CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[chrysophylax]

sp ...

it compiled after i changed the filenames as per your instruction in the Makefile.am file - though the second file required the .cu extension ...

ive now moved the compiled spreadminer to one of the production systems for testing ...

there is an improvement in performance - though not as much as i would have hoped using stock clocks per gpu - but nonetheless - an improvement in comparison to tsivs miner ...

below are the output of both the currently running spreadminer-tsiv and also the newly compiled spreadminer-sph both using the -x 20 parameter ( they are machines exactly the same specs ) ...


spreadminer-tsiv ...

[2015-03-02 18:15:35] accepted: 66765/68063 (98.09%), 7264 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:36] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1448 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: found a solution, nonce $CC22B141
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] accepted: 66766/68064 (98.09%), 7259 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $994E71C5
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1451 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] accepted: 66767/68065 (98.09%), 7257 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:43] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1452 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:45] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $3345AA8F
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] accepted: 66768/68066 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:49] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1454 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005965AD
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] accepted: 66769/68067 (98.09%), 7280 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $0022EAEA
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:53] accepted: 66770/68068 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $99469AD2
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1450 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] accepted: 66771/68069 (98.09%), 7274 khash/s (yay!!!)


spreadminer-sph ...

     *** Spreadminer 5 - a SpreadX11 miner for nVidia GPUs ***
           based on ccminer 1.2 Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
           based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
           SpreadX11 additions by tsiv
[2015-03-02 18:14:09] 5 miner threads started, using 'spreadx11' algorithm.
[2015-03-02 18:14:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1280 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:11] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 799.36 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $6607585D
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 582.66 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 3321 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:14:15] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1607 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $664BC097
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1546 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 4726 khash/s (yay!!!)

and after the miner has settled and processed a few more shares ...

[2015-03-02 18:18:40] accepted: 85/87 (97.70%), 7635 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $001056A8
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1359 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] accepted: 86/88 (97.73%), 7449 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1553 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:45] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1552 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:48] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1574 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $66497DF1
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1495 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] accepted: 87/89 (97.75%), 7675 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $332952A2
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] accepted: 88/90 (97.78%), 7610 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005DB092
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1505 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] accepted: 89/91 (97.80%), 7570 khash/s (yay!!!)


so as you can see there is a marked difference between the two workers ...

ill now propagate the latest spreadminer-sph across the farm and see how they perform overnight ...

tanx again sp ... this will help a great deal overall ...

#crysx

[1714694106]

1714694106

[1714694106]

1714694106

[1714694106]

1714694106

[sp_]

sp ...
it compiled after i changed the filenames as per your instruction in the Makefile.am file - though the second file required the .cu extension ...
ive now moved the compiled spreadminer to one of the production systems for testing ...
there is an improvement in performance - though not as much as i would have hoped using stock clocks per gpu - but nonetheless - an improvement in comparison to tsivs miner ...
below are the output of both the currently running spreadminer-tsiv and also the newly compiled spreadminer-sph both using the -x 20 parameter ( they are machines exactly the same specs ) ...
spreadminer-tsiv ...
[2015-03-02 18:15:35] accepted: 66765/68063 (98.09%), 7264 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:36] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1448 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: found a solution, nonce $CC22B141
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] accepted: 66766/68064 (98.09%), 7259 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $994E71C5
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1451 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] accepted: 66767/68065 (98.09%), 7257 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:43] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1452 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:45] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $3345AA8F
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] accepted: 66768/68066 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:49] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1454 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005965AD
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] accepted: 66769/68067 (98.09%), 7280 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $0022EAEA
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:53] accepted: 66770/68068 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $99469AD2
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1450 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] accepted: 66771/68069 (98.09%), 7274 khash/s (yay!!!)


spreadminer-sph ...

     *** Spreadminer 5 - a SpreadX11 miner for nVidia GPUs ***
           based on ccminer 1.2 Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
           based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
           SpreadX11 additions by tsiv
[2015-03-02 18:14:09] 5 miner threads started, using 'spreadx11' algorithm.
[2015-03-02 18:14:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1280 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:11] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 799.36 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $6607585D
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 582.66 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 3321 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:14:15] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1607 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $664BC097
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1546 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 4726 khash/s (yay!!!)

and after the miner has settled and processed a few more shares ...

[2015-03-02 18:18:40] accepted: 85/87 (97.70%), 7635 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $001056A8
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1359 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] accepted: 86/88 (97.73%), 7449 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1553 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:45] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1552 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:48] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1574 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $66497DF1
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1495 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] accepted: 87/89 (97.75%), 7675 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $332952A2
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] accepted: 88/90 (97.78%), 7610 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005DB092
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1505 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] accepted: 89/91 (97.80%), 7570 khash/s (yay!!!)
so as you can see there is a marked difference between the two workers ...
ill now propagate the latest spreadminer-sph across the farm and see how they perform overnight ...
tanx again sp ... this will help a great deal overall ...
#crysx

I run without launchparameter (default is set to -x 5 on the 750ti). The 750ti will reduce the clockspeed if the cards get too hot. Lower intensity might be bether in the long run. I also think that 32bit builds will be faster. My windows compile (x86) is performing much bether.

[chrysophylax]

sp ...
it compiled after i changed the filenames as per your instruction in the Makefile.am file - though the second file required the .cu extension ...
ive now moved the compiled spreadminer to one of the production systems for testing ...
there is an improvement in performance - though not as much as i would have hoped using stock clocks per gpu - but nonetheless - an improvement in comparison to tsivs miner ...
below are the output of both the currently running spreadminer-tsiv and also the newly compiled spreadminer-sph both using the -x 20 parameter ( they are machines exactly the same specs ) ...
spreadminer-tsiv ...
[2015-03-02 18:15:35] accepted: 66765/68063 (98.09%), 7264 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:36] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1448 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: found a solution, nonce $CC22B141
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:37] accepted: 66766/68064 (98.09%), 7259 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $994E71C5
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1451 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:38] accepted: 66767/68065 (98.09%), 7257 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:42] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:43] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1452 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:45] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $3345AA8F
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:46] accepted: 66768/68066 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1463 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:49] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1454 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1453 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005965AD
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1465 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:50] accepted: 66769/68067 (98.09%), 7280 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1447 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $0022EAEA
[2015-03-02 18:15:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:53] accepted: 66770/68068 (98.09%), 7276 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:15:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1464 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: found a solution, nonce $99469AD2
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1450 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:15:54] accepted: 66771/68069 (98.09%), 7274 khash/s (yay!!!)


spreadminer-sph ...

     *** Spreadminer 5 - a SpreadX11 miner for nVidia GPUs ***
           based on ccminer 1.2 Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
           based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
           SpreadX11 additions by tsiv
[2015-03-02 18:14:09] 5 miner threads started, using 'spreadx11' algorithm.
[2015-03-02 18:14:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1280 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:11] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 799.36 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $6607585D
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1458 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 582.66 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:13] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 3321 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:14:15] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1607 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $664BC097
[2015-03-02 18:14:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1546 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:14:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 4726 khash/s (yay!!!)

and after the miner has settled and processed a few more shares ...

[2015-03-02 18:18:40] accepted: 85/87 (97.70%), 7635 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $001056A8
[2015-03-02 18:18:40] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1359 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] accepted: 86/88 (97.73%), 7449 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:41] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1573 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1553 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:45] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1545 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1510 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1552 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:48] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1574 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: found a solution, nonce $66497DF1
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1495 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:49] accepted: 87/89 (97.75%), 7675 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $332952A2
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1445 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:50] accepted: 88/90 (97.78%), 7610 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: found a solution, nonce $005DB092
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1505 khash/s
[2015-03-02 18:18:51] accepted: 89/91 (97.80%), 7570 khash/s (yay!!!)
so as you can see there is a marked difference between the two workers ...
ill now propagate the latest spreadminer-sph across the farm and see how they perform overnight ...
tanx again sp ... this will help a great deal overall ...
#crysx

I run with -x 5. The 750ti will reduce the clockspeed if the cards get too hot. Lower intensity might be bether in the long run. I also think that 32bit builds will be faster. My windows compile (x86) is performing much bether.

ive changed the parameter to -x 5 and it seems to perform about the same ... so ill keep it at that ...

as for the x32 builds ... ill have to test that another day - as ill setup a x32 machine ( fedora 19 or 20 x32 ) and build it from a fully 32bit platform ...

what other commandline parameters do you think would benefit the hashrate / processing? ...

btw - just a small thing - but the title still says spreadminer 5

#crysx

[sp_]

ive changed the parameter to -x 5 and it seems to perform about the same ... so ill keep it at that ...
as for the x32 builds ... ill have to test that another day - as ill setup a x32 machine ( fedora 19 or 20 x32 ) and build it from a fully 32bit platform ...
what other commandline parameters do you think would benefit the hashrate / processing? ...
#crysx

Different intensity  parameters for different cards.

For the 750ti -x parameters should be a multiple of 5
for the 750, 960,980  -x paramameter should be a multiple of 8
and the 970 -x parameter should be a multiple of 13

[chrysophylax]

ive changed the parameter to -x 5 and it seems to perform about the same ... so ill keep it at that ...
as for the x32 builds ... ill have to test that another day - as ill setup a x32 machine ( fedora 19 or 20 x32 ) and build it from a fully 32bit platform ...
what other commandline parameters do you think would benefit the hashrate / processing? ...
#crysx

Different intensity  parameters for different cards.

For the 750ti -x parameters should be a multiple of 5
for the 750, 960,980  -x paramameter should be a multiple of 8
and the 970 -x parameter should be a multiple of 13

tanx sp ... that is something that will be kept in the knowledgebase ...

i edited earlier - which i missed obviously - but the title of spreadminer is still at version 5 ...

thats not a big thing at all - but i thought you might want to know ...

...

#crysx

[sp_]

btw - just a small thing - but the title still says spreadminer 5

yeah, forgot to change it. The bottleneck in the spreadcoin hash is the cuda_sha256.cu function that iterates a 200000 element table.
I moved the table to a texture and got a small boost, but it broke the hash.
I will release a version 8 with higher speed soon.

[chrysophylax]

btw - just a small thing - but the title still says spreadminer 5

yeah, forgot to change it. The bottleneck in the spreadcoin hash is the cuda_sha256.cu function that iterates a 200000 element table.
I moved the table to a texture and got a small boost, but it broke the hash.
I will release a version 8 with higher speed soon.

sounds like a great deal of work ...

if version 8 can run faster - then wouldnt that be a 'leaner' miner? ...

would be nice to see if there was a leap in hashrate ...

#crysx

[sp_]

I have started on the cryptonight core now. But tsivs compiled version seems to crash on cuda 6.5 win8. Anyone have any tips ?
I tried different -l parameters but doesn't seem to work

[PVmining]

I have started on the cryptonight core now. But tsivs compiled version seems to crash on cuda 6.5 win8. Anyone have any tips ?
I tried different -l parameters but doesn't seem to work

never used it on win, on linux -l 8x60 was my always working launch config with a 750ti.

[sp_]

I have started on the cryptonight core now. But tsivs compiled version seems to crash on cuda 6.5 win8. Anyone have any tips ?
I tried different -l parameters but doesn't seem to work

never used it on win, on linux -l 8x60 was my always working launch config with a 750ti.

The hashrate is too high and the driver is crashing..

Seems to work now, I fixed a bug in benchmark mode

8x60 crashes

8x30 works.

[PVmining]

I have started on the cryptonight core now. But tsivs compiled version seems to crash on cuda 6.5 win8. Anyone have any tips ?
I tried different -l parameters but doesn't seem to work

never used it on win, on linux -l 8x60 was my always working launch config with a 750ti.

The hashrate is too high and the driver is crashing..

but it should work without launch config. the default tsiv used were quite conservative.

[myagui]

I believe you just need to disable the driver checking (or make the check interval larger):
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff569918%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

My working setup was to just set TdrLevel off (zero).
A more conservative launch value is 8x30 (though 8x60 does work best for me).

Cheers!

[antantti]

If I remember right there were some strange issues with windows 8 & 8.1 and tsiv's cryptonight miner. Had to use 8x30, higher values and it crashed. On windows 7 8x60 worked and was faster too.

[sp_]

I get 200-227H/s on a standard clocked 750ti with 8x30.  Latest version of the sourcecode

What hashrates did you get?

[sp_]

If I remember right there were some strange issues with windows 8 & 8.1 and tsiv's cryptonight miner. Had to use 8x30, higher values and it crashed. On windows 7 8x60 worked and was faster too.

Yes I am on windows 8.

[myagui]

I get 200-227H/s on a standard clocked 750ti with 8x30.  Latest version of the sourcecode

What hashrates did you get?

I have about 265~285 h/s with factory overclocked 750 TI and using 8x60.
Hashrate fluctuates quite a bit for me.

[antantti]

I get 200-227H/s on a standard clocked 750ti with 8x30.  Latest version of the sourcecode

What hashrates did you get?

I have about 265~285 h/s with factory overclocked 750 TI and using 8x60.
Hashrate fluctuates quite a bit for me.

240-245 overclocked cards. 8x30 and windows 8.1.

[sp_]

The crash is because windows tries to allocate a big chunk of memory. I am trying to build in x64 now to check if it works with -l 8x60

edit: Crashed with a bluescreen. -l 8x30 works and the speed is around 5h/s slower than the 32bit build

[myagui]

The crash is because windows tries to allocate a big chunk of memory. I am trying to build in x64 now to check if it works with -l 8x60

edit: Crashed with a bluescreen. -l 8x30 works and the speed is around 5h/s slower than the 32bit build

Increasing the delay on the driver check (or disabling it entirely) as I posted about above, allows for the memory allocation to succeed without crashing. I have best performance with the x86 build as well.

[sp_]

I managed to get 20KHASH pretty easy, and the hashrate is more stable.

Now the miner is running stable at 232.5-236 on standard clocks. up from 200-224 (8x30)