What are the chances two “friends” have the same type of wallet hacked at nearly the same time


He does a pretty good job of keeping his addresses separated. Even if his wallet was hacked, the connection would still exist as it would show the person has the private keys on the same computer even if in different wallet files.

None of my accusations are frivolous.

You are a liar and are intentionally presenting mischaracterized and inaccurate information in the OP. 

I strongly disagree with your characterization of any of my accusations. 

In regards to the Hhampuz accusation, I believe the evidence is very solid. The existence of the loan from Darkstar_ should eliminate any reasonable doubt as to if the money was stolen or not. I believe he is being protected because of who he is associated with, not based on the merits. I believe any the "possible" explanations his friends have posted are excuses not to call him a scammer -- if Hhampuz wanted to go on the record to give some kind of explanation as to what happened, one of the "possible" explanations would perhaps be sufficient to create reasonable doubt, but he has not given any explanation. Another one of his campaigns shut down not long after the BestMixer campaign was shut down, and the owner of that site confirmed receipt of the excess money, so I don't think it is reasonable to say the alligation is so ludicrous to Hhampuz that it does not even deserve to be acknowledged. Obviously, if evidence was later found that contradicted Hhampuz's explanation, it would be clear he is a liar, and it would be more clear the money was in fact stolen from BestMixer.

If I see someone doing something they shouldn't be doing, or doing something unethical, I am not going to stay silent just because they are powerful.   

I recently declined to give bibop555 merit because his post history is nearly entirely made up of one liners when I checked yesterday.

Absent his spammy post history I probably would have given one of his posts merit:
Re: 51% attack on Bitcoin

He also submitted Random number that did generate some responses.

I will leave this here in case anyone else wants to review his submission and award him merit. I told him I would not give him any because of his post history.

Please stop posting in this thread.

I reported your posts here, and other merit sources will review your posts and decide if they want to give you merit.

I stand by the connection based on this:



I also strongly suspect it was sold along with one of its twitter accounts. It was perhaps sold to someone else who can speak similar languages, possibly someone the original owner knew via posting in a local section.

Accounts connected:
loughlin - 987496 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=987496
examplens - 314792 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=314792

Connection:
Both share common deposit address to unknown service:
3LiA88oaf74obwfHPFWtBDjqhvKtJJebL7

loughlin has 3CxiChh1MFtmb3h6ejuuvMT8pZuYfUhcMP in his signature
above address sent to above deposit address via b54794676dc03487d444c69b215250c4f38f2f8ee1540383f7499b8235a36e8b
he also sent ca62c26b597ca98cb25094d76ed5db1cc209b7ac86e41a17a545a56d38e42180 from 1mcNWbo1wdt6B3LWEbwkAKEwzrzxoSFU8 which he posted here

examplens sent to above deposit address many times including:
755488dfced41d8595d71b5d66b2dc04118c55861ffed37b3be37154fae981cf
6abae1dcda816e99526641a4857e79ae9e4f1a03b217a5109e725b05c343d587

Notes: the 2nd txid loughlin sent to the deposit address was confirmed on 12/7/18
Loughlin had not posted for at least two weeks before or after this date

loughlin appears to know many languages:
He speaks serbian (Jan 18, 2019) (Dec 25, 2018), Russian (Oct 17, 2018), and Croatian (June 1, 2018)

examplens knows many languages:
He also speaks serbian (Dec 13, 2017) (May 24, 2019), Croatian (June 13, 2019),

examplens likes to change his password:
http://archive.is/FhbCt#selection-117945.0-117957.19
December 28, 2017, 01:45:33 PM
December 28, 2017, 01:43:28 PM
December 28, 2017, 03:19:25 PM - Reset via email

examplens also sent merit to loughlin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3168503.msg32826153#msg32826153

In Jan 2017, examplens enrolled in a signature campaign with the address 15QLwhoYgaVt7nMUm5NCV1Z13VCqD12x9f and roomfirst (UID 904327) enrolled in the same campaign with the same address. roomfirst has negative trust from yahoo62278 for cheating a twitter campaign (I have not reviewed the reference). Also, I think there is a high probability that examplens is a sold account (see above PW changes) as of Dec 2017, so it is probably unfair to punish him for this.

The only merit loughlin received was from examplens

I believe this is it. Especially the wanting to control what is being advertised here.

In the past (and probably currently) there have been many scam sites that have advertised on adsense, and the damage would be very large on here if a scam site were to get ads placed on the forum. In the past, a small number of scam sites have slipped through the cracks and purchased advertising here, however theymos was able to quickly take them down and warn users about the scam. This would be much more difficult with adsense.

Weird, right? Not only that but you can say my name without having your post deleted
Trying is the key word in your statement.

Lauda is not becoming admin. People in this thread are displaying their double standards. They are willing to do any and everything to protect their allies.

Sarcasm. Those displaying outrage have double standards.

You are confused. What theymos did was detrimental to lauda. He also used fact based logic not heavy handed “suggestions”.

I was not referring to you.

But to answer your question, if someone received the PM from theymos, they could have wiped their trust list as a protest against being pressured to exclude lauda from their trust list. It would be a way of showing they would rather not participate in the DT system than exclude lauda. <-- this would be how someone could support lauda.

After further consideration, I will drop the issue presently.

if anyone wishes to post something, feel free to PM me and I will unlock it for you.

I strongly disagree with your assessment (underlined), but I will stop pushing the issue. I would note that I did ask him about the issue prior to opening up my thread.

---

IMO, the best way to decide if someone should be accepted into a campaign is to check how good of posts they have been making recently, and how often others will respond to the person's posts.

The problem in the past was that certain people were using the trust system as a weapon, rather than a tool to warn others about scammers, or those who objectively will scam in the future, which affected these people's ability to conduct business, including to join a signature campaign.

I would presume theymos compiled a list of those he wanted to send the PM to, and part of the criteria would be based on who is associated with lauda and related alts (of lauda and of those associated with him).

If someone were to share say an office, or a home-office or a home with another person, it would probably be a pretty safe assumption to say they at least sometimes share an IP address. If they (sometimes) share an IP address, they might show up as a possible alt. I am however specifically saying he is not an alt of someone else that posted in the thread in question.

Anyway, perhaps you should ask suchmoon if there is any other reason why she might have wanted to lock the thread besides the alleged "off topic" posting

Gotcha. I hadn't seen that post. Thanks for clarifying that up

The subject of who was receiving the fact based argument and why they were part of the group receiving this is very much on topic.

I will both highlight this subject and allow others to continue posting in a non-censored manor about the topic you locked.

I am hesitant to give you merit when you have exactly one good post in your post history.

Wrong. The subject of why certain users did not receive the PM in question is exactly on topic. I realize it doesn't fit your narrative, and understand you don't want this specific topic highlighted.

You mean that Hhampuz stole money shortly after kicking me from his campaign?

Solution: don't steal money