CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[bathrobehero]

I read somewhere that you got "robbed" by someone copying your wallet dats and actually got into your system with teamviewer?!

There are a few people who got robbed that way (search reddit).

It actually seems teamviewer is the culprit here.

Imo someone is bruteforcing teamviewer accounts. The attacker only needs to bypass the loginlimit somehow ...

Don't forget the basic teamviewer password is only 6 letters, so even if you set a permanent login password that is way longer that basic 6 letter pw is still valid.
(the default 6 letter pw can be changed to a 10 letter pw including special characters)

I doubt it's Teamviewer because it increases the amount of time you have to wait to try again after unsuccessful tries but it's possible.

But, you can change the default password's length to 10 characters which includes symbols in Options\Security > password strength.

And you can also disable incoming connections from outside your local network. It also makes windows much more responsive and don't use your bandwidth and of course it's completely safe from the outside (Options\General - Incoming LAN connections > accept exclusively). In this case you can also use local IP addresses to connect for example in shortcuts like this which is pretty convenient:

"C:\Program Files (x86)\TeamViewer\TeamViewer.exe" -i  192.168.1.x --Password doesnt_matter_local_only_password

You mean anyone can get into team viewer if they know the id and root path? 

The path is to your local teamviewer, the example above is what you'd be putting in a shortcut link to easily connect to a local PC.
And as far as I know IP addresses instead of IDs are only allowed for LAN connections.
You still should have a password set on the remote PC it just doesn't have to be strong if you set it that it only accepts connections from inside your local network.

[tbearhere]

Hrmm at this point I cannot remember the title but I remember it said tpruvot 1.7 or so.  Obviously a scam since when after the fact I went to the github and saw tpruvot wasn't even on 1.7 - lol - hind sight is always 20/20.

Any chance you mined Oxen?

Some people confused ccminer having malicious code instead of Oxen which was malicious.

cryptomining blog really? that site is huge for mining, how they can not check for malicious code, are they stupid? what was the miner with the virus?

Apparently people can hide their malicious stuff with FUD crypters so the virus can't be detected and can be triggered anytime, even like months later.

it's not about antivirus, it's about code checking, no virus can be hidden if you have the source and you know what you're doing

They obviously publish a clean surce with dirty binaries from a the private, malicious source. People would be fine compiling the clean source but they rarely do it themselves on windows.

soon : http://techcrunch.com/2016/03/30/be-very-afraid-hell-has-frozen-over-bash-is-coming-to-windows-10/

That will be very interesting. It might even convince me to make the switch from 7 to 10.

Doing that will give b g  legal permission to download every file... look at your file photos .. the whole works.. to the best of my knowledge.  I WILL NEVER... NEVER GET WINDOWS 10!
Someone told me he is ... can't say.

[tbearhere]

1.5.79(sp-MOD)

-Faster lyra2v2
-Faster quark
-Faster neoscrypt
-Faster x11,x13,x14,x15,x17,nist5
-Faster deep and doom
-Added vcash (blake 256 (run with -a vanilla))

1.5.79(sp-MOD) is available here: (02-april-2015)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Please test it and report your hashrates. Compare with 1.5.78. What are you getting?

Slower hashrates on three I tried. ~15% less.

[tbearhere]

i tried 1.579 but it is slower than the djrm34 mod for neoscrypt a bit slowe
also more not validate nonce, djm34 version is better

try quark.

Slower  turn your oc off.

[sp_]

i tried 1.579 but it is slower than the djrm34 mod for neoscrypt a bit slowe
also more not validate nonce, djm34 version is better

try quark.

Slower  turn your oc off.

Here is what I get on the standard clocks: 1290Mhz core. release 79 is around 500khash faster than 78 on the 980ti windforce G1 gaming

[Vaccomondus]

is this with faster vcash and can mine decred?

Not faster. For a faster Vcash kernal. donate 0.2BTc. (15% faster than  the Provos Alexis kernal) And get decred #7 included. (25-30% faster than 1.7.5)

i can get 3000 mega on xvc with 1.7.4(1450 core) is your version faster?

[sp_]

release 79 crashed mining quark on 2gb compute 5.2 cards. (gtx 950,960) I submitted a fix

release79.7z updated on github with new exe.

[tbearhere]

i tried 1.579 but it is slower than the djrm34 mod for neoscrypt a bit slowe
also more not validate nonce, djm34 version is better

try quark.

Slower  turn your oc off.

Here is what I get on the standard clocks: 1290Mhz core. release 79 is around 500khash faster than 78 on the 980ti windforce G1 gaming

Ok on the 980ti.... but the 750ti is less.

[tbearhere]

Anyone know what x11gost algo is?  SP ?  Is that in ccminer ?  thx

[pallas]

Anyone know what x11gost algo is?  SP ?  Is that in ccminer ?  thx

SIbcoin. Try tpruvot's.

[sp_]

is this with faster vcash and can mine decred?

Not faster. For a faster Vcash kernal. donate 0.2BTc. (15% faster than  the Provos Alexis kernal) And get decred #7 included. (25-30% faster than 1.7.5)

i can get 3000 mega on xvc with 1.7.4(1450 core) is your version faster?

I get

3150 on 1450
3300 on 1466

with decred private #4

[sp_]

Slower hashrates on three I tried. ~15% less.

I have tested this now. Slower on the 750ti. The new blake implementation works good on compute 5.2, but on the 750ti 10% slower..

[tbearhere]

Anyone know what x11gost algo is?  SP ?  Is that in ccminer ?  thx

SIbcoin. Try tpruvot's.

Ok thx pallas. 

[joblo]

Anyone know what x11gost algo is?  SP ?  Is that in ccminer ?  thx

SIbcoin. Try tpruvot's.

Ok thx pallas. 

-a sib

[tbearhere]

Anyone know what x11gost algo is?  SP ?  Is that in ccminer ?  thx

SIbcoin. Try tpruvot's.

Ok thx pallas.  

-a sib

Thx  joblo...

EDIT:That didn't work on any ccminer or tpruvot's.

[maxim000]

EDIT:That didn't work on any ccminer or tpruvot's.

try this
http://cryptomining-blog.com/wp-content/download/ccminer-1.7.1-dev-tpruvot.zip

[joblo]

EDIT:That didn't work on any ccminer or tpruvot's.

try this
http://cryptomining-blog.com/wp-content/download/ccminer-1.7.1-dev-tpruvot.zip

SP_MOD doesn't have it.
TPruvot 1.7.5 has it but I haven't tried it.
I know it works in my cpuminer-opt.

I'd be careful downloading from CMB, best to get from from dev's DL links.

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

[Vaccomondus]

is this with faster vcash and can mine decred?

Not faster. For a faster Vcash kernal. donate 0.2BTc. (15% faster than  the Provos Alexis kernal) And get decred #7 included. (25-30% faster than 1.7.5)

i can get 3000 mega on xvc with 1.7.4(1450 core) is your version faster?

I get

3150 on 1450
3300 on 1466

with decred private #4

what card? i get 3k mega on a 970 mining XVC not decred

[sp_]

is this with faster vcash and can mine decred?

Not faster. For a faster Vcash kernal. donate 0.2BTc. (15% faster than  the Provos Alexis kernal) And get decred #7 included. (25-30% faster than 1.7.5)

i can get 3000 mega on xvc with 1.7.4(1450 core) is your version faster?

I get

3150 on 1450
3300 on 1466

with decred private #4

what card? i get 3k mega on a 970 mining XVC not decred

Gigabyte g1 gaming coreclock 1366. No trottling

[induktor]

Hi sp_
testing 1.5.79, seems a liiiiiitle bit slower in quark on the GTX970, results:

Mining QUARK

(power measured at the wall with an professional TrueRMS clamp meter)
started the miner and wait 10 minutes to take the readings:
stock speeds, cards are ALL gigabyte.

1.5.78 on 6x750Ti = 35320 Kh @ 353W (100Kh/W efficiency) Power target: 34W on all cards
1.5.79 on 6x750Ti = 35330 Kh @ 355W (99.6Kh/W efficiency) Power target: 34W on all cards

1.5.78 on 2xGTX970 = 32300 Kh @ 310W (104.1Kh/W efficiency) Power target: 140W on all cards
1.5.79 on 2xGTX970 = 32150 Kh @ 310W (103.7Kh/W efficiency) Power target: 140W on all cards

so it seems that in quark there is no difference.

Lubuntu 14.04 x64, 8GB RAM, OS on flash drive. (no hard drive)