CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Bombadil]

I compiled your latest source, and get worse results than from tpruvots latest on my GTX760.
http://snag.gy/uBKmK.jpg - http://snag.gy/BfP3L.jpg

It's better on the 750tis, that's for sure
http://snag.gy/e6KjJ.jpg - http://snag.gy/FjUyD.jpg

Bombadil (KBomba) seems to be working on "ccmonitor" code just recently.

Previews are up there ^^ Anyone likes tabs as much as I do?

looks like VB/.NET, so if your a sane developer (to question due to your programming language ) it should run with mono on non-retarded systems.

It's C#.NET with WinForms as GUI and might work, might not ^^" I'm an autodidact when it comes to programming, so don't expect me to know those tricks I just make tools for myself and give them out for free Sharing is caring!
Also, even if it doesn't run on linux and other exotic species, it can still connect with a rig that's on linux through the API. So no real worries there.

Epsylon has already included a sample api.php in his source/releases. Maybe that might suit your needs? (no extensive stats though )

[tbearhere]

will ccminer work for solo mining ? via qt-.exe

Yes

[go6ooo1212]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

[djm34]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

the problem with m7 isn't much the algo... rather than what need to be modified in cpu-miner to hook it up into the new interface...

[go6ooo1212]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

the problem with m7 isn't much the algo... rather than what need to be modified in cpu-miner to hook it up into the new interface...

I hoped some improvements for maxwell 2

[djm34]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

the problem with m7 isn't much the algo... rather than what need to be modified in cpu-miner to hook it up into the new interface...

I hoped some improvements for maxwell 2

looked at my latest version, it was already improved

[go6ooo1212]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

the problem with m7 isn't much the algo... rather than what need to be modified in cpu-miner to hook it up into the new interface...

I hoped some improvements for maxwell 2

looked at my latest version, it was already improved

this one from 01.09.2014., I think.. Im using it

[djm34]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

the problem with m7 isn't much the algo... rather than what need to be modified in cpu-miner to hook it up into the new interface...

I hoped some improvements for maxwell 2

looked at my latest version, it was already improved

this one from 01.09.2014., I think.. Im using it

latest like in last... from last week committed at the same time as lyra2re (actually after, as I had to correct a few compatibility issue)

[go6ooo1212]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

the problem with m7 isn't much the algo... rather than what need to be modified in cpu-miner to hook it up into the new interface...

I hoped some improvements for maxwell 2

looked at my latest version, it was already improved

this one from 01.09.2014., I think.. Im using it

latest like in last... from last week committed at the same time as lyra2re (actually after, as I had to correct a few compatibility issue)

I didn't get involved in that new lira2re vtc algo , doesn't make sense to me..

[djm34]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

the problem with m7 isn't much the algo... rather than what need to be modified in cpu-miner to hook it up into the new interface...

I hoped some improvements for maxwell 2

looked at my latest version, it was already improved

this one from 01.09.2014., I think.. Im using it

latest like in last... from last week committed at the same time as lyra2re (actually after, as I had to correct a few compatibility issue)

I didn't get involved in that new lira2re vtc algo , doesn't make sense to me..

get involve in reading  :
I committed some optimization to m7 at the same time I released lyra2re (last try...   ), that was announced on the cudaminer thread.

[go6ooo1212]

@SP_
Do you planning optimize the miner with m7 algo supported

the problem with m7 isn't much the algo... rather than what need to be modified in cpu-miner to hook it up into the new interface...

I hoped some improvements for maxwell 2

looked at my latest version, it was already improved

this one from 01.09.2014., I think.. Im using it

latest like in last... from last week committed at the same time as lyra2re (actually after, as I had to correct a few compatibility issue)

I didn't get involved in that new lira2re vtc algo , doesn't make sense to me..

get involve in reading  :
I committed some optimization to m7 at the same time I released lyra2re (last try...   ), that was announced on the cudaminer thread.

haha good point , I think Ive missed it , shame ... thanks for the hint..

[HoY]

to be fair that thread is over 1100 pages long

[Bombadil]

to be fair that thread is over 1100 pages long

A real cudaminer has read it all!

[HoY]

So nobody has an answer or idea about these two errors?

"Cuda error in func 'x11_smid512_cpu_init' at line 462 : unspecified launch failure."
"Cuda error in func 'quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80' at line 308 : unspecified launch failure."

happens regardless of how low I set the intensity, using stock clocks on my MSI GeForce GTX 750 Ti OC TwinFrozr IV's (7 card rig running windows 8.1 with latest nvidia driver)

[djm34]

So nobody has an answer or idea about these two errors?

"Cuda error in func 'x11_smid512_cpu_init' at line 462 : unspecified launch failure."
"Cuda error in func 'quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80' at line 308 : unspecified launch failure."

happens regardless of how low I set the intensity, using stock clocks on my MSI GeForce GTX 750 Ti OC TwinFrozr IV's (7 card rig running windows 8.1 with latest nvidia driver)

first one looks like a typo...
may-be if you show wjat there is at line 462 and 308 that would help...

[HoY]

I don't have any clue what files those errors are referring to. they were just the error ccminer.exe spit out while mining, posted the screenshots of them 2 pages ago. The typo could have been me, I didn't copy/paste them I just didn't want to re post the same screenshots.

edit, yes the typo was me. the screenshot shows simd but I typed smid

[Schleicher]

So nobody has an answer or idea about these two errors?

"Cuda error in func 'x11_smid512_cpu_init' at line 462 : unspecified launch failure."
"Cuda error in func 'quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80' at line 308 : unspecified launch failure."

happens regardless of how low I set the intensity, using stock clocks on my MSI GeForce GTX 750 Ti OC TwinFrozr IV's (7 card rig running windows 8.1 with latest nvidia driver)

first one looks like a typo...
may-be if you show wjat there is at line 462 and 308 that would help...

Looks like one of the kernel calls failed.
Since we don't do any error checks at all, we only see the error the next time x11_simd512_cpu_init() is called.

[qs.lab]

sp_
all i can say is WOW. thank you will post hashrates tomorrow. try quark  increase of 20% 

in god we trast!

[lexiii]

GTX750, ccminer21.

GPU #0: result for ffffffff does not validate on CPU!

What is it?

[tbearhere]

to be fair that thread is over 1100 pages long

A real cudaminer has read it all!

I wish I could download that all in PDF format.