I think you are very aggressive with your opinion and insulting users I am sorry, dear yahoo, but he accused me of trolling and FUD 3 years ago yet he never brought any arguments for his accusations. He only run like a rat each time I asked him. And he is alsways looking for victims of lower ranks! I've had enough of this idiot!
It is not entirely clear to me why Timelord2067 started this discussion in the Lending section, plus in the self-moderated topic. OK, feel free to delete my posts if you'd like, I'm prepared to open my own thread about the situation. Is it still unclear?  Also, I would invite all other participants Gazeta  in this discussion to refrain from using offensive names, this only deepens the disagreements and makes civilized discussion difficult. And I am also trying to deepen the disagreement as there can be no agreement with the old perv. Besides, being an imbecile is a disease, not a libel
imbecilities This is a great word. Blushing  @fillippone, @examplens, @nutildah, @mendace, @yahoo62278 and all other users which posted in the other thread and opposed the irrational allegations of this baboon: make sure you distrust him. This is the only way to make sure his hallucinations appear only as Untrusted feedback and he won't be able to affect someone's Trust score. Agreed, and what's worse is to be actively including Timelord in your trust list. Its 2023, the dude has only gotten worse in the 3.5 years Indeed, sadly the unstable mind only becomes even more unstable during time. Having this combined with his occasional escapes from the mental institution, while he is also avoiding his pills, only brings his brain to the IQ of a peanut. As a consequence, when such incidents occur, the shits he stirs are only bigger and bigger. I guess what I am saying is he gets shit wrong from time to time, but overall does a pretty fair job with his feedbacks. I disagree. That makes 2 of us His feedbacks for the most part are a mess, borderline psychotic. He spends way too much time leaving baseless tags, harassing & bullying smaller accounts for no good reason. He's done this for years & is always remorseless about it. There's simply no excuse for him to ever be on DT, even momentarily. Sadly, excepting the 10 DT1 exclusions, he still has 9 DT1 inclusions (from minerjones, bitbollo, TwitchySeal, Igebots, KTChampions, YOSHIE, FatFork and Stalker22) plus some more inclusions from other DT2 users (which may become DT1 after a future reshuffle, which would only bring more strength to the lunatic). But, at least, if some of these DT1 users mentioned above would change their position it would still represent a huge hand of help. Yes I was going to and still might but now that I know the conversation I wanted to see is happening in this thread, I'm hoping it will suffice and be enough for Timelord to remove his tags & flags on the aforementioned two accounts. The imbecile runs like a rat when a user with good ranking confronts him. Have you noticed that, after more users with good reputation came to this topic, he never showed up again? He is hiding like a rat now! He made a huge mistake posting here, inside this topic where he can not delete others' posts and now he is acting like a rat =))) And, if you'll spend 5 minutes to read also the topic where he was exposed for acting like an idiot toward hilariousandco, you'll also notice that he never showed up there. Do you think he did not observe that thread? Of course he did! But look at the reputation of the users which posted there. He turned into a very small, stinky rat and hid into a corner, crying for his pills. dkbit98 also observed that. So it's not the first time when the baboon stirs some shit then runs and hides. I am almost certain he will not show up here again =))) If he doesn't, surely some of the DT that still includes him in their trust list will reconsider, given what a clearly egregious misuse of the trust system this is. Let's hope for the best. |
|
|
|
This account must be removed from the forum or we must all give a red trust so that his account equals 0. While I agree with first part of your sentence (yes, the forum will be better without the village idiot), unfortunately, there is no reason for giving him red trust. Remember, this is a Marketplace Trust system, and positive and negative tags should be given only for financial deals, not for trolling or being an imbecile. Negative (shown as -1) - If you believe someone is a scammer, or someone is likely to scam, that deserves negative feedback. Please provide evidence.
- If you really hate someone and he's a terrible troll, that does not deserve negative feedback.
However, a neutral feedback can be left for various matters. If you are curious, check the neutral feedback I left him (and you'll be amused to see that it's identical with the neutral feedback icopress also gave him ). So in this situation -- of imbecility taken to a whole new level -- only a neutral feedback is appropriate. |
|
|
|
I am posting here as I am more than certain that, if I would post inside the lunatic's thread he would delete my posts. So, at least here, my message is safe.
As I already explained, with multiple occasions, in the past, TimeLord sometimes manages to escape from the mental institution where he is held for years now and, while he is out of his leash he does not take his pills anymore. When this happens, the village idiot comes on the forum either for trolling, for abusing users with low merits / ranks or to stir some shit. Even our Supreme Leader observed that: DT is full of trust-abusing trolls, and Timelord2067 is one of the most notorious. That's why I excluded him, after all. In February 2023 he tried to troll ibminer. In June 2022 he tried to troll hilariousandco. In January 2020 he had a beef with marlboroza. Obviously, he ended up like a clown after confronting these users so he learned his lesson. Therefore, most of the time, when he is not institutionalized, he is looking for victims among users with lower ranks. Such as now, when he throws his imbecilities toward alterra57 and HedgeFx. First of all, as examplens wisely observed, If the lenders don't report a problem with loan repayment, I don't see what exactly is the problem here. The baboon has no idea about how Flag system works. He just comes and throws a flag here and there, like a village idiot he is. So let's remember theymos' words to the baboon: It's probably best if one of the victims makes a flag and the rest support it. However, due to his very low intellect I highly doubt he will understand these words. Regarding this part: Timelord2067, I just saw that you left negative feedback on these accounts. I invite you to double-check the matter, the fact where someone spends their money should certainly not be the subject of trust assessment. Dear examplens, the baboon has no idea also about how to use Marketplace Trust system. I already explained that here. Furthermore, you can see inside this link that he also accused me of being a troll, of causing conflicts and FUD. Although I asked him, in different topics, fore more than a dozen times, where I have ever created FUD or where I have ever trolled, he never replied. The imbecile runs like a rat when a user with good ranking confronts him.Coming back to current case, of course I opposed both of his flags and I recommend this to all users to do the same. Furthermore, make sure you distrust TimeLord, as he is only stirring shit around and looking to harass users with low ranks. And he does it while forgetting that his contributions to the forum are so good, that he only managed to earn 1077 merits in 5.5 years, lol! (/s) @HedgeFX and @alterra57: ignore the idiot. Nobody gives a shit for his flags or feedbacks. Most users know that TimeLord is highly delusional and he is in deep need for the pills given to him by doctors from the mental institution where he is held for a long time. Furthermore, he is also a hypocrite: he dares to accuse others about anything, forgetting that he is an old perv, supporting pornography. Just like MinoRaiola, lol! @fillippone, @examplens, @nutildah, @mendace, @yahoo62278 and all other users which posted in the other thread and opposed the irrational allegations of this baboon: make sure you distrust him. This is the only way to make sure his hallucinations appear only as Untrusted feedback and he won't be able to affect someone's Trust score. |
|
|
|
M-a apucat rasul cand am citit partea cu deținerea a cel puțin unui cont bancar în monede fiduciare prin care își desfășoară operațiunile, deschis în Romania. adica unii, saracii cauta banci locale cu care sa lucreze si li se inchide usa-n nas de ani de zile... Sincer, nu inteleg cum se poate alica aceasta norma, dat fiind ca bancile romanesti nu lucreaza cu crypto. Poate ca le vor forta sa lucreze si cu crypto (a se citi venituri din crypto)? O alta parte de interes ar fi ca un ATM nu va mai pute opera fara full-KYC. Cam nasol. Asta era de asteptat sa se intample mai devreme sau mai tarziu... Sa ne amintim si ca shitcoins.club a implementat deja procedura in Italia (cel putin), dupa cum explica fillippone in urma cu ceva vreme. Sa ne amintim si ca, in demersurile mele de pe la inceputul anului, toate ATM-urile pe care le gasisem cereau deja KYC... Daca nu ma insel, la momentul respectiv, doar cele ale BitcoinRomania mai permiteau tranzactii fara KYC. Acum va disparea si aceasta posibilitate. Na, concluzia mea este ca legislatorul nostru dovedeste din nou ca habar n-are in ce sfere traieste, dar legatura cu realitatea clar nu are. Asadar adoptia crypto in Ro, in loc de claritate, primeste inca un sut in dos si o piedica serioasa. Nu ca as fi avut asteptari... Acestea sunt "roadele" acestor demersuri, de peste 10 ani, de a centraliza ceea ce a fost menit a fi descentralizat. Iar roadele sunt toate putrede. |
|
|
|
I know at least one other mixer which uses this idea so far. It is not exactly an investment program but a win-win scenario, helping the mixer and also its users. We all know what klarki is saying is very good idea because he is bring business idea to increase the wallet of uniJoin and also telling them to diversify and their expand their business to other areas of the business but probably UniJoin might under what klarki is saying, and that was why they asked him to show them other works so they can understand what is talking in full. Not that they are debunking him, I believe they will accept the idea the image is forecast for them to see. Perhaps it is a good idea that UniJoin collaborates in a way or another with an old member of the forum. However, I am not sure I understand exactly this collaboration from what you mentioned above. Can you be a bit more specific? Or can klarki offer more details about this collaboration? |
|
|
|
|
Great job with the last update, OP! However, the real reason for removing Dabs should not be the fact that he said he is not offering escrow services anymore, unless someone specifically request for him.
The true reason for his removal should be related to the fact that he is "busy with other things going on right now". Among others, as I already explained above, Dabs is in a very deep debt, which totally not recommends him for being an escrow. Needless to mention, begging for money from other users does not offer him any credibility as an escrow.
|
|
|
|
fillippone's back must hurt more and more from life struggles, yet he is always so brave, so brave, and never complains about all his back pains... This is so admirable!  |
|
|
|
Excepting the movies already mentioned here, I would also like to mention 3 Bitcoin documentaries which are very interesting: First one talks also about Silk Road saga. Third one is first Bitcoin documentary made in Asia and many iconic figures appear in the film, such as Jihan Wu or executives of ViaBTC or other Asian crypto exchanges. Perhaps the most fascinating character from this documentary is a trader, whose face and voice are obscured, which brings more mystery to the movie. Among others, this trader also explain how he made his " first barrel of gold". |
|
|
|
After reading this post I checked my own note and recorded the balance and then came back the next day to see if it had changed - and it had increased so I'm getting the APR daily.
Are you sure you saved down the exact amount on one day and then checked it again after a day or two? I checked again today and I see that I received some sats during the night. However, excepting today (when the daily stake was added), during past days I checked too and for several days I did not notice any change of the balance... Apparently, this problem was also encountered by fillippone. |
|
|
|
Supeeer! Incredibil cat de tare ma bucur pentru tine! Merci frumos Nici asta nu arata rau deloc. E din plastic, facuta la imprimanta 3d, asa-i? Da, la imprimanta 3D. Si da, din plastic (presupun insa ca este un plastic special totusi, nu unul ordinar -- cred ca imprimantele 3D utilizeaza doar anumite materiale plastice). Acum am doua monede de acest fel de la krogoth
Concursul cu pizza l-am ratat din nou. Asta e... Tu ai reusit sa participi? Din pacate, nici eu nu am reusit sa particip... O sa votez insa... are rost sa il mai tin in zona de concursuri la care participarea s-a incheiat? Pai... cum crezi si tu de cuviinta... Din punctul meu de vedere, dat fiind ca pastrezi acolo toate concursurile pana cand se anunta castigatorii, pentru consistenta, ai putea sa il mai tii si pe acesta un pic, ca nu mai dureaza mult pana se vor afla castigatorii |
|
|
|
Great work dear Peanutswar! Thank you for translating 6 of my topics, including this one, which is one of the most important essays I wrote on the forum! I'm more than happy to see that the second most important article I wrote (that's how I look at this topic, after Bitcoin: The Dream of Cypherpunks, Libertarians and Crypto-Anarchists -- which will be soon translated by Asuspawer09) has now been translated in five languages, including Filipino. In fact, it takes a translator some courage to translate this essay, because it is quite long, but I think it is very valuable. This topic should make everyone aware of the dangers associated with centralized exchanges and banks. At the same time, the article aims to convince people to use Bitcoin the way Satoshi wanted: peer-to-peer and anonymously. Satoshi's invention should never be associated with trusted third parties, in order to free us all from bank and government slavery! |
|
|
|
In addition to my previous questions I would also like to ask if there is any problem with the daily paid interest. The problem is that I think I did not receive it for days now, maybe up to 2 weeks... I asked also another staker yesterday, to check if he received during the night the 1%/30 daily interest and today he confirmed me he has same balance as yesterday, meaning that he also did not receive the daily interest. Is there any problem with these daily payments? Are they made now at different intervals (e.g. maybe once per month instead of once per day)? |
|
|
|
Reflection on pizza day, what would it be like to build a city from scratch, accepting Bitcoin? This may sound like a surprise, but there is one such project in development, in El Salvador: Bitcoin City. After El Salvador became first country which accepted Bitcoin as a legal tender, their president also announced, a while ago, that he wishes to build a Bitcoin City. As fillippone explained here, El Salvador, the only country in which bitcoin is a legal tender, announced a debt issuance to raise capital in order to "accelerate hyperbitcoinization and bring about a new financial system on top of Bitcoin," according to a blog post by Blockstream. Half of the Proceeds of the bonds will be used to build a new city, nicknamed “Bitcoin City”, in the Gulf of Fonseca, in the immediate vicinity of an active volcano, whose geothermal energy will be used not only to power the city itself but also to mine bitcoins. The city would have no income, property, capital gain or labour taxes but would be financed only by a 10% sales tax. Of course, the news also appeared in press. According to a CoinTelegraph article, President of El Salvador stated that “In #BitcoinCity we will have digital and technological education. Geothermal energy for the entire city and efficient and sustainable public transport.”
Other than that, we'll see soon first Bitcoin Tower in Dubai. Indeed, it's not an entire city, but it's a start. According to BitcoinNews.com, [...] the hotel chain designed in the likeness of bitcoin is anticipated to go beyond incorporating state-of-the-art technologies like blockchain and artificial intelligence. It is also set to prioritize material sustainability and achieve zero CO2 emissions. [...]
The forthcoming Bitcoin Tower is set to become a 40-story skyscraper, serving as a testament to Dubai’s homage to bitcoin and embodying the principles of its enigmatic creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. |
|
|
|
|
It is a great joy for me to read again this fascinating book. I read it in the past, when it was published and I recommend it to everybody interested in learning and understanding deeper the philosophy behind Bitcoin and learn, as well, much more interesting things about historic facts, history of private money, Cypherpunks and crypto-anarchy.
Although it is not very well known the book is, in my opinion, one of best books about Bitcoin and crypto. In fact, I was so impressed by the material that I fully translated it in Romanian. It was a tremendous work but I felt very happy in the end!
|
|
|
|
By pure chance, I know about a similar recent case, where someone was accused for same thing and the accuser used same website - sapling.ai. However, checking, first mentioned post of Bitcoin_people with another AI detector ( https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector) it seems the text has 73.8% chances to be written by a human:  Checking second post with another AI detector leads to a 71.8% chance for the text to be written by a human:  Last days a forum user was excluded from a campaign after an accuse of using AI for his posts because the reporter checked the text with sapling.ai. That user was also denied his last campaign payment. I checked the text with 2 other AI detectors and both said his reported posts were written by a human. The user sent this proof to the manager, the manager accepted to send him the last payment but, however, the user remained excluded from the campaign. Seeing that different websites give totally different results makes me wonder about the accuracy of some of them. Perhaps, excepting the website results we should also take into consideration the user's reputation, in such cases?
@Bitcoin_people, if the result comes negative from majority opinions then please accept my apology in advance but if you found guilty then you will be banned participating from any of my campaigns until 2nd January 2023. Perhaps you want to update the highlighted part? |
|
|
|
Am bucuria de a vă prezenta în limba română topicul “Bitcoin vs. criptomonede alternative – capitalizarea de piață proiectată”, scris de 1miau la data de 5 noiembrie 2022. 1miau este un personaj remarcabil al forumului, implicat in diverse acțiuni de a promova Bitcoin și de a-i ajuta pe toți ceilalți membri, dar și un organizator recunoscut de tombole cu premii în BTC. Printre cele mai importante eseuri ale lui 1miau se numără, pe lângă acest topic, și " Listă de statistici interesante legate de Bitcoin”, “ De ce oamenii ar trebui să utilizeze adrese SegWit”, “ Statistici ale BitcoinTalk”, “ De ce procesul KYC este unul deosebit de periculos – și inutil”, “ [GHID] Cum îți creezi o adresă Bitcoin personalizată (vanitygen) – pas cu pas”, “ Evitarea plății unor comisioane BTC prea mari – ghid pas cu pas (Electrum)”, “ MLM – o periculoasă strategie de marketing”, sau “ Este diversificarea monedelor un sfat bun pentru începători?”. |
|
|
|
Autor: 1miauTopic original: Bitcoin vs. Altcoins – projected Marketcap
Din punct de vedere speculativ este esențial să înțelegem cum să analizăm capitalizarea de piață a criptomonedelor. Si asta deoarece capitalizarea curentă de piață va reflecta doar parțial dacă o criptomonedă poate păstra valoare pe termen lung. Atenție! Capitalizările de piață actuale sunt înșelătoare, mai ales când este vorba de monede lipsite de valoare.
Capitalizarea de piață curentă vs. Capitalizarea de piață proiectatăCând luăm în considerare capitalizarea de piață trebuie să facem o distincție între capitalizarea curentă de piață și cea proiectată. Capitalizarea curentă de piață include doar monedele intrate până atunci în circulație. Inflația potențială generată de monedele emise ulterior nu este luată în considerare în acest caz. Foarte important de știut: - Cantitatea aflată în circulație:
Se referă la monedele aflate în prezent în circulație (incluzând și monedele inaccessible, cum ar fi cele cu chei private pierdute etc.). - Cantitatea totală de monede:
Numărul tuturor monedelor existente, incluzând și monedele care există dar sunt blocate de dezvoltatori (cum este cazul XRP) sau monedele care nu au fost încă minerite. Monedele arse nu fac parte din această categorie, întrucât acestea nu mai există. - Cantitatea maximă de monede:
Numărul final de monede care pot exista (prin cod). Pentru unele monede cantitatea totală și cea maximă sunt identice. - Cantitatea infinită:
Unele monede nu au o cantitate limitată și vor fi emise constant.
Pentru astfel de monede trebuie să analizăm bine câte vor fi în circulație la un moment dat, deoarece ele prezintă riscul unei INFLAȚII MASIVE.
Țineți minte data când se furnizează o capitalizare de piață, deoarece este foarte înșelătoare, ea prezentând doar o situație temporară a monedelor aflate în circulație și, posibil, multe alte monede vor exista în viitor. Este mai fezabil să considerăm o capitalizare de piață ajustată, unde vom alege mereu un moment din viitor și putem vedea cum arată cantitatea aflată în circulație și capitalizarea de piață din acel moment. = > Capitalizare de piață ajustată = alegerea unui moment din viitor (de pildă, anul 2050) și compararea între două sau ami multe monede a modului în care vor arăta cantitatea proiectată care se va afla în circulație și capitalizarea de piață care va rezulta de aici.
Examplu: Bitcoin De pildă, se știe că Bitcoin va avea aproximativ 20.980,000 monedele în circulație în 2050 și, la prețul actual de 20.000$, ar rezulta o capitalizare de piață ajustată de aproximativ 420.000.000.000$. Comparând cu starea curentă a capitalizării de piață, de cca. 382.800.000.000$ (preț calculat pentru 19.140.000 BTC), ar rezulta o diferență de sub 10 procente. Cu cât valoarea este mai apropiată de 0, cu atât moneda poate stoca valoare mai bine. Practic, toți ceilalți competitori ai Bitcoin au valori semnificativ mai mari în acest caz.
Exemplu: Polkadot Polkadot este considerată o criptomonedă alternativă cu inflație mare, bazată pe nPoS (ceea ce este, practic, dPoS). Conform surselor curente, inflația Polkadot este de cca. 10% pe an, în funcție de cantiatea de Polkadot deținută de utilizatori. Dar, în mod normal, este în jurul valorii anuale de 10%. În plus, excesul de Polkadot determinat de inflație poate circula înapoi către buzunarele fondatorilor monedei, la fel cum se întâmplă și cu monedele Polkadot confiscate, dezvoltatorii putându-se folosi de aceste monede sau putând să le ardă. Totuși, există puține surse referitoare la inflația Polkadot, în condițiile în care declarațiile oficiale ale Polkadot sunt limitate la primul an sau cei de la Polkadot chiar au șters complet sursele anterioare existente, precum au făcut aici: https://w3f-research.readthedocs.io/en/latest/polkadot/economics/1-token-economics.html#inflation-model. Pagina nu mai există. Iar aceasta reprezintă un foarte mare semnal de alarmă!!! Unele informații mai sunt disponibile doar pe alte site-uri, care au analizat documentele Polkadot când acestea mai existau, cum ar fi aici: https://www.coinbase.com/de/cloud/discover/solutions/polkadot-token-economics. În prezent, Polkadot are o cantitate aflată în circulație de aproximativ 1.150.000.000 monedel, la un preț de 7,36$ per monedă, ceea ce presupune o capitalizare de piață de aproximativ 8.464.000,000$. Luând în calcul inflația anuală de 10%, numărul monedelor Polkadot ar urma să crească cu cca. 16.500.000.000 monede până în 2050, un număr de 12 ori mai mare decât cantitatea din prezent. La prețul actual de 7,36$ pentru o monedă, am ajunge la o capitalizare de piață ajustată de aproximativ 120.000.000.000$, ceea ce ar fi un procent îngrijorător de 1400% față de capitalizarea de piață actuală. Să ne reamintim: Bitcoin este la sub 10%. Oricine are cunoștințe despre piață poate concluziona că prețul Polkadot va scădea masiv până în 2050. Considerând aceeași capitalizare de piață din 2020 în comparație cu 2050, prețul pe unitate va scădea de la 7,36$ astăzi la 0,51$ (!) în 2050. Concluzie: Polkadot este o monedă lipsită de valoare, lovită de inflație, și mari cantități de monede care vor intra în circulație în viitor vor ajunge la cei care vor deține sume mari de monede... Prețul unei monede Polkadot va scădea drastic, dacă ne uităm la capitalizarea de piață ajustată a Polkadot (cum ar fi, de exemplu, în anul 2050).
SumarLa final, putem spune că, în cazul monedelor solide precum Bitcoin, capitalizarea actuală de piață și cea ajustată sunt foarte apropiate. Pentru monedele inflaționare lipsite de valoare, capitalizarea curentă de piață și cea ajustată sunt foarte diferite.
Predictibilitatea capitalizărilor de piață proiectatePredictibilitatea capitalizării de piață ajustate ne spune dacă este posibil să aflăm care va fi în viitor cantitatea de monedă aflată în circulație. Pentru a putea face această analiză vom avea nevoie de numărul monedelor. Dacă această cantitate aflată în circulație a unei criptomonede nu poate fi prezisă bine nici măcar în următorii 20 de ani, atunci aceasta poate fi considerată a fi periculoasă sau impredictibilă, ceea ce reprezintă un motiv important pentru a o evita. Iar dezvoltatorii acestui tip de monede știu deja de ce nu dezvăluie această informație importantă.  Daca nu există predictibilitate pentru capitalizarea de piață ajustată este ca și cum ai cumpăra gaura de la covrig. Lecția acestui articol: analizarea evoluției pe termen lung a unei criptomonede, privită din perspectiva capacității de stocare a valorii – prin evaluarea capitalizării de piață – și dacă moneda respectivă poate rivaliza cu liderul de piață Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Avem re-editarea concursului Utopia, cel cu postarea in aplicatie: [RAFFLE] Utopia - P2P Ecosystem | Free Bitcoin Raffle Weekly 💎 Round 14Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454337Organizator: joeperry Se castiga: 60$, 40$, 20$ in BTC. Ca de obicei, se alege un numar intre 00-99, trebuie descarcat softul Utopia, facut cont si intrat in sistemul lor de chat. Trebuie scris ceva care nu este spam, trebuie postat link la ce ai discutat. Termen limita: 4 iunie 23:59:59 ora forumului. Sunt acceptati doar utilizatori cu cel putin 5 merite in ultimele 120 de zile. Nu sunt acceptati cei cu recenzii negative sau neutrue legate de incercari de a fenta diferitele campanii sau legate de conturi multiple. Nu sunt acceptate conturi care au postat aproape numai in sectiunile de campanii / bonificatii. Editarea postarii nu este acceptata. Participantii trebuie sa se inscrie folosind urmatorul formular: [b]Bitcointalk Username[/b]:
[b]Utopia Public Key[/b]:
[b]BTC Address:[/b]
[b]Message Deep Link (Chat link):[/b]
[b]Slot No:[/b] |
|
|
|
SO glad you received all your items and that you like them as well! Yay! Someday I will raffle a loaded one and you might just be the winner I certainly hope so they are not only loaded with BTC...but also have their own NFT under the hologram as well....these were the very first printed Physical loaded bitcoin coins ever made as well. You mean these coins you are raffling now have NFTs? Including the ones I won? Oh and by the way, is there any use of the stickers which come with the coins? I got one sticker with the first won coin but with last coin there were 2 stickers. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
