A code sample from hes side would help a lot.
<?php
$ID = "";
$PW = "";
$newAddy = json_decode(file_get_contents("https://blockchain.info/merchant/$ID/NEW_address?password=$PW"), true);
$parseAddy = $newAddy[address];
echo $parseAddy;
?>
This is pretty much all that the OP could give us. His PHP syntax appears to be correct, so I believe that it is some kind of problem with the URL he is inputting. OP, have you tried using the urlencode(); function on your password? I recall when I was using the API and it was bringing back errors it was due to the characters in my password. Using URL encode makes these characters into something that does not affect the URL, but still gives the desired output. Something like this could do the trick: $newAddy = json_decode(file_get_contents("https://blockchain.info/merchant/$ID/NEW_address?password=" . urlencode($PW)), true);
|
|
|
|
Hi minifrij , they give a masseage ,
Dear nawaraj ,
Your hosting account has been suspended. Details of the account are below:
Hosting Plan: Free
Domain: shahbtc.gq
Reason: Abuse
Additional information: Phishing.h.FakerScript-11 detected on username u539638842 at 2015-09-29T02:34:57+00:00
It seems that they thing the FaucetBox script is a phishing attempt of some kind (trying to trick users into inputting their personal information), which if used unmodified it is not. If you can contact them and tell them that the website is running a stock script with information about the FaucetBox faucet script I would think that they would lift the suspension. To me it looks like it could have been a mistake/misunderstanding on their side. |
|
|
|
snip
This is working example, tested.
By the use of /merchant/ in the URL call of the API, it looks like he is trying to use the MyWallet API, not the Recieve Payments that you have listed. I doubt that this example is very helpful, especially since that code sample is on the API documentation already. |
|
|
|
As i am interested to start escrow services so that i purchased an member account.
No one is going to use an escrow of a member account. If that was your only reason you wasted your money. It's a neutral rating, only giving someone information on how the account was sold. Even if this were a negative rating, it wouldn't matter as it is not trusted feedback. Stop complaining. Please let me know did i done any mistake here ??
Apart from thinking that having a member account makes you more trustworthy, you haven't made one. Buying accounts is basically the norm here now, sadly. Also, this thread shouldn't be in Digital Goods. Move it to Meta or Reputation. |
|
|
|
Hi, I previously had a deal to sell this domain, however it fell through. Because of this, I'm going to relist the domain with a lower price. Cost.pw- Start Bid: 0.005BTC
- Minimum Increment: 0.001BTC
- Expiry date: 11/25/2015
- Registrar: Namecheap
Domain transfer is free to other Namecheap accounts. I would much prefer if you would create a Namecheap account for me to transfer it to as there would be no other fees. Auction Rules:- If you bid, you intend to buy. I will add negative feedback to invalid bids.
- No proxy/ghost bidding. Bid for the amount you intend to buy for.
- Auction ends 72 hours after last bid (on each domain)
Please post below to bid. PM me or post below if you would like any further information. Thanks and happy bidding! -Minifrij |
|
|
|
|
I don't believe the forum will last very long simply because there is no need for it right now. There is more than enough on this forum for the Bitcoin community, the only thing I can think it would win on is up time.
|
|
|
|
|
The forum is probably a lot smaller than you would think as it is all stored as strings in databases, rather than individual pages, much like every other forum software. The size would probably be less than 1TB, though I'm not exactly an expert at this sort of stuff.
|
|
|
|
when i am running it. it is not showing anything i think this is the blockchain api access problem but i have tryed to white list my ip but still it is not working.
Have you tried returning the error variable from the JSON output? Try something like this: if($newAddy['error']){
die($newAddy['error'];
}
If the address isn't properly generated, the only thing that will be returned is the error in the JSON. and btw what do you mean by using arrays rather than a normal object?
Usually when I use json_decode(); I do not use the true at the end of it. It is personal preference if you do or not, as it just returns the data in a different way. For example, if you use code like this: $string = json_decode($JSON, true);
You get the individual variables using things like this: However, if you use it like this: $string = json_decode($JSON);
You can get the individual variables using this: It just depends what you're used to and how you code. |
|
|
|
I get confused. blockchain.info is only for storing bitcoin. How could you send dollar from that? You even claim sent dollar to your BETCOIN deposit address. BETCOIN deposit address? How could betcoin receive dollar? Betcoin should be totally different coins. How coulld it receive bitcoin? Can you make it clear?
I expect that he means he sent $20 worth of Bitcoin, rather than sending $20 over the blockchain. Try contacting Blockchain support if it's an inconvenience. They can probably help you out. |
|
|
|
Due to your new faucet script. My hosting account is suspanded. Please fix your script now.
I doubt that the script caused your hosting to be suspended. Has your host given you any info as to why the hosting was suspended? |
|
|
|
|
I can't see any specific problem with your code, though I don't much understand why you are using associative arrays rather than a normal object. I cannot check the syntax of the URL right now, though will try to be sure that's correct when I get home.
What sort of an error do you get? A PHP error or an error returned in the JSON object from Blockchain?
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I don't see this idea being as bad as previously mentioned. I know in a thread I was fairly active in (Faucetbox Discussion) a self moderated thread was needed as their was an increasing amount of spam from certain members. I suppose on the flipside though, it could be used very effectively to censor negative opinions about your service. It is really a matter of trusting the OP of the thread, and if you didn't leave them a negative rating.
As hilariousandco said, this sort of feature could be pretty useful for things such as business' threads where there are several users which could moderate the thread.
|
|
|
|
FMS has a feature where anyone can publish a CAPTCHA, and solving this will add you to that person's trust list automatically (with a low score), but this is pretty vulnerable to DoS attacks. Paying some bitcoins is also a good idea.
I would say this is possibly even more limiting on free speech than just using a centralized forum. The idea that a newbie would have to pay to get their posts seen isn't too great imo. I know that if that were the case I wouldn't have joined (as I would not have the funds to be able to pay comfortably), and I'm sure several others wouldn't have either. |
|
|
|
hi.
the payment will be transferred next 48 hours after the threshold reached rite?
or depends on our turn to get the payment?
thx
Once you have reached the payment threshold, your payment will be sent on the next cycle. This is usually every 48 hours, but can sometimes vary. |
|
|
|
|
Give us the code that you are using with sensitive info (Passwords, GUID) removed. I can try and fix it if so, or remake it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're trying to think of a way you can work around the banning system, don't. BadBear has perma-banned several accounts in the past for ban evasion, yours will be no different.
If you did not receive an E-mail, the only way would be to wait for Theymos or BadBear to stumble upon this thread and try to help. However, since your blatant disregard for the rules, I would be very surprised if they didn't extend your ban on the spot.
|
|
|
|
So there is no option to retrieve the coins after you sended it to microwallet?
A friend of mine is crying because he lost his 0.01 coins hehe.
Once you send Bitcoins over the network, the only way you can get them back is if the recipient decides to send them back. Judging by the previous actions of Microwallet, this isn't going to happen. 0.01 BTC is practically dust, but I've been in the same position of him in the past. Tell him to do more research before blindly investing in websites from now on. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the explanation of the shortcomings of decentralized forums. I've always been curious why they haven't blown up and this seems like the actual reason. Could create a market opportunity if someone could address the issues Theymos pointed out.
The question is, how. It would be impossible to remove things such as bots, spam or other bad things in a decentralized forum as there would (by concept) be no moderation. It would rely on responsibility by the posters on the forum. The internet isn't responsible. |
|
|
|
OP is a member in default trust depth 4, with black trust when viewed in default trust (depth 2), however I don't think this trust rating is enough. At least the member needs to be in depth 2/3 and dark green trust in depth 1/2 to be very trusted here.
By this logic the only people able to be Moderators or staff would be those who trade. I fail to see how trading with someone would make a person more eligible for being Staff over someone else that didn't. |
|
|
|
|
If you made a new account before your initial ban period was over and posted anywhere other than in Meta, you could have been banned further for ban evasion. That is likely a reason behind your other accounts being banned from the forums.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
