Bitcoin Forum
December 24, 2024, 12:52:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 [1154] 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3917500 times)
jjdub7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 502


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 06:32:45 PM
 #23061

We're obviously receiving 10 BTC every 58 hours now in the mining address. Combined with the recent difficulty change this perfectly accounts for the 270 TH/s on BTCGuild. I don't know if lophie even reads my posts, or just skims them over and picks out some figures and combines them arbitrarily, but this just adds up perfectly Smiley. I also just can hope that we've got mining income from other sources, since this is very meager. My bets are on gen 4 as of now.

And what happens if gen4 misses efficiency specs like gen3 did?  ASICMINER is dead in the water.
KarmaShark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 617
Merit: 559



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:05:14 PM
 #23062

We're obviously receiving 10 BTC every 58 hours now in the mining address. Combined with the recent difficulty change this perfectly accounts for the 270 TH/s on BTCGuild. I don't know if lophie even reads my posts, or just skims them over and picks out some figures and combines them arbitrarily, but this just adds up perfectly Smiley. I also just can hope that we've got mining income from other sources, since this is very meager. My bets are on gen 4 as of now.

And what happens if gen4 misses efficiency specs like gen3 did?  ASICMINER is dead in the water.

Three strikes and you are out. Gen2, Gen3 (which I haven't thrown the towel in on just yet), and then Gen4 which the company believes it can deploy by years end. One dark winter for AM was brutal enough, another would do the company in. We will not have to wait much longer to find out how this story concludes, and Fried Cat could still surprise us with Gen3.
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:13:08 PM
 #23063

Looks like something is going on:

https://blockchain.info/address/16V3hoVfbQmpQQpCSkAirjVHGfSFoDFSbW

Lots of single satoshis being sent to lots of addresses.

The tag clearly says "BtcSmart - Multiply your money" and yet you link that to AM? Are you really that stupid or do you just think everyone else here is?

And what happens if gen4 misses efficiency specs like gen3 did?  ASICMINER is dead in the water.

If AM miss the specs but the chip is still competitive then there won't be a problem. If gen 4 fails to be competitive though then yeah, AM is pretty much dead in the water.
Juzzers
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:14:15 PM
 #23064

Apologies, I was just following a link from another post. I have deleted it.
Bonam
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:14:48 PM
 #23065

If AM miss the specs but the chip is still competitive then there won't be a problem. If gen 4 fails to be competitive though then yeah, AM is pretty much dead in the water.

People were saying the same about gen 3 a few hundred pages back.
supert
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:15:16 PM
 #23066

Has anyone received a sig ad payout?
MichaelBliss
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 526
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:16:21 PM
 #23067

I did yesterday.
bitsalame
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510


Preaching the gospel of Satoshi


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:18:46 PM
 #23068

We're obviously receiving 10 BTC every 58 hours now in the mining address. Combined with the recent difficulty change this perfectly accounts for the 270 TH/s on BTCGuild. I don't know if lophie even reads my posts, or just skims them over and picks out some figures and combines them arbitrarily, but this just adds up perfectly Smiley. I also just can hope that we've got mining income from other sources, since this is very meager. My bets are on gen 4 as of now.

And what happens if gen4 misses efficiency specs like gen3 did?  ASICMINER is dead in the water.

Three strikes and you are out. Gen2, Gen3 (which I haven't thrown the towel in on just yet), and then Gen4 which the company believes it can deploy by years end. One dark winter for AM was brutal enough, another would do the company in. We will not have to wait much longer to find out how this story concludes, and Fried Cat could still surprise us with Gen3.
If gen4 is out, it will be a very long summer afterwards.
Fabrizio89
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:26:57 PM
 #23069

Has anyone received a sig ad payout?

Yes, me and many others did and it was very early in the morning.
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 09:58:39 PM
 #23070

People were saying the same about gen 3 a few hundred pages back.

So what? Gen 3 may not be as efficient as some other chips, but it's certainly competitive based on price and is certainly not a complete disaster. So, I'm not sure what point are you actually trying to make. AM Tubes actually have a pretty good value (a combination of efficiency and cost) per volume despite BE200 not being the most efficient ASIC. The price and size offset the efficiency.

stompysteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 10:05:36 PM
 #23071

Has anyone received a sig ad payout?
im assuming everyone on the list did the OP also notified me im a sr. member now which i didnt notice  Grin so extra .05
if they have money to spend for sig campaign and are continuing it, sales must be going good enough
silverfuture
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 947
Merit: 1008


central banking = outdated protocol


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 10:34:40 PM
 #23072

Someone is trying to get a good AM position on Havelock without moving the price up too much.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NastyFans - The Fan Club for Bitcoin Enthusiasts | MININGCOINS | POOL | ESCROW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 10:50:10 PM
 #23073

Hi Guys

My Findings regarding mining addresses:
.......

I know that people will bash me, but I will still state my view. Usually on this forum (especially in the Hardware section) people that come and give any kind of information on their first/firsts posts is usually frowned upon, yet here it's the other way around. I'm not saying anything else and I can't wait to see how will this develop.

jdany
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Inspired


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 10:58:10 PM
 #23074

Hi Guys

My Findings regarding mining addresses:
.......

I know that people will bash me, but I will still state my view. Usually on this forum (especially in the Hardware section) people that come and give any kind of information on their first/firsts posts is usually frowned upon, yet here it's the other way around. I'm not saying anything else and I can't wait to see how will this develop.

I am always suspicious of those users.
The optimist says it was someone in-the-know who was trying to share positive news without really giving anything away.
The pessimist says it was some dick just messing with us - and created a new account so we won't kill them when we find what they said untrue.

jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 11:13:42 PM
 #23075

Hi Guys

My Findings regarding mining addresses:
.......

I know that people will bash me, but I will still state my view. Usually on this forum (especially in the Hardware section) people that come and give any kind of information on their first/firsts posts is usually frowned upon, yet here it's the other way around. I'm not saying anything else and I can't wait to see how will this develop.

I am always suspicious of those users.
The optimist says it was someone in-the-know who was trying to share positive news without really giving anything away.
The pessimist says it was some dick just messing with us - and created a new account so we won't kill them when we find what they said untrue.

What about actually reading what he had to say and drawing your own conclusions?

He never claimed any insider info, he simply pointed out that there is a correlation between those two addresses which anyone can verify via the blockchain.
jdany
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Inspired


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 11:17:32 PM
 #23076

I get it.
But why hatch a new account to pitch the info.
drasted
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 240
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 11:34:25 PM
 #23077

I get it.
But why hatch a new account to pitch the info.

Maybe he just didn't have an account before.
jjdub7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 502


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 11:36:08 PM
 #23078

People were saying the same about gen 3 a few hundred pages back.

So what? Gen 3 may not be as efficient as some other chips, but it's certainly competitive based on price and is certainly not a complete disaster. So, I'm not sure what point are you actually trying to make. AM Tubes actually have a pretty good value (a combination of efficiency and cost) per volume despite BE200 not being the most efficient ASIC. The price and size offset the efficiency.



The quantity of gen3, despite the failings in the design's efficiency, allowed enough of a margin on the project to stay in the fight for the top chip producer.  Gen4 needs to be able to beat that efficiency mark and still make the large-scale quantity orders that we saw with gen3.

Can anyone give info on which of AM's chips are in current mining hardware from hardware partners (namely RockMiner)?
jdany
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Inspired


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 11:56:46 PM
 #23079

I get it.
But why hatch a new account to pitch the info.

Maybe he just didn't have an account before.

Possibly, but unlikely
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 16, 2014, 12:41:30 AM
 #23080

Based on the information provided the gen4 is coming along according to schedule. There will be some time span in which it will be evaluated. However, to put things in perspective any new chips will not move the profit margins too much. Profit margins are mainly a function of BTC price, network power and average upkeep costs. The tech has moved quickly in the last 2 years and is hitting Moore's barrier pretty hard. Main profits will likely come from innovative ways to reduce capex and opex, which not necessarily requires the latest chips.

I really don't see why there is such concern for Gen4. From Jutarul's statement it appears the current concerns are with the size of the network, the cost of maintaining what they presently have or will have and the price of BTC.
Pages: « 1 ... 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 [1154] 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!