I'm not quite sure whether this is too great of an idea. In some recent cases it has been Full Members and other groups sending the links from hacked accounts. While the green hover colour does help, it may not be seen by mobile users causing them to perhaps be vulnerable.
Perhaps there should be a seperate blacklist which is forum wide for URLs such as this, and affects all user-groups.

In the new Blockchain.info I don't believe this feature is possible in the web interface anymore.
You will have to export the Private Key of the address into another wallet in order to sign it. You can do this by following this guide, as described by shorena's thread here. You should refer to that post if you have any further questions with signing an address.

While I disagree with your other proposal, I do agree that this one should be implemented. Currently the Auctions sections is a mess due to the variety of the things people sell, so separate sub-forums could work well.

Perhaps it could be similar to the Goods section in where there is a 'Digital Goods' and 'Collectibles' section, since those are the most popular things to be auctioned. Any miscellaneous auctions or questions could then be posted in the Auctions section its self, outside of any sub-forum.

I have a few years experience in PHP and may be able to help depending on the complexity of the project. Feel free to drop me a PM with some more information.

And I'm sure it will be, once the campaign updates fully. There isn't much point telling people before it has actually updated.

Should this campaign perhaps be added? Though, it seems a bit shady currently.

Since ASIC chips, which were built specifically for solving the mathematical calculations needed to mine Cryptocurrency, can do so many calculations per second it is near impossible for a normal desktop computer to do enough calculations towards the network to compare to what such a chip can do (in terms of hashpower).

Desktop computers can support mining, though (should you use a pool) you will be giving very little hash power to the network and therefore get next to no reward. If you are trying to solo mine and find a block, the chances of the pools finding the block is exponentially higher due to them solving a lot more calculations per second. To find a block yourself is near, if not, impossible with a desktop computer.

I think we should wait for a signed message from the owner, just to be sure that everything has happened as expected.

I do understand how your site works, which is why I didn't call it a scam. freedoge.co was talking generally about Ponzi schemes, therefore I responded with the facts about Ponzi schemes in general.

I don't appreciate you putting words in my mouth and insulting my intelligence because of it. I never said your site was a scam, I said that Ponzis in general were scams.
Please don't do that.

This depends on the jurisdiction where you live, but it may well be.

That's a lie and you know it.

This is somewhat true, though gambling sites are usually a lot more transparent than Ponzi schemes in how they operate. Therefore, it isn't a very good comparison.

For trying to protect people from scams? No. It tends to only be those trying to be dishonest and push said schemes to unsuspecting users that say things like this.

If this doesn't work for you, you can use the other geo-location service I mentioned a page back in this way:

If a person's trust score (from inclusions and exclusions) is greater than or equal to 0 they are still on the Default Trust network. It is only once said score turns negative that they are no longer trusted by default.

This forum doesn't use the MyBB forum software, it uses SMF. Therefore, it is extremely unlikely this is possible here.
The closest you could perhaps get on the forums is using Coinbase's payment buttons leading to a customized URL, which you can read more about here.

Added to the list. Please remove the https:// from any non-BitcoinTalk links before you post them here. Thanks.

Let me tell you what that looks like to more experienced members around here:
"Give me 10BTC, then you can complain when I run off with it".

If you want to prove your legitimacy, you might want to answer a few of these questions:

• How do you get profit?
• If the answer to the previous question is trading or anything similar, can you prove it?
• Why do you need such an insanely high minimum deposit, if you're as legitimate as you say?
• Why is a website with such a high deposit minimum as yours using a $15 one-page theme?

I also like that you're offering Bitcoin -> Paypal as well, perhaps the easiest exchange method to charge back.

Right now this is looking like a pathetic excuse of a scam; I hope to god no one is stupid enough to fall for it.

I believe it would all carry over. You would have a visible activity of 4 and a potential activity of 56.

Yes. Then added with the 1 activity they got in the first interval would give them the maximum for both intervals, 28. They would not earn any extra from posting until the next activity period.

Let's say an account posts once in one interval. They would get 1 activity (which is visible on their profile), along with 13 more potential activity (that you cannot see). If they were then to post in the next interval, the first 13 posts would then unlock that potential activity from the last period, then the next 14 would unlock the activity from the current interval.

Basically, if an account's activity and post count is the same, they have extra activity they can unlock (usually).

Basically QS is gripping at straws to try and justify his petty arguments with other people.

What point? I don't see CD trying to distract from anything. If anything, by tagging those who take part in Ponzis he is bringing it closer to light.

Nice conspiracy. have you got any evidence towards that, or are you just trying to push the anti-CD circle-jerk more?

Fixing a bug in a script != coding a script. I've fixed bugs in scripts previously, I cannot then put that on my portfolio and imply that I made it.

You're over exaggerating again. Do you really think that the 5 lines doog fixed were so detrimental to the script that it would have rendered the script unusable? I can almost guarantee that the script was used prior to dooglus' involvement, and had been used to steal money from others. Trying to argue that he had such a large effect on the script is stupid, as it is plainly obvious he didn't.

I would ask for evidence, though I can already tell you're just going to bring up the dicebitco.in signature campaign again.

Hey, remember when you worked directly with TF to try and get a lawsuit against Vod (where he sent you money towards it)? TF, someone who single-handedly stole over $1,500,000 (at current prices) from people using his services, sent money he stole from others directly to you?
Yeah me neither. What am I talking about, burn dooglus for advertising a site that scammed!

Really QS, this is starting to get a bit sad. Do you really have nothing better to do with your time than follow internet vendettas against people who don't trust you?

It doesn't seem like there has been any update on the dev's twitter about it. For now, you can use this instead (I should think):

Is it possible to reserve a spot on this campaign? I consider myself to be a high quality poster, though I am bound to my current campaign until the current term finishes.
Also, is the campaign being escrowed?