-000 - on its way of 0.1btc ...
tanx sp ...
#crysx
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 07:43:58 AM |
|
You were right! I missed it! Now my own build is doing well, 4378khs in Qubit
Pretty good for 512 cores.. (The GTX 750 Maxwell 1gb card retails for around $120) A AMD radeon 280x R9 does 5,5MHASH with 2048 cores. (optimized opensource miner with 5 times the power usage).  What is this "optimized" miner you're talking about? This number is very odd as R7750 can push out >2000khs with ported kernels.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 09:15:21 AM |
|
What is your launchconfig? My 7950 can do around 4MHASH@qubit with -i 20 and -w 256.
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 09:45:53 AM |
|
linearIntensity 512. I'm a bit uncomfortable providing more details right now.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 12:23:51 PM |
|
linearIntensity 512. I'm a bit uncomfortable providing more details right now.
 good one
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 12:45:24 PM |
|
What should i use for whirlcoin miner v40.for this algorithm? -a whirlcoinx doesn't work?
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 12:59:51 PM |
|
What should i use for whirlcoin miner v40.for this algorithm? -a whirlcoinx doesn't work?
I made a release (windows binaries) here: http://ge.tt/2Mw0LKB2/v/0?cthis release include a 5% fee to dev.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 01:08:19 PM |
|
What should i use for whirlcoin miner v40.for this algorithm? -a whirlcoinx doesn't work?
I made a release (windows binaries) here: http://ge.tt/2Mw0LKB2/v/0?cthis release include a 5% fee to dev. How fast is it?
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 01:13:43 PM Last edit: February 28, 2015, 01:24:17 PM by fenomenhaa |
|
What should i use for whirlcoin miner v40.for this algorithm? -a whirlcoinx doesn't work?
I made a release (windows binaries) here: http://ge.tt/2Mw0LKB2/v/0?cthis release include a 5% fee to dev. Thanks Djm34 I will try it right now?@sp for your miner what's the parameter for whirlpoox algo? **Update - tried djm34 built 750ti 60-63mh/S per card. +150-200 core +100 mem clock
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 01:17:34 PM |
|
What should i use for whirlcoin miner v40.for this algorithm? -a whirlcoinx doesn't work?
I made a release (windows binaries) here: http://ge.tt/2Mw0LKB2/v/0?cthis release include a 5% fee to dev. Thanks Djm34 I will try it right now?@sp for your miner what's the parameter for whirlpoox algo? this one is for whirlpoolx... (don't use it for pluck though... this version is partly broken, I was working on it while I released that)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 01:30:11 PM |
|
What should i use for whirlcoin miner v40.for this algorithm? -a whirlcoinx doesn't work?
I made a release (windows binaries) here: http://ge.tt/2Mw0LKB2/v/0?cthis release include a 5% fee to dev. Thanks Djm34 I will try it right now?@sp for your miner what's the parameter for whirlpoox algo? **Update - tried djm34 built 750ti 60-63mh/S per card. +150-200 core +100 mem clock I haven't released the whirlpoolx. Did some tests yestday. My version is slower and not working 40MHASH on the 750ti. Use the DJM version 
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 01:45:46 PM |
|
What should i use for whirlcoin miner v40.for this algorithm? -a whirlcoinx doesn't work?
I made a release (windows binaries) here: http://ge.tt/2Mw0LKB2/v/0?cthis release include a 5% fee to dev. Thanks Djm34 I will try it right now?@sp for your miner what's the parameter for whirlpoox algo? **Update - tried djm34 built 750ti 60-63mh/S per card. +150-200 core +100 mem clock I haven't released the whirlpoolx. Did some tests yestday. My version is slower and not working 40MHASH on the 750ti. Use the DJM version  you are probably doing a full round...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
malekbaba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1026
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 09:38:32 PM |
|
can anyone tell me what should be the .bat file for GTX 970 to mine whirlcoinx , please
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
 |
February 28, 2015, 10:13:05 PM |
|
can anyone tell me what should be the .bat file for GTX 970 to mine whirlcoinx , please
Should just be: ccminer.exe -a whirlpoolx -o pool:port -u user.worker -p password Happy Mining!
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 01, 2015, 12:33:58 AM |
|
@sp_
I ran your SPR miner 6 on one rig and release 5 on another. The one with the release 6 does not find valid blocks. Thay all say "result for nonce xxxxxxxxx does not validate on cpu!"
Version 5 ran fine. Just getting back in from work and seen this. Both rigs are on Windows 7 65 bit.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks 
|
|
|
AliMan
|
 |
March 01, 2015, 01:58:01 AM |
|
@sp_
I ran your SPR miner 6 on one rig and release 5 on another. The one with the release 6 does not find valid blocks. Thay all say "result for nonce xxxxxxxxx does not validate on cpu!"
Version 5 ran fine. Just getting back in from work and seen this. Both rigs are on Windows 7 65 bit.
I'm glad you pointed it out, also have the same issue.
|
|
|
|
|