CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[flipclip]

Submitted another +15KHASH in qubit and +2khash on x11.

the latest build is from 8-march.

Build 43 is comming soon.

Unfortunately on linux I get a compile error:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/cstdint:35:0,
                 from qubit/qubit_luffa512.cu:21:
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/c++0x_warning.h:32:2: error: #error This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.

Not sure where I should add the above compiler option.  (The previous commit "qubit +20Khash on the 750ti." compiles fine.)

Also, what should the --intensity be set to for auto.  I set intensity for some algos, and not others, via a script.  0 used to work for auto, but now that doesn't (gives extremely slow speeds and then ccminer crashes).

[sp_]

get latest. is it fixed now?

[sp_]

Just submitted another +30KHASH in qubit and +10KHASH x11 (750ti) and some megahashes more in Doomcoin. (is this coin dead?)

[sp_]

Added 0.5MHASH to whirlpoolx on the 750ti.

[sp_]

Note that the exe is build without compute 5.2. If you have a 960/970/980 card you should eighter build yourself or wait for another build.

The cuda version I am using doesn't support compute 5.2 and it takes forever to download on my mobile link in Thailand.


-faster  lyra (3%)
-faster qubit
-faster whirlpoolx
-Faster x11,x13,x14,x15,x17
-faster doomcoin


1.5.43(sp-MOD) is available here: (24-mar-2015)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.43

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

[flipclip]

get latest. is it fixed now?

Yes the compile is fixed.  Just compiled 1.5.43(sp-MOD) without issue.

(Setting --intensity=0 doesn't work for "auto" but that is a back burner issue for me.)

[sp_]

get latest. is it fixed now?

Yes the compile is fixed.  Just compiled 1.5.43(sp-MOD) without issue.
(Setting --intensity=0 doesn't work for "auto" but that is a back burner issue for me.)

Remove the intensity parameter to get the default intenisty

[flipclip]

get latest. is it fixed now?

Yes the compile is fixed.  Just compiled 1.5.43(sp-MOD) without issue.
(Setting --intensity=0 doesn't work for "auto" but that is a back burner issue for me.)

Remove the intensity parameter to get the default intenisty

Yeah, that's what I've done 

[sp_]

750ti WHIRLPOOLX-
I am getting 463Mh/s vs 458Mh/s on my 6x750ti FTW rig.  Hash rate is very consistent.  The 458Mh/s rate was for tpruvot's  current Linux 1.6-git build.
BTW, tpruvot's current cpu-multi v1.1-git build bangs lyra2 on Intel.  I get a very consistent 332kh/s on an older i7.
--scryptr

Is this on your 64bit linux rig or your win7 x86 rig? My modded kernal is optimized for 32 bit.

[coinits]

i mined drk when it was still in its infancy and sold ALL of them when they hit $11 ...

what did i convert them to? ... btc of course ...

why setup another 'standard' when you already have THE standard ...

besides - donors will only back something they THINK they can make money from ... so if thats what 'they' are doing - then it just might be something to continue looking at ...

but for now - not for me ...

#crysx

I was never sold on DRK so I never held onto it. I sold over 1k for around 0.0003 last year february.

thats one of the reasons i sold all of my 'stock' of drk ...

great concept - but when the whole drudgery of anon this and anon that started - thats when i knew this whole thing was going to be dragged on senselessly ...

the whole concept of anonymity goes against ALL of the trade markets - ALL of them ... if you cant see where a trade goes - or cant get a refund for a product or service - or cant change your mind and receive your monies back - then what the hell are we doing transferring coins in the first place ...

i know that sounds liek im a government supporter and supporter of all thats illuminati and all that crap - but seriously ... if a CURRENCY is going to be usable in any way shape and form - it NEEDS to be tracked for OUR OWN benefit ... not those bureaucratic controlling nazi's ...

hence the 'dumping' or 'selling' or 'trading of all the drk i had at the time - and i had a LOT ...

anyway - about to test the compilability of sp's newest ...

#crysx

That is why I like Monero. You have the option to make a transaction transparent, if that is what you need. Also, have the comfort of knowing that you can be 100% private too. Plus the ability to use http://xmr.to to send bitcoin 100% anonymously is a bonus.

[sp_]

This is why i like darkcoin bether:

[Bombadil]

* Bombadil checks the subforum

Ah, we're still in "Mining (Altcoins)", I almost thought I was in some shitty thread on Altcoin Discussions lol

[sp_]

[AliMan]

With 1.5.43(sp-MOD), I'm getting 50-80 watts lower than 1.5.42(sp-MOD) with some better performance on Whirlpoolx, even without being optimized for Compute 5.2. I did not recompile.

[rednoW]

1.5.43 - really beautiful! Great work, SP! You should better stay in Thai

[scryptr]

750ti WHIRLPOOLX-
I am getting 463Mh/s vs 458Mh/s on my 6x750ti FTW rig.  Hash rate is very consistent.  The 458Mh/s rate was for tpruvot's  current Linux 1.6-git build.
BTW, tpruvot's current cpu-multi v1.1-git build bangs lyra2 on Intel.  I get a very consistent 332kh/s on an older i7.
--scryptr

Is this on your 64bit linux rig or your win7 x86 rig? My modded kernal is optimized for 32 bit.

LINUX x64--

My 750ti FTW (dual fan, w/6-pin connector) rig is run on Ubuntu 14.04 x64.  I converted my 750ti SC rig (single fan, no 6-pin connector) to Win 8 x64 and it is now much more stable than when it ran on Linux.  It is currently mining Lyra2.  Both rigs have 6 cards.

I compiled and executed your latest release on my FTW rig and achieved a further 1.5Mh/s increase in hash rate.  The rig's total whirlpoolx hash rate is now 464.5Mh/s.        --scryptr

[kaltar]

Latest version on X11,x13,x15 i'm getting a CPU does not validate, all other algos are ok.
previous version was working fine

[scryptr]

Note that the exe is build without compute 5.2. If you have a 960/970/980 card you should eighter build yourself or wait for another build.

The cuda version I am using doesn't support compute 5.2 and it takes forever to download on my mobile link in Thailand.


-faster  lyra (3%)
-faster qubit
-faster whirlpoolx
-Faster x11,x13,x14,x15,x17
-faster doomcoin


1.5.43(sp-MOD) is available here: (24-mar-2015)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.43

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Latest version on X11,x13,x15 i'm getting a CPU does not validate, all other algos are ok.
previous version was working fine

GTX 960 and X11--

My GTX 960 on Win 7 x64 runs 225+ kh/s faster with X11 (5740kh/s v 5515kh/s), but gets nothing but "does not validate on CPU" errors with no accepts.  I reverted to v42 after a very short trial.       --scryptr

[sp_]

Latest version on X11,x13,x15 i'm getting a CPU does not validate, all other algos are ok.
previous version was working fine

Download the binary from here:

http://cryptomining-blog.com/4546-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-43-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/

My version is buildt with an older version of cuda 6.5 wich doesn't support compute 5.2

[scryptr]

Latest version on X11,x13,x15 i'm getting a CPU does not validate, all other algos are ok.
previous version was working fine

Download the binary from here:

http://cryptomining-blog.com/4546-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-43-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/

My version is buildt with an older version of cuda 6.5 wich doesn't support compute 5.2

I downloaded the crypto-blog version.  I assume that it was compiled by a friendly third-party.  It is currently mining X11 at 5545kh/s on my Win 7 x64 GTX 960.  This result is compared to 5515kh/s on your last release of v42.  I suppose my earlier (and unsuccessful) results gave a larger, but false, increase in hash rate for v43.

Thanks for your continued programming efforts.        --scryptr