|
JuanHungLo
|
 |
April 15, 2015, 12:41:02 PM |
|
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
groggin
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 15, 2015, 12:59:19 PM |
|
WOW!  over 350 mhps on r9-280x but runs too hot 100 o+ what arguements to control I, mem and core? |
|
|
|
groggin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 15, 2015, 01:48:37 PM
Last edit: April 15, 2015, 04:23:37 PM by groggin |
|
WOW! over 350 mhps on r9-280x but runs too hot 100 o+ what arguements to control I, mem and core? What options? I'm pretty sure it's a work-in-progress... only thing i changed in the .cmd was the addresses, running in win7, fresh format/install, no sp1 (yet), power is undervolted slightly. i'm using the new beta driver (15.3) and 2.9 sdk. is there a throttle? brakes?  >>>edit 4 hrs> i quit the other gpu and now running ok, i see the i/o from 230 - 420 mhps. doing 389 right now, 78 o  |
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
April 15, 2015, 01:59:09 PM |
|
so the smolter displays the sum of all your gpus.
I'm testing it on Nicehash and getting a lot of discarding stale work and NONCE overflows and a few Error 23: Share above target
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
April 15, 2015, 06:16:29 PM |
|
I'm testing it on Nicehash and getting a lot of discarding stale work and NONCE overflows and a few Error 23: Share above target
I guess you turned on debug output with -D option. Stale work is supposed to be replaced with fresh one, the more NONCE overflow messages the better is the speed WOW! over 350 mhps on r9-280x but runs too hot 100 o+ what arguements to control I, mem and core? The best settings for 280x already are in cmd file, with reasonable overclocking (1150) I get 540 MH/s. There is no options for changing clock, use external tools (AMD control center or afterburner) |
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
|
|
jimlite
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018
|
|
April 15, 2015, 07:57:44 PM
Last edit: April 15, 2015, 08:20:36 PM by jimlite |
|
I think it will be a little longer than 2 hours.
Err, no it won't, forgot about PoS blocks.
|
|
|
|
pseudonymdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 15, 2015, 08:58:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
April 16, 2015, 03:38:56 AM |
|
Just heard how Nicehash stopped responding - the fans stopped too Nicehash is OK now, pool switching got a boost in my TODO list, while it's not ready it's better to use some stratum proxy with pool balancing. I guess Pfool's one will do the job. |
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
Zuikkis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
April 16, 2015, 06:23:15 AM |
|
with 270 ~265 270 is exactly the same as 270X, just binned lower - so I guess smolen was right. Weird that I'm still so much faster on 270.. 310MH/s at 1123MHz. 280x is about same speed as you or smolen, 510MH/s at 1150MH/s. My miner is full sgminer with all algos working, works fine with multi-algo in nicehash. |
|
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
April 16, 2015, 06:55:53 AM |
|
Weird that I'm still so much faster on 270.. 310MH/s at 1123MHz. 280x is about same speed as you or smolen, 510MH/s at 1150MH/s. My miner is full sgminer with all algos working, works fine with multi-algo in nicehash. That's not weird, that's good - at least, for Vanillacoin The released kernel (exactly same binary) is getting 543MH/s with 280x, 4 threads, worksize 64, core 1150, mem 500 on Linux. I got last few MH/s by using more registers, perhaps it was wrong optimization for other cards. Old kernel is somewhere in archives, good occasion to implement --kernel switch and release it. |
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
|
Havelivi
|
|
April 16, 2015, 06:57:11 AM |
|
oops i miss the that great tip party for 100,000 blocks, VNL is most promosing coin with innovation ideas and the best solution for anon transaction. |
|
|
|
|
avirdoz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1191
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 16, 2015, 10:28:36 AM
Last edit: April 16, 2015, 11:36:06 AM by avirdoz |
|
Wiht smelter I have near 1000 MH/s with two 7970:) but with four 7950 my h/r is near 800 MH/s. Maybe it's because on my 2nd rig weak cpu (Celeron 420). Smelter load 80% and gpus load only 53%.
|
|
|
|
|
jimlite
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018
|
|
April 16, 2015, 03:21:40 PM |
|
Same with me, my semperon single core gets 100% cpu load and about 400MH for 280x as opposed to 500MH on stronger cpu rig with smelter.
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
April 16, 2015, 03:32:58 PM |
|
that's normal: all the faster whirlpoolx miners use cpu to precompute part of the hash, see the public wolf miner for details.
on a side note, I measured a system running both with a supercheap sempron and a powerful fx: exactly the same idle power consumption, so no reason to make sempron rigs.
|
|
|
|
|
AliMan
|
|
April 16, 2015, 07:38:27 PM |
|
With this kinda difficulty, even farms should be crying, and I still found a block at 2:45 pm, lol...
|
|
|
|
|
AliMan
|
|
April 16, 2015, 11:03:13 PM |
|
pool01.vanillacoin.net - strange pool can't remember if i ever saw share counts invalid > valid in such considerable amounts, and who's that guy with invalid ones all along ... Yea spotted this sometime back, and he isn't even banned..... |
|
|
|
traumschiff (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
April 16, 2015, 11:05:59 PM |
|
pool01.vanillacoin.net - strange pool can't remember if i ever saw share counts invalid > valid in such considerable amounts, and who's that guy with invalid ones all along ... Yea spotted this sometime back, and he isn't even banned..... Will ask John if you want, he is hosting the pool. |
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
April 17, 2015, 12:19:26 AM |
|
Don't worry, I do read all the feedback. that's normal: all the faster whirlpoolx miners use cpu to precompute part of the hash, see the public wolf miner for details.
1 CPU precalculation per 2^32 (4 billion) hashes. CPU is wasted either in driver, or in Smelter. Well, with this 100% CPU bug in miner Vanillacoin looks like Bitcoin back in 2011 |
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
|
