Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 04:40:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 200 »
1681  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 04, 2014, 07:16:07 PM
Does anyone recall the comment from Ken that he was working with eASIC engineers to get the chips and boards working? That comment has been deleted.

Well the eASIC engineers shouldn't be anywhere near the boards. They design a chip and specification and Ken takes that to produce boards. If the eASIC engineers are looking at boards I feel something is going awry.
1682  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 04, 2014, 07:07:47 PM
We really need something substantial from Ken at this point.

I disagree. We are still on schedule on the amended time-scale. You are just piling on pressure for no reason. January is the month for full delivery on this project. You know we are currently waiting for the new batch of chips. Relax.

You can't be serious. We really have no idea where we are in the schedule, and we are still unable to trade shares. I know it isn't Ken's fault directly with regards to the shares, but he hasn't addressed this in weeks. This is poor communication from the man we invested in. We do need something more substantial from Ken.

In my short time here, I feel like investing in Bitcoin securities is like playing Russian roulette with 5/6 of the chambers loaded

Well unless you can play the market and sell on a high, I think 99% of every Bitcoin security actually failed to bring in more Bitcoin.
1683  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 04, 2014, 06:00:22 PM
We really need something substantial from Ken at this point.
1684  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 04, 2014, 01:50:52 AM
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?

did eAsic fuck up?

We are not sure who really went wrong, Ken or eASIC, but it was one of them. I invested with the expectation that we would have eASIC chips in full production at the end of December as the absolute worst case scenario. We have passed that point and still only have <3TH online.

No shares, no eASIC, maybe a little hope?
1685  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 03, 2014, 04:02:55 AM
No.  zumzero.  You like?

You were banned?
1686  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 03, 2014, 12:23:42 AM
While it would be great if it were  ACtM hardware, it doesn't matter at the end of the day. Ken is still close to assembling and shipping our hardware and he just said we are going to have a great year ahead. I'm more than happy with that assessment - from the man who has the details.

I've lost faith in this venture and feel that it's at a standstill. Ken is blowing smoke up all our asses with the BS weekly updates. We DO NOT have shares in anything at this point. All of this going back and forth you guys are doing is useless nonsense that is getting none of you anywhere.

It's 2014 and we are not mining, trading or shipping. GAME OVER.
1687  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 08:13:39 PM
Like shit. I showed the plots which documented 24.5 TH increments in hashing power at Eligius. There are no other miners which can account for that. Here are the unstable testing miners:

Ken posted a picture of some empty work benches for crying out loud.
The man is desperate for showing us something that proves he is making some kind of progress!

What reason could he possible have to not show us the ultimate proof that he succeeded and that we (and him) will be millionares?

I agree Stenkross, it's depressing that my fellow shareholders are sinking to this level. I know you all are desperate, so am I. We need to hold strong and try not to go mad.
1688  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 08:10:05 PM
Except that our 24TH miners are a massive combination of many smaller miners, I doubt our farm going online would be in jumps of 24TH, I would instead imagine a gradual rise to 24TH thus making a distinction impossible.

As Ken would add the modular parts the mining capacity would increase in much smaller amounts, also Bargraphics says that he knows that miner is not us, of all people why would he lie?

No they aren't. Each 24.5TH unit relies on 1 base unit + 6 extensions. They function as a whole unit. The extensions need the base. They go on and off all at the same time.

Start with the base, go online.

Add an extension, added power is now online.

Keep doing this until all 24TH is online, now move on to the next one.

1689  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 08:08:45 PM
67Cuda, you weaken your position by posting stupid meme pictures, grow up.
1690  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 08:04:16 PM
Bargraphics, how soon until you visit Ken and take pictures of progress?
You can already monitor the progress on Eligius. We have 10 24.5 TH miners that are still going through some software debugging or potentially hardware issues.

You people are blind as all shit.

I am all for cheerleading, but this is madness Vigil. There is no evidence at that we have more than 3TH.
Like shit. I showed the plots which documented 24.5 TH increments in hashing power at Eligius. There are no other miners which can account for that. Here are the unstable testing miners:



Except that our 24TH miners are a massive combination of many smaller miners, I doubt our farm going online would be in jumps of 24TH, I would instead imagine a gradual rise to 24TH thus making a distinction impossible.

As Ken would add the modular parts the mining capacity would increase in much smaller amounts, also Bargraphics says that he knows that miner is not us, of all people why would he lie?
1691  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 07:56:57 PM
... and with our 2013 sales at $6,311,788.33 we have a very good share of the market.

Real sales (trades with payment and delivery) or preorders? If you call it a sale, you can pay dividends too...

Even if these are actual sales and Ken has that money, we take a dividend on profit only, not revenue. Many things will bring that number down before it comes out to us.
1692  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 07:55:54 PM
Bargraphics, how soon until you visit Ken and take pictures of progress?
You can already monitor the progress on Eligius. We have 10 24.5 TH miners that are still going through some software debugging or potentially hardware issues.

You people are blind as all shit.

I am all for cheerleading, but this is madness Vigil. There is no evidence at that we have more than 3TH.
1693  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 07:40:55 PM
Bargraphics, how soon until you visit Ken and take pictures of progress?
1694  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 07:36:59 PM
May I remind people that nothing would make Entropy happier than the SEC crushing ActM.

At this point we have nothing to gain by taking Ken to court, the only chance we ever make our money back is if ActiveMining pulls through and ships miners/builds a mining farm.

The trolls made their point about ActM 4 months ago, they now mostly post to gloat at our expense.
1695  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 05:21:47 AM
Bid depth down to below 20btc on CT

I really wish Ken would say something about the shares, why are we not allowed to trade.

This loss of confidence is even eradicating the lowest bids Sad
1696  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 31, 2013, 05:12:11 PM
Just wanted to wish all you guys a happy new year when it finally hits in your respective timezones! My prediction is that ActM will surprise us (one way or the other) in 2014!  Grin

Lets hope so, my entire net worth is in ActiveMining stock!

Happy new year everyone!
1697  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 30, 2013, 04:59:02 AM
I'm glad to see newbies expressing interest in ActM and VMC!

To be honest, I would prefer newbies to only get interested once the company proves itself and I say that as a top 20 shareholder.

The last thing we need is another round of inexperienced investors/buyers getting involved in ActM and being burnt.

The reason?

Because they will kick and shout loudly once another delay happens, causing more damage to our reputation.

I would prefer interest only to pick up after Ken ships eASIC miners and gets our mining farm well north of 100TH/s.

I would prefer the discussion and speculation to remain grounded in reality.
1698  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 24, 2013, 12:27:43 PM

Blah blah blah blah blah (/Face palm).




As for waiting another month or two for Chromawallet we may as well, we've waited this long. The Colored Coins prospect is definitely more appealing and promising than another tired, sketchy and soon-to-be-closed-down-or-disappear "securities exchange." I also most certainly would like to avoid a potential shitstorm like the Yuko/BF fiasco…


I would prefer to trade for the next two months and then go over to CC.

I am getting really upset about not being able to trade shares. If Ken can't get CT working for whatever reason I now demand we be allowed to trade our shares directly on this forum.
1699  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 24, 2013, 10:10:47 AM
I've been hoping that the "delay" on Cryptotrade is because Ken has been in talks with the Chromawallet team and knows their timelines for a full release of this brilliant system.
Therefore; why duplicate work for himself if this is the end goal anyway?


I apologize for breaking up the useless banter with relevant discussion. ActM shareholders, please consider and comment:

It seems Chromawallet (colored coin) development is progressing very well. I'm wondering if it would be best to skip listing on crypto-trade.com and avoid the inevitable issues that arise with trading securities on centralized exchanges. I for one, would rather not be exposed to the risk of another exchange operator "having wallet issues" — (I'm looking at you Ukyo) or simply getting bullied by the SEC. Centralized bitcoin security exchanges inevitably fail for technical or legal reasons with few exceptions. Given chromawallet's progress we may be able to use a decentralized solution by the end of January and avoid the rather significant counter-party risk crypto-trade.com represents. Perhaps Killerstorm (chromawallet developer) would provide Ken with some listing support as ActM trading on ChromaWallet might go a long way to increasing ChromaWallet's usage for decentralized stock exchange.

It would be nice if Ken were to comment on this...

This is shaping up to be the most depressing christmas so far...
1700  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Drawingthesun's Thread. Only Known/Useful Information on: December 23, 2013, 03:38:41 PM
  • 24th December - 9th January [original guesstimate] - Normal volume chip production starting in 16-18 weeks.
So normal chip production starts early January or in May?

Early January.
Pages: « 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 200 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!