minerpumpkin
|
|
June 07, 2014, 03:53:44 PM |
|
also best part in all that is bitcoin has seemed to stop its lately rally.. might even go further down.. Don't worry, we need some time for stabilization. (Especially) we don't want another bubble yet.
|
I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
|
|
|
arousedrhino
|
|
June 07, 2014, 04:41:13 PM |
|
yeah but honestly at this point I don't care if it crashes, I have the answers I needed so I am in no way worried about the future of AM - back to being bullish!
Do you think we'll see 1 BTC per AM1 share this year? Take it over to the speculation thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=235763.new#new
|
|
|
|
TheJuice
|
|
June 07, 2014, 05:06:04 PM |
|
Is there a good summary of recent asicminer developments? I'm a long term direct shareholder and just curious what's going on. Gen3 flopped? And now we are banking on gen 4?
|
|
|
|
|
glendall
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1018
Buzz App - Spin wheel, farm rewards
|
|
June 07, 2014, 09:11:00 PM |
|
It's all happening now, he's back in full effect and its all business now.
Wish someone would sort Havelock out... I'd like to buy on this news. The site is constantly down and when it is up, it is very slow. It's almost becoming impossible to trade AM1 and AM100 shares. I'd be willing to bet that they are under near constant ddos floods. By who , no idea, but seems the norm for exchanges.
|
|
|
|
MichaelBliss
|
|
June 07, 2014, 10:58:23 PM Last edit: June 08, 2014, 05:36:16 PM by MichaelBliss |
|
Edit: Looking to buy 10 direct AM shares, might be easier this way than through Havelock. PM me.
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
June 08, 2014, 12:42:17 AM |
|
Looking to buy 10 direct AM shares, might be easier this way than through Havelock. PM me.
For 10 shares I think you would be much better served on Havelock. Any more then 10 and the thin liquidity on there will get you, but buying 10 now only bumps the price a bit. On this note, has anyone done any legwork on setting up an AM PT on some 2.0 exchange? It would be nice if someone with established trust did it... but if no one gives Havelock any competition I may end up doing it myself once I do the research on which platform to use.
|
|
|
|
bitcoin.newsfeed
|
|
June 08, 2014, 05:01:17 AM |
|
Wish someone would sort Havelock out...
I'd be willing to bet that they are under near constant ddos floods. By who , no idea, but seems the norm for exchanges. Blackmailed by skiddies, nowadays its cheap to order DDoS another point for decentralized exchanges
|
... Question Everything, Believe Nothing ...
|
|
|
mc_lovin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
www.bitcointrading.com
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:03:34 AM |
|
On this note, has anyone done any legwork on setting up an AM PT on some 2.0 exchange? It would be nice if someone with established trust did it... but if no one gives Havelock any competition I may end up doing it myself once I do the research on which platform to use.
I wonder if Peershares would be suitable?
|
|
|
|
bitsalame
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 714
Merit: 510
Preaching the gospel of Satoshi
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:16:16 AM |
|
I wonder if NXT is more robust.
|
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:17:33 AM |
|
Looking to buy 10 direct AM shares, might be easier this way than through Havelock. PM me.
For 10 shares I think you would be much better served on Havelock. Any more then 10 and the thin liquidity on there will get you, but buying 10 now only bumps the price a bit. On this note, has anyone done any legwork on setting up an AM PT on some 2.0 exchange? It would be nice if someone with established trust did it... but if no one gives Havelock any competition I may end up doing it myself once I do the research on which platform to use. This could work via colored coins. The difficulty would be in finding someone trustworthy enough to issue shares. Honestly, it would be easiest if FC would issue the asset and then allow people to transfer their direct shares to colored coins. That way there wouldn't be an additional counter-party.
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
June 08, 2014, 07:07:38 AM |
|
I wonder if NXT is more robust.
On this note, has anyone done any legwork on setting up an AM PT on some 2.0 exchange? It would be nice if someone with established trust did it... but if no one gives Havelock any competition I may end up doing it myself once I do the research on which platform to use.
I wonder if Peershares would be suitable? counterparty is years ahead
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
June 08, 2014, 07:25:32 AM |
|
The platform almost matters less then the person who runs it to be honest.... again. SOMEONE should do it, someone with reputation and trust (and possibly a good number of shares to start things off with). I have an OTC rating that is positive, a neutral rating on BCT, but really that is nothing. Several people that post often in this thread have a more "lofty" reputation in the community then myself which is really needed for this sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
mc_lovin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
www.bitcointrading.com
|
|
June 08, 2014, 08:51:33 AM |
|
The platform almost matters less then the person who runs it to be honest.... again. SOMEONE should do it, someone with reputation and trust (and possibly a good number of shares to start things off with). I have an OTC rating that is positive, a neutral rating on BCT, but really that is nothing. Several people that post often in this thread have a more "lofty" reputation in the community then myself which is really needed for this sort of thing.
What we need a system without someone needing to be trusted.
|
|
|
|
spartan82
|
|
June 08, 2014, 08:58:54 AM |
|
The platform almost matters less then the person who runs it to be honest.... again. SOMEONE should do it, someone with reputation and trust (and possibly a good number of shares to start things off with). I have an OTC rating that is positive, a neutral rating on BCT, but really that is nothing. Several people that post often in this thread have a more "lofty" reputation in the community then myself which is really needed for this sort of thing.
What we need a system without someone needing to be trusted. How is that even possible though? There will always be a team developing this so called "system" so even if no one needs to manage it, there will always be a need to trust the developers
|
|
|
|
bitcoin.newsfeed
|
|
June 08, 2014, 09:00:07 AM |
|
The platform almost matters less then the person who runs it to be honest.... again. SOMEONE should do it, someone with reputation and trust (and possibly a good number of shares to start things off with). I have an OTC rating that is positive, a neutral rating on BCT, but really that is nothing. Several people that post often in this thread have a more "lofty" reputation in the community then myself which is really needed for this sort of thing.
What we need a system without someone needing to be trusted. How is that even possible though? There will always be a team developing this so called "system" so even if no one needs to manage it, there will always be a need to trust the developers open-source
|
... Question Everything, Believe Nothing ...
|
|
|
|
maxl
|
|
June 08, 2014, 11:34:30 AM |
|
Probably they make the chips open source when gen4 is ready to ship?
|
|
|
|
minerpumpkin
|
|
June 08, 2014, 12:12:12 PM |
|
Probably they make the chips open source when gen4 is ready to ship?
Maybe even earlier. But it would be silly to believe that they just now give away their assets for free. As soon as the profits have been made this would only foster the impact of AM. It's a bold move!
|
I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
June 08, 2014, 05:18:05 PM |
|
What we need a system without someone needing to be trusted.
I don't think its possible with how AM works. AM sells a physical product, and needs to get paid for it. They then take those funds and use them to pay out dividends. An all digital business could be made into a DAC, but one where you need to manage inventory, three different currencies, and all that sort of thing? You need a person to manage it, and then you need to trust that person. And even if you did work out all those problems, in an industry like mining, if you did have everything managed by a DAC somehow, and shareholders voted... the business would expose itself to having any and all competitors knowing exactly what it is doing and planing to do, you need to keep some plans under wraps in the industry.
|
|
|
|
|