It is legal and illegal, depends on the place and occasion. It's part of the country's culture that even exists since year 1500 and I don't thing banning it will be easyor possible. Big businesses are behind it.

Well, cockfighting is really addictive, even young ones enters and to bet in the locals.
Even before the online sabong (online live cockfighting) there is already live television for it other than the one in the locals but all of them are regulated.

As for the news, I don't think Cayetano will succeed to this, many big politicians (and big businessmen) are on this business so it wont work, though Cayetano's concern is somewhat right regardless his purpose of acting up to this.

A literally meaning of "In bitcoin we trust", trusting that bitcoin will only have one direction, to rise.

While this project really having huge risks, but this will cause huge benefits to them, investors, and to the whole bitcoin community. Wish them luck 

Nft/token related topics doesn't suit on this board (Services). Move this thread to Service Discussion (Altcoins).

Command in the lower left of this thread (Alternate cryptocurrencies -- Service Discussion (Altcoins)

Check the bold phrase I just made in the quoted text from their about page. They're telling that their site (or casino) users should not be worried on the listed casinos on their site, yet they listed 1xbit  knowing that they were scamming their users, asking KYC (private information) and locking their accounts with balance on it (financial information).

Anyway, they removed it now just because some of the comments made here against 1xbit.

Only if devs/businesses can offer more reliable, non-kyc, and user friendly DEX platform than what the current DEXs we have now.

If the DEX will be something like what jack wanted to build - tbDEX then that's impossible (it's just the same to CEX), our option is only just accept that our privacy will be the exchange for crypto being regulated by the authorities.

Well, in the very first place, anonymity and privacy always the risk exchange when using a regulated exchange/platform.

Also the deposit/withdrawal feature with a connected bank is not a new thing, besides the local exchange I'm currently using have it years already.

That exchange was made only to make new/existing projects to migrate on Binance chain, nothing else. I don't know if there are still using the exchange aside from a binance fan.

Calling it DEX because it has one of the same feature like DEX?

If this tbDEX is requiring KYC then why people should use it if the exchange(s) they're currently using (/trusting) has almost the same features anyway?
The unique linking of the non-custodial wallet on tbDEX is somewhat comparable of the trust to CEX.

But the thing is, this website doesn't want to review scam casino or the negative side of a particular casino they have listed. Listed casinos on the website mostly have high ratings and sounds like a paid one.

If no one tell them here that 1xbit is selective scamming users then they will not remove it on their website while they describe themselves as:

If there's no way you can remember those 10 word, as I assume it's something like a recovery seed/phrase to open the account/wallet but I doubt if the wallet is still operating now. So your only option is to leave those coins as lost forever.

As what I have mentioned, having backup of your recovery seed (12 or 24 words seed) will help you to recover your coins in case if something happen to your device.

Instead of removing the site, it could be better to leave it there and write your own reviews about them, why it was hated and labeled as scam/unethical by some (selective scamming) of their users, you can just make those thread made on scam accusations as your reference, here are some of the scam accusation against 1xbit - 1xbit scam accusations. Scamming gamblers since 2017

Because jr. member ranks (your current rank) does not support anchor links on their signature space, that's why it was suggested for you to buy/pay the copper membership to have features like a member rank does and be able to put an anchor link on your signature.

What wallet did you used? And what year you started using it? I bet this is not a recovery seed but something like a mnemonic phrase of blockchain.info legacy address but probably it's different since they have 15-word mnemonic phrase.

If you still into bitcoin now and using non-custodial wallet (e.g. electrum, trustwallet, mycelium), it's really recommended to have a backup (offline copy) of your recovery seed (12 or 24 word seed) in case the device got broken, stolen, etc.

You forget to add an additional fee sending from user's wallet to instant exchange. Saying using instant exchange for smaller amounts is better but actually it's not as always, especially when it comes to ERC20 token and ETH related tokens listed.

It would cost a lot for them to send first before it got exchanged to other coins. Average ERC20 (ETH) tx fee as of writing is around $25 and you only have 100$ to be exchanged, either it will cost you $125 for the whole transfer or -$25 saying you only have $100 so it's now only $75, then Instant exchange rates are still lower than CEX. So at the end it's still better using CEX for ERC20 (ETH) exchange/transfer.

But for other coins other than ERC20 (ETH) I guess it might a little better on instant exchange, at least to those cheap tx fee.

It should be, if don't, then it would be a nightmare later on.

Not only just how a wallet works, but it should be, how different wallet works (custodial and non-custodial).
And having a wallet is not just keeping it secure, keping your device safe/secured will keep your wallet/backups secured as well.

The chance of you from getting profit x2 or more is the same chance or more to getting loss. Unless you're investing alts that were established already, like those top 20 coins listed on cmc. BNB is more impressive coin to invest either in short term or long term. For eth it should be in long term.

They might not scam their users on their own way, but what they did is unethical business practice and probably labeled as a scam to others, it's obviously their fault, blaming and pointing fingers to their users (indirect way).

I don't think anyone will send those doge back not unless the doge amount (value) is lower than their current balance on their account.

The above posts explains it, it's all about the exchange's API they provided.

Exchanges get their data from their very own records to be shared via API to developers, analytics, etc. You might see high/short difference to other exchanges, some exchanges might alter this records (fraud exchanges do) to lure people to trade there but that's not the case here though.

More like it needs to bought first?

Anyway, to op, there are lots of wallets available (mostly mentioned already above) to use if your main concern is the intervention of the authority. It just a matter of your understanding between wallets and exchanges.

There's no difference between custodial wallet to CEX if in question is user's privacy and the involvement of the law which is the main issue of OP.

I guess archive services only work on a single page, unless there's an "All" button on Show the last topics started by this person page like other thread do.

Loycev archive tool doesn't have a feature like that as well, only the all posts created by the user including the tread and replies. Maybe you/we can suggest it to him if it's possible.

So how about your issue, it is already solved? or still on pending status?

If nitrogensports only refers the IP as the main subject to consider as multiple accounting then they should be ashamed and deserve to those negative reviews.
There should be many to consider before they label users as multiple accounting such the screen/monitor size, browser, playing history, previous deposit/withdrawal transactions, then IPs. Not unless it's their main motive for such kind of account and withdrawal amounts.