I don't think a government will create new projects and stuff like that. Most of the time they only need to allow businesses to accept crypto and provide a clear framework for retail users, and then anyone interested in crypto will likely use them. I'm not sure how to feel about CZ's praise though, since his company has been doing some shady moves here and there. I'd not be surprised if he starts criticizing Japan if they started demanding CZ and his company to provide more details related to their business. At the end of the day, if crypto stays they will need to regulate it, whether it includes Web3 projects or not.

As far as I can tell, the app is still in developer beta, so I guess they don't really test it on other devices. They stated that the app should support Android 8+ 64 bits but I wouldn't be surprised if there are other limitations. It's really hard to tell why either since the error doesn't mention any reasons. Maybe you can try to log the error manually and see why it crashes?

There is no publicity either so it's not surprising that nobody knows or uses it. I'd rather wait until they release it publicly before trying to use them.

Personally, if I can't be sure I understand how the tech work or verify the developer's claim, I'd rather not use it. They keep mentioning that it uses Samsung Knox as a base to provide a secure environment, but it also supports cloud backup which can be an issue regardless since it adds a new attack vector. I'm not even sure the Redmi secure option is really secure either considering Xiaomi phones are not that popular for privacy and security purpose. Since you mentioned you don't know how some of them work, I'd suggest looking at other options instead of risking your funds for some temporary convenience.

I'm not sure if inbuilt DCA tools are broker though, or is there something I'm missing? Are you referring to exchanges' extra fees when the user uses their DCA tools, not a broker that helps them make DCA trades? What about yours then? Will you charge for each transaction too or you're going to monetize solely on advanced features mentioned on your OP?

There are tools to calculate stuff like this such as whattomine, assuming you know how to find out the necessary calculation variables such as hash rate, and so on as mentioned above. Treat it as a prediction since the variables will likely change when you start your mining activity. It is really hard to answer since you don't provide anything concrete to calculate. You'll likely get better suggestions if you can provide more data imo.

I believe his self-confidence is so high he's okay with lying as long as it gets him attention. I'm not sure what term can describe his behavior perfectly, maybe sociopath? It is clear that he's trying to get benefits by ignoring what's right or wrong and others' feelings as long as it fits his agenda.

Sadly some people still believe in him for whatever reason. Some of them are definitely trolling, but there are others who genuinely fall for his tricks even after he's been exposed as a liar.

Ane rasa dua hal itu saling berkaitan hanya agan melihat di aspek yang berbeda saja. Pada prinsipnya kan candlestick ini dimanipulasi, yang mau tidak mau ya mempengaruhi volume transaksi.  Agan bisa bilang juga sebaliknya. Poinnya adalah karena analisa teknikal banyak yang menggunakan pembacaan candlestick, tentunya yang lebih disorot adalah masalah risiko analisa candle mereka tidak valid lagi karena datanya saja sudah fiktif. Apapun yang terjadi trader harus lebih berhati-hati lagi kalau hal kaya gini ditemukan dan bahkan bisa diverifikasi. CMIIW.

Berdasarkan pengalaman ane masang 3600x di PC ane, selama agan teliti dan masang sesuai tanda panah semuanya bakal baik" saja. Kalau sudah pas prosesor bakal masuk dengan mudah kok seingat ane. Bisa juga dipasang di atas tempat yang empuk kalau memang parno bakal jatuh dst. Jangan sampai tanganya licin juga kalau pas masang. Kalau pernah bongkar rakit sendiri memang bisa lebih tenang sih saat masang. Kalau agan benar" baru dan tidak familiar dengan rakit PC mungkin bisa cari yang jual deket agan dan mau pasang sekalian.

Kalau konteksnya ATM itu dirilis oleh perusahaan exchange dan sejenisnya yang sudah populer di Indo, ane ras bukan tidak mungkin mereka menyediakan fitur integrasi yang membuat pengguna bisa WD hasil transaksi ke akun mereka yang ada di exchange lalu WD ke bank langsung. Kalau standalone mungkin ada pertimbangan lain seperti masalah keamanan, baik untuk pengguna ataupun pengelola ATM itu sendiri.

Sekilas ane baca penyebab utamanya adalah kompetisi yang makin ketat dan demand pasar yang mulai stabil. Sepertinya hanya proses seleksi bisnis seperti biasa kalau menurut ane.

Fitur terjemahan di Youtube memang sejauh ini terbatas pada terjemahan literal saja. Kalau mau dipaksakan bisa saja orang nyari term bahasa Inggris yang sering dipakai seperti Proof of Work untuk dihafalin terjemahan literalnya jadi kalau membaca subtitle paham term itu yang sedang dirujuk. Sebenarnya lebih bagus lagi kalau Youtube bisa menyediakan subtitle dua bahasa sekaligus jadi yang mendengarkan bisa cek apa yang dia dengar dan apa terjemahan yang dipakai. IMO lebih baik menggunakan buku atau sumber belajar sejenis karena secara teknis lebih mudah untuk diterjemahkan daripada Youtube kalau agan terkendala bahasa.

Wajar juga mengingat WA adalah aplikasi yang populer di Indonesia. Kalau esploit yang digunakan sama besar kemungkinan penipu juga bisa menyebarkannya lewat aplikasi lain seperti Telegram dan sejenisnya. Ane pribadi jarang mendapatkan kiriman dari nomor asing di WA, mungkin mereka mendapatkan nomor itu dari sosmed atau aplikasi lain yang menjual data pribadi seperti pinjaman online. Kalau memang risih mungkin bisa ganti nomor atau gunakan dua nomor HP, yang satu untuk masalah sensitif dan jangan pernah digunakan selain untuk perbankan dsj.

---

Btw, tampaknya ada malware baru yang secara aktif dibuat untuk menyerang pengguna Mac (terutama MacOS versi terbaru), walau ditemukan juga varian yang menyerang sistem Windows. Modusnya adalah dengan mengelabui user bahwa aplikasi yang mereka tawarkan adalah game blockchain. Nama malwarenya adalah Realst[1]. Sumber penyebaran utama berasal dari Twitter dan Discord sejauh yang ane pahami, dari akun verified bodong dan user yang ngirim link untuk download aplikasi seperti biasanya.

[1] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-realst-macos-malware-steals-your-cryptocurrency-wallets/

That would be counterintuitive to their goal IMO. They want people to use their blockchain so they encourage them with cheaper fees and so on. Even the lightning option is probably added because they are certain they can make money out of it. Binance is a business in the end, and profit is its goal. They would not explicitly encourage users to be aware of the risks associated with their products unless they need are forced to do it, either by law or something else. Still, hopefully, this addition helps people.

I just checked your post history, and it seems one of your projects still relies on having somebody help filter out bad actors. I don't think it is that different from how escrow works in a marketplace. If you plan to solve the necessity of an escrow then you need to build a tool that is smart enough, easy to understand for everyone, and not prone to false alarms so that it can solve any issues from both sides. I'm not sure if removing human intervention is the only solution since contexts do matter and a code might not be able to handle it. CMIIW.

You should consider doing other kinds of marketing since most of the time a thread like this won't get you anywhere. Your app has been around for a month or so according to your forum activity, yet the download is still very low. Either your app doesn't look attractive or it is not high in demand since other tools usually offer the same function. I've seen many aggregator projects in the past but most of them don't stay around that long, maybe the competition is too tough or the market is not really big to begin with.

I'd suggest regularly bumping this thread if you want people to read this (like once a week or so). Those who want to use VPN will actively ask for reviews/read previous posts anyway. Even if you can incentivize people it will just give you more trouble later on. Not to mention some reputable members do post their experience/suggestions regularly already. If anything doing something like that is likely going to invite spammers to your thread.

How are they similar or worse though? Which part EU are you talking about here? Some countries in the EU seem to have different issues from one another, like energy, climate, and so on if those media reports can be trusted. But I don't think it is remotely similar to what Russia gets from sanctions etc.

I think fiat in general is susceptible to manipulation regardless of who issues it.

I believe transaction fees are independent of what software you use to make them most of the time. As long as the mempool condition is the same, any decent wallet should give you the same recommendation fees (not to mention you can change it yourself most of the time). So I don't think a cheaper transaction fee is a key feature to select your HW wallet. Maybe things will change if too many HW releases with exclusive software that doesn't allow you to change fees. CMIIW.

I think he meant to say that regulators don't need to introduce any new rules since they can just force DEX or any other platform to implement KYC or whitelisting. If they are popular and the owner is known, for example, I guess some threats could work and potentially force them to do what the government wanted. I believe DEX and self-custody wallet is not the same in this regard, I doubt they can force people to KYC to use Electrum for example. CMIIW.

I'm not sure I understood your question correctly, but I was referring to clearnet IP filtering. Stuff like blocking visits from countries or VPN IPs and so on. I do know one or two mixers that do this on their clearnet website but most people can still use ToR to access their services. So yeah, some mixers do recommend users to use ToR and apply IP filtering on their clearnet website.

I guess that's true. At the very least you can opt not to use any centralized service if you want to avoid them.

I guess we can give that leeway if we're talking with the average joe. But I don't think a government body can be that careless and just assume everything is the same thing. Even if they focus on altcoin instead of the Bitcoin market, I don't think it is that hard to see some differences between gambling and their high-risk trading process.

That being said, I think UK in general is more 'friendly' toward crypto from the news I've seen shared on this board for the last months or so. I believe they see potential in regulating the market/crypto for their own benefit instead of outright banning them or deterring people from trading crypto. CMIIW.