CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Vaccomondus]

how much decred is doing with 970 with future release? can you reach 1500 1600? i may pay for it

[sp_]

how much decred is doing with 970 with future release? can you reach 1500 1600? i may pay for it

release #2 is doing 1515@1366
release #3 beta(unreleased) is doing 1560@1366 (gigabyte gaming default clock) (single card)

[sp_]

After I am done with decred mod #3. I think I will do Vanilla. Anybody interested? Around 5% boost.

[chrysophylax]

After I am done with decred mod #3. I think I will do Vanilla. Anybody interested? Around 5% boost.

im always here ...

and interested ...

#crysx

[Grim]

LOL 



From cryptominingblog:

The last part of our initial impressions that did not leave us very happy is the fact that there was quite a bit of dust buildup inside the miner, way more than there should be from a normal testing of new hardware before shipping to customer for example. The outside of the miner makes an impressions that it is new (cleaned well), but on the inside – the fans and the heatsinks of the blades with chips have dust that is hard to cleanup with just compressed air without taking the device apart. The amount of dust we should normally be associated with at least of few weeks of usage in normal everyday environment (non server room) and we don’t think that these devices are tested in a very dusty room. So it seems that they have been “tested” for some more time before being shipped to customers…

[pallas]

LOL 

From cryptominingblog:

The last part of our initial impressions that did not leave us very happy is the fact that there was quite a bit of dust buildup inside the miner, way more than there should be from a normal testing of new hardware before shipping to customer for example. The outside of the miner makes an impressions that it is new (cleaned well), but on the inside – the fans and the heatsinks of the blades with chips have dust that is hard to cleanup with just compressed air without taking the device apart. The amount of dust we should normally be associated with at least of few weeks of usage in normal everyday environment (non server room) and we don’t think that these devices are tested in a very dusty room. So it seems that they have been “tested” for some more time before being shipped to customers…

hehe!
if someone was still not convinced that they lie when they say "we do not mine" ;-)

[antantti]

sp_ have you tested your dcr mod on 980?

[sp_]

Release #3 does 2370 on the 980ti
1.7.4 buildt with cuda 6.5 does 1940 on the same  card.
I din't tune it for compute 5.2 yet. compute 5.0 is the priority now.

[sp_]

Release #3 sendt to the donators

release 2: asus strix Gtx 750ti 517MHASH(1260 core)
release 3: asus strix Gtx 750ti 528MHASH(1260 core)

Also bether on gtx 970

release 2: gigabyte g1 gaming 1515MHASH (1366 core)
release 3: gigabyte g1 gaming 1540MHASH (1366 core)

This version Doesn't use much CPU and should work on celeron rigs..

Buildt with cuda 7.5 32 bit this time. (Use less power.)
release #2 was buildt with cuda 7.5 64 bit.

[sp_]

People are asking for a linux version. I might give the sourcecode of version #3 to trusted members for a 0.3 BTC donation.

[AliMan]

Release #3 sendt to the donators

release 2: asus strix Gtx 759ti 517MHASH(1260 core)
release 3: asus strix Gtx 759ti 528MHASH(1260 core)

Also bether on gtx 970

release 2: gigabyte g1 gaming 1515MHASH (1366 core)
release 3: gigabyte g1 gaming 1540MHASH (1366 core)

This version Doesn't use much CPU and should work on celeron rigs..

If you're able to do over 2500 on the 980 ti's, then I'll be interested.

[sp_]

980ti: 2,5GHASH 300W
750ti: 0.5GHASH (30W) (tdp/OC)

2x more bang for the buck with the 750ti, sp-modded kernals & configuration.

[sp_]

Consider making two modes. One for high cpu utilization and one for low as has been done in the past. Some people have more powerful CPUs so it's not a issue, but I agree most machines are pretty anemic.

I might add a "--cpu-mining" in Release #4. Gains a few MHASH but use alot of power.

[bensam1231]

After I am done with decred mod #3. I think I will do Vanilla. Anybody interested? Around 5% boost.

Vanilla is a pretty poor earner now, even with a 5% boost. Time better spent on Neo, Lyra, Quark, Decred...

LOL 



From cryptominingblog:

The last part of our initial impressions that did not leave us very happy is the fact that there was quite a bit of dust buildup inside the miner, way more than there should be from a normal testing of new hardware before shipping to customer for example. The outside of the miner makes an impressions that it is new (cleaned well), but on the inside – the fans and the heatsinks of the blades with chips have dust that is hard to cleanup with just compressed air without taking the device apart. The amount of dust we should normally be associated with at least of few weeks of usage in normal everyday environment (non server room) and we don’t think that these devices are tested in a very dusty room. So it seems that they have been “tested” for some more time before being shipped to customers…

Yup... Saw that. Sure those things have been in use for at least for six months. If it's in a datacenter maybe even longer then that due to the air quality.

[joblo]

LOL 

From cryptominingblog:

The last part of our initial impressions that did not leave us very happy is the fact that there was quite a bit of dust buildup inside the miner, way more than there should be from a normal testing of new hardware before shipping to customer for example. The outside of the miner makes an impressions that it is new (cleaned well), but on the inside – the fans and the heatsinks of the blades with chips have dust that is hard to cleanup with just compressed air without taking the device apart. The amount of dust we should normally be associated with at least of few weeks of usage in normal everyday environment (non server room) and we don’t think that these devices are tested in a very dusty room. So it seems that they have been “tested” for some more time before being shipped to customers…

hehe!
if someone was still not convinced that they lie when they say "we do not mine" ;-)

There are two parts to that comment. Do they have their own farm with their own mining equipment and do they mine with
their customer inventory. The latter is assumed to be false while the former is likely the target of such a claim.

Miners don't seem more likely to be passed off as new when used than other electronics. It was probably a production
sample that had been stress-tested before shipping to be reviewed. Assuming they knew who they were shipping to
they would make sure the unit wouldn't die during the review tests. Either way the reviewer and the producer should
have been explicit about the unit's status.  And not cleaning it was simply sloppy and unprofessional.

[bensam1231]

LOL 

From cryptominingblog:

The last part of our initial impressions that did not leave us very happy is the fact that there was quite a bit of dust buildup inside the miner, way more than there should be from a normal testing of new hardware before shipping to customer for example. The outside of the miner makes an impressions that it is new (cleaned well), but on the inside – the fans and the heatsinks of the blades with chips have dust that is hard to cleanup with just compressed air without taking the device apart. The amount of dust we should normally be associated with at least of few weeks of usage in normal everyday environment (non server room) and we don’t think that these devices are tested in a very dusty room. So it seems that they have been “tested” for some more time before being shipped to customers…

hehe!
if someone was still not convinced that they lie when they say "we do not mine" ;-)

There are two parts to that comment. Do they have their own farm with their own mining equipment and do they mine with
their customer inventory. The latter is assumed to be false while the former is likely the target of such a claim.

Miners don't seem more likely to be passed off as new when used than other electronics. It was probably a production
sample that had been stress-tested before shipping to be reviewed. Assuming they knew who they were shipping to
they would make sure the unit wouldn't die during the review tests. Either way the reviewer and the producer should
have been explicit about the unit's status.  And not cleaning it was simply sloppy and unprofessional.

It takes a lot of time to build up dust, especially in a good environment such as a datacenter more so if it's already been pressure dusted and there is residue that wont come off. This isn't flipping it on and testing it for a week.

I'd definitely say it's more likely for miners to be used before being sold compared to other electronics. Cryptos are a completely different market.

[scryptr]

LOL  

From cryptominingblog:

The last part of our initial impressions that did not leave us very happy is the fact that there was quite a bit of dust buildup inside the miner, way more than there should be from a normal testing of new hardware before shipping to customer for example. The outside of the miner makes an impressions that it is new (cleaned well), but on the inside – the fans and the heatsinks of the blades with chips have dust that is hard to cleanup with just compressed air without taking the device apart. The amount of dust we should normally be associated with at least of few weeks of usage in normal everyday environment (non server room) and we don’t think that these devices are tested in a very dusty room. So it seems that they have been “tested” for some more time before being shipped to customers…

hehe!
if someone was still not convinced that they lie when they say "we do not mine" ;-)

There are two parts to that comment. Do they have their own farm with their own mining equipment and do they mine with
their customer inventory. The latter is assumed to be false while the former is likely the target of such a claim.

Miners don't seem more likely to be passed off as new when used than other electronics. It was probably a production
sample that had been stress-tested before shipping to be reviewed. Assuming they knew who they were shipping to
they would make sure the unit wouldn't die during the review tests. Either way the reviewer and the producer should
have been explicit about the unit's status.  And not cleaning it was simply sloppy and unprofessional.

It takes a lot of time to build up dust, especially in a good environment such as a datacenter more so if it's already been pressure dusted and there is residue that wont come off. This isn't flipping it on and testing it for a week.

I'd definitely say it's more likely for miners to be used before being sold compared to other electronics. Cryptos are a completely different market.

SHABBY BUSINESS MODEL--

I agree with Bensam1231.  These mining machines are being dumped on the market when protoypes of the newer models are being used by the company for "testing".  The dust accumulation may be a result of highly polluted air, however.  A month in a foreign polluted environment will deposit significantly more dust than 6 months in a highly regulated environment.  One of the motivations, perhaps, for a poor business model.       --scryptr

[chrysophylax]

LOL 

From cryptominingblog:

The last part of our initial impressions that did not leave us very happy is the fact that there was quite a bit of dust buildup inside the miner, way more than there should be from a normal testing of new hardware before shipping to customer for example. The outside of the miner makes an impressions that it is new (cleaned well), but on the inside – the fans and the heatsinks of the blades with chips have dust that is hard to cleanup with just compressed air without taking the device apart. The amount of dust we should normally be associated with at least of few weeks of usage in normal everyday environment (non server room) and we don’t think that these devices are tested in a very dusty room. So it seems that they have been “tested” for some more time before being shipped to customers…

hehe!
if someone was still not convinced that they lie when they say "we do not mine" ;-)

There are two parts to that comment. Do they have their own farm with their own mining equipment and do they mine with
their customer inventory. The latter is assumed to be false while the former is likely the target of such a claim.

Miners don't seem more likely to be passed off as new when used than other electronics. It was probably a production
sample that had been stress-tested before shipping to be reviewed. Assuming they knew who they were shipping to
they would make sure the unit wouldn't die during the review tests. Either way the reviewer and the producer should
have been explicit about the unit's status.  And not cleaning it was simply sloppy and unprofessional.

any of the machines are tested for two weeks before they are integrated into thefarm ... so even in our own farm - we test machines outside - before they are permanently placed inside the server room ...

even if the miners are sold - they are tested for two weeks ...

but there is NEVER that much dust buildup that would cause the dust to be 'stuck' to any parts of the inside of the machine ... that is a 'test' of large magnitude of time - and has only been seen in our systems after something like 6months worth of mining ( not 'testing' - as it were ) ...

but they can get away with lying - as no one can prove otherwise ...

its a trust factor - and so far - the factor for them is around 1 ( from a scale 1 - 7 ) ...

#crysx

[sp_]

I agree with Bensam1231.  These mining machines are being dumped on the market when protoypes of the newer models are being used by the company for "testing".  The dust accumulation may be a result of highly polluted air, however.  A month in a foreign polluted environment will deposit significantly more dust than 6 months in a highly regulated environment.  One of the motivations, perhaps, for a poor business model.       --scryptr

387MHASH was a bit low for an Asic. Gen II is probobly doing 10x more hash.

[bensam1231]

I agree with Bensam1231.  These mining machines are being dumped on the market when protoypes of the newer models are being used by the company for "testing".  The dust accumulation may be a result of highly polluted air, however.  A month in a foreign polluted environment will deposit significantly more dust than 6 months in a highly regulated environment.  One of the motivations, perhaps, for a poor business model.       --scryptr

387MHASH was a bit low for an Asic. Gen II is probobly doing 10x more hash.

At half the power. If it's anything like BTC ASICs, these will probably useful for another six months, which is still pretty good if you get in on the first 'batch'. After that it's all a matter of time before difficulty catches up. Either way GPU X mining is done, private kernel or no.