Gladimor
Legendary

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 01, 2015, 04:16:13 AM |
|
How much faster is Sp_'s optimized miner on the 750 Ti?
|
Mining since 2014
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 01, 2015, 08:27:41 AM |
|
sorry guys, version 6 is broken. I will be fixing it today, and add some more hash as well.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 01, 2015, 12:20:59 PM |
|
Spreadminer 7 is sendt to the donators.
- Fixed the hash - fixed the makefile (linux) - Rewrote Blake185 - some small tuning
0.6% faster than build 6 (750ti)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kaltar
|
 |
March 01, 2015, 11:18:57 PM |
|
DJM
i'm running your wirlpoolx miner you release, is it normal that the pool side is reporting half the speed that ccminer is displaying, i tried both suprnove and noncepool.
|
|
|
|
|
Gladimor
Legendary

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 12:54:30 AM |
|
What hashrates are you guys achieving on the 750 Ti using the optimized SpreadX11 miner?
|
Mining since 2014
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 05:45:56 AM |
|
I am using this card to test: http://www.gainward.com/main/vgapro.php?id=926&Tsivs version Standard clocks and no launch parameters: 1450KHASH my version 7 Standard clocks and no launch parameters: 1625KHASH
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3150
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 06:13:29 AM |
|
sp - i am having issues with the compilation of spreadminer7 and im unsure as to how to 'fix' it ... the 'standard' ccminer you have in git compiles without a hitch ... this compile halts after the curl.h errors ... pasting the issue below ... ####### gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -msse2 -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DSCRYPT_KECCAK512 -DSCRYPT_CHACHA -DSCRYPT_CHOOSE_COMPILETIME -O3 -MT spreadminer-sha2.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/spreadminer-sha2.Tpo -c -o spreadminer-sha2.o `test -f 'sha2.c' || echo './'`sha2.c In file included from sha2.c:12:0: miner.h:15:18: fatal error: curl.h: No such file or directory #include <curl.h> ^ compilation terminated. In file included from scrypt.c:31:0: miner.h:15:18: fatal error: curl.h: No such file or directory #include <curl.h> ^ compilation terminated. util.c:23:18: fatal error: curl.h: No such file or directory #include <curl.h> ^ compilation terminated. cpu-miner.c:37:18: fatal error: curl.h: No such file or directory #include <curl.h> ^ compilation terminated. make[2]: *** [spreadminer-sha2.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: *** [spreadminer-scrypt.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [spreadminer-util.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [spreadminer-cpu-miner.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/compile/ccminer-all/sp-hash/sptest' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/compile/ccminer-all/sp-hash/sptest' make: *** [all] Error 2 [root@ace-cm010 sptest]# ####### any ideas please? ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 06:18:13 AM |
|
Try to copy /usr/include/curl into the spreadminer folder
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3150
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 06:24:58 AM |
|
Try to copy /usr/include/curl into the spreadminer folder
i copied the files directly to the spreadminer7 folder and it seems to have started the compile ... if the ccminer-spmod is anything to go by - this should take a little bit of time to finish ... ill keep you informed in the next 15-30mins as to how this goes ... one question though - does this miner run via a pool ( like tsivs one does ) ? ... tanx ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3150
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 06:39:11 AM |
|
ok - errors out with the following ...
#######
mv -f sph/.deps/spreadminer-simd.Tpo sph/.deps/spreadminer-simd.Po In file included from /usr/local/cuda/bin/../targets/x86_64-linux/include/cuda_runtime.h:59:0, from <command-line>:0: /usr/local/cuda/bin/../targets/x86_64-linux/include/host_config.h:82:2: error: #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc 4.9 and up are not supported! #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc 4.9 and up are not supported! ^ Makefile:1232: recipe for target 'cuda_util.o' failed make[2]: *** [cuda_util.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/mnt/horustor/compile/ccminer-all/sp-hash/spreadminer/Spreadminer7_source.7_FILES/sptest' Makefile:808: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/mnt/horustor/compile/ccminer-all/sp-hash/spreadminer/Spreadminer7_source.7_FILES/sptest' Makefile:393: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2
#######
does this mean i have conflicting versions of cuda / gcc ? ...
#crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 06:41:23 AM |
|
There are spelling errors in the makefile.am You need to rename these files:
spreadx11/x11_luffaCubehash512_cpu_hash_64.cu rename to spreadx11/cuda_x11_luffa512_Cubehash.cu spreadx11/cuda_jh512Keccak512_cpu_hash_64 rename to spreadx11/cuda_jh512keccak512
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 06:48:15 AM |
|
You managed to compile tsivs version, then you should compile mine as well. I use cuda6.5 on windows.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3150
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 06:50:44 AM |
|
There are spelling errors in the makefile.am You need to rename these files:
spreadx11/x11_luffaCubehash512_cpu_hash_64.cu rename to spreadx11/cuda_x11_luffa512_Cubehash.cu spreadx11/cuda_jh512Keccak512_cpu_hash_64 rename to spreadx11/cuda_jh512keccak512
sp ... the first was already there in the directory ... the second is named currently cuda_jh512keccak512.cu ... should i rename it to cuda_jh512keccak512 ? ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 06:57:17 AM |
|
There are spelling errors in the makefile.am You need to rename these files: spreadx11/x11_luffaCubehash512_cpu_hash_64.cu rename to spreadx11/cuda_x11_luffa512_Cubehash.cu spreadx11/cuda_jh512Keccak512_cpu_hash_64 rename to spreadx11/cuda_jh512keccak512
sp ... the first was already there in the directory ... the second is named currently cuda_jh512keccak512.cu ... should i rename it to cuda_jh512keccak512 ? ... #crysx keep the filename, but rename filename in the makefile. Cases are important, so you need to rename the cuda_jh512keccak512 with a small k in Keccak
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3150
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 07:09:53 AM |
|
There are spelling errors in the makefile.am You need to rename these files: spreadx11/x11_luffaCubehash512_cpu_hash_64.cu rename to spreadx11/cuda_x11_luffa512_Cubehash.cu spreadx11/cuda_jh512Keccak512_cpu_hash_64 rename to spreadx11/cuda_jh512keccak512
sp ... the first was already there in the directory ... the second is named currently cuda_jh512keccak512.cu ... should i rename it to cuda_jh512keccak512 ? ... #crysx keep the filename, but rename filename in the makefile. Cases are important, so you need to rename the cuda_jh512keccak512 with a small k in Keccak ok - changed and compiling once again - lets see what happens here ... tanx sp ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3150
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 07:51:56 AM |
|
sp ...
it compiled after i changed the filenames as per your instruction in the Makefile.am file - though the second file required the .cu extension ...
ive now moved the compiled spreadminer to one of the production systems for testing ...
there is an improvement in performance - though not as much as i would have hoped using stock clocks per gpu - but nonetheless - an improvement in comparison to tsivs miner ...
below are the output of both the currently running spreadminer-tsiv and also the newly compiled spreadminer-sph both using the -x 20 parameter ( they are machines exactly the same specs ) ...
spreadminer-tsiv ...
[2015-03-02 18:15:35] accepted: 66765/68063 (98.09%), 7264 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:36] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1448 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: found a solution, nonce $CC22B141 [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] accepted: 66766/68064 (98.09%), 7259 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $994E71C5 [2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1451 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:38] accepted: 66767/68065 (98.09%), 7257 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:43] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1452 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:45] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $3345AA8F [2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:46] accepted: 66768/68066 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:49] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1454 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005965AD [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] accepted: 66769/68067 (98.09%), 7280 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $0022EAEA [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:53] accepted: 66770/68068 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $99469AD2 [2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1450 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:54] accepted: 66771/68069 (98.09%), 7274 khash/s (yay!!!)
spreadminer-sph ...
*** Spreadminer 5 - a SpreadX11 miner for nVidia GPUs *** based on ccminer 1.2 Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H. based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler SpreadX11 additions by tsiv [2015-03-02 18:14:09] 5 miner threads started, using 'spreadx11' algorithm. [2015-03-02 18:14:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1280 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:11] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 799.36 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $6607585D [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 582.66 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 3321 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:14:15] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1607 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $664BC097 [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1546 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 4726 khash/s (yay!!!)
and after the miner has settled and processed a few more shares ...
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] accepted: 85/87 (97.70%), 7635 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $001056A8 [2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1359 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:41] accepted: 86/88 (97.73%), 7449 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1553 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:45] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1552 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:48] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1574 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $66497DF1 [2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1495 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:49] accepted: 87/89 (97.75%), 7675 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $332952A2 [2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:50] accepted: 88/90 (97.78%), 7610 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005DB092 [2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1505 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:51] accepted: 89/91 (97.80%), 7570 khash/s (yay!!!)
so as you can see there is a marked difference between the two workers ...
ill now propagate the latest spreadminer-sph across the farm and see how they perform overnight ...
tanx again sp ... this will help a great deal overall ...
#crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 08:15:00 AM |
|
sp ... it compiled after i changed the filenames as per your instruction in the Makefile.am file - though the second file required the .cu extension ... ive now moved the compiled spreadminer to one of the production systems for testing ... there is an improvement in performance - though not as much as i would have hoped using stock clocks per gpu - but nonetheless - an improvement in comparison to tsivs miner ... below are the output of both the currently running spreadminer-tsiv and also the newly compiled spreadminer-sph both using the -x 20 parameter ( they are machines exactly the same specs ) ... spreadminer-tsiv ... [2015-03-02 18:15:35] accepted: 66765/68063 (98.09%), 7264 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:36] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1448 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: found a solution, nonce $CC22B141 [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] accepted: 66766/68064 (98.09%), 7259 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $994E71C5 [2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1451 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:38] accepted: 66767/68065 (98.09%), 7257 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:43] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1452 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:45] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $3345AA8F [2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:46] accepted: 66768/68066 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:49] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1454 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005965AD [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] accepted: 66769/68067 (98.09%), 7280 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $0022EAEA [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:53] accepted: 66770/68068 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $99469AD2 [2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1450 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:54] accepted: 66771/68069 (98.09%), 7274 khash/s (yay!!!)
spreadminer-sph ...
*** Spreadminer 5 - a SpreadX11 miner for nVidia GPUs *** based on ccminer 1.2 Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H. based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler SpreadX11 additions by tsiv [2015-03-02 18:14:09] 5 miner threads started, using 'spreadx11' algorithm. [2015-03-02 18:14:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1280 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:11] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 799.36 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $6607585D [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 582.66 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 3321 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:14:15] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1607 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $664BC097 [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1546 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 4726 khash/s (yay!!!)
and after the miner has settled and processed a few more shares ...
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] accepted: 85/87 (97.70%), 7635 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $001056A8 [2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1359 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:41] accepted: 86/88 (97.73%), 7449 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1553 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:45] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1552 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:48] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1574 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $66497DF1 [2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1495 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:49] accepted: 87/89 (97.75%), 7675 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $332952A2 [2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:50] accepted: 88/90 (97.78%), 7610 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005DB092 [2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1505 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:51] accepted: 89/91 (97.80%), 7570 khash/s (yay!!!) so as you can see there is a marked difference between the two workers ... ill now propagate the latest spreadminer-sph across the farm and see how they perform overnight ... tanx again sp ... this will help a great deal overall ... #crysx
I run without launchparameter (default is set to -x 5 on the 750ti). The 750ti will reduce the clockspeed if the cards get too hot. Lower intensity might be bether in the long run. I also think that 32bit builds will be faster. My windows compile (x86) is performing much bether.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary

Activity: 3150
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 08:22:27 AM |
|
sp ... it compiled after i changed the filenames as per your instruction in the Makefile.am file - though the second file required the .cu extension ... ive now moved the compiled spreadminer to one of the production systems for testing ... there is an improvement in performance - though not as much as i would have hoped using stock clocks per gpu - but nonetheless - an improvement in comparison to tsivs miner ... below are the output of both the currently running spreadminer-tsiv and also the newly compiled spreadminer-sph both using the -x 20 parameter ( they are machines exactly the same specs ) ... spreadminer-tsiv ... [2015-03-02 18:15:35] accepted: 66765/68063 (98.09%), 7264 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:36] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1448 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: found a solution, nonce $CC22B141 [2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:37] accepted: 66766/68064 (98.09%), 7259 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $994E71C5 [2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1451 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:38] accepted: 66767/68065 (98.09%), 7257 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:43] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1452 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:45] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $3345AA8F [2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:46] accepted: 66768/68066 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:49] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1454 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005965AD [2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:50] accepted: 66769/68067 (98.09%), 7280 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $0022EAEA [2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:53] accepted: 66770/68068 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:15:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $99469AD2 [2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1450 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:15:54] accepted: 66771/68069 (98.09%), 7274 khash/s (yay!!!)
spreadminer-sph ...
*** Spreadminer 5 - a SpreadX11 miner for nVidia GPUs *** based on ccminer 1.2 Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H. based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler SpreadX11 additions by tsiv [2015-03-02 18:14:09] 5 miner threads started, using 'spreadx11' algorithm. [2015-03-02 18:14:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1280 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:11] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 799.36 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $6607585D [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 582.66 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:13] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 3321 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:14:15] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1607 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $664BC097 [2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1546 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:14:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 4726 khash/s (yay!!!)
and after the miner has settled and processed a few more shares ...
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] accepted: 85/87 (97.70%), 7635 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $001056A8 [2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1359 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:41] accepted: 86/88 (97.73%), 7449 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1553 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:45] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1552 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:48] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1574 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $66497DF1 [2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1495 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:49] accepted: 87/89 (97.75%), 7675 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $332952A2 [2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:50] accepted: 88/90 (97.78%), 7610 khash/s (yay!!!) [2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005DB092 [2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1505 khash/s [2015-03-02 18:18:51] accepted: 89/91 (97.80%), 7570 khash/s (yay!!!) so as you can see there is a marked difference between the two workers ... ill now propagate the latest spreadminer-sph across the farm and see how they perform overnight ... tanx again sp ... this will help a great deal overall ... #crysx
I run with -x 5. The 750ti will reduce the clockspeed if the cards get too hot. Lower intensity might be bether in the long run. I also think that 32bit builds will be faster. My windows compile (x86) is performing much bether. ive changed the parameter to -x 5 and it seems to perform about the same ... so ill keep it at that ... as for the x32 builds ... ill have to test that another day - as ill setup a x32 machine ( fedora 19 or 20 x32 ) and build it from a fully 32bit platform ... what other commandline parameters do you think would benefit the hashrate / processing? ... btw - just a small thing - but the title still says spreadminer 5  #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1089
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 02, 2015, 08:29:28 AM |
|
ive changed the parameter to -x 5 and it seems to perform about the same ... so ill keep it at that ... as for the x32 builds ... ill have to test that another day - as ill setup a x32 machine ( fedora 19 or 20 x32 ) and build it from a fully 32bit platform ... what other commandline parameters do you think would benefit the hashrate / processing? ... #crysx
Different intensity parameters for different cards. For the 750ti -x parameters should be a multiple of 5 for the 750, 960,980 -x paramameter should be a multiple of 8 and the 970 -x parameter should be a multiple of 13
|
|
|
|
|