|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
August 25, 2015, 12:32:39 AM |
|
My point exactly. I could understand reaching out and crediting user who won with their " modified" timeframe, but changing stance and terms of their own OP .. not as much
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2339
|
|
August 25, 2015, 01:00:47 AM |
|
My point exactly. I could understand reaching out and crediting user who won with their " modified" timeframe, but changing stance and terms of their own OP .. not as much Maybe the user who won with their modified timeframe was one of their shills. This is obviously speculation however it would match up with their other highly unethical and sketchy behavior
|
|
|
|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
August 25, 2015, 01:43:20 AM |
|
My point exactly. I could understand reaching out and crediting user who won with their " modified" timeframe, but changing stance and terms of their own OP .. not as much Maybe the user who won with their modified timeframe was one of their shills. This is obviously speculation however it would match up with their other highly unethical and sketchy behavior ¸ I wouldn't go as far as that; it is just 0,1 btc. But i agree it is unethical to change terms mid game, with the dev making an error and not user. (referring to downtime)
|
|
|
|
SyGambler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1804
guess who's back
|
|
August 25, 2015, 03:31:04 AM |
|
stop judging like this , just act like there were no downtime you can see that the person who rolled 750m took his full bounty without considering the down time days so it's fair enough to give who predicted the correct date the bounty ( this costs Dadice more money BTW )
|
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
|
August 25, 2015, 05:39:46 AM |
|
My point exactly. I could understand reaching out and crediting user who won with their " modified" timeframe, but changing stance and terms of their own OP .. not as much Hi, Your statement is not valid in my opinion. If you disagree then you should have got in touch with Da Dice when he announced so. You can't simply wait for everything to be over and then come up with your argument. The downtime was unexpected, and it is only fair that it be deducted from the downtime. Other way round, you are giving the full control of who wins to DD which might even beat the concept of provable fairness. Da Dice or any other site always reserve the right to change their terms if changing the terms result in a more fair way of evaluating. The participant who predicted 20th is the winner because downtime is not his fault. That is the correct argument. And I'd personally argue that DD did the best possible thing by deducting the downtime, by upholding the fairness and integrity of the competition. Just my opinion. Thanks
|
|
|
|
laiyskylone
|
|
August 25, 2015, 06:08:57 AM |
|
I am very like the UI of this site. Where all should be
|
|
|
|
|
ashfaq
|
|
August 25, 2015, 07:36:15 AM |
|
I am sorry i didnt judged anyone ... if i am right i just explained what people are seeing and what its effect can be ..
that might have been a bit more direct than intended. I wasn't addressing you direct, I just think people should read about how trust came together before judging based on a number, no matter if its positive or negative. i get what you mean to say there ,but what you said was pointing my post straightly so i just gave an explanation... i know there are many bad and unworthy guys out there who are having large amount of+ trust.
|
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
|
August 25, 2015, 08:10:48 AM |
|
I am sorry i didnt judged anyone ... if i am right i just explained what people are seeing and what its effect can be ..
that might have been a bit more direct than intended. I wasn't addressing you direct, I just think people should read about how trust came together before judging based on a number, no matter if its positive or negative. i get what you mean to say there ,but what you said was pointing my post straightly so i just gave an explanation... i know there are many bad and unworthy guys out there who are having large amount of+ trust. Yeah, trust is not a reliable way of measuring trust or just about anything meaningful from my experience. Even default trusted accounts and obviously a lot of green trusted accounts are being sold around, so there is no way one could conclude anything meaningful here.
|
|
|
|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
August 25, 2015, 02:30:33 PM |
|
My point exactly. I could understand reaching out and crediting user who won with their " modified" timeframe, but changing stance and terms of their own OP .. not as much Hi, Your statement is not valid in my opinion. If you disagree then you should have got in touch with Da Dice when he announced so. You can't simply wait for everything to be over and then come up with your argument. The downtime was unexpected, and it is only fair that it be deducted from the downtime. Other way round, you are giving the full control of who wins to DD which might even beat the concept of provable fairness. Da Dice or any other site always reserve the right to change their terms if changing the terms result in a more fair way of evaluating. The participant who predicted 20th is the winner because downtime is not his fault. That is the correct argument. And I'd personally argue that DD did the best possible thing by deducting the downtime, by upholding the fairness and integrity of the competition. Just my opinion. Thanks Your statement is not valid in my opinion. When sites fail like dadice did, they usually expand their original offer, but most certainly do not try to avoid payments.I predicted to op correctly that was one month ago, and dadice failure to hold site online should not hurt me as an contestant.Just like 20th is the correct in one hand, the 24th is maybe even more correct in another. Can you imagine Stunna pulling something like this off with primedice? Not a chance.
|
|
|
|
teemus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
August 25, 2015, 02:39:19 PM |
|
tried this site last month, lost a lot of money.
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3570
Merit: 9744
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
August 25, 2015, 03:03:11 PM |
|
tried this site last month, lost a lot of money. Sorry to hear that. There are risks involved with gambling though as I'm sure you were aware. We've all had periods of both good & bad luck in our 'gambling careers'. Better luck next time buddy.
|
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
|
August 25, 2015, 05:00:25 PM |
|
Your statement is not valid in my opinion. When sites fail like dadice did, they usually expand their original offer, but most certainly do not try to avoid payments. I predicted to op correctly that was one month ago, and dadice failure to hold site online should not hurt me as an contestant.
Just like 20th is the correct in one hand, the 24th is maybe even more correct in another.
Can you imagine Stunna pulling something like this off with primedice? Not a chance.
Had the downtime hadn't happened, 20th would be the winning date. The downtime was not supposed to happen. It is as simple as that. If Da Dice had declared 24th a winner, that would be really unfair, in my opinion. And your point means Da Dice could wait a few months before going up, and deny everyone the entries? Come on, mate, it is not logical. If you had genuine concerns you are to suggest it when OP made the announcement. I don't think anyone else would consider this unfair, in my opinion. It is the best possible decision someone can make. This is one of the posts made on 20th August 2015, which makes anyone dead certain that 20th is really the winning date. wow, site is online and autobet work, only 2 mln bet for 750 million.
I see 113 user online, but in chat or to site?
On site, but seems to have decreased down to 90 users now. BTW 1.90 mill only to go now.I had been around at the time, and I can confirm that it was around 748,000,000 at the time, and it would have hit 750m within the day in a matter of around 2 hours. Stunna would do the same. Every responsible admin will try to make the contest fair for all. Come on, mate, I know how you feel. But the decision he took is fair.
|
|
|
|
dadice_pr
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 25, 2015, 09:16:12 PM |
|
1 BILLIONTH ROLL PREDICTION..Just a quick update to let you know we will have the next prediction contest underway within 24hours, until then you can enter this other competition https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1156642.msg12181441 This thread will have your daily updates stay tuned for tomorrow.. Keep Rollin & Good Luck!
|
|
|
|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
August 25, 2015, 10:10:10 PM |
|
1 BILLIONTH ROLL PREDICTION..Just a quick update to let you know we will have the next prediction contest underway within 24hours, until then you can enter this other competition https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1156642.msg12181441 This thread will have your daily updates stay tuned for tomorrow.. Keep Rollin & Good Luck! Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice ..
|
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
|
August 26, 2015, 05:02:26 AM |
|
1 BILLIONTH ROLL PREDICTION..Just a quick update to let you know we will have the next prediction contest underway within 24hours, until then you can enter this other competition https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1156642.msg12181441 This thread will have your daily updates stay tuned for tomorrow.. Keep Rollin & Good Luck! Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice .. You can join that ^ competition. It is the prediction contest on what the result of the 1 billionth roll would be. Not when it will happen.
|
|
|
|
cazkooo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1013
|
|
August 26, 2015, 07:06:05 AM |
|
Im funny to see someone so desperate to win that 0.1 bitcoin. It has been said that the downtime will be deduct to ensure fairness. It has been said like since the first downtime and not something that is make up to cover the downtime also that the prediction is very way off if there is no downtime, very funny someone is angry because of this thing
|
|
|
|
panjul07
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1357
|
|
August 26, 2015, 01:17:00 PM |
|
Im funny to see someone so desperate to win that 0.1 bitcoin. It has been said that the downtime will be deduct to ensure fairness. It has been said like since the first downtime and not something that is make up to cover the downtime also that the prediction is very way off if there is no downtime, very funny someone is angry because of this thing
No other reasons except because of his own prediction (24th August), so he hope he win the bounty prediction and blame the downtime without reading previous discussion about the time deduction. I guess if he did not predict 24th August, he would not so angry..
|
| .SHUFFLE.COM.. | ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ | ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ | . ...Next Generation Crypto Casino... |
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2339
|
|
August 26, 2015, 01:23:05 PM |
|
Im funny to see someone so desperate to win that 0.1 bitcoin. It has been said that the downtime will be deduct to ensure fairness. It has been said like since the first downtime and not something that is make up to cover the downtime also that the prediction is very way off if there is no downtime, very funny someone is angry because of this thing
I am not sure how they can argue that downtime being deducted would be fair. There was no term in their contest that downtime would be deducted so it should be fair to expect that it would not be. The fact that they control the speed of rolls mean that by slowing down or speeding up rolls just a little bit mean that it would be easy to manipulate who the winner is.
|
|
|
|
|