There is nothing to speak about; he was a spammer. The proof is in his posts, which are public for everyone to read. There are no excuses for spamming, especially while he was getting paid for it.

You should probably pay closer attention to the members of your campaign before paying them.

AFAIK Kozan had received negative trust* before you paid him out (with his bonus), which is unfair as he is breaking the 6th rule of your campaign.

I hope that you pay more attention to the content of your participant's posts to the status of their accounts.

*

For anyone wanting to order a Pizza using Bitcoin in celebration and living in Europe, Takeaway.com is a reputable company that accepts Bitcoin. I may consider ordering one myself.

$6 on dogeStats.com
Sorry

$4 on dogeStats.com.

Considering that a non-existent page gives the same error on your webpage and that error doesn't look like one from the Paytoshi script, I'm guessing that you do not have your index.php file in the correct place. Did you accidentally leave the script in it's paytoshi-faucet-script-v# folder? If not, do you have a folder similar to public_html that you could try putting the script into?

Simply being a moderator doesn't mean you have to agree with everything your superior does, similar to how being a member here doesn't mean you have to agree with the staff.
Regardless, the reasoning behind the sub-forum has been made clear in this thread. If you were to read it there is really not much to be confused about.

A user does something untrustworthy. That user gets the consequences of doing something untrustworthy. User complains about consequences.
You would think after a while there would be no issues, as people could simply use their common sense and figure out that their actions have consequences. Sadly, and as this thread shows, this is not the case.

You don't have to trade with someone to distrust them. Promoting an eventual scam is extremely untrustworthy IMO.

If we went by your logic I could steal some bitcoin from a newbie and keep my reputation clean. Since I wouldn't have traded with a DT member they couldn't tag me as a scammer with negative trust. Do you think this is how it should work?

This was explained above by Lauda. If the section was removed the Ponzi schemes would go back to being posted around the forum like previous and would need a lot of effort to clean up. It's easier just to have all of them in one cesspool than to have to clean them up from around the forum. See:

I don't think the administration (theymos and BadBear) really cares currently. The people in the Default Trust system do not represent the views of the administration, nor Lauda or any other staff member than theymos and BadBear.

If you don't have a compelling enough argument to send to the person keeping cryptodevil on their trust list, I guess that they don't deserve to be removed from DT. Dooglus doesn't keep people on his trust list because they're his 'good mates', else he wouldn't be on DT1.
So far your argument consists of 'he negative trusted me so I can't earn bitcoin from a signature campaign'. Considering that you can live without being in a signature campaign, your argument isn't really valid enough to warrant anyone else really caring.

My suggestion would be to stop posting support in shady services' threads, wait a few months and contact cryptodevil to ask nicely if he will remove the negative trust. This would probably work better than trying to start a witch hunt against him.

I'm just throwing a shot in the dark, however it is probably because a lot of his posts look exactly the same. They're also very frequent, I grabbed all but two of those from the first page of his recent posts.
These posts are obviously copy-pasted, which is unacceptable. Especially so when you're wearing a signature and being paid for it.

Not running, but spam checking for their signature campaign. Pretty ironic if I say so myself.

To perhaps elaborate on this, it depends on how/what the user is spamming, and partly how the user conducts themselves on the forum. For example, posting 3-4 large advertisements around the forum would (I hope) give you a temporary ban, however posting 3-4 low quality comments on certain threads would likely be fine.
I also believe that those part of a Signature Campaign are scrutinized more harshly than those who aren't, as they would perhaps be rewarded should they spam.

Why's that? Running a business doesn't make you exempt from rules in real life, why would they on this forum?

$8

$6, providing you send first.

There isn't enough of a demand for Bitcoin Collectibles outside of physical coins/notes for it to warrant it being split into two separate sub-boards. All that would likely happen is the activity from the Collectibles sub-board would move to this new one, leaving the Collectibles sub-board essentially dead.

IMO, the opposite should happen. I think that creating a Physical Coins sub-board in the Auctions board would be a better way to combat the messiness of Auctions currently, than killing a current sub-board to achieve it.

I've added it to the list with a note, since the site can (and should only) be used for archival purposes AFAIK. Thanks.

The title essentially says everything. This would hopefully fix things such as spaces and [] breaking URLs on the forum.
This change is somewhat insignificant, however it would fix a few small bugs currently happening when links are handled (such as the one posted here) and would be fairly easy to implement I imagine.

The domain is transferred to the person giving the loan, and is then sold should the loan be defaulted. If not, the domains are transferred back to the person recieving the loan once they have repaid fully.
The problem with taking domains as collateral is that most of the time they can't be sold quickly for a good price, causing the person giving the loan to be out of pocket for a while.

I believe it happened when EcuaMobi gave a loan to liteon (which was defaulted). Not entirely sure if he has managed to get the loan amount back through collateral yet, which is the problem with accepting domains.

I don't think I will add this site as I am guessing that it is a GPT. I won't add those to the list for the same reason as Faucets.

Added to the list, thank you.
In the future, if you see something like this you can report it to AdWords as well through one of their contact methods.

Added to the list, thanks.

Thank you for removing the http:// from your original posts. I would appreciate if you would do the same to the quotes in the posts quoted. Thank you.

Again, please make or find a thread in Scam Accusations and I will add it to the proper list.

Alright, since you're going with this, can you instead sign any quoted addresses from your BiPolarBob account?
Take your pick between this one, this one or this one. You can sign any message so long as it is dated with the current date.
Or, have you forgotten the password to your wallet too?

Which registrar is this domain with?