Thank you very much Hairy!
It has been a very nice game. Any more of these in the future?
From the FTSE 100 price it seems the picture was taken on Friday after session close, are you still there for vacation?
Yes I have more planned for when I go somewhere else interesting. Glad you enjoyed. I thought my opsec was pretty clean ( scrubbed the Exif data) but your observation regarding the timing of the photo is dead on. Friday night NYC time. I am also in far too good a mood to argue politics any further so will need to leave that to another time! First thing I checked.
|
|
|
If people are moving to SF to use the public toilets, there are probably bigger problems.
How many times does the tragedy of the commons need to be demonstrated? Couple week/month Also likely the amount of times millions must be killed by socialism for people to learn that socialism is kinda bad.
|
|
|
No. Not bitcoin.de.
My German bank account has been frozen to international transfers (likely because I connected to the server from my current country, French Polynesia, trying to transfer all of my funds out). I no longer live in Germany . They want me to come in and verify whatever bullshit they need to unlock it.
So I am interested in buying bitcoins from someone with a German bank account.
Let me know. Thank you.
About 6k euro.
|
|
|
If people are moving to SF to use the public toilets, there are probably bigger problems.
How many times does the tragedy of the commons need to be demonstrated?
|
|
|
As a leftie I would suggest maybe you need more public toilets in SF. I take it addressing the symptoms rather than the cause is the conservative approach.
Poop on the public streets is a symptom of public streets. Privatize it all and you won't have people pooping on other peoples' private property. And if they do, the owner cleans it up. If the owner has to clean up enough poop...they eventually realize that having a toilet is easier. In Germany they usually charge about 1 euro to use the toilet. They are very clean and well maintained. Everyone in Germany knows to keep a few euros on hand in case you need to use a toilet.
|
|
|
*beep* *oop* *burp* *I am a robot* *tax is not theft it is your civic responsibility* *end of transmission* *derp* *fap* *boop*
|
|
|
I should hope there's more to that case than meets the eye. There should be reasonable belief that an offence has been committed for a warrant. I don't think receiving a large sum from an exchange would be sufficient for money laundering charges without some kind of incriminating evidence (IANAL of course). I had that exact thing happen to me due to depositing 30k euro over the course of a year, transferring it to a bitcoin exchange.
|
|
|
*beep* *oop* *burp* *I am a robot* *tax is not theft if money is spent right* *end of transmission* *derp* *fap* *boop*
|
|
|
Shall we play a game?
This, fellow Wall Observers, is a picture of a Wall. The Wall is located somewhere in the world. It has been heavily cropped.
First person to guess the correct location of this Wall gets 10 merit points from me. You must name the nearest intersection.
Edits:
* As an anti-spam measure, no more than one guess per 24 hours. * Please include city + intersection in your guess
I will progressively add more pixels to the photo on an irregular basis. The full photo contains all the information required for anyone to identify the location. Remember, there are two types of people in the world. Those who can extrapolate from incomplete information.
Room 77, Berlin
|
|
|
WTF? Why is the volume on different exchanges almost the same? It is very strange.
Bots and arbitrage.
|
|
|
It's too quiet in here.
I was just thinking - there are three types of people in this world. Those that can do basic math, and those that can't.
#deepthoughts
10 print people who can do Basic 20 goto 10
|
|
|
OP, what about an off-chain private network set-up, but made up of only "approved" validating nodes running on top of Bitcoin? Users are free to join the network but only through the approved validating nodes that follow its own rules.
Any chain that's not backed by an underlying asset is prone to attack. At least, less secure than bitcoin. Going off chain or creating a new shitcoin or using ETH tokens is easy. But not the best solution.
|
|
|
I thought with lightning you can't see the transactions under the channel is closed? So therefore how would you color them?
Well, the channel needs to be opened. When a channel is opened the two/three nodes know the public keys of who is opening them. Once the channels are open all transactions are anonymous (you don't know if coins coming from your neighbor node are originally from him or passed to him from someone else). I think the key would be to find a way of restricting the opening of channels from addresses that aren't colored. And somehow restricting the amount (to prevent someone from just adding X bitcoins that aren't colored). Still need to check into the way others have approached it.
|
|
|
Finally after 2 years of trying to get back into my account I was able to get my NMC out. Well, about 60% of them. The rest are in NMC tokens.
They unlocked my account and gave me 2 weeks. Then opened up withdrawals. I pulled out all the NMC I had on there.
Wasn't sure whether or not I wanted to take a 25% cut on the final bit of NMC or not. Waiting things out to see what develops.
|
|
|
BTC was, is, and always will be used to buy drugs. Then these freaks, geeked up on meth and lsd, go on this forum, and speculate about prices in between their cocaine fueled shitposting competitions. Once the coke wears off, the paranoia kicks in and they make lists of people they muted, to show them that, they have indeed, been muted.
For me it has been a way to live anywhere in the world without the need of a bank account. Especially since most foreign banks hate Americans.
|
|
|
For those of you looking for a positive outlook on today's price movements, Yahoo just posted this article: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/crypto-market-crash-prompts-suicide-concerns-135248250.htmlI think the key part that the Yahoo article did not include or mention is the differentiation between investors who got in above their heads and invested money they could not afford to lose, and those who invest in cryptocurrency while fully cognisant of the risks. How could that be positive, if it is referring to crypto suicide tendencies? Very positive. Weak hands + Darwin = less weak hands And there I was, trying to be all subtle. Well, according to mymenace 5/6 of my posts are shitposts. So...either this post is a shitpost or my last one was. Statistically it is likely that both were. don't take mymenace dude serious. either he is a dumb spambot or he is stoned and drunken. EDIT: my guess is more a spambot. I for one welcome all drunken stoned spambots.
|
|
|
For those of you looking for a positive outlook on today's price movements, Yahoo just posted this article: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/crypto-market-crash-prompts-suicide-concerns-135248250.htmlI think the key part that the Yahoo article did not include or mention is the differentiation between investors who got in above their heads and invested money they could not afford to lose, and those who invest in cryptocurrency while fully cognisant of the risks. How could that be positive, if it is referring to crypto suicide tendencies? Very positive. Weak hands + Darwin = less weak hands And there I was, trying to be all subtle. Well, according to mymenace 5/6 of my posts are shitposts. So...either this post is a shitpost or my last one was. Statistically it is likely that both were.
|
|
|
For those of you looking for a positive outlook on today's price movements, Yahoo just posted this article: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/crypto-market-crash-prompts-suicide-concerns-135248250.htmlI think the key part that the Yahoo article did not include or mention is the differentiation between investors who got in above their heads and invested money they could not afford to lose, and those who invest in cryptocurrency while fully cognisant of the risks. How could that be positive, if it is referring to crypto suicide tendencies? Very positive. Weak hands + Darwin = less weak hands
|
|
|
Look at it this way, theft ("A") is illegal ("C"), whereas taxation ("B") is legal ("-C"), right? If A=C and B=C, then A=B, right? But in our example A=C, but B=-C, so they cannot be equal. Therefore, in terms of "linear logic," "taxation" ≠ "theft," IMHO.
Just like when the US bombs women and children in Iraq it's not murder because it's legal.
|
|
|
|