Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:37:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 200 »
1661  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 12:42:35 PM
Everybody chill the fuck out and shut the fuck up.. He said he wanted December and January to sort this shit.
All you KOOKS begged him to give you some update/any update weekly. And jizzed when that started but following one week when he does what you all begged him to and says everything is on track you all go berserk.

I am more concerned about the share situation, it was implied that we would be trading by now.

Ken might have his reasons for the lack of trading and we really deserve to know what these reasons are.
1662  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 11:21:07 AM
And to top it all I heard from zumzero via email today that he has received a lifetime ban from bitcointalk. He says his IP has been blocked. Yet crumbs and VE are still posting FUD like crazy.

This place is not fit to host the ACtM thread. It's bad for investor morale and bad for business. Imagine what a prospective buyer is going to think after reading what is going on in here today. Are they going to order? No. I wouldn't either based on the lies in here.

This company will succeed but there is the potential for a loss of customers and the creation of ill-will between our suppliers and ourselves through the dirty work going on here. eASIC might not be so keen to keep supplying us if their name is dragged through the dirt like it is being. Where would we be then?

THINK people.



The only reason I could see the mods blocking Zumzeros IP and NOT VE OR CRUMBS would be that they could clearly see that zumzero was obviously part of the scam which could have been given away by his IP address.. and this was a kind gesture on their part for relieving us of his dark ambition.  My guess is that he was perhaps even part of the eASIC team, or even a slaughter himself. Why else would he have paid me 5BTC to post that garbage??

so let me just get this right, zumzero paid you 5BTC to post that you have a working vmc machine in hand?

What!?!?!??!

$5,000 for that? No one even believed that prick (CanadianGuy)

1663  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 02:30:14 PM
Ahh Ok you are looking for AsicMiner. This is active mining and Ken runs this operation. You should check with the AsicMiner discussion threads and get in contact with ThickAsThevies or FC.
no, AM = Active Mining, yeh?


AM = AsicMiner
ActM = ActiveMining (us)

You're in the wrong thread.
1664  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 12:03:57 PM
ah okay Smiley
thanks for the quick info!
i'll wait then...

No worries, I have been waiting for a long time.

Ken no longer talks about shares. Sad
1665  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 12:00:12 PM
hey guys.

sorry if this has been discussed before here, but i was wondering when your IPO will become active on Crypto-Trade.com
It's already listed there for a while now and there are actually buy orders for it Wink
https://www.crypto-trade.com/tradex/ipo/amc_btc

so, is there an ETA or a related precondition for the start?
admin of CT said it's up to you - which means up to kslaughter i think.

best,
grinny

Ken is still programming the system to allow for share transfer, but I am not sure why a several day task has taken over a month. I told him that manual transfer would be faster than this bullshit.
1666  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Much talk about the NSA, but is the NSA really a threat to bitcoin ? on: January 05, 2014, 06:41:17 AM
This raises interesting political questions. It's likely many Governments will buy Bitcoin to position themselves in good light if Bitcoin does take off, also many institutions are known to be investing heavily in Bitcoin. So attacking Bitcoin would be more dangerous politically if for example China was heavily invested.

Could they attack Bitcoin? They have around $10 billion in funding per year, so they could easily design their own ASIC and 51% attack, the loss in confidence would then cause permanent price collapse, they could then keep attacking with each new proof of work introduced.

However would they be allowed to? Probably not.

Also as time goes on the window for attack grows ever smaller. It will cost the NSA more and more the longer they wait, and it's unlikely they will ever have the right or will to do it. In a few years even a budget of many billions will not be enough to 51% attack.
1667  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 06:30:11 AM
BG claimed to have huge orders with TH. He went out there, supposedly, told everyone it was legit on the forums. Then as the ship was sinking he kept reassuring everyone things were cool and not to panic - delaying the inevitable as he pretended to have large sums of money in TH product. What was so strange about the whole situation with TH is that it played in perfectly with Avalon scamathon.

Reminds me of Babefoot.  Don't you find it was awfully strange that his interest in posting on bitcointalk pretty much came to a halt after his visit?


Well VE was sure that Babefoot was someone else, maybe even Bargraphics.

Although he did lie a few times too and admitted to it, so who knows what's going on inside his head?

EDIT:

VE knew more too and that is when Ken got super angry and told him the shares would be revoked if he released more information.
1668  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 05:47:19 AM
Guys, you understand that this is not how money is made, right?  As I understand it, Bar's going to visit Ken and be your industrial spy/liaison/intrepid reporter?  I can confirm that he shilled for Terrahash, hard.  And everyone who listen to him lost all of their money.  But you are... you're going to listen to him 'coz it's different this time.



Bar has offered many times to go along with someone else, I don't think any large shareholders live within 1000KM though.

If Ken was 1000KM away from me I would have been up to see him and the operation months ago, I think most of the large shareholders have given up.
1669  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 05:44:48 AM
Lol, you really don't understand how ANY of this works, do you?  You gave your money to Ken, not to a smarter investor Grin Grin Grin

Think he means he didn't buy shares at IPO so he technically didn't give Ken any BTC but instead his BTC went to the investor that sold him his shares.

Lol, I totally spaced!  He bought @double the second IPO price.  Scary stuff.

Apart from 0.0025 * 2 != 0.004

I did buy much higher and my shares were acquired from someone dumping as JoTheKhan correctly deduced from my post. Not sure how you misunderstood my post and cannot do math, you're perhaps a little slow? I can't really say much as I have essentially gambled everything away.
1670  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 04:43:46 AM
You did your part.  Without your generous financial help, this sideshow would be pointless, if not outright impossible.  

Not really, my money went to a smart investor not Ken.
1671  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 04:29:28 AM
zumzero paid me to say i had a machine
i just realized the contract of silence ended yesterday

not sure why
but i have no machine.

Aww poor zumzero must have been getting desperate. I was desperate and made a knowledge thread to at least help without being a loud cheerleader/liar.

1672  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 04:16:55 AM
Owners of machines may not come to these forums. For example, the first customers could be Ken, his family, and/or engineers working on the boards/chips.

Lets stop being naive, there are no machines shipped. Ken shipped something but it did not hash, perhaps a computer module like power supply?

And of course I was right about CanadianGuy, it wasn't shares but was some type of financial incentive.
1673  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 04:13:03 AM
What you did here has nothing to do with calculated risk or startups failing.  You had nothing to base your calculations on - other than the second-rate pitch of an aging serial scammer.
This shit needed as much calculating as slashing your wrists and falling into a shark tank.  

Not sure if you know much about startups, not starting a brick laying business, that's not a startup, but rather http://www.paulgraham.com/growth.html

And most of these startups don't even have a method of generating revenue for most of their lives, some are even planned on making an exit as the only possible investment return. Many angels and VC's admit that it's a gut feeling and luck mostly, it's hard to calculate the unknown.

And there were calculations for ActM laying around. I still believe that if we were on schedule we would have had some success. I invested in the knowledge we would have a full capacity by the end of December and there were no hints back when I invested that something went wrong with the eASIC chips.
1674  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 12:21:06 AM
Just a heads up Ken.. you need to renew your license.



Send an email to support@virtualminingcorp.com.
1675  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 12:20:02 AM
If eASIC is legit and the deal was legit, we already received sample chips. Why can't we see a picture of them?


We wouldn't want Cointerra or KNC to copy our design.  We need to keep the secret of our success hidden.
CanadianGuy, I thought you claimed to be hashing with VMC machines?


CanadianGuy is invested and wants to pump once we can trade. Sorry Vigil it's really that simple. Once this liar posts images and a tear down of the machine then he can clear his dirty name.
1676  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 12:18:08 AM
I can't stop loving people investing in non regulated markets expecting crazy profits and later crying for not getting all the warranties of regulated markets.

Get lost with the "I love the law so much anything not allowed by authority is bad" jerk off.

We are allowed to complain about whatever investment we want. Please note that legal investments that expect crazy profits also derail all the time.

One thing to take away from all of this is that we are going through an experience that many people have gone through with 100% legit investments, this is normal for investments as many do fail. That is why diversification is the number one rule, a rule I fucked over badly and lost.

My point to Mr "I love the law so much because all laws are right and just", this situation is less about unregulated securities and more about the normal course of action for startups. Most startups fail, fact.*

* But we can still get pissed that it went down and would like to understand why it failed or seems to be failing.
1677  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 05, 2014, 12:13:30 AM
If eASIC is legit and the deal was legit, we already received sample chips. Why can't we see a picture of them?


We wouldn't want Cointerra or KNC to copy our design.  We need to keep the secret of our success hidden.

Pure stupid.

A photo of the chip does not allow one to copy or understand the design.
1678  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 04, 2014, 07:45:01 PM
25,000 BTC to be exact, goodluck with that

Lucky you, I need something closer to 0.004 to be break even, I got in higher than anyone.
1679  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 04, 2014, 07:38:06 PM
We have had our share exchange shut down by SEC

The exchanges were closed by their respective owners based on advice from their lawyers.

No exchange was actually closed by the SEC, the overarching threat of the SEC was the reason and it's likely the SEC would have stepped in if the owners had not followed the advice from their lawyers.
1680  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 04, 2014, 07:20:14 PM
I recall the post but it didn't say eASIC engineers it said 'our engineers'. Well the post I read said that anyway.

Well if that is the case then cool.

That would mean we have boards and real in the flesh eASIC chips! It's a downer they don't work but it's a step further than I thought we were.
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 200 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!