To add to nc50lc's post: You can also select "Enter cosigner seed" on "Add cosigner (2-2)" window and enter your second seed phrase. In this way, you can have a multi-signature wallet which includes both of the keys required for making a transaction.
As mentioned by nc50lc, this is useful only for learning purposes. You shouldn't have both of the keys on the same device, let alone the same wallet.
|
|
|
incorrect, receiver wallet is atomic wallet , cannot spent unconfirmed tx. just tell me if there any possibility that he used tx accelerator ?
Charles-Tim answered you correctly. The fee rate used in the transaction you shared in the OP was 2.21 sat/vbyte. One of the outputs was spent in this tranaction with the fee rate of 108 sat/vbyte. The total (virtual) size of these transactions was 368.25 vbyte and the total fee was 24,574 satoshi. So, the combined transaction fee rate was around 66.7 sat/vbyte which was more than enough for a fast confirmation. That's why both transactions were confirmed in the same block (776342).
|
|
|
I don't know what application you are talking about. Just take note that you can't mine bitcoin just with running an application. That's not how bitcoin is mined at all and it seems that someone is trying to scam you. There are scammers showing a fake number as your bitcoin balance, so that you (wrongly) think that you have mined bitcoin.
|
|
|
The problem is that with using the forum search messages tool, you can only search in your inbox. You can't search for the messages you have sent out. Since OP was trying to find a message in his/her outbox, that tool can't be helpful.
|
|
|
I am using Firefox so maybe that explains why it doesn't work for me.
You are right. I just tested the shortcuts on Firefox and they didn't work. So, it seems that the behavior depends on the browser that is used. Accardo, what browser you are using? Are you using firefox too?
|
|
|
I just tested those shortcuts on google chrome and I confirm that they are working without any problem. I had the same experience as Xal0lex. When I change the keyboard language, the shortcuts no longer work.
|
|
|
The website in question has been created only 100 days ago and like any other ponzi scheme, they are surely scammers. Do not waste your money and avoid any get-rich-quick scheme. No one will give you free money. Dates 100 days old Created on 2022-11-04 Expires on 2024-11-04 Updated on 2022-12-19
|
|
|
To avoid any confusion: The user you are referring to is ibuddy122505, not ibuddy122055. I also think that he uses malware to copy paste. But ibuddy122055 is only person who mentioned something about address and now he deleted his post only
All the posts that are made in the forum are archived by ninjastic.space and loyce.club. Click here to see the deleted post.
|
|
|
When will be the halving? It's impossible to know the exact date of halving. Assuming the next blocks will be mined at the rate of 1 per 10 minutes on average, the halving will be 637,830 minutes later which would be April, 30, 2024.
How will the halving affect bitcoin price? No one knows that.
|
|
|
Don't worry these low-fee 1sat/byte transactions get confirmed eventually you'll just have to wait.
Transactions are usually confirmed even if the fee rate is too low, but there is no guarantee that your transaction will be finally confirmed. Your transaction will be removed from the mempool, if it isn't confirmed in 14 days. It's also possible that your transaction is removed from the mempool due to limited capacity of the mempool. You can use some free tx accelerator to speed things up.
The only working free transaction accelerator I know is ViaBTC which doesn't accept transactions with the fee rate of lower than 10 sat/byte.
|
|
|
I know about the pumps. Or bumps? Super pumps? Super bumps? That is if you are consistently posting your rank goes higher and higher? Shoot, I need to just ask Chat GPT
No need to ChatGPT for that. You could get answer to your question with a simple google search or reading the pinned topic on "Meta". FAQ: Everything you need to know about forum 'activity, account ranks and meritTake note that bumps and super bumps are different things and they have nothing to do with determining your rank.
|
|
|
Is the 400000 weight unit not equals to 100kb?
100 KB is equivalent to 400000 weight units only if all inputs and outputs are legacy. A segwit transaction includes some witness data that are counted as a quarter of non-witness data. Weight/4 = size. That is 4000000/4, making 100000 bytes which is 100kb. Or is this not correct?
Weight/4 = virtual size, not actual size. 400000 weight units is equivalent to 100 vKB.
|
|
|
The limit is 100kb, any transaction that is more than 100kb will not be broadcasted,
The limit is now 400,000 weight units, not 100 KB. That's the default maximum standard transaction weight and nodes will likely reject your transaction if it has a larger weight. It may worth mentioning that the protocol allow a transaction to have larger weight and nothing prevents a miner from including a transaction with larger weight.
|
|
|
Its a long time ago, but I had such issue with my mycelium wallet and the transaction got returned a lot earlier.
As mentioned by nc50lc, the default time is 14 days. If your transaction was removed from the mempool earlier, that was probably because the network was so congested and the nodes removed your transaction from their mempool due to reaching the maximum size of the mempool. It's very unlikely that OP's transaction will be removed from the mempool earlier than 14 days.
|
|
|
Go to console. Decrypt your wallet (if it's encrypted) using the following command. Skip this step if your wallet is not encrypted. walletpassphrase "YourPassPhrase" 600
With the command your wallet will be encrypted again after 600 seconds. You can change the 600 to any number you want. After that, use the following command to import your private key. importprivkey YourPrivateKey
|
|
|
Having multiple accounts is not an offense by itself on this forum. If you encounter a negative trust rating with such an explanation, it is a sign of misuse of the trust system. (I honestly didn't notice such trust ratings from DT members based on multiaccounting. Perhaps you have some example to show?)
I also haven't seen any DT member giving negative trust to someone just because of using multiple accounts. But the trust system has been used for giving negative trust to users who use alternative accounts for cheating in bounty/signature campaign, ban evasion or abusing the merit system. That's probably what OP is referring to.
|
|
|
I had to tell a friend about it, who recommended I should redo the transaction but with a higher fee rate, which I did and it didn't took up to 30mins to drop.
Take note that you can't always do this. In the case the original transaction hasn't been flagged as RBF, nodes reject the second transaction even if it pays much higher fee.
|
|
|
And according to what I discovered, the bluewallet is not the best option to use to hide our assets that are bitcoin or other cryptocurrency.
Bluewallet is surely a good option. It's open-source and non-custodial. So, it gives you full control over your fund and there is nothing hidden from the users. It also allow you to make offline transactions. Note that bluewallet only supports bitcoin and can't be used for altcoins.
|
|
|
Since I happened to come across this thread, I checked it briefly. Also these three users are currently banned.
I thought they haven't been banned, because that's not recorded neither on modlog nor BPIP. nemruth and Atrain622 made post on February 2. Since modlog keeps the data for the past 7 days, their ban should be shown on modlog. It's weird that modlog doesn't show that.
|
|
|
|