Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 07:34:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 »
1781  Economy / Gambling / Re: How to win 1 million dollars with only 10$? on: April 05, 2015, 05:58:31 PM
i dont believe thats even possible Smiley

I dont see why you believe its not possible? Its possible, there has been reports of 30 loosing streaks, the same would happen with winning streaks. Lets say you go right now to a casino with 10 btc max bet and you bet 10 btc over and over, lets say you have 100 btc so you lose some bets you win some and suddenly you win 30 consecutive bets (3.000 btc or 760.000$) and thats on a casino with 10 btc as max bet
1782  Economy / Lending / Re: Looking for $80 loan in BTC - colleral included on: April 05, 2015, 05:55:23 PM
If you are selling the domain it might be a fair price, however you have actually posted in the lending section which is not designed for sales.

If you looked at the digital goods section and the auction section, you will see tons of threads of domain spammers/squatters trying to sell their worthless domains with no luck.

The domain appraiser sites generally are not able to give accurate valuations, at least this is what I understand

The problem here is not only their value but being able to sell it its hard, collaterals should be easy to sell to get your money back in case OP doesnt pay the loan back and as you said a lot of domain auctions and sales are in this forum but no one buys.
1783  Economy / Digital goods / Re: ☆ ☆ ☆ Luckydice.net blackjack casino site for sale ☆ ☆ ☆ on: April 05, 2015, 05:51:20 PM
Move it to the digital goods section. Also, I would suggest selling it only as a domain, as its for a dice site, and having or paying for the blackjack would not be really affordable to pay 1.2 BTC for it.

What do you recon the domain is worth?


Probably a little bit more if the site has its reputation untouched, i dont know about the site so i dont know its reputation but if its clean and someone wants to buy it and still use it as a casino it would be worth at least 2 BTC
1784  Economy / Gambling / Re: How to win 1 million dollars with only 10$? on: April 05, 2015, 05:49:07 PM
Your chances of turning that into $1m is tiny. Casinos wouldn't be built up if turning $10 to $1m is easy

No one said it was easy, you can check the odds right there but with bitcoin dice casinos its easier to make if you are lucky because they allow a bigger max bet but of course the odds are still shit. The thing is that if everybody was using the anti martingale or reverse martingale whatever you call it someone would make a good amount of bitcoins even if the max bet is something like 50 bitcoins. You start with base bet of like 0.01 and you double on each win, you would probably lose but someone would win 20 times in a row aswell
It is possible but you can't change the odds in any way, a house egde is a house edge  Grin

Yes you can, odds = percentage to win

you can freely set it up until 97-98% in a 1% house edge sites

Yes, if you set a profit you can have way better odds than just betting non stop. Like if you want a profit of 1$ and you have 100$ you could just bet everything on 98% wich would give a payout of 1$ if im not mistaken and boom you would have 98% chances of winning. With more money you could have even bigger chances to win "x" amount of money
1785  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: In need of a Primedice Bot that can do this martingale strategy on: April 05, 2015, 05:46:19 PM
So i need a bot that can help me with this.

Make X amount of 0.00000000 BTC bets
then
If 10 reds in a row, Base bet = 0.00000001 BTC.
then
Start Margintale.

This way i have way less chance of losing 0.1btc with 28 reds in a row *i think its 28* from 1 satoshi. as i would need 38 reds in a row, less likely than 28 reds in a row.
28 reds after 10 reds is as likely or unlikely as 28 reds from the beginning.


Really? I'm not so good at math but logically speaking it seems that it shouldn't be right?

It is like this, if you bet 3 times you could get these results:

RED RED RED
RED RED BLACK
RED BLACK RED
RED BLACK BLACK
BLACK BLACK BLACK
BLACK BLACK RED
BLACK RED BLACK
BLACK RED RED

Each of then having a 12.5% of happening, now lets say you got 2 reds in a row, you would have thise:

RED RED RED
RED RED BLACK

2 possibilities 50% so the previous 2 reds didnt affect at all the next result
1786  Economy / Gambling / Re: How to win 1 million dollars with only 10$? on: April 05, 2015, 03:14:29 PM
Your chances of turning that into $1m is tiny. Casinos wouldn't be built up if turning $10 to $1m is easy

No one said it was easy, you can check the odds right there but with bitcoin dice casinos its easier to make if you are lucky because they allow a bigger max bet but of course the odds are still shit. The thing is that if everybody was using the anti martingale or reverse martingale whatever you call it someone would make a good amount of bitcoins even if the max bet is something like 50 bitcoins. You start with base bet of like 0.01 and you double on each win, you would probably lose but someone would win 20 times in a row aswell
1787  Economy / Gambling / How to win 1 million dollars with only 10$? on: April 05, 2015, 02:00:54 PM
http://vegasclick.com/gambling/million-dollar-bets.html

I found this interesting article and after reading it a question passed through my mind. What would happen if people instead of using normal martingale strategy would use anti-martingale strategy? Would we see posts of people winning a lot of bitcoins with this strategy? There has been 30 losing streaks so 30 win streaks would be possible aswell, of course the bet limits would come to play but a lot of bitcoin casinos let you bet a high amount of money compared to normal casinos, just-dice allowed once even 270 btc as max bet (68.000$ as of the actual price)
1788  Other / Meta / Re: Sales threads in Betting section is annoying- rant on: April 05, 2015, 01:48:06 PM
Well some tipsters are legit here and they have been playing for quite some time and they still have profit. If you do that as a tipster and AFTER THAT you ask for money for more tips then its ok because people can see that you are indeed a good tipster, but asking directly for 50$ per tip is likely a scam
1789  Economy / Gambling / Re: Gambling sites that allow investing on: March 31, 2015, 05:32:52 PM


Well shit, talking about scams, im talking about the investment itself not if the casino owners will scam you or not because by that logic you can get scammed anywhere, casinos, exchanges etc etc. invest in just-dice then, they will never scam you. Why is investing in casinos bad? They profit in the long term, so can you. Your argument is just plain stupid

Well the fact that you can be scammed outweighs the fact about being profitable. There was this guy who did reviews of all sites and even invested in them. And at the end despite profiting from the casinos he was at loss because some of them ended as scams.

Looks like you don't understand investments in general. At the dice sites all you get is 1% of wagered, and that too maybe. But you take a bigger risk by investing into them. So its best to not do so. I am not going to argue with anyone, as I am happy not investing, I am just leaving it as a warning. It does me no personal good or bad by telling people to be careful while investing.

I told you that there are sites that are 100% trusted and you can invest in those, just-dice. So whats your idea of a good investment then ?? I would like to hear it.
1790  Economy / Gambling / Re: Gambling sites that allow investing on: March 31, 2015, 04:24:20 PM
Investing in dice sites is risky, personally I don't recommend this investment method. Yes, dadice is good so far, but nobody can predict the future.
Not sure if troll or you dont know anything about investments. Investing in casinos is one of the best investments you can make, of course no one can predict the future but dont the casinos keep winning and winning? Yes they do and if you invest carefully you can make steady profit easily, yes you might lose sometimes but thats part of the game.

Looks like you are the troll here. Investing in dice sites is one of the worst investments. No onc can predict the future , but the past has been pretty clear in that matter. Almost all the investment dice sites pulled a fast one and ended up scamming.
And you just don't become a millionaire the next day by investing into these dice sites .They profit over a long term, and its best to save your money than investing into them

Well shit, talking about scams, im talking about the investment itself not if the casino owners will scam you or not because by that logic you can get scammed anywhere, casinos, exchanges etc etc. invest in just-dice then, they will never scam you. Why is investing in casinos bad? They profit in the long term, so can you. Your argument is just plain stupid
1791  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: March 31, 2015, 04:22:12 PM
The fact that mathematical probability shows that a built-up universe such as ours is impossible,

We're here aren't we? Ergo, not impossible.



Why should I even post this? That is exactly what I said, and it is in my post, which part you didn't quote above. In fact, the fact that we are here is the ONLY logic that we have for the possibility that we can exist. Except for our existence, it is impossible that we or the universe does exist according to any knowledge or understanding that we have.

Someday we might gain enough knowledge that we will be able to say truthfully that we understand how we are possible. But we aren't there yet by a long shot.

This makes the idea of the existence of God more probable... God Who is way more "advanced" than we... God Who made us and all things with understanding and knowledge that we don't have. How does He have knowledge that we don't? It is in the definition of the word "God."

Smiley

Even then, that's wrong. There's no sure way to prove out own existence, the mind is not metaphysical, it is "the body". The brain is the mind, simply put so using the mind as a method to prove your existence is faulty, with use of the senses being completely out of the question(You can answer/think for yourself as to why using one's senses to make claim of their own existence is illogical, schizophrenia, etc etc. We can use reasoning to give support to the notion that we may exist, but we can never declare it a certainty. The idea of God to explain the unknown is an idea of the ignorant as history has shown. When people don't know something, they say god did it until proven otherwise. It's a very stupid argument to make.


Why is this that you have said foolish? Because at this stage in the knowledge of mankind, absolutely nobody knows how to make people last alive much more than 100 years. The healthiest of people live not long over 100 years. And the best, most qualified of doctors and scientists don't know how to cause anybody to live even to the young age of 200 or 300 years.

What does this have to do with the brain being the mind and the other things you said above? Here's what. Like as we don't know enough to keep people alive a mere, piddly, 200 years, because we are so ignorant of how things work, in the same way we are even more ignorant of the operations of brain, mind and consciousness. Nobody knows that the "brain is the mind" for sure. Nobody knows that there absolutely isn't any other mind operation besides that done by the brain. Some scientific investigations themselves are starting to show that there are mind/consciousness operations done outside the brain.

At its core, the scientific method itself may not be something that operates according to the scientific method as it describes itself. This is shown by the fact that we don't know much about mind/consciousness at all. Because of this, the proof for the existence of God at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is completely accurate.

Further, just because we have a hard time recognizing God, and an even harder time determining much of anything about Him, doesn't mean that He doesn't see us. For example, when we place an ant colony in between two panes of glass so that we can observe them at work, they don't see us (if they do, they don't understand what they are seeing), but we see them. We watch them do their daily thing. Why would anyone think that God doesn't watch us, that He isn't aware of our every activity, even in far more detail (maybe, complete detail) than we are ourselves?

You are not thinking clearly. But if you are, then you are deliberately trying to confuse the issue. Why not start your own thread that talks about these issues rather than spam this thread with all your off-topic stuff?

Smiley


So if no one knos anything of that for sure how can you be so sure about all the things you have been posting so far? You keep posting your fallacy link wich was proven to be full of shit and even religious people dont accept it. Why would anyone think god is watching us? How do you know the ants dont know what they are looking at? You said it yourself, we dont know a lot of things.
1792  Economy / Gambling / Re: Gambling sites that allow investing on: March 31, 2015, 04:18:20 PM
Investing in dice sites is risky, personally I don't recommend this investment method.

Yes, dadice is good so far, but nobody can predict the future.

Not sure if troll or you dont know anything about investments. Investing in casinos is one of the best investments you can make, of course no one can predict the future but dont the casinos keep winning and winning? Yes they do and if you invest carefully you can make steady profit easily, yes you might lose sometimes but thats part of the game.
1793  Economy / Services / Re: ★☆★ 777Coin Signature & Personal MSG Campaign ★☆★ Newb to Hero [RE-OPEN] on: March 31, 2015, 01:15:03 PM
Change rank to MEMBER

Thanks!!
1794  Economy / Gambling / Re: Gambling sites that allow investing on: March 31, 2015, 01:14:04 PM
You should have checked the forum before making a new thread, here :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1000312.0

and here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=945191.0

2 threads discussing the investing in gambling
1795  Other / Meta / Re: Please delete my bitcointalk account. on: March 31, 2015, 12:02:36 PM
OP, why don't you sell your account instead?
There are scammers who would use a stolen account to scam people or to spam non-constructive posts. He probably did not want his reputation to go down the drain and risk the reputation.

What does he care about that if he wanted to delete the account in the first place? I think that someone stole his account and now is trying to delete it.
1796  Other / Meta / Re: negative trust on: March 31, 2015, 11:45:21 AM
ok when i check the same topic there is a red bar which advices people not to trade with me
but most people don't see it?


You have to go to your trust and look where it says trusted feedback, for example for me i only see dooglus on the trusted feedback and since he gave you a neutral feedback your general trust is at 0, you probably have someone else in your trusted feedback
1797  Other / Meta / Re: negative trust on: March 31, 2015, 11:39:00 AM
Also, you are abusing trust by accusing someone as a scammer even though he is pretty legit.

Pretty legit? Do you mean that guy with a positive score of +3?

so if 100 people give negative trust to him his false negative trust for me will not count anymore for me right?

It's unconfirmed feedback, so it doesn't really count.
but next to my name is still the red bar when i want to trade which might stop people trading with me, only because 2 people accused me falsely

No actually next to your name there is nothing, it all depends on what people have other people in their trust list but for me right now i dont see anything in your trust, everything is at 0
1798  Economy / Speculation / Re: Do you think 1.00 BTC will worth more than $10,000.00 USD at any time in 2015? on: March 31, 2015, 11:37:07 AM
The price right no is pretty stable for bitcoin and i doubt it will go to 1.000 soon, it can go up if some major events happen like a popular site adopting bitcoins as a form of payment and things like that but until then i dont think the price will go up any time soon by itself.
1799  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CoinBand and BitSolitaire scam on: March 31, 2015, 11:30:37 AM
He said this in his last post: I paid couple players, there is no problem with winners. There is problem ONLY with this specific guy which was ruining house. I already paid him before thinking that its statistical coincidence.

Wich is not true right? He also said that he will be closing the game until he solves the ''bug'' if theres any but judging by his responses and all the time has passed seems like a scam, if he doesnt find any bug he would definitely have to pay you even if he finds a bug he has to prove you used it. Can you post your deposits and withdraws from the site?
1800  Economy / Gambling / Re: Small negative house edge on: March 31, 2015, 10:49:24 AM
Honestly at this point i dont know how people still play dice, its just not fun and you lose, poker blackjack and pretty much any other games are way more fun than dice and you can even win some money on poker on pvp.

By the way on 0% House Edge the casino would win money tho.
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!