No, I did not, not even close.
But I can understand how you might believe that, given we are having two very different conversations here, the one actually happening in English, and the one you translate to Russian every time.
It seems impossible for you to grasp the logic and content of my messages, maybe because of your terrible translation service.

That's a lie. It's simply a big fat lie. Anything coming after is invalidated by this being a lie.

No, it wasn't. That's not for you to decide, either.

They did. Which you would know if you had read the longass article regarding faucet usage you have been linked several times.
It appears you did not read, or did not understand that.

Again, your shit translation is playing tricks on you. You claim I sad something I did not say, and respond to your wrong translation of my message, rather than my message itself.

---

This conversation makes no sense. Nothing I say of substance gets properly addressed by you.
When I bring up something uncomfortable that does not fit the version of this story you tell, you either mistranslate it and address something completely different, or you flat out lie about facts.
I've humored you and given you the chance at an actual discussion, which you have avoided so far.
Everyone reading along should realize by now that there's little substance to your posts.
"Good buy".

That's misleading, because your gambling statistics only include bet wins and bet losses, those statistics you post do not include the 22,624 faucets you have claimed.
Saying you haven't won anything is a lie, when you made 5 withdrawals since 2018, while playing from faucets. How could you have withdrawn 5 times without winning anything?

Yes, they want to get rid of you. You are no longer welcome. That's the point of blocking your account, to get rid of you.
You have been given the reason for that decision several times, by different people, yet you refuse to accept what was explained to you in detail over and over.
What do you propose they do now? Continue to tell you the same thing again and again? Nothing you argue will change the decision. Heck, you even said yourself you do not want to be unblocked.
So why continue spamming? Why get upset over the statement that any mail regarding this topic will go into the trash, since it has been decided and that decision is final?

It's not about a relationship with players, you no longer are one. You're not welcome anymore.
It's about people failing to accept decisions and wasting everyone's time by asking the same things again and again.
You insisting on a point where you have no legs to stand on is a waste of everyone's time. Time the support could use better to help players in actual need of support.
There's no point in further answering your mails to support, because you ignore anything they say anyway, as it doesn't fit your personal opinion, and you refuse to accept any other standpoint.

Where do I even start?!

I doubt that. You don't seem to understand English and judging the intention of my posts based on the google-translated versions of my posts is a ridiculous thing to attempt.

---

For your next post, think about what you want to post first, then write a proper post, and post it once you are done. Maybe even go as far as formatting it in a proper way.
Those edits do not help the readability of your posts. It's already hard enough to understand you as it is.

Do me the favor and point out where exactly the fraud happens here? How exactly have you been scammed?
You were able to use the site, and now you are no longer welcome. It's a private website, and their good right to refuse their service to you.
Even without any reason, that would be something you'd simply have to accept.
But that's not the case here, is it? You were given a reason, your account was shut down according to a rule in the ToS (8.3), the same ToS that you have agreed to when creating your account.
You agreed to this exact situation being the result of your behaviour, yet didn't change your behaviour, nor accept the inevitable consequences of it now.
What's your endgame here? What do you want to achieve with your posts? Other than sounding like a lunatic and probably annoying nearly everyone reading along in this thread.

Well see, maybe you're just not supposed to google-translate your message from Russian to Mandarin into Egyptian hieroglyphs to Sanskrit and then to English.

I got nametagged, hey, that's me. But that's about all I understood from your posts.
I speak English and German, a bit of French and some Japanese. Pick one of those if you want to communicate with me.

Oh, and "good buy". Have a nice life.

Depends on the sensor and settings used, for numbers refer to my post above.

Both of those are software wallets.
Further wallets that come to mind are Copay, which uses an optional fingerprint lock to encrypt your wallet,
and I would assume that all branded wallets that fork from copay offer the same (bitcoin.com runs a branded version of copay, eg).

Then there's also MyCelium, which IIRC has a feature like that as well, but I'm not 100% sure on that and do not use that one, so cannot confirm.

I didn't dig into the way CoPay handles your fingerprint, but it's open source, so you should be able to find out whether the fingerprint information is stored locally on your device, or shared and stored on any of BitPay's servers.

---

What comes to mind are wallets like Ledger's Blue and Ellipal (or their new Titan).
Both of them are very similar to smartphones in design, and I agree that it's only a question of time before someone takes that step and adds a fingerprint sensor in one of those, same as it happened for smartphones.

It's not really surprising, but certainly way too easy.
If you want to dig deeper in how insecure fingerprint authentication via your phone is, there's some great research on AI-generated DeepMasterPrints.
It's an interesting read, that much I can promise you. Especially if you had been using fingerprints in combination with your phone before.

Or simply by the numbers:
A one in five chance of someone getting access to your wallet with a MasterPrint isn't the security standard you should set for yourself.

Do you see how paying withdrawals from an exchange goes directly against your earlier statements of privacy being a high priority for your service?

---

So you supposedly allowed someone to win 500BTC while having 80BTC (or now 116BTC) in your bankroll.
Why did you fail to impose proper bankroll management mechanics after the player won 127BTC of your 80BTC bankroll?
Shouldn't that have been a point where you hit the brakes and change something to avoid this mistake happening again?
Are you going to continue operating without any limits and bankroll management, allowing players to supposedly win more than you can cover,
hoping you are good for your word and somehow magically come up with the funds once they do?

Why did you cover the withdrawal from a single address, instead of your 20,000 privacy focused 0.004BTC addresses?
Why do you need time to refill your bankroll, when you used none of the 20,000 addresses that hold it in this transaction?
Why do you publicly post the withdrawal transaction of a user of your site, when privacy is your second highest focus after security?

Hey MaltaGames, please do sign a message from the address you sent the transaction from: 39fH3nwEKJthiAohwV2zW3SAoc4GKQnja7

Great, a few questions: If you have 80BTC and owe someone 130, where do the other 50 come from?
Further, how do you plan to proceed with your site now that you have no funds left in the bankroll?

About the KYC crap. Did you pruposefully omit that from your ToS? Because I don't see it being mentioned there.
If you plan to enforce KYC/AML, shouldn't you do so before a user deposits, and not after they deposited and won, when they want to withdraw?

Archived for possible future reference and to avoid the site altering the public stats later: http://archive.is/J1zE0

How could you allow a user to win 125BTC when you can only cover 80BTC?
Why did you accept bets after your bankroll had already been drained?
Didn't you have any stop mechanism in place that reduced the max bets as your bankroll was drained,
or at least stopped accepting new bets once the player had won 80BTC and you knew you couldn't cover any possible profit from additional bets?

Why? What does the fact change that they are? What will you do differently if they aren't?
Do you treat players differently based on their reputation on other sites?
Would you scam someone who hasn't made a name for themselves yet because you can get away with it more easily?

That's today, and yesterday, and the day before. What about last week, last month?
How long have you been making bitcoin transactions? And I mean daily, a huge amount of them, for customers that are waiting on you?
The situation around transaction fees and block size is pretty chill right now, but it would be foolish to expect it to remain like this indefinitely.
Do you have a contingency plan, for when fee averages shoot up, because the transaction load increases. For when it suddenly becomes way more expensive to consolidate your small inputs?
I can't see the future, maybe we're lucky and fees stay like this or lower for a long while, however the possibility exists, and we've seen extreme fee levels in the past, so you should be prepared for them.
With the current setup you are running, your service will be significantly more impacted by a rise in the fee market than most, if not all, other services. And it's already been bad for everyone else in the past.
Feel free to ignore my warning, or give it some thought and consider to be prepared, rather than stumbling blindly in a crippling situation.

Ok, how are your 20,000 addresses generated? What source of entropy did you use for them?
Creating 20,000 addresses sounds like a huge task, convenience allows us to generate a batch of addresses from a single source, using hierarchical deterministic wallets.
Are your 20,000 addresses fully independent addresses, or are they part of one or several HD wallets?

It's a cost/benefit calculation to make, and imho, yours doesn't come out on the benefit side of things.
I would also suspect that it isn't that hard to identify funds that come from your service. Harder than when not doing any of the things you do, for sure, but not hard enough, and certainly not impossible.
I'd wager a skilled blockchain detective can unmask your whole setup with little to no work. Hell, I by no means am one, but would give myself a fair stab at it.

That brings my example down from 44kB to 22kB, that is still bad. Both for you and the network in general.
I guess it's not as bad as the calculation I did, but it's also not really a response to my whole point, it's just an adjustment for what I calculated.
The principle point I made still stands.

So...all 80BTC connected to the live servers? I asked about that in my earlier post (the first half, you might have missed it).

I'd challenge that, given how Bitcoin is a fully public ledger and chainanalysis can be a b*tch. But that's something for another time, maybe.

The way I read it, your full bankroll is stored in a wallet that is connected to your life servers, as you use it for hot-wallet purposes, is that correct?
You say you store your bankroll this way for anonymity purposes, which means you work with a single wallet structure, no separation between hot-wallets and cold-wallets, correct?
Mow I can see the argument being made that at 80BTC all funds are needed to provide a reliable hot-wallet,
but I'd disagree and point out the low transaction load, thus room to secure parts of the bankroll in a more traditional way.

That sounds unpractical, and wasteful in terms of block space.
Also, it might directly go against your second highest priority (anonymity), unless you strictly prohibit address reuse, and even then it might not be enough.

Have you played out some test scenarios with this setup to see how it impacts yourself and the bitcoin blockchain?

Say I deposit 0.5 BTC, get lucky and win 0.5 BTC, now I want to withdraw 1BTC, that would result in a transaction having 250 inputs from your end.
Let's assume we're operating on the "standard" address half of your bankroll (I guess that means non-segwit & p2sh or p2pkh), I'll use p2pkh in my calculation as worst case example:
each input would amount to 180 bytes of transaction size, two outputs a 34 bytes, and 10 bytes overhead.
Sum it up and you get 180*250+76=45076 bytes -> 44.02kB That's a shitton of data for one single transaction.
Now let's say you're using a fee of 0.0003BTC/kB (source: BTC.com average over the last days; yeah, it should be WU now, but whatever, bear with my and my legacy calculation),
That would amount to transaction fees of 0.0132BTC for this withdrawal. Do you charge that fee to the customer?
Do you send the withdrawal with a significantly lower fee, resulting in it taking ages to confirm during high network traffic times?
Or do you eat the fees yourselves, providing a nice experience for your customer, but costing yourself dearly in transaction fees, especially if several of those transactions happen in a short time.


On a side note (wrapping back to the first point): With that withdrawal, you just linked 250 of your 20,000 addresses together, someone who knows the transaction was sent by you (like the user issuing it) can now go and analyze 250 addresses, the way you funneled the funds into the addresses, where they came from, find similar addresses that were connected in earlier transactions, or just analyze the pattern and see where it repeats.
Your 20,000 address setup might not increase anonymity at all, and given the huge overhead it comes with, I'd question whether it's worth it or not.

Let me give you a primer:
You claim to have a 80BTC bankroll, and you state in the OP that the bankroll information can be checked with customer support.
Now it would be a waste of everyone's time if every potential player has to verify your solvency one by one with your support.
It's fairly standard for new casinos to provide signed messages from their coldwallet addresses to show they hold enough reserves.
Having a traceable verified bankroll gives your casino some legitimacy, something you struggle for right now.

Sounds like you've spent a lot of time and money on your site. Although I immediately see one thing missing from your list of expenses. Marketing.
You may have a great website there, with very decent software, more than enough hardware capability to sever many users, and a well trained staff to resolve issues.

But that's worthless if nobody knows about your site. And yes, I know getting exposure can be hard, I know getting your name out in a market that's already as saturated as the crypto gambling market can be hard.
And I also can promise you that it's not going to happen over night. You've just started off, you have the capabilities to grow, but you have to give it the time needed to do that.
Building trust is a long process, you're not gonna establish yourself from one day to another. It takes time, and work, over months and years.

And sadly mistakes can destroy the trust you've built way quicker than you earned it. After that, regaining trust can be even harder than it was the first time.
So, what I would advise you is this: Do it right, you seem to have done it right setting up your site, don't destroy that now with dumb decisions, continue what you did before and act properly.

What would be your base line to determine that against?
One of the possible conversions would be depositing EOS to get ETH.
Current markets for EOS/ETH range from 0.019926 (hotbit) over 0.020182 (fatbtc), (Bibox) 0.020023, all the way up to 0.02004713 (DigiFinex).
That's nearly a 1% difference in exchange prices depending on where you look up the rate already. Which of those do you use if you attempt to determine the "percent gaps" for CoinSwitch?

As of right now, depositing EOS for ETH would give you a rate of 0.01986442 using CoinSwitch.
Which one of the previously listed rates you compare that to makes a big difference in the "percent gap" you get as a result of your calculation.

That's correct, CryptoGames acquired the pocketdice domain in an expiry auction, which is the only reason why it currently redirects to CG.
There's no further connection between PD and CG beyond that.

I'm not aware of any such step being communicated to customers.
It could have been something that the reseller had to do when they sold a card, and that wasn't done with my cards and some others, for whatever reason.
But, to the best of my knowledge, there was no public method of "activating" a prypto scratch card after you received it.
The FAQ section at GetPrypto (one of those resellers) doesn't mention anything like that either.

0.002BTC