Bitcointalk is an open to all online forum, and anyone on the internet can read the posts made here, through simple google searchs too. Not only Bitcointalk members but any person out there seeking for knowledge realted to a crypto topic could end up here for an answer. I was searching for an option to block someone so that s/he can't read my post.
There is no option were you could prevent your posts on Bitcointalk from someones notice. Note: I have found ignore option which stands for not showing his her post but shows his/her name.
Ignore option works totally opposite of what you are asking for.
|
|
|
The more clearly you explain, it's more clear to the mods. And yes, you should stick to the reporting guide here. Also note: "Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports" Good Luck!
|
|
|
Can you put a link to the users localbitcoins profile where he sends 10 negative feedback for a singal trade? Blind statements without any proof would not explain much here.
you guys are not reading the original post properly ?
I think you are not getting our point here! what part of him is allowed to handle such data?
You are allowed to decide with whom to deal on localbitcoins, so no one forced you to deal with a specific scammer you are complaing about and its not a issue if the trader asks for identity verification.
|
|
|
Local Bitcoin is just a website were any user can register as an buyer and seller. They usually do not monitor each profile and also do not interfere in the trade requirements of the buyer or seller.
Due to the increasing number of crypto scam attempts any buyer or seller could ask for an identity verification to be safe at his side if he is scammed later.
If you were working on an PayPal realted trade on local Bitcoin you are most probably need to do a Identity verification with the trader as its an reversable method of payment and is risky. I personally have dealt with users asking for identity verification for trades mostly PayPal related.
|
|
|
This is how the scammer approaches you: <Mari_>: my ex owe me money, and he said that my money is on the exchanger, but i cant withdraw it, i dont know how to, there is $3900, i can give you 30%, if you can withdraw it The rest of the scamlog is at: http://btcfaucet.com/logs/your-btc.txtI have experienced such fake exchange withdrawal requests many times from unknown users on telegram. They always have some same first sentence like. Hello, I got some XX amount of fund on an exchange and can you help me in withdrawing those. I would give you a XX% as an reward out of it. This is most probably a scam attempt and I just go with blocking the ID and reporting it as a spam mostly.
But yaa thats a pretty stupid trick to scam anyone, excited to know how much do the Spammer earn from this trick. I would guess not much.
|
|
|
Banned users are usually paralizist or spammers and there feedbacks would not make any sense once they are nuked. If a user is banned he/she is banned from using the forum totally even creating an alt would get to a ban evasion.
That means forum does not want that person to come here again, so why should there feedbacks be here even after they are out of the whole community?
Most of the times there feedbacks are irrelevant and nothing contributive to the community. Its a great suggestion to vanish the the unwanted feedback of all the nuked users and could reduce trust spam as listed in the OP.
|
|
|
I think CryptopreneurBrainboss is an good asset to the Bitcointalk and especially the African Community. His efforts is starting a personally funded signature camping for African Community awareness here should be noted and appreciated too. I would support this application.
|
|
|
Can you post a screenshot of the email where they ask you for the KYC?
I don't think they often practice this!
|
|
|
I don't think any non-scammer is at a risk from sandy-is-fine. He/She is only tagging users who are selling fake stuff on digital board with locked thread, from a newbie account or with autobuy links. All of this totally proves the seller is scammer and would surely run away with your funds. Also, this is not a moderation issue and mods would do nothing here. If you have not done anything scammy you have nothing to fear.
Watch this, I will update this thread week to week. In 6 weeks we will have 18 pages long thread of her talking nonstop and assuming everyone is Skeptical One. If you don't believe me just watch this thread updated in 6 weeks it's gonna be longer than a Lord of the Rings movie. She deletes most of her messages she writes, ask moderators I'm pretty sure they can see it not us so you guys don't see the half of it. I will screenshot it before it gets deleted. If you don't believe just wait and watch that is spamming no matter how you look at it.
Watching:
|
|
|
Hello everyone. Just to tell everyone, I have taken a 1 week extension over this and the adjusted date is now 2nd of April 2019. Hacker, can you please confirm this here?
Confirm. Repayment date adjusted to 2nd April 2019.
|
|
|
@Lassie is a participant in the BTC campaign so there must be some game going on between them otherwise why would @zupdawg coming online after 2 months and the first thing he did was, finding @Lassie's old Ann thread and then sending merit to the same thread again.
Yes, I agree this looks like an merit abuse for sure as no one would just wake up to merit an ANN thread after such a long time. But we cannot pass a judgement as we have very little proofs of the abuse happening. As I said we need some connections between both the accounts to get to a conclusion other wise this would just end up with nothing.
|
|
|
There is no connection of any common crypto address or social media account between Lassie and zupdawg. I have seen another case of such merit transaction were a bounty manger experienced some unknown merit transactions and he thought it could be an abuse later. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116827.0I dont think there is any evidence of merit abuse here too and as Lassie is also a bounty manager and Bounty thread launcher, he could get some unknown merit transactions.
|
|
|
Please move your thread to Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Trading Discussion > Reputation
I don't think this is a moderation issue and forum mods will not help you here. But the user paralyzing your signature designs could get a red-tag from DT for sure.
|
|
|
I see you have already got the loan filled by Lassie here. I would recommend locking this thread to avoid confusion.
|
|
|
Read verified source code of contract and exchange Source Code does not prove anything about the legitimacy of the team or about the vision of the project. Your project lacks most of the important things which a well managed and successful ICO needs. Its basically a scam attempt. Fake Team Fake Content Fake ReviewsHello! I participate in the XIO project from the very beginning _snip_.Thanks to the developer, he works alone!
What more do you what us to say?
|
|
|
Zahar Deina is operating a ICObench expert account. Zahar Deina= https://icobench.com/u/zahar-deinaThis also seems a bit scammy to me. Imagine if he gives reviews to his own fake ICOs.
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Forum rules allow multiple thread creation for selling different products on each thread in the same board. So, both the users are not breaking any forum rules rather they are already red-tagged for selling from locked thread and autoby links.
Its just not allowed in currency exchange board. 16. Do not have more than one active sales topic in the Currency exchange board. [3]
|
|
|
ICObench may be corrupt but they're not that stupid.
Yes, I agree with this, they are not that stupid, also the real ICObench expert Igor Karavaev too does not seem to be that stupid to ruine his personal repo by sending such ponzi and scammy messages. His LinkedIn profile is also pretty well managed if you go through it. Real LinkedIn profile link: https://www.linkedin.com/in/igorkaravaev/
|
|
|
do not know what the scammers have to do with porn stars " maybe they must have thought it would be harder to find out. as in the last times they have used stock photos Yes, the only reason behind using those pic should be that the scammer thought it would be difficult to detect or they are some porn addicti and doing Embarrassing cheque!
|
|
|
|