It is also possible that OP uses a hosting website that blocks some IPs according to their blacklist. Sometimes they block regardless of what the user requests them, so it is possible that OP doesn't intend to block anyone although the chance is low since he can easily view it from his hosting control panel afaik. Kind of weird that using a VPN allows them to bypass the filter though, since most hosting would block VPN IPs most of the time.

You can make a thread on the scam accusations board with proof of your case if you want to bring more attention to your case. You can also set a flag or provide a negative review since the service has an account on this forum. Keep in mind that most people will request some decent proof to support your flag/negative feedback. If your case is solid though, expect at least a few supports from some high-ranked members.

I used to work on a project like this in the past. I second the suggestion to allow users to try your features first before asking them to sign-up. You can make a guest option that is tied to the user's IP with limited access for example. If you're afraid of abuse then you can add a filter or something similar. It is hard to gain new users for tracker apps afaik. I've seen at least two projects with the same idea that failed recently, mostly due to a lack of features and low appeal for users. Giving them a trial might be able to solve it to some extent.

I guess you can make a new thread asking for suggestions if you still don't find them in the near future. I'd suggest you avoid experimental wallets even if offers features that you need since it is very risky to use them. But I guess that's not a problem if you know what you're doing.

Btw, if two wallets or more have some trouble with rerouting nodes, maybe it was caused by the network condition and not the wallet itself? Unless both of them use the same source code with little to no changes.

I believe it is a matter of infrastructure building. If they managed to build a solid network that is not prone to hacking and is easy to use, they will likely pivot to it as soon as possible since it offers better control over their fiat transactions.

I mean that should be expected. The government's main goal is to control the economy. I don't see why they will shy away to copy any new tech even if it was used by something that they deemed illegal. Some of them even fund privacy technology, probably to add another point of control over their people.

I wonder what crypto actually means for different people. It seems like the writer, the SEC, communities, and so on have different interpretations, allowing them to frame what SEC did according to their point of view. One of the implicit assumptions is that crypto is security as mentioned above, where does this idea come from? I always thought crypto was just a digital asset that used cryptography to secure its blocks. It looks like there is a new narrative that aims to lump crypto and security together from its definition.

Kritik yang paling sering ane dengar adalah nama baru ini bikin situs Twitter mirip situs pornografi. Agak susah juga mau mengubah persepsi karena produk yang dimaksud udah cukup popular dan ane ragu Elon bakal mengeluarkan duit hanya untuk memperbaiki citra produknya. Bisa jadi malah pro dan kontra kaya gini yang bikin ads naik dan menghasilkan visits ke situsnya. Yang jelas kalau itu strateginya bisa jadi situs ini hanya berumur pendek mengingat banyak user yang jelas tidak nyaman dan bakal pindah kalau ada produk serupa yang lebih sesuai dengan kebutuhan mereka.

Pandangan yang cukup fair kalau maksudnya analisa teknikal itu ujungnya probabilitas dan tidak ada jaminannya bakal bekerja tiap saat. Di sisi lain investasi jangka panjang sekalipun juga hanya probabilitas meskipun menggunakan sudut pandang analisa fundamental. Ane pribadi agak ragu kalau manipulasi di market yang teregulasi dengan benar bakal sangat mudah, kecuali yang bermain ya pemegang kuasa/regulasi atau makelar besar. Entah kalau mereka juga bermain terus tiap hari, susah juga buat verifikasinya. Pada akhirnya ya balik lagi hanya pake duit yang kalau sewaktu-waktu ilang agan masih baik" aja untuk bermain trading harian. CMIIW.

Ane tidak menyarankan menggantungkan diri agan ke jasa pihak ketiga seperti exchange atau sejenisnya kalau mewariskan kripto adalah tujuan agan. Selain udah banyak bukti yang menunjukkan exchange bisa punah kapan aja (siapa tahu tahun depan exchange itu udah raib, dan agan malah ribet ngurus pemindahan dana), risiko dana agan dipake dibalik layar tanpa sepengetahuan agan juga besar. Beberapa exchange juga menawarkan produk tabungan berbunga yang sangat berisiko, dan bukan tidak mungkin dana agan dipake meski agan tidak daftar ke program tersebut. "Ribet"nya melakukan edukasi menurut ane harga yang pantas dibayar kalau agan ingin mewariskan dana dengan aman.

Kalau dari sumber yang ane cantumkan penyebaran utama berasal dari aplikasi Discord dan sosial media seperti Twitter gan. Kemungkinan mereka menginstall aplikasi tersebut dan memberikan izin meskipun Mac sudah ngasih notif kalau aplikasi tidak bisa diverifikasi. Ane sendiri pernah melakukan hal tersebut ketika beberapa apps yang ane pakai tidak dikenali Mac store, tentunya setelah dipastikan itu apps bukan berasal dari sumber yang tidak jelas.

---

Btw ada juga malware baru yang menarget pengguna Signal, Telegram dan aplikasi sejenis bernama SafeChat[1]. Buat pengguna Android khususnya yang menyimpan data pribadi di aplikasi tersebut sebaiknya hati-hati, dan sebisa mungkin segera memindahkan data karena mau bagaimanapun cloud drive bukan solusi paling bagus untuk menyimpan data sensitif.

[1] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hackers-steal-signal-whatsapp-user-data-with-fake-android-chat-app/

Mungkin bisa dikomplain sekalian om. Ane sendiri juga punya pengalaman yang tidak enak karena pernah deposit dua kali tapi balance ga berubah, kemungkinan karena nama user yang tidak sesuai rekening. Waktu itu ane tanya tidak ada kejelasan jadi akhirnya ane ga menggunakan Tokocrypto lagi. Apa mungkin akuisisi Binance ada pengaruhnya dengan sistem yang mereka pakai sehingga double deposit tidak jadi fokus dulunya, dan baru sekarang mulai ditindaklanjuti semua? Sayangnya hanya Tokocrypto yang bisa menjawab hal kaya gini.

That is not surprising since the app is still in development. They'll probably list it after doing some beta tests if that ever comes. If you want to check them out see the link shared by OP and build the app yourself.

Maybe you can report it on their GitHub too. Who knows, maybe the app only meed the file access permission but it got mixed with phone calls management permission on the code. If they don't respond though, I believe it is better to leave it and use other apps.

The smart choice would be to withdraw some cash from a nearby ATM and pay him, or just look for other vendors that accept Bitcoin if you really wanted to use your BTC to get some bananas. I don't think it is a big deal, at the end of the day you can't pay with crypto if the stores don't accept them.

Personally, I never use my BTC for daily necessities since I don't think it is worth the cost. But BTC is my go-to choice for international payments. I use BTC to pay for VPN, gaming top-ups, and stuff like that regularly. It is cheaper, faster, and allows me to decrease my personal data exposure compared to using a credit card or something similar. Would I like to pay for everything with BTC? Maybe in the future, but for now I see no reason to use my Bitcoin to buy a coffee.

If the condition is really that bad, I believe they should focus on that first. It should provide a good base to develop legal regulations if the infrastructures are great. On the other hand, maybe this is one of the reasons why they will limit it to city or other areas with good internet access.

Doesn't thing like this already exist with fiat right now? I'm referring to how people can pay with cash or use their phone to pay with digital wallet apps or PayPal.

I do recall one of the projects asked me to fill out a KYC form and provide an ID plus wallet address to claim the tokenized assets. If you don't live in the US or Europe it is difficult to claim the tokens, and you literally have no one to rely on if you want to file a claim against them if your country doesn't even allow tokens and stuff like that. I don't think this thing will become mainstream in the near future for countries in Asia.

I believe it refers to the hype people have for ordinal that makes them spam the network with ridiculous fees while they don't have any guarantee that their NTF will sell as much as their paid fee. As far as I'm aware, it has died down since people realize that they gamble too much without thinking about the feasibility. Some still try to mint their NFT but fees have become way cheaper. I believe they'll likely move on to layer 2 or other networks if they want to continue doing their thing sooner or later.

If you visit the right website, you should be able to see a list of sellers or buyers right? I'd suggest trading with those with track records instead of newbies. You should be able to avoid most scammers who require you to contact them through other platforms with that. Most P2P platforms have built-in chat systems, to begin with.

As far as I'm aware, the source code is the same regardless of the OS that you use. You can also build and develop it on your own if you don't want to download the app file[1]. Also, they don't use wallet.dat[2] like Bitcoin core. You should be able to copy and paste the wallet file regardless of the OS. CMIIW.

[1] https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum#development-version-git-clone
[2] https://electrum.readthedocs.io/en/latest/faq.html#where-is-my-wallet-file-located

This reminds me of some altcoin projects I've followed in the past. They do similar things but in the end, failed. Some of them even run away and scam their users. Not really sure how to feel about tokenized assets, especially if most of them are overseas. Most smart contracts are hard to understand/verify and prone to hack too. I'd rather not buy them and stick with buying Bitcoin if an investment is my goal.

I can see why they request media permission if they need to create or access some hidden folders or something similar, but phone call permission is suspicious as heck. If this is still present on their final build, I'd suggest not using them at all. I don't recall other apps requesting similar permissions just to create and open a wallet.