|
jimmothy
|
 |
January 10, 2014, 08:42:35 AM |
|
200 shares was for am100 n00b. stop bs
Wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
Zubilica
|
|
January 10, 2014, 09:17:57 AM |
|
17th is coming more walls and irregular trading . Price will jump allover the place.
|
|
|
|
|
papiraul
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
January 10, 2014, 09:40:14 AM |
|
The gf is the first to notice when it's about to raise.
I think the gf has noticed. 91 shares just been sold at havelock at 0.55 ! And another 200 shares!! A total of 372 shares was bough up at 0.55. Tension is rising! |
|
|
|
|
|
spartan82
|
|
January 10, 2014, 09:43:07 AM |
|
Up they go baby!
|
|
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
January 10, 2014, 09:49:38 AM |
|
Up they go baby!
And no sell walls at the moment. Excellent! |
|
|
|
|
runam0k
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
Touchdown
|
|
January 10, 2014, 10:42:46 AM |
|
I know it is difficult, but here you go:
193
3
3
1
____+/+
200
Wait, let me double check that. Yes, it's right. |
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 10, 2014, 12:14:01 PM |
|
I know it is difficult, but here you go:
193
3
3
1
____+/+
200
Wait, let me double check that. Yes, it's right. Someone listed almost 200 shares and bought them themselves. |
|
|
|
|
papiraul
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
January 10, 2014, 12:24:34 PM |
|
The ask wall was set up at 372 shares. And the whole lot was bough. Yes, someone bought 200, but all shares went. Either to the same person or to a few different ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
|
January 10, 2014, 01:33:27 PM |
|
200 shares was for am100 n00b. stop bs
I know it is difficult, but here you go: 193 3 3 1 ____+/+ 200  The ask wall was set up at 372 shares. And the whole lot was bough. Yes, someone bought 200, but all shares went. Either to the same person or to a few different ones. pretty nice! I'm glad I'm bagholding  (I'm secretly laughing at those who sold AM to buy ActiveMining) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rival
|
|
January 10, 2014, 02:01:07 PM |
|
One issue I never see discussed is the role of the "Institutional investor". That is to say, there are a fair number of funds out there that may (or may not) hold AM shares in their portfolios. It is a bluechip stock in the bitcoin world after all, even with low dividends.
I cannot really state with any certainty what effect they may have, but I would assume it is non-zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
neilol
|
|
January 10, 2014, 02:13:58 PM |
|
One issue I never see discussed is the role of the "Institutional investor". That is to say, there are a fair number of funds out there that may (or may not) hold AM shares in their portfolios. It is a bluechip stock in the bitcoin world after all, even with low dividends.
I cannot really state with any certainty what effect they may have, but I would assume it is non-zero.
Not sure there are any established/revered/respected funds (yet) that would create a follower-effect like a Berkshire would in the "real world". Obviously you have demand concerns, if a large fund wanted to build a 10-20% position of their portfolio in AM..but that would likely be done through direct shares behind the scenes. I'm unsure if there are any funds in existence in the BTC world that are substantial size, +10,000 BTC would do it.. |
|
|
|
Sledge
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 10, 2014, 02:27:42 PM |
|
200 shares was for am100 n00b. stop bs
It's bad enough that immature kids plague online games calling people noobs, now one reveals herself here. Easiest "ignore" ever. |
|
|
|
|
|
GodHatesFigs
|
|
January 10, 2014, 04:15:29 PM |
|
One issue I never see discussed is the role of the "Institutional investor". That is to say, there are a fair number of funds out there that may (or may not) hold AM shares in their portfolios. It is a bluechip stock in the bitcoin world after all, even with low dividends.
I cannot really state with any certainty what effect they may have, but I would assume it is non-zero.
There is no such thing as a blue chip company in the bitcoin world; and even if there were, ASICMiner certainly wouldn't be one (cf. 2nd gen fiasco, current reliability of earnings). |
|
|
|
|
|
Gabit
|
|
January 11, 2014, 09:09:56 AM |
|
One issue I never see discussed is the role of the "Institutional investor". That is to say, there are a fair number of funds out there that may (or may not) hold AM shares in their portfolios. It is a bluechip stock in the bitcoin world after all, even with low dividends.
I cannot really state with any certainty what effect they may have, but I would assume it is non-zero.
There is no such thing as a blue chip company in the bitcoin world; and even if there were, ASICMiner certainly wouldn't be one (cf. 2nd gen fiasco, current reliability of earnings). lol. Gimme a better one? Have you ever looked Apples fucked up projects? They out number their successes 10:1. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
January 11, 2014, 12:25:33 PM |
|
lol. Gimme a better one? Have you ever looked Apples fucked up projects? They out number their successes 10:1.
If you want to give a number, give a number which makes sense, or provide data to back it up. |
|
|
|
|
minerpumpkin
|
|
January 13, 2014, 04:08:28 PM |
|
I hope FC provides us a (vague) roadmap for the deployment of gen3 hardware and chips once tapeout is completed successfully and production of the chips is on its way
|
I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
January 13, 2014, 04:19:38 PM |
|
When was the tapeout announcement due? 14th was it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
January 13, 2014, 04:22:35 PM |
|
When was the tapeout announcement due? 14th was it?
I believe the 17th, but I'm not sure. |
|
|
|
|
minerpumpkin
|
|
January 13, 2014, 04:23:17 PM |
|
When was the tapeout announcement due? 14th was it?
Tapeout is supposed to take place on the 20th. I hope FC also announces whether it was successful a few days later... |
I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
January 13, 2014, 04:41:37 PM |
|
It was announced so long ago we've all forgotten lol
20th rings a bell but that's because FC normally reports on the 20th ... normally ... thought the tapeout was happening before that.
Anyone got a link to the FC announcement?
|
|
|
|
|
|
