While I feel like it may be futile, let's try to explain it again. The problem with what you're doing isn't about what you do with previous bumps on your thread. The problem is that your bumps are not within 24 hours of each other.
I even italicized the part of your quote which applies to what you're doing wrong.

You mean the topic being #417,000? It's most likely pure luck, since there is nothing else about the user that resembles something that a bot would do (more just a person promoting his altcoin).

Google Adsense never accepted sites like Faucets in the first place, as Adsense doesn't allow Incentivized Traffic (See 'Sites that offer compensation programs ("pay-to" sites)' on this page).

You won't receive a warning. If you try to approve an Adsense account with a Faucet website your account will be denied. If you're found to be using Adsense ads on a faucet from an already approved account your account will be banned without warning.

I don't think it would be that sale, since the numbers don't quite match up (The post mentions >2000 posts, where as Blazr only has 1933 and the activity is significantly lower than Blazr's). If it was an account sale, I believe that it would be this one, since the numbers match up more nicely.

It's hard to tell though, considering there are THREE DT account sales happening now. Some people in this community are fucking awful sometimes.

It depends on the importance of your account. If your account could damage the forum by being abused (E.G being on DT) then the process would be significantly faster. Otherwise, if your account is just a normal Senior-Hero account, you can expect a wait of several months to a year.

If people don't want the wait, they should improve their security so they don't get hacked. It's not the admin's problem if they can't demonstrate good security practices.

I do understand that it was just a temporary lapse of judgement, though it was extortion by definition. You were trying to get your way by threatening the forum with monetary loss.
Regardless, it was very noble of you to accept your mistakes, apologize, return the BTC and still contribute to the forum as you do. I don't think anyone holds your mistake against you anymore.

It isn't impossible, but it isn't as clean cut as you're making it out to be IMO. I expect it's easier if your first language is comprised of mostly Latin characters, however (much like your example) if a person is coming from a language based on Cyrillic characters (Russian, Chinese, Greek etc) it will likely be significantly more difficult to become fluent in a language such as English (at least to the point where you can communicate decently).
Not only this, but things such as idioms and sarcasm can make it harder for non-natives to fully understand what people fluent in the language may be saying.

I don't believe anyone is a perfect English speaker on this forum. Even natives such as myself still make a good amount of mistakes when typing or reading replies.
No one expects you to speak English perfectly, however people do expect you to speak it fluently enough to convey your point. If you do not speak English fluently then people that do may think that your post is spam or off topic as they do not properly understand what you're trying to say. This is not anyone's fault, simply a problem with trying to communicate with a language barrier.

The current list of treasurers can be seen here. According to the post, the forum currently holds ~1,750BTC between 4 treasurers.

This is true, as sadly Paraipan passed away in 2014.

In addition to this, Rassah is holding 750BTC in this address:

I expect that the majority was used on the new forum software, though I know CIYAM chose to return his holdings to theymos after an extortion attempt against the forum using them.
If you would like to see what the treasurers list used to look like, there is an archived version from 2014 at archive.org.

It's subjective. A constructive post is (IMO) a post that adds to the conversation/answers a query whilst still having effort put into it.
It's difficult to define, however it is not difficult to distinguish. Low quality posts tend to repeat things that have already been said (either in the thread or in their post) to stretch out their post length/count, or say things that have no relevance to the thread /conversation (E.G saying something like 'I hope the price stays high' in a Speculation thread).

I started a similar thread to this a while back, of you would like to read it.

Would just like to start by saying that I am in no way related to FaucetBox, just in case you decide to use what I say to you against them. I'm just talking as someone who has been here for a while and understands how this works a lot more than you seem to.

Correct. This fee can be reduced, though something will have to change. Would you prefer:

• FaucetBox to shut down as it cannot afford to pay it's infrastructure,

OR

• Transactions to faucet users take days to confirm (or may never) as fees are not paid.

If you can find a way to do this using only a Bitcoin address, I'm sure that FaucetBox will be happy to implement it. Otherwise, it is not their responsibility.

FaucetBox has no reason to look after your site for you. It is your responsibility to look after your website.
If you added a way to withdraw from your website using PayPal, do you think they would help you stop bots visiting your site? Absolutely not. This is no different.

You do not have any idea what you're talking about, though that wasn't hard to pick up on based on the rest of your posts. If you can find such software for a low price, use it.

1. Yes, if there were any security exploits in the FaucetBox script then they are responsible for fixing them. However, the bot problem is because a bot looks no different from a human. A user comes from a valid browser, checks the captcha and gets a withdrawal to their address. How do you prove that this user is not a bot?
2. Are you stupid? Why is FaucetBox responsible whatsoever for external services that they use in their script? Is FaucetBox responsible for the Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin networks too? (Hint: Of course not).

Learn how the bots complete captchas and you will see that the captcha is the reason for the bot attacks. Of course, you once again have no idea what you're talking about and want to blame a scapegoat (that being FaucetBox).

No, it is your site. As far as I'm concerned, FaucetBox has given you more than enough to get started on running a faucet. Expecting them to do everything for you and crying like a child when they don't is stupid.

The fee is for the Bitcoin network and the site's (not faucet script's, though I expect that comes into it somewhat) running costs. This was explained to you clearly here:

Threatening people because you can't get your own way, what a clever and mature way to handle things. Child.

---

As explained above, this is not their problem. The faucet is infested with bots as the script is exactly the same as every other, making it easy for bots to attack multiple sites at the same time. This is the inherent flaw with faucet scripts.
If you want to reduce bots without putting any sort of measures into place, make your faucet layout/function unique. Chances are (unless your rewards are amazingly good) bot creators won't bother to create/fix a bot just for your website.

However, this is not a signed message. He's asking for the signed message that you sent to theymos.

It depends on how important your account is. Since (AFAIK) your account isn't thst important anymore, it can take anything from a few weeks to a year.

Shorena created a useful tutorial on creating and verifying signatures here.
If you would like to use a non-web service, there is the 'Verify Message' option under 'File' in Bitcoin Core, A 'Verify' option in Electrum on the 'Sign/Verify message' option under 'Tools' and a 'Verify Message' option under 'Tools' in MultiBit.

It is. So is identity theft. Should that be allowed as well?

Not to mention how easy it is to buy a Facebook Account with many friends (it was discussed literally 3 posts before yours), what if a member doesn't use social media? Would they have to sign up for it, gain a lot of friends/follows and wait for a year before they could perform any transactions on this forum? If they didn't want to do this, what would stop them posting some random Facebook user's account and pretending it was them?
In addition to this, one of Bitcoin's main principles is that it is anonymous. This is then ruined if everyone has to post all of their personal information just to do something as simple as transact using it.

The account being legit doesn't necessarily mean the user posting it being legit. I am this Facebook user, can I transact now and be trusted?

You obviously didn't think it through very well. Hope you enjoy your signature payment!

You should just trade with people you trust after looking at their history on the forum and evaluating their behavior/trade history. Relying on any other factor to make a judgement for you has the possibility to go very wrong (even with personal evaluation it can still go very wrong, see Master-P).

If you're talking about people selling accounts with positive trust, it happens more than you would expect. It is disgusting.

It would depend on how well you went about hiding you buying it.

For what I believe is a good reason. You were looking to develop/get help with something that severely damages a business that I have helped others with for years. Regardless, this is not on topic so let's not discuss it here.

You too.

While I do agree with you, this is a moot point since it has happened on the forum in the past.

Did you try to reset your password through your security question? If so, that will automatically lock your account.

The admins are busy, and have better things to do than fix problems which (most of the time) were caused by the users themselves.

1PNmymEXA8mGZfdsWAWmicJPTXEf5KAzTG
Cheers Bob! Welcome back. How're you doing?

People don't get added to DT because of their trust score; that would open the door for abuse. People are added to DT because a DT1 member sees their feedback and considers it to contribute to the forum.

ibminer leaves accurate trust feedback, and does not spam. Stop crying because you were left negative feedback.

There was any debate? I just thought I should point out how hypocritical you're being, maybe hoping you won't pull the same shit for the third time in a month or two. I apologize if I said it harshly.

Apart from, if you read it, I pretty much agreed with you for the rest of my post (apart from I corrected you in a few places you were wrong).

Neither do they change their mind like the weather on their paid signature, coincidentally only when they get punished for spamming.
Adults do read people's posts and reply to their points, regardless of whether said points hurt their feelings or not.

I mean, you do have first hand experience with this point as well. Good to see that whole "I hate signature campaigns and I'm not joining one again" is going well for you too, child.

It's simpler than that. More people that are here spamming bullshit, more people are giving traffic to the site spamming bullshit. It has nothing to do with search engines.
That, and I highly doubt that a search engine will not index any page on this forum because it sees it as spam.

Moderators are rewarded monetarily for the work they do on the forum by theymos. I don't think you know what you're talking about.

In reply to this, I believe you're half right. All up until you started trying to shove an unrelated agenda into your point.

You could maybe brute-force your password using a script similar to what is described here, however this depends on a few things.
How much of the password do you remember? Do you remember the type of character set the remaining characters belong to (E.G a-z, A-Z, 0-9)? If the password was a readable word/phrase, do you have any idea how the rest of it might go?
The answers to these questions may determine whether or not it would be sensible to try and brute-force it. Even if you know a lot about the rest of the password, it can still take days to crack it fully. If you don't remember anything about the rest of your password, it may not be worth the time or effort to crack it for the amount of Bitcoin you would lose.