I don't agree with this as am still using Steemit as they keep upgrading their platform. The truth is, Steemit is trying its best to remain relevant more than other crypto-related blogging platforms. Nevertheless, a good alternative would be cryptocoinpravda
|
|
|
One thing that drives the value of coin is the use case, thus use case is one of the factors to consider. Another is the team, how active and experienced are they matters a lot. If you check ETH you will see it passed all these, thus its value today.
|
|
|
IEO is popular owing it its way of making it easy for investors to partake in public funding raising for new projects. Also, it is popular as it tends to be more secure thus reducing the rate of scamming. Yes I will participate if after due diligence the project tends to worth it.
|
|
|
To begin with, all offers or instead have same motive and that is to create a medium where the team can raise funds to start development. But they have their similarities, ICO tends to be a better and easy way to generate funds but was plagued with scams, STO makes investors to have a share in the project they are investing while IEO is a better form of ICO but more secure in terms of investors funds. Out of the three, in my own opinion IEO is better.
|
|
|
First you should know that all centralized exchanges aren't safe no matter the exchange. Secondly, what happened to Binance didn't make the exchange lose focus or go down with the services they offer. Thirdly, even with what happened to Binance it is far better than Hitbtc (my opinion), have used both and Binance offers more user friendly interface.
|
|
|
Irrespective of the fact both are good, but ETH has always been my thing, owing to the efficient team and services within the blockchain. The team is constantly looking for ways to offer a better and stronger blockchain, and that means a lot.
|
|
|
It is really disheartening and becoming the norm now, most times bounty mangers don't even care. Also, this is the reason why it's good to study the project, team etc before engaging to avoid wasting time and effort. If a team can do this, who knows what the project will look like in the near future.
|
|
|
That's one of the "natural" thing about the crypto space, and this happens because investors will always like to cash out thus either causing a slight dump in price which will recover in a while or causing a hard dump which will take the project a long while to recover. But one thing stands out and that is the fact that, if the project is solid it will surly recover with time.
|
|
|
I take risk it be a better person, to be a better person and to achieve extraordinary results. Risk taker are always at the for front of everything; example take a look at those who bagged BTC and ETH when it dumped hard last year, you will see they are in profit now. They are the true risk takers.
|
|
|
Take a while and call out the name again, then you will see that the name shows why it disappoint. These shitcoins offers absolutely nothing and investors who ventures into such will only be risking their funds. Therefore one can see that shitcoins will always disappoint as they have no tangible value.
|
|
|
In addition to these ones you listed are many more, with no clear or unique idea but to take money from investors. Good research can't be overemphasized or taken for granted, as anyone who refuses to do so will only be at the mercy of fraudulent projects.
|
|
|
This is just the truth and doesn't need to be looked twice. Now the market is recovering gradually even projects whose team abandoned will start reviving so that they can defraud more investors. Also, many upcoming projects with no verification whatsoever will also spring up to make away with investors funds. In this time, there is need to be very careful so that we don't give them the opportunity they want.
|
|
|
|