|
Did you post similarly when you created a new account at nulled?
If not, please give us more details about your services and then give some vouch copies to some users, whom you think are eligible based on your criteria. Coming here suddenly, thinking your nulled colleagues will vouch for you here for nothing, will not bring you any vouch.
|
|
|
|
17,18 bitcoin? hah, that's nothing. Back in when binance was hacked, at Least 4,836 BTC was laundered through chipmixer. More than one year has passed since then if I am correct and nothing has happened to chipmixer, so, believe me, this amount is just a drop in the ocean.
Persoanlly I couldn't imagine if any mixer would try to really enter this market seriously but Chipmixer just rocks, they are not only great but greatest in what they do. Will be interesting to see if they were caught soon after using mixing services and which mixer succeed in this situation.
I am not in favor of mixers and also not against them, but I can clearly state that mixers are not responsible for the hacks and so we should stop blaming them for the 'laundering' we are talking here about. It is the hacker, stealer or even one of us who chooses their (mixer's) services to go for, uses them to move our funds in such a way that nobody finds any traces to our money. They are doing their service and if they start revealing people, what is the point of having mixers? |
|
|
|
I am analyser of the crypto market and this time BTC will make a great pump but i hope that the ETH will also go so much up this year and soon all the ALT coins will go up in the market.
Analyser? Or analyst? And if you analyze the markets, why do you hope? Analysts provide analysis but not on the basis of hope. Let Eth alone handle $400 for some time which seems impossible right now as the fall looks to have started for every coin. |
|
|
|
|
DeFi is all about quick profits nowadays as every coin adding a tag #defi makes a hype in the market and trends among investors which opens it to huge gains like YFI did, but I doubt that this will end even worse than what we saw in 2018. This is becoming a dream come true for many and till we have the chance, we should wash our hands in the flowing river.
|
|
|
|
|
It is cheating and you can hire a lawyer to determine the category under which this falls as it is related to online gambling. One another point to remember, only hire if you can afford the length of the case (if your money is worth recovering and if it was too big a number to recover) because you may end up losing more on your case if the judge doesn't allow a fee claim to you.
|
|
|
|
You maybe right that OP is part of the team but in my views there is a big chance that he is only part of the marketing team and he/she was paid in posting this kind of information to the forum in order to gain more players to their platform.
The offer is very less so I am not so sure if many will likely to take their bait or promotion. 0.1 doge is equivalent to 0.000355 US Dollar, is it worth your time? Not unless if you are planning to use their platform from the start.
Did you even visit the site before commenting here? Their domain is for sale and there is no gambling site there now. And even if there was, I would never visit a site giving me just 0.1 dogecoins as I am scared by their generosity and don't want to be their part. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, thanks for your feedback! We understand your doubts and have a surprise ready for the Bitcointalk community! stay tuned
If you are sure about your bets and services, why don't you prove your abilities by providing free bets along with sharing your bet slips here from platforms like nitrogensports or sportsbet? Instead of speaking, your work will do the job for you and you will get many more followers than you have right now. |
|
|
|
|
If Buffet is into buying mining companies and shares instead of the metals, why are we worried about him buying BTC? He can, instead, trade ETFs and make good money through it but you know he is Warren Buffet and someone sitting at such a high position will look for more liquidity to be able to redeem his profits while not dumping the markets (yes, he can dump the whole BTC market and still will not be in profits). I think he will take interest in BTC futures soon when the total crypto marketcap goes insane.
|
|
|
|
Is there any other way to verify someones activeness on not showing off our faces?
If you have suggestions, I'd love to hear them! None of them so far solve the problem of making sure a unique person is doing the task. What about the tasks which are made to be done by a single person? How can that task be cheated by more users if it is already assigned to the one who gets chosen by the task provider? If verification is so much necessary 'and if users agree', why not choose a service that does verification processes instantly and does not give any details of the face of that person but prove that the person is genuine? |
|
|
|
|
Why do they show a 24H RTP and RTP now? Which one should be followed? I mostly see 24H RTP to be over 100% in certain games where current RTP for that games is less than that level, why is that difference there? And if less than 100% RTP, is that game not profitable if played then?
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot say a word about 'oldest' coins but my approach to old coins is like - Defi tokens and tokens which launched on exchanges are doing great currently and I don't see any losses if we invest in these old yet new projects instead of going for coins like PPC, NMC, DOGE, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Lending here will gain you more than 5% per month on your lent crypto funds and there will be no guarantee anywhere. If you are looking for a guarantee from your borrower, you can only lend to those who give you 120% or more worth of collateral to the amount they are willing to borrow from you. So if you don't lend no collateral loans, you will be at much lesser risk.
|
|
|
|
|
Trading is more profitable than holding currently as holding can retrace some percentage out of your current profits and make you lose a bit if a token has already reached an all time high and some tokens which you buy when they hit a trustworthy exchange like Binance (a token like CRV) but trading will keep you aware on taking profits when the markets are highly volatile and enter a new token after waiting for the right time and price of that token.
|
|
|
|
Private casinos can add any requirements they want but as it was said they will be reluctant to do so because more regulation means less clients. After all we all want to make money and avoid KYC.
Casinos want to add minimum requirements forced on them by the authorities so it's lika a game between a cat and a mouse.
End result is that, a gambler is the one who suffers between these two. Before taking these decisions, isn't it fair for the government to ask their citizens if they are comfortable doing what they are supposed to do? And if told about KYC upfront, why would a gambler agree on this? |
|
|
|
|
If a website is rigged and is not good with you winning even a cent from there, it is possible that the admin might call the developer to let them know about the 'exploit' to be stopped and make immediate changes to the gaming code so to make us lose in the long run. Many games do not have the provably fair option available, which can be a perk to the admins of that casino.
|
|
|
|
My main purpose is not to earn only from faucets as i know that faucet earning are almost close to nil. I prefer gambling always on the sites but i was excited about the duckdice faucet as i saw someone claim around 1400$ from faucet only. Later i came to know that we need to wager a lot before leveling up on the faucet.
So is not the purpose of any gambler but in some ways, even a faucet can make us win a fortune. We just need to stay awake on the opportunity that can be used as an advantage on our end. Duckdice had been the best while giving stable and increasing faucet giveaways to making instant withdrawals possible even on the earnings made through faucet only. |
|
|
|
I am just curious does this regulated gambling platforms requires KYC? I am seeing two things here, If they will require KYC they will have fewer users since some users does not like KYC and prefer being anonymous, but if they don't implement KYC that 100 euro limit per account is useless because 1 user can create multiple accounts and bypass those limitations.
If they are levying these limitations, what will stop them from adding a 'KYC mandatory' tag under the hood? They simply cannot steal a gambler's rights and the reason is - it is the gambler's money and they have the right to spend or throw away their money wherever they want to. Why are they robbing a gambler's rights this way? |
|
|
|
|
If it is forex, you need key levels to set as entries and finding them is easier when compared to crypto trading. Patience is needed in both, but crypto needs much longer time to achieve unbelievable results. It is not so easy to trade in crypto because sometimes, we think that altcoins will follow Bitcoin but that does not happen and this is where we need to cut our losses by stopping the trade. We should control our emotions to know where we need to stop a trade in loss.
|
|
|
|
I am lately getting a warning from my Anti-virus when I access Freebitco.in saying, " Download of adware is blocked - https://pushpad.xyz/pushpad.js " - virus ...." HEUR:AdWare.Script.pusher.gen I do not think Freebitco.in has a adware injector on it, but I am troubled that it was flagged only when I access Freebitco.in.  I can access any other site and I get no flag for this... but when I access Freebitco.in it does this. Anyone else experiencing this? Which Anti-Virus software are you using? I am using K7 TotalSecurity and haven't got anything similar to what you said. May be some update to your Anti-Virus is showing that error for the site? I have no updates currently which shows that my software is up-to-date. |
|
|
|
Thank you for you well thought-out suggestion. I already run a crypto blog/new site. I don't need to make money, I've got a handful of businesses already. I'm trying to put these names to go use if there's someone that could actually use them.
If no projects are interested, no harm done, back in the cupboard they go.
Really, are you not interested in making money? If you want a business to be run on your domain because 'you think' your domains are of premium level and can get a business the type of exposure it can capture through the name, and looking for a partnership for that? What is the term 'partnership' for, then? Are those business going to entertained and landed on your domains for free? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
