Stake your Bitcoin address here

[sebr1ng]

Signed with Trezor. Address: 33QCnZcVhnyMimmPuDUTQqha5SLUHCAR5m

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is sebr1ng from bitcointalk.org - today is June 18, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
JMEfhddylVMxGVSSJ+F/53ARR76DDCDrBGIvRxWRMRfgZR8yJLENBdudwn2HquGa9O2Zzw39nbALw3DCwIVcsmE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hope it'll be ok this way!

[1714753517]

1714753517

[asu]

Signed with Trezor. Address: 33QCnZcVhnyMimmPuDUTQqha5SLUHCAR5m

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is sebr1ng from bitcointalk.org - today is June 18, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
JMEfhddylVMxGVSSJ+F/53ARR76DDCDrBGIvRxWRMRfgZR8yJLENBdudwn2HquGa9O2Zzw39nbALw3DCwIVcsmE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hope it'll be ok this way!

Quoted, verified and archived.

A little advice; you should include your address in "insert address here". That's the usual format.

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is sebr1ng from bitcointalk.org - today is June 18, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
<insert address here>
JMEfhddylVMxGVSSJ+F/53ARR76DDCDrBGIvRxWRMRfgZR8yJLENBdudwn2HquGa9O2Zzw39nbALw3DCwIVcsmE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[sebr1ng]

Should I re-generate, or will it be ok for proof of ownership of the account?

Signed with Trezor. Address: 33QCnZcVhnyMimmPuDUTQqha5SLUHCAR5m

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is sebr1ng from bitcointalk.org - today is June 18, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
JMEfhddylVMxGVSSJ+F/53ARR76DDCDrBGIvRxWRMRfgZR8yJLENBdudwn2HquGa9O2Zzw39nbALw3DCwIVcsmE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hope it'll be ok this way!

Quoted, verified and archived.

A little advice; you should include your address in "insert address here". That's the usual format.

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is sebr1ng from bitcointalk.org - today is June 18, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
<insert address here>
JMEfhddylVMxGVSSJ+F/53ARR76DDCDrBGIvRxWRMRfgZR8yJLENBdudwn2HquGa9O2Zzw39nbALw3DCwIVcsmE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[BeggarInCryptos]

Message was signed using Electrum

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
15/06/2020 I'm BeggarInCryptos from bitcointalk forum. My address for further reference : 14piFmQxXvqFY2r4nE5kaFBYoCpbBvLTGZ
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
14piFmQxXvqFY2r4nE5kaFBYoCpbBvLTGZ
H20U1w5T2nObh7aapme4D2tPHrHJaHenzjcbVlWiftGQXPMRasIAatBRROJTxgKHVrmwGjTwKR0naUSm2Rhz8nI=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[akhjob]

Message was signed using Electrum

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
15/06/2020 I'm BeggarInCryptos from bitcointalk forum. My address for further reference : 14piFmQxXvqFY2r4nE5kaFBYoCpbBvLTGZ
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
14piFmQxXvqFY2r4nE5kaFBYoCpbBvLTGZ
H20U1w5T2nObh7aapme4D2tPHrHJaHenzjcbVlWiftGQXPMRasIAatBRROJTxgKHVrmwGjTwKR0naUSm2Rhz8nI=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Quoted, Verified and archived

[Charles-Tim]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
06-20-2020. I am Charles-Tim from bitcointalk forum. My primary bitcoin address for reference: 3HkmxFukfkRkTV6BR7xRSNxGjyM38qcnaJ
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
3HkmxFukfkRkTV6BR7xRSNxGjyM38qcnaJ
H81r6kuKPM+VX/8MrXAbpXOWNTGPvQlpyM339XH0BPxQJbsftiVRO1O0GLDnVtd5pzpJaZKuy4yg+fB1Zh8ZMrU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[logfiles]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
06-20-2020. I am Charles-Tim from bitcointalk forum. My primary bitcoin address for reference: 3HkmxFukfkRkTV6BR7xRSNxGjyM38qcnaJ
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
3HkmxFukfkRkTV6BR7xRSNxGjyM38qcnaJ
H81r6kuKPM+VX/8MrXAbpXOWNTGPvQlpyM339XH0BPxQJbsftiVRO1O0GLDnVtd5pzpJaZKuy4yg+fB1Zh8ZMrU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Not sure if it's just me but Something is definitely wrong with your signature or message mate
I have failed to verify it using both Brainwalletx



and Electrum


Please try signing it again properly.

[bL4nkcode]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
06-20-2020. I am Charles-Tim from bitcointalk forum. My primary bitcoin address for reference: 3HkmxFukfkRkTV6BR7xRSNxGjyM38qcnaJ
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
3HkmxFukfkRkTV6BR7xRSNxGjyM38qcnaJ
H81r6kuKPM+VX/8MrXAbpXOWNTGPvQlpyM339XH0BPxQJbsftiVRO1O0GLDnVtd5pzpJaZKuy4yg+fB1Zh8ZMrU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Not sure if it's just me but Something is definitely wrong with your signature or message mate
I have failed to verify it using both Brainwalletx

I have tried different app/site to verify the signed message but it gives me failed message. You may try to sign a message again and make sure you copied the whole thing properly.

[Bitcoinsummoner]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
06-20-2020. I am Charles-Tim from bitcointalk forum. My primary bitcoin address for reference: 3HkmxFukfkRkTV6BR7xRSNxGjyM38qcnaJ
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
3HkmxFukfkRkTV6BR7xRSNxGjyM38qcnaJ
H81r6kuKPM+VX/8MrXAbpXOWNTGPvQlpyM339XH0BPxQJbsftiVRO1O0GLDnVtd5pzpJaZKuy4yg+fB1Zh8ZMrU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Not sure if it's just me but Something is definitely wrong with your signature or message mate
I have failed to verify it using both Brainwalletx

I have tried different app/site to verify the signed message but it gives me failed message. You may try to sign a message again and make sure you copied the whole thing properly.

I have checked and I could verify the signature both on electrum and brainwalletx. But the address need to change, the real address should be 1BULwmXDh7JZJuQ4noLKouMqvNSbF7x7dj. Message has been verified from 1BULwmXDh7JZJuQ4noLKouMqvNSbF7x7dj

[HCP]

But the address need to change, the real address should be 1BULwmXDh7JZJuQ4noLKouMqvNSbF7x7dj.

No... the address does not need to change. The way the message has been formatted and/or copy/pasted to Bitcointalk needs to be modified. Most likely there is "missing" or extra whitespace (like spaces, tabs, newline characters etc) in the post here which is actually causing the issue.

I doubt the poster has the address "1BUL..." in their wallet.

[Bitcoinsummoner]

But the address need to change, the real address should be 1BULwmXDh7JZJuQ4noLKouMqvNSbF7x7dj.

No... the address does not need to change. The way the message has been formatted and/or copy/pasted to Bitcointalk needs to be modified. Most likely there is "missing" or extra whitespace (like spaces, tabs, newline characters etc) in the post here which is actually causing the issue.

I doubt the poster has the address "1BUL..." in their wallet.

I think signature code is unique for each time generated. If the address is not as I mentioned and if there is something included/excluded on the message or somewhere else then how it is verified from the address as I mention 1BU-------7dj?

[pooya87]

I think signature code is unique for each time generated. If the address is not as I mentioned and if there is something included/excluded on the message or somewhere else then how it is verified from the address as I mention 1BU-------7dj?

every signature is valid for a public key and that public key can be computed from the given signature and the message that was signed. that doesn't mean the found public key is the correct one. what you did above is to exploit a bug in the website you linked which happens when the message doesn't include any addresses, they calculate the public key(s) and compute its corresponding address and show you that.
try changing stuff in the message (add space, add new words,...) and take the same steps. that site will always show you a different address no matter what!

[snipie]

I have checked and I could verify the signature both on electrum and brainwalletx. But the address need to change, the real address should be 1BULwmXDh7JZJuQ4noLKouMqvNSbF7x7dj. Message has been verified from 1BULwmXDh7JZJuQ4noLKouMqvNSbF7x7dj

AFAIK brainwalletx can just verify the bitcoin addresses starting with 1xx....xx. I remember trying it in the past with segwit bc1 and 3xx...xx adresses and failed. Now if Electrum is failing to validate it too then there is a problem in the message tho. Correct me if I am wrong or if there is updates that I missed 

[Bitcoinsummoner]

I have checked and I could verify the signature both on electrum and brainwalletx. But the address need to change, the real address should be 1BULwmXDh7JZJuQ4noLKouMqvNSbF7x7dj. Message has been verified from 1BULwmXDh7JZJuQ4noLKouMqvNSbF7x7dj

AFAIK brainwalletx can just verify the bitcoin addresses starting with 1xx....xx. I remember trying it in the past with segwit bc1 and 3xx...xx adresses and failed. Now if Electrum is failing to validate it too then there is a problem in the message tho. Correct me if I am wrong or if there is updates that I missed 

I have also verified from electrum. The signature poster is not responding here so, we cant understand the reality. But As signature is verified and message is verified how those could be wrong? I think there is something wrong with the wallet ID.

[Csmiami]

I have also verified from electrum. The signature poster is not responding here so, we cant understand the reality. But As signature is verified and message is verified how those could be wrong? I think there is something wrong with the wallet ID.

The comparison might not be the best; but I'll try it anyway.

The website calculates the signature and the message, and produces an address, if they match, the signature is verified; if it doesn't, then it can't verify the signature. In the event of you not providing an address for said message, the website will show you what is has calculated.

In simpler terms (comparison): You use a website to verify that the result you have on the square root of 4. the website calculates the sqrt of 4, and if you input the value of 2; it will verify it. If you input (for example) 7, it will fail to verify. And if you leave it blank, it will show the right answer, in this case, 2.

But there is more than 1 correct answer to this! In the example I provided, both 2 and -2 are the right answer, and not only 2. The example website, only displays positive value numbers (+2), and doesn't work with negatives (-2). The website you've used to verify the signature works similarly; it does support Legacy addresses (1....) but doesn't support Segwit addresses (bc.../3...).

That's why it will always show a result for whatever signature+message you input, and it will always be shown as a Legacy address

[pooya87]

The website calculates the signature and the message, ~~
That's why it will always show a result for whatever signature+message you input, and it will always be shown as a Legacy address

it calculates the "public key", the signature and  the message are already given.
and the formula is Q = r⁻¹(sR − eG).
and it is not "always" there are cases when there is no valid Q (public key) recovered from the signature.

[$crypto$]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
26/06/2020 My $crypto$ from this bitcointalk forum states this address for reference and security of the main wallet
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qe7l35g7hfr63h3t59z9arzut2pucqtm8ndmzyp
IPB2qLIFQVGWdT0Gf3WnboiC7jjVdfQdYhtsBkHaUQqAL6FhMhsrYHiUySd9vjf/rpaZYTs3EpEQpbGgvZmzbbM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[hd49728]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
26/06/2020 My $crypto$ from this bitcointalk forum states this address for reference and security of the main wallet
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qe7l35g7hfr63h3t59z9arzut2pucqtm8ndmzyp
IPB2qLIFQVGWdT0Gf3WnboiC7jjVdfQdYhtsBkHaUQqAL6FhMhsrYHiUySd9vjf/rpaZYTs3EpEQpbGgvZmzbbM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Message failed to verify! ,You can make Signature with 1xx address rather than bcxx address,so we can verify,
I think that Signature is wrong too, I still cannot verify even with Electrum Segwit Wallet

I can not verify the signed message too. I use Electrum wallet. With Electrum wallet, you can verify Segwit or Legacy address.

I guess the $crypto$ signed a message with a different address that what is posted bc1qe7l35g7hfr63h3t59z9arzut2pucqtm8ndmzyp. Or he signed a message with the wallet that is not compatible with Electrum and can not be verified using Electrum.

[$crypto$]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
26/06/2020 My $crypto$ from this bitcointalk forum states this address for reference and security of the main wallet
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qe7l35g7hfr63h3t59z9arzut2pucqtm8ndmzyp
IPB2qLIFQVGWdT0Gf3WnboiC7jjVdfQdYhtsBkHaUQqAL6FhMhsrYHiUySd9vjf/rpaZYTs3EpEQpbGgvZmzbbM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Message failed to verify! ,You can make Signature with 1xx address rather than bcxx address,so we can verify,
I think that Signature is wrong too, I still cannot verify even with Electrum Segwit Wallet

I can not verify the signed message too. I use Electrum wallet. With Electrum wallet, you can verify Segwit or Legacy address.

I guess the $crypto$ signed a message with a different address that what is posted bc1qe7l35g7hfr63h3t59z9arzut2pucqtm8ndmzyp. Or he signed a message with the wallet that is not compatible with Electrum and can not be verified using Electrum.

Well if that's wrong and I only try to use the Electrum wallet if it can't be verified I'll try with the 1xxx prefix wallet and maybe it's on the blockchain.

[HCP]

How exactly did you create the message in the first place? Did you use Electrum?

If so, try and create the signed message again from within Electrum, but this time... make sure you also take a screenshot and post the screenshot here so we can see!

It's possible that you've done something a little "non-standard" that is preventing us from being able to verify your message (given that the format you have posted your message in is NOT the format that Electrum outputs)