To which the moderator will say "Trust is not moderated, sorry". Especially considering that the negative feedback was given due to the user doing something discouraged by the forum.
I wonder if your account has been sold again, since I'm sure you've had this explained to you in the past.

That's not the same situation though. This is about someone (who has made extremely improbable margins of profit) being temporarily unable to withdraw their funds while their account is scanned for fraudulent activity.
Not only this, but AFAIK they have already received half of their withdrawal. I would say that is more than fair considering the current situation, especially when said situation has not fully happened yet.

While I do think the site is trusted, that isn't my reasoning for stating that the site is reputable. Stunna (the owner) is a very trusted individual in the community, and PrimeDice its self has had very few large complaints/accusations over the years it has ran (not to mention a lot of said accusations were made by scammers/trolls).
There isn't a site on this list that is there specifically because I trust or distrust it, hence why almost every site has one or more references as to why they are on the list.

I don't believe I have abused anyone on this list, nor did the previous OP. Sites on this list are there because they either stole BTC or products from someone, or did not resolve a situation which caused someone loss (whether monetary or other).

I suggest that you make a thread in the Scam Accusations section with all proof you have.

I'll see how this pans out over the next week or two, though I don't see a huge problem in what PrimeDice is doing currently. They are a reputable company and I believe they will do the right thing.
You're also being very obnoxious in that thread by the way, doesn't help your point at all.

Would it be possible to trade ~$17 of BTC for your Paypal?

0.07BTC

In this case, may I ask why he wasn't banned? I understand that banning a user isn't as simple as it sounds however, in such an extreme case of breaking the first rule of the forum, I can't think that a decision by a global mod would take very long.

IIRC Namworld doesn't particularly care about the signature campaign. He has previously delayed payments to all of his users, and allows a large amount of spammers to participate in the campaign with little to no action.
I really wish there were some sort of action to be taken against campaigns (and managers) like this. They do nothing but exploit and degrade the forum for their own gain.

There will be a lot of Legendary accounts?
Theymos has said in the past that he was considering creating a rank over Legendary, so perhaps something similar to that could be implemented in the future. Considering that there are still <1,000 of such accounts however, and only a certain amount of those are active, I don't think there is a dire need for such.

This is close to impossible as there isn't a way for a machine to accurately judge post quality, so it would likely require manual approval. This would be unnecessary work for the staff for such an insignificant change.

He is most likely taking advantage of those with poor security (through either phishing or using older password hashes as Lutpin suggested). As long as you use good security practices I expect you have very little to worry about.

Does the thread its-self still exist in a viewable format? AFAIK if a thread is deleted with all of it's posts no warning is given.

I would like to leave this campaign. Feel free to discount my posts since the last stage.
Just posting for it to be public knowledge.

"I can't say anything about the bits of your post that mean something, so I'll reply to an invalid point."

The fact that someone is allowed to post like this, regardless of signature, shows that there is becoming a serious problem with the current system when dealing with post quality.
IMO more staff members are needed to police users like this, perhaps dedicated to dealing with post quality, and any signature campaigns ran by a bot should be removed. They are asking for spammers to exploit them.

If this is the case and you want to get your original account back, you will have to contact theymos with the information stated in this thread. Contacting a moderator will achieve nothing; they cannot recover accounts.

Keep in mind that the process of recovering your account could take several months or more, so it may be faster to cut your losses and start over with a new account.

Not only this, but .ml is a TLD that can be registered for free. Any sort of casino or dice site that is not even bothering to register a paid domain should not be trusted with yours, or anyone else's, money.

Well, there's no real way that you could deny it.

See the first Q&A in the Rules. Scams are not moderated on this forum.

See the aforementioned thread. Copying and pasting posts goes against Rule 1. If you break the rules, the forum as a zero tolerance policy.

Regardless, you spammed the forum. You could make 1,000 quality posts, however it will not excuse if you were to then spam several shitty copy-pasted posts (especially so if you were to be paid for such).

The staff don't, and their opinion is the one that matters on this matter. Sorry.

This is because screenshots are not valid proof whatsoever, and should never be taken as such (especially when monetary loss could ensue because of it). I mean, you even said the same thing to me over Skype, right?

While it wasn't technically a flaw in the system, it was a flaw by design. The fact that there is no mediator in the escrow meaning that problems such as kassadin5's can arise is inherently a flaw in the system IMO. It's a shame that it was shut down, however it is perhaps something better left to humans.

Sorry, there isn't. By the time the trade had confirmed and gone though (15 days), the cards would have expired and become useless.

Steam has a lot of intermittent problems, especially considering the Summer Sale. It is no problem.

Last chance to sell me any Summer Trading Cards you may have in your inventory! They will expire after tomorrow.

I'm hesitant to add this, since your problems are caused by a flaw in the way that the system is made. If you weren't willing to accept that, you shouldn't have used the service.
I will see how this turns out in the coming days and weeks and make a decision then.

Personally, I do. Over the three reference threads associated there are several different people claiming that the site is a scam. I don't believe that any site with that many scam accusations and such little response from support staff on said accusations should be trusted with anyone's money.

Unique visitors are measured over all ad units across the network.
If someone has previously been on a website with an a-ads banner on it, then goes to your site, that user will not be recorded as a unique impression to you (they will be recorded to the banner previous to yours, or whichever a-ads banner the user saw first).

Would the announcement not belong in the Service Announcements section, then a discussion/support thread could be made in the Service Discussion->Exchanges/Online Wallets section?

I'm not sure if there is enough demand for that, especially since the Micro Earnings section already encompasses them.