Bitcoin Forum
September 18, 2025, 06:03:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 [1328] 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3918372 times)
flyingplows
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 27, 2015, 06:16:35 PM
 #26541

ASICMINER, if there is anything left from you, can you be so kind to answer one simple question, since you seem to ignore emails to your support: Are you planning to return amhash.com balance which according to AMHash support is sent to you or should we consider it also stolen? Thank you for the answer.
Do you even read support@bitquan.com?

Chris_Sabian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 27, 2015, 07:35:58 PM
 #26542

ASICMINER, if there is anything left from you, can you be so kind to answer one simple question, since you seem to ignore emails to your support: Are you planning to return amhash.com balance which according to AMHash support is sent to you or should we consider it also stolen? Thank you for the answer.
Do you even read support@bitquan.com?

I have been trying to get into contact with both support and sales at bitquan.com but haven't heard a response.  I've tried multiple emails and different texts but no response.  All of the emails are received and are not bounced.
flyingplows
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 27, 2015, 07:42:03 PM
 #26543

ASICMINER, if there is anything left from you, can you be so kind to answer one simple question, since you seem to ignore emails to your support: Are you planning to return amhash.com balance which according to AMHash support is sent to you or should we consider it also stolen? Thank you for the answer.
Do you even read support@bitquan.com?

I have been trying to get into contact with both support and sales at bitquan.com but haven't heard a response.  I've tried multiple emails and different texts but no response.  All of the emails are received and are not bounced.

I got that support@bitquan.com email when I wrote to AMHash support. They said they sent money to AM, and we should write to them to retrieve out balances. I find it somehow strange... Sent money to AM after all this? They should have guarded the money from AM Smiley and just send it to our withdraw addresses.

ensurance982
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Trust me!


View Profile
April 27, 2015, 09:06:53 PM
 #26544

Lost about $55,000 USD in this fiasco. I'm still stunned FC robbed all the shareholders when he had a decent chip ready to self-mine back to profitability and he takes a runner? WTF?
What about this other David Fan guy that "took-over" asicminer, not a peep from him in this forum? Ugh.
Why do AMHASH people get crumbs and asicminer shareholders get total silence + zero btc when asicminer has/had? fat wallets filled with BTC?
I trusted FC, that's what hurts the most.




Sorry for your loss, seriously! I think the official (backed by board member "Jutarul") story is that the planned funding for the BE300 didn't materialize as investors dropped their support back in December or so. Then the fiasco with AMHASH. AM1 holders get nothing, because they were investing in an unregulated company, AMHASH was a "solid" product with a clearly defined payment plan.

                                                                                                                      We Support Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP
ensurance982
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Trust me!


View Profile
April 27, 2015, 09:08:44 PM
 #26545

So many pages here. I do recall some BoD coming on here and saying they are kept in the dark. They were implying that the AM BoD is a shadow puppet? It was only there to make AM seem legit?
Seems like a puppet organization, a diversionary tactic

 AM is legit.

  I liken them to popular yet short-lived musical talent such as The Smiths, The Doors, Joy Division, Richie Valens, Janice Joplin, Cream, Buddy Holly, Sir Mixalot, Bobby Darrin and yes even Gogmagog - the wannabe, rock super-group dripping with talent: Pete Willis (Def Leppard), Neil Murray (Whitesnake), Paul Di’Anno and Clive Burr (Iron Maiden), Janick Gers (White Spirit) which lasted but a few days.  Like AM, they added to their trade but alas, their life was short and sweet.

 In saying that, I'm hoping for one last encore!  (from AM that is)


Sounds like a weird comparison at first, but I guess it actually is pretty spot on. Back in 2012/2013 AM was able to produce the first (one of the first next to Avalon, I guess) ASICs and was also able to profit massively from the first bubble of 2013. Also, 2014 was an incredibly unlucky year.

                                                                                                                      We Support Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP
EternalWingsofGod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 03:55:33 AM
 #26546

Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

Fordee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 146
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 06:02:54 PM
 #26547

As an aside to the general gloomy topics here, I was considering how the mining/manufacturing  climate has changed changed in the past year..

Can anyone help me building a list of the Current 2015 marketplace for private/public asic availability in the .28 or better realm??

For example:

Companies that have access to a proven functional .28 or better CHIP for Private Use:
Spondoolies, Bitmain, Bitfury, KNC, BFL

Companies that still produce publicly accessible (and shipping) ASIC miners of .28 or better.
Spondoolies; Bitmain.

Any others come quickly to mind?



Chris_Sabian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 28, 2015, 06:11:49 PM
 #26548

Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.
TheIZS
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 09:55:47 PM
 #26549

So does nobody wonder what happened to the balances in their AMHash account? I didn't have much but it wasn't ZERO. So they are stealing that too?

1KRuaLy9R7r328m2H67xxnJ8QeAbvCDe6C

Mr. GARBOZO you lost your bet pay up 100BTC
flyingplows
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 28, 2015, 10:17:45 PM
 #26550

So does nobody wonder what happened to the balances in their AMHash account? I didn't have much but it wasn't ZERO. So they are stealing that too?


I wondered at least, you can check my posts, but no answer from AM and AMHash just telling they sent everything what's left to AM for some reason...

ensurance982
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Trust me!


View Profile
April 29, 2015, 12:00:45 AM
 #26551

As an aside to the general gloomy topics here, I was considering how the mining/manufacturing  climate has changed changed in the past year..

Can anyone help me building a list of the Current 2015 marketplace for private/public asic availability in the .28 or better realm??

For example:

Companies that have access to a proven functional .28 or better CHIP for Private Use:
Spondoolies, Bitmain, Bitfury, KNC, BFL

Companies that still produce publicly accessible (and shipping) ASIC miners of .28 or better.
Spondoolies; Bitmain.

Any others come quickly to mind?

I guess I don't have to advise you not to buy from BFL, right? Smiley Yeah, I guess Spondoolies, Bitmain, and BitFury are the most reliable companies out there at the moment. I was wondering for quite some time, whether maybe the harsh climate in the mining business may have also taken its toll on the price of Bitcoin. I guess a large inflow of people interested in mining and the new ASIC hardware pushed the price up back in 2013...

                                                                                                                      We Support Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP
ensurance982
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Trust me!


View Profile
April 29, 2015, 12:02:19 AM
 #26552

Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

                                                                                                                      We Support Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 503

FUN > ROI


View Profile
April 29, 2015, 10:27:52 AM
 #26553

I guess I don't have to advise you not to buy from BFL, right? Smiley Yeah, I guess Spondoolies, Bitmain, and BitFury are the most reliable companies out there at the moment.
Doesn't really matter much if a company is reliable if they don't really have any product to sell; BitFury doesn't really sell anymore (if you want to put together a large mine, anybody's willing to talk business, of course) and Spondoolies is out of stock and changing business models along the same lines.  On the up side, a few other companies may be joining the fray.

Chris_Sabian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 29, 2015, 01:41:22 PM
 #26554

Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

Correct.  Since TaT was acting as a passthrough and 'holding' ~10,000 direct shares at the time, TaT was able to be a board member in name only since the PT shares didn't have the 'rights' that direct shares had.  I talked with TaT several times on IRC about AM.  I guess during the early days of AM, the board meetings were over Skype video chat.  Around the summer of 2013, FC stopped giving video chats and went only to text chats via Skype.  The dates / information may be a little off as I'm trying to remember detail of conversations that took place a year ago.
statdude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 29, 2015, 07:19:22 PM
 #26555

and another thing...
has this been verified as the AM wallet held by FC? https://blockchain.info/address/3KBUuGko4H5ke7EVsq9B7PLK1c5Askdd7y

if so has anyone been able to follow the coins?

im looking at it but idk what im doing and get lost pretty quick. there is still 30k btc in it, but plenty moved out right around the bad news....

the majority went to 3KgtbGgaX2ngstNpvyv7LwpHSweVeqGbpM and 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8

after that, i have no idea?

Does anyone know what address is 3KgtbGgaX2ngstNpvyv7LwpHSweVeqGbpM?

I have hacked coins that went there.

▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█ ███████████████████████ █
█ █████     █ ▀██████████ █
█ █████     █   ▀████████ █
█ █████  ██ █     ▀██████ █

█ █████  ▀▀ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████ █
█ █████  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  █████ █
█ █████  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  █████ █
█ █████  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  █████ █
█ █████  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  █████ █
█ █████             █████ █
█ ███████████████████████ █
▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀
  Website
    Twitter
      Gitlab
      Reddit
    Telegram
Whitepaper
  ▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█ ███████████████████████ █
█ ███████████████████████ █
█ ███▄    ███████▀   ▄███ █
█ ████▌    █████▀    ████ █
█ ████▌     ███▀     ████ █
█ ████▌▐█    █▀ █    ████ █
█ ████▌▐██     ██    ████ █
█ ████▌▐███   ███    ████ █
█ ███▀  ▀███ ███▀    ▀███ █
█ ███████████████████████ █
█ ███████████████████████ █
▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 29, 2015, 08:45:51 PM
 #26556


Does anyone know what address is 3KgtbGgaX2ngstNpvyv7LwpHSweVeqGbpM?

I have hacked coins that went there.

Looks like an Exchange wallet.  Most likely converted to fiat.
ensurance982
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Trust me!


View Profile
April 29, 2015, 11:58:00 PM
 #26557

Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

Correct.  Since TaT was acting as a passthrough and 'holding' ~10,000 direct shares at the time, TaT was able to be a board member in name only since the PT shares didn't have the 'rights' that direct shares had.  I talked with TaT several times on IRC about AM.  I guess during the early days of AM, the board meetings were over Skype video chat.  Around the summer of 2013, FC stopped giving video chats and went only to text chats via Skype.  The dates / information may be a little off as I'm trying to remember detail of conversations that took place a year ago.

Interesting insight! Yeah, I remember people recounting how they even saw friedcat during the board meetings and maybe even pre-funding phase. That was during a time where he was some kind of mythological creature and the bringer of coins. I guess the decrease in information and communication was indeed a very red flag :/

                                                                                                                      We Support Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP
pedrog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031



View Profile
April 30, 2015, 12:15:05 AM
 #26558

Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

He also got burned with the NeoBee scam at that time, he might just want to distantiate himself from all this mess.

ensurance982
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Trust me!


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 12:04:00 PM
 #26559

Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

He also got burned with the NeoBee scam at that time, he might just want to distantiate himself from all this mess.

Who, TaT? How did he actually get burned by NeoBee? Did he invest in there or did he operate some passthrough, as well? The NEOBEE shares on Havelock were direct NeoBee shares, weren't they? The only connection I know of is Bitfunder/Ukyo and NeoBee, they allegedly worked on restoring the BitFunder coins...

                                                                                                                      We Support Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4620
Merit: 10493

'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
May 01, 2015, 03:26:30 AM
 #26560

As an aside to the general gloomy topics here, I was considering how the mining/manufacturing  climate has changed changed in the past year..

Can anyone help me building a list of the Current 2015 marketplace for private/public asic availability in the .28 or better realm??

For example:

Companies that have access to a proven functional .28 or better CHIP for Private Use:
Spondoolies, Bitmain, Bitfury, KNC, BFL

Companies that still produce publicly accessible (and shipping) ASIC miners of .28 or better.
Spondoolies; Bitmain.

Any others come quickly to mind?





avalon 4.1 is sold with warranty from www.ehash.com  


 costly machine very quiet


there are threads on it in hardware .. I am running 2 of them as I type.

Altair Technology - Your One-Stop Shop for Bitcoin Mining Solutions
🔧 Hardware, Parts & Accessories | 💡 Mining Farm Consulting
🌐 altairtech.io - Based in Missouri, USA 🇺🇸
Pages: « 1 ... 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 [1328] 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!