CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[djm34]

What must I do to not include cudart32_65.dll when copying the exe to another PC ?

Not statically compiled/linked ?

click on property / Cuda c/c++ / common then change "cuda runtime" to "static cuda runtime library"
(or add "-cudart static" to the command line)

Ah thanks a lot for that answer, i assume the same should work with the right flag for openssl?

honestly I don't know, it works well because cuda is fully integrated in msvc.
If you look into c/c++ / preprocessor / preprocessor definitions:  there are a bunch of word which can be edited, that would probably to go there, but I don't know what to put

[ocminer]

What must I do to not include cudart32_65.dll when copying the exe to another PC ?

Not statically compiled/linked ?

click on property / Cuda c/c++ / common then change "cuda runtime" to "static cuda runtime library"
(or add "-cudart static" to the command line)

Ah thanks a lot for that answer, i assume the same should work with the right flag for openssl?

honestly I don't know, it works well because cuda is fully integrated in msvc.
If you look into c/c++ / preprocessor / preprocessor definitions:  there are a bunch of word which can be edited, that would probably to go there, but I don't know what to put

Okay I fiddle around a bit.. The funny thing is that Cuda stuff works really good, which is what i did not expect, but all the free stuff, libcurl, openssl etc is one pita after the other.. Which i do absolutely not know from linux/unix.. Everything works as a charm there ..

Funny Windows world

[antonio8]

Using Release 36 on Qubit I show I am getting 11,700 kh/s on a GTX970 but the pool never shows above 5,500 kh/s.

Is the miner way off or an issue with the pool?

I am on Windows 7 64 bit.

I tried the Release 38 but I get no hashes.

Which pool ?

The Block Factory.

Sorry can't tell for them - probably different implementation, but do you have rejects/invalids ?

Yes.

I am showing 4.51 Mh/s valid and 45.08 kh/s invalid for hash rate for the last 3 hours.

Hmm I know that from my pools, looks like a portion is "share above target" - it usually comes when vardiff retargets and the formula (or diff1) is wrong.. Its either a pool or a miner prob .. Can you test on any other pool to see if it works ?

Just getting back from work.

I tried the qubit miner on Hamster Pool and I get all booo's with the same bat. On digihash and minerspooleu when I start the bat it has a first line that says about the difficulty and then nothing. No hashes at all, it's like it is locked.

[pokeytex]

Can anyone tell me what the hashrate is on a 750ti on SP's modified Spreadminer please.  If you don't want it public please PM me.  I am trying to see if it is worth me purchasing it at this point.  Thanks.

[chrysophylax]

Can anyone tell me what the hashrate is on a 750ti on SP's modified Spreadminer please.  If you don't want it public please PM me.  I am trying to see if it is worth me purchasing it at this point.  Thanks.

it usually is worth donating in general to sp and other devs - purely just for the input they have done for the public miners ...

but the private miner is definitely worth it also - only for windows though ...

#crysx

[pokeytex]

Can anyone tell me what the hashrate is on a 750ti on SP's modified Spreadminer please.  If you don't want it public please PM me.  I am trying to see if it is worth me purchasing it at this point.  Thanks.

it usually is worth donating in general to sp and other devs - purely just for the input they have done for the public miners ...

but the private miner is definitely worth it also - only for windows though ...

#crysx

I run Windows and a set of 10 750 ti's.  What is the average they are getting per card on the new miner.  I have no problem donating just want to make sure i am not gaining 10 kh/s.

[chrysophylax]

Can anyone tell me what the hashrate is on a 750ti on SP's modified Spreadminer please.  If you don't want it public please PM me.  I am trying to see if it is worth me purchasing it at this point.  Thanks.

it usually is worth donating in general to sp and other devs - purely just for the input they have done for the public miners ...

but the private miner is definitely worth it also - only for windows though ...

#crysx

I run Windows and a set of 10 750 ti's.  What is the average they are getting per card on the new miner.  I have no problem donating just want to make sure i am not gaining 10 kh/s.

i have shifted all my farm to gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards on linux - so i can tell you that the 'standard' miner from tsiv gets about 1450KH and sp has increased that hashrate ( from what ive been told ) by about 200-300KHash per card ...

so 10 cards would amount to a nice figure ...

i unfortunately cant use it - as i refuse to rebuild the entire farm in windows - especially BECAUSE its windows ...

#crysx

[pokeytex]

Can anyone tell me what the hashrate is on a 750ti on SP's modified Spreadminer please.  If you don't want it public please PM me.  I am trying to see if it is worth me purchasing it at this point.  Thanks.

it usually is worth donating in general to sp and other devs - purely just for the input they have done for the public miners ...

but the private miner is definitely worth it also - only for windows though ...

#crysx

I run Windows and a set of 10 750 ti's.  What is the average they are getting per card on the new miner.  I have no problem donating just want to make sure i am not gaining 10 kh/s.

i have shifted all my farm to gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards on linux - so i can tell you that the 'standard' miner from tsiv gets about 1450KH and sp has increased that hashrate ( from what ive been told ) by about 200-300KHash per card ...

so 10 cards would amount to a nice figure ...

i unfortunately cant use it - as i refuse to rebuild the entire farm in windows - especially BECAUSE its windows ...

#crysx

Ty crysx - that is significant

[chrysophylax]

Can anyone tell me what the hashrate is on a 750ti on SP's modified Spreadminer please.  If you don't want it public please PM me.  I am trying to see if it is worth me purchasing it at this point.  Thanks.

it usually is worth donating in general to sp and other devs - purely just for the input they have done for the public miners ...

but the private miner is definitely worth it also - only for windows though ...

#crysx

I run Windows and a set of 10 750 ti's.  What is the average they are getting per card on the new miner.  I have no problem donating just want to make sure i am not gaining 10 kh/s.

i have shifted all my farm to gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards on linux - so i can tell you that the 'standard' miner from tsiv gets about 1450KH and sp has increased that hashrate ( from what ive been told ) by about 200-300KHash per card ...

so 10 cards would amount to a nice figure ...

i unfortunately cant use it - as i refuse to rebuild the entire farm in windows - especially BECAUSE its windows ...

#crysx

Ty crysx - that is significant

no problem pokeytex ...

only sp can give a real accurate figure - and those that run your actual cards ...

but at 10 cards using sp's miner - it should be a huge upgrade in hashrate ...

let us know how it works - in comparison ... if you are using tsivs miner that is ...

#crysx

[duboisi]

Using Release 36 on Qubit I show I am getting 11,700 kh/s on a GTX970 but the pool never shows above 5,500 kh/s.

Is the miner way off or an issue with the pool?

I am on Windows 7 64 bit.

I tried the Release 38 but I get no hashes.

Which pool ?

The Block Factory.

Sorry can't tell for them - probably different implementation, but do you have rejects/invalids ?

Yes.

I am showing 4.51 Mh/s valid and 45.08 kh/s invalid for hash rate for the last 3 hours.

Hmm I know that from my pools, looks like a portion is "share above target" - it usually comes when vardiff retargets and the formula (or diff1) is wrong.. Its either a pool or a miner prob .. Can you test on any other pool to see if it works ?

Just getting back from work.

I tried the qubit miner on Hamster Pool and I get all booo's with the same bat. On digihash and minerspooleu when I start the bat it has a first line that says about the difficulty and then nothing. No hashes at all, it's like it is locked.

Just did a test again for R38 running qubit at HamsterPool (low hash as only running 65% TDP):
 [15:17:38] Starting HamsterPool Qubit with C:\Software\Currency\--970 Miner Control--\ccMiner38.exe -a qubit --no-color -o stratum+tcp://eu.hamsterpool.com:7776 -u xxx.xx -p xxx -d 0
[2015-02-11 15:17:39] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://eu.hamsterpool.com:7776
[2015-02-11 15:17:39] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2015-02-11 15:17:39] 1 miner thread started, using 'qubit' algorithm.
[2015-02-11 15:17:40] Stratum difficulty set to 0.0673913
[2015-02-11 15:17:42] eu.hamsterpool.com:7776 qubit block 579636
[2015-02-11 15:17:42] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 10416 kH/s
[2015-02-11 15:17:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 10343 kH/s
[2015-02-11 15:17:51] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 10379 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-02-11 15:17:56] eu.hamsterpool.com:7776 qubit block 579637
[2015-02-11 15:17:56] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 10376 kH/s
[2015-02-11 15:18:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 10330 kH/s
[2015-02-11 15:18:06] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 10366 khash/s (yay!!!)
[15:18:11] Stopping HamsterPool qubit

[rednoW]

R38 cubit works no problem on yaamp and hamsterpool.
Only 4340khs on my poor gtx750

[sp_]

The GTX750 (non ti) has only got 512 cuda cores, while the gtx750ti has got 640 cores. A radeon 280x has 2048 cores.


But the 512 core gtx beats the 2048 core AMD:

[antonio8]

@ sp_

Can you help me understand why in the miner (r36, same happens with r38) on qubit it shows 11,660 kh/s but I never show over 5,500 kh/s on the pool (the block factory)?

I have tried it on hamster pool with the same bat and only get booo's (message is low difficulty share). On digihash pool and miners pool eu I get to "Stratum difficulty set to xxx" and then nothing from there. NO hashing at all booo's or yay's.

Do I need to manually set the difficulty in the bats?

[sp_]

I tested qubit on yaamp.com yesterday and the miner got the correct hash. Don't set the difficulty in the bat file. just run it with -a qubit

[antonio8]

I tested qubit on yaamp.com yesterday and the miner got the correct hash. Don't set the difficulty in the bat file. just run it with -a qubit

It works fine on yaamp so that must mean there is an issue with The Block Factory Pool and some setting. I prefer that one since I have been there for a while.

I guess I have to figure out what is wrong with that pool.

EDIT: Just found out that TBF does have a difficulty issue and it must be manually set lower.

[bathrobehero]

TBF wouldn't let me connect (Bad Access) and on hamsterpools whatever diff I try I can't get the pool to show my real hashrate. The closest I could get was with -f 0.01, anything lower means lower hashrate and anything higher introduces low difficulty shares.

[antonio8]

TBF wouldn't let me connect (Bad Access) and on hamsterpools whatever diff I try I can't get the pool to show my real hashrate. The closest I could get was with -f 0.01, anything lower means lower hashrate and anything higher introduces low difficulty shares.

I could not get hamsterpool to work at all with any diff settings. All booo's.

I had to use R36 to get it to work at TBF but had to use difficulty 1.

EDIT: The only pool I can get the miner and pool to show the same is yaamp

[sp_]

I submitted a 3% faster keccak my looking at the wolf0 changes in the cryptonight miner and rewriting/optimizing it it to use uint2.

Since Keccak is used in most algos, a small speedup in quark/x11,x13,x14,x15. etc.

[sp_]

I could not get hamsterpool to work at all with any diff settings. All booo's.
I had to use R36 to get it to work at TBF but had to use difficulty 1.
EDIT: The only pool I can get the miner and pool to show the same is yaamp

The only way to fix this properly is to make a new parameter to autoadjust the diff.
Also a parameter for --No-submit-stale shares.

Maybe later.

[scryptr]

QUBIT--

Here is my configuration line for adding Qubit algo to my YAAMP auto-switch batch file for a GTX 960.  This is a 1-line configuration string, broken after the "-p" flag by the blog formatting:

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7 -f .01  -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4733 -u name -p x11=5.4,x13=4.2,x14=4.1,x15=3.6,quark=9.8,lyra2=0.7,fresh=6.1,qubit=7.9

Without the "-f 0.01" flag, the algo does not mine, I get long successions of "boos".  Even with it, I am only mining at about 72% to 73% accepts.  I get a lot of "Low Difficulty Share" rejects, and long strings of "result does not validate on CPU".  

The algo has been best-paying several times today.       --scryptr