Bad luck this week, the profit would be huge, but on the last moment a gambler (or few of them) was more lucky than investors and got all the profit.
Would you call it "bad luck" as well, if the users first had won big and then lost back some of that? Variance is a part of gabling, and that's true for both sides of the house edge. |
|
|
|
Hi Lutpin. I see that I was kicked because of negative trust.
EDIT: I haven't received any PMs in regards to me being kicked.
You were not kicked, I had suspended your account for the time it was hacked / had negative trust. I don't really know how did that happen but I got control of my account at the start of this week's round and I don't see any negative ratings.
You had negative trust from ranochigo at the time I proceeded post counts and payments. I haven't received any PMs in regards to me being kicked. I ask for your consideration about my case.
Neither did I in regards to your account being hacked or recovered. If stuff like this happens, contacting me and updating me about everything is the best way to go. |
|
|
|
|
Nobody should rely on signature campaign earnings as their main income.
Signature campaigns are great ways to earn a few bitcoin (or altcoins) while doing what you would do anyway, posting/discussing on this forum.
They are, however, not a job.
|
|
|
|
We can discuss terms of your investment here or in your support section.
Why should anyone trust you? |
|
|
|
hello, what happened to bitblender?
The .io landing page seems to be down right now, the .onion mixer still works over here. I've reached out and checked what's going on, will keep you updated. |
|
|
|
7btc is a great thing to make but makes no sense in this case, the bonus was only 20% unlocked – so 5 btc is still not a profit but something you need to unlock first.
Taking the whole balance including the initial deposit doesn't make any sense either. If you argue with logic, also use it whe determining your cancelation policy. If the user isn't refunded his 2btc deposit i will never adjust or remove my rating.
I concur. |
|
|
|
Oh my gosh! So much for speedy transactions. I'm hoping that this segwit thing will help speed it up, but who knows if it is enough.
It's not Bitcoin's fault, but Coinbase (the service) where the problem lies. Want fast transactions? Use Core or Electrum and send them yourself. Don't blame Bitcoin for Coinbase's incompetence.
What do you mean Coinbase is not a true bitcoin wallet? Why do they need to withdraw money?. I thought it was a bitcoin transfer, I'm not withdrawing anything.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1631151.0#post_storeCustodial ServicesAlthough often called Bitcoin wallets, services like Coinbase and Circle aren’t true Bitcoin wallets. Customers private keys are held by these third party services, meaning users don’t really have control of their money. As Bitcoiners often say: “if you don’t control the keys, you don’t control the coins”. Mt. Gox is an extreme example, but one that illustrates the importance of holding private keys. Gox was the first and largest Bitcoin exchange up until 2013. Thousands of users stored more than 800,000 bitcoins in their Gox accounts. At the time, one may have claimed to have 1,000 bitcoins in a Gox account. While true at the time, as soon as Mt. Gox claimed to have been victim of theft users with bitcoins in their accounts were left empty handed. Services like Coinbase and Circle may in fact use good security practices and there’s a chance your bitcoins are safe. But by storing bitcoins with a third party you are always taking on additional risk. |
|
|
|
It says that it is pending
Means coinbase didn't send the transaction yet. No transaction means you won't be able to find anything using block explorers. You'll have to wait for coinbase to work off their backlog. |
|
|
|
.02 same terms as above
Ill up my offer to .015 BTC, plus pay for escrow/shipping fee. Psst, you're supposed to offer more, not less than the current best offer. burning art makes you no better than any dictator who destroyed objectives of expression
Burning something is sort of an expression too, isn't it? One could argue the act of burning is art itself. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't neg. rate someone for advertising such as long as they remove their signature as soon as they are aware of the situation.
That's the key point here. Once it becomes evident a project is bad, managers and participants have to react. If they fail to, then yes, a negative rating might be warranted. However, someone who is no longer advertising a project should not be tagged for previously doing so in times there was nothing speaking against it. |
|
|
|
Judging from the lack of responses I got to my reports about the 24 hour bump rule, moderation either does not care or is not nearly active enough to enforce the rule. |
|
|
|
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawikithe notes for BIP141, which BIP91 is made to activate, state that there will be a block size increase, wouldnt that technically mean support for BIP91 means support for BIP141 which implies support for a block size increase? If im confused let me know Segwit is the equivalent of a block size increase as it allows more transactions per block. I think this is what they mean when they say block size increase. Block size is replaced with block weight. That's not the same as a straight increase from 1MB blocks to 2MB blocks, which is planned as second part of SegWit2x. BIP141 does not specify anything in that regard, it's the SegWit soft-fork, no 2MB hard-fork.
With BIP91 enforcing since block 477,120 all following blocks have signaled SegWit/BIP141, are we still worried about miner lying? |
|
|
|
It's not me who made up the rules. Is this the best way for the bonus? I don't know, but that's how it worked.
You're just here to defend them, gotcha. The point is that everyone talking about that's made up to scam users. That's not the case here. Maybe the rules weren't that clear but it was never the intention to scam users with it.
We said it was unethical, and it still is. They were not just not clear, they were not existent. but it was never the intention to scam users with it.
Yet it happened. As mention earlier is DD gonna stop the bonus for now so it won't happen again.
Once again, not relevant to this case. Sure, it avoids future incidents, but what happens with this one? |
|
|
|
How can a site steal money if the user was behind the buttons.
Making the user acknowledge and confirm the action doesn't make the action itself any better. The underlying rules are flawed, not how they are executed. Also, as shown several times, the users are trapped in the bonus. You fail to address this issue or comment on it. A lot if users won with the bonus, even High rollers like Negan4.
We're trying to discuss this case, and everything you can say in your defence is "others are winning from it". Irrelevant. |
|
|
|
|
Unlike bitcoin core, electrum is no full client, meaning it does not store a full copy of the blockchain.
Electrum gets transaction data relevant to your addresses from servers and verifies this using block headers.
Seems like one of those steps is causing issues for you. I'd try connecting to another electrum server.
|
|
|
|
I sent you a PM two days ago, did you receive it? Can you please respond? Thanks!
Should be good for this round.
Payments will be rolling out in a bit. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
