I'm starting to think that you two have some sort of a connection, since you two have very similar views on subjects which seemingly very few others agree with you on. Plus you both have come forward with these views at a very convenient time to back each other up. Just thinking aloud

If he stops the stupid bumping thing that dogie mentioned, no I don't think he should.

You don't represent the majority of the forum, nor does anyone else here. Your opinion, and anyone else's, are irrelevant without a majority.
Also, why do you insist on using obnoxious font sizes? It doesn't even emphasize anything in your post, it looks like you just put it there because you got bored.

TIL every respected news network or website is now "high school" because they have talked about another being at some point in time.
Talking about others is fine, and should be encouraged if the person being talked about has done something wrong.

I don't know about you, but if someone is trying to claim that I have done something wrong I would personally like to be able to talk back and give my side of the story so that people could understand both sides of the story and base their opinions on that. Preventing this would just create manhunts against a single user based off of one other user's opinion, which I would hope you see as worse than one person making a potentially hurtful post about a certain user.

So, for you to forget about someone you must stop them viewing your content? I don't understand.

Then he can implement it on a different forum and you can join there, because I sincerely hope that this idea wouldn't even be thought about by the admins.

Whether Lauda wanted the self moderation option or not their opinion would not get it changed in any way. Since this is the case, they may as well help out and suggest that option to someone who wants to censor their threads. Lauda is simply being mature and suggesting an option which could fit the needs of what the OP wants, regardless of whether they feel said option is right or not.
Also, what are you trying to prove by targeting Lauda like this? Are you trying to get them demoted? Either way, I suggest you stop with it. You're just making yourself look like an idiot by severely misunderstanding simple posts.

AFAIK unless something has changed blocking someone on Facebook doesn't stop you viewing their profile if the blocker's privacy isn't set properly. Forgive me if I'm wrong, it's been a few years since I used that shitshow properly.

Either way, the fact that Facebook has a similar system says it all haha

No popular service that I know of does this; it's not needed. I have no doubt that it would just be abused, as you could easily shit talk a member behind their back and since you ignored them they would have no idea that it is going on. While I'm not saying that you would do that, I'm sure some members of the forum would. Let's not turn this forum into a high school.

As said, Self Moderation is the option that you most likely want. I don't much see why it would be that much of a hassle deleting someone's post compared to replying, which is what you said you wanted to avoid:

IMO hilariousandco has always been civil, however he doesn't sugar coat what he says to lessen the blow at all. This is quite right, as if someone is doing something wrong they should know about it, and trying to lessen the severity of the warning is less likely to make the person stop or change their ways.

The way that I feel is pretty similar to the way that it works. You can feel free to ask any staff member.
Also, thank you for bringing up a completely irrelevant subject. Try to come up with something relevant to the topic at hand, especially when talking about off topic posters.

You either misunderstood or you're deliberately trying to be awkward. By the way you've tried to call out Lauda for essentially nothing before it looks that you have a bit of a grudge on them for some reason.
Talking about the forum or Bitcoin its self is no problem as long as what you're talking about has some relevance. Hence why posts like this are allowed, hence why the entire Meta section exists. Going to the Off Topic section and posting on 'What drink did you last drink' every day to boost your post count is not adding to anything whatsoever, as no one cares about what you post there.

I don't really think it would. While it would be nice for this forum to live for a long time, I doubt anyone will care about an online number of points and title to stay here for several decades.

Would they? I don't think it would really make someone donate over $3k (right now) because they have been here for a long time.

Which is true, especially so if the user has a paid signature. If all of your contributions to the forum is just spamming in Off Topic you shouldn't be here.

This is dependent. Accounts such as Gleb's and Phinnaeus's have a large amount of posts in Off Topic, but they have provided enough elsewhere to the forums to warrant it. Users that do nothing but spam in Off Topic shouldn't be here.

It's not too great of an idea, similar to a lot of your others. It isn't about how much you post per day, it's about the quality of the posts made.

So, what happened to marcotheminer getting promoted to Legendary almost as soon as he could? Stop talking out of your arse.

Good constructive feedback. Thanks for telling us why.

If this forum is alive in 5-10 years I will be amazed, let alone 30.

Does this happen with every claim or only a few?

A Payivy link from a newbie isn't too trustworthy. You should probably do your first few deals on the forum its s elf.

Personally, I don't particularly trust this hosting. I haven't been sent a bill, nor a reply to a support ticket I opened a while ago and yet the hosting is still active. I would not suggest anyone to use this hosting.

I've made a list of sites which can be used to host websites/domains, you can see this by following the link below my signature.

I really doubt that is the case, sometimes the statistics can take a little while to update (I don't believe they are real time).
If you wait a day and you are still having problems, you can post on the support topic and arsenische will probably help you out

I was asked to be searched by a police officer. Since they had no proof I was holding anything I flirted with them until they arrested me. I don't understand why, it was only a joke!

I would like you to link 10 or more of these meaningful posts. She also wasn't banned solely on her posts in Off Topic (AFAIK), though they did contribute a significant portion to her ban.

The internet is srs bsns, right?

Got to say, I'm feeling a bit uneasy about how you suddenly joined and tried to introduce authority here despite being a newbie. Still, innocent until proven guilty I suppose.

It hasn't. Same for you, even if I see your views on what is offensive slightly skewed.

Sadly, that's essentially anywhere on the internet. Get used to it I suppose.

As said before, codishmumu was banned due to their insignificant posts on the forum. If they stopped that and stopped taunting staff members that called her out on it they wouldn't have been banned.

It's a joke.

To be fair there isn't much of a better place that I can think of to put it other than Off Topic.

So because you don't say their name you're not talking about them? Either way I can see where you're coming from on this; I'm not going to dwell on it.

Why wouldn't I be? If a user has made a contraction or has done something strange they deserve to be called out about it. The subject is irrelevant.

I don't know where you've got this from. I hated what codishmumu posted and the way she acted on the forum, though I doubt I would hate her specifically. I hate very few people, especially not people on the internet. Towards the last bit, please stop trying to make me look like a psychopath.

lel

Don't worry, very few people care about Untrusted Feedback. Take a look at mine or a trusted member of the forum, their untrusted feedback is a warzone.
The trust system isn't moderated in 3/4 cases to lower the (already large) amount that staff have to do and to stop censorship. If there is massive trust spam (such as the one seen here) you can contact an admin to have it removed. You should try to work out any disagreements on trust with whoever set the trust, though since it is in Untrusted Feedback you don't really have to worry about it.

If someone does something wrong then they deserve to be called out on it. By your logic, the Scam Accusations section should be closed because of users talking about other users.
Also, don't you see yourself being slightly hypocritical by always talking about codishmumu and then calling out others for talking about other users? As you so nicely said:

inb4 'Who asked you?'

Unless an admin has added more, afaik the only other one is that your post count changes to 'leet' when you reach 1337 posts. Like this: https://i.imgur.com/rLqDltF.png

I really don't believe that Mexxer would sell his account.

It has perhaps been posted by Mexxer due to him being a somewhat trusted member of the forum. Perhaps lottery248 felt that people would listen to him more.