Please explain me because I am stupid. How can your chart predict what will happen if there will be for example some major negative or major positive news? I am always very puzzled by so called chart experts (who always predicts two side movement lol) who never mention news. For me its like news run 90% of crypto market. For chart experts its like they never heard for news.
Or perhaps I am just stupid and news doesnt mater. I feel i will hear now flame, but i dont got it, post like news doesnt matter.
News has not really played that big of a role in the bitcoin price in the short time that I've ever seen. Usually it's like google trends where people look for the news to justify whichever way the price has gone. |
|
|
|
|
Someone asked me if he should sell when the price was around $9100. I was going to tell him to sell around $9950, not $10k because everyone will set that as their sell number...if he was going to sell.
Instead I told him to come up with a number that made sense from his budget and what he needed and stick to that. Telling him to rely on the numbers to determine when he needed to sell as opposed to selling on emotion. That was more on the par of advice for the long term as opposed to the immediate market.
|
|
|
|
|
The huge buy walls I see on the buy side on 'finex tells me it is whales screwing with things.
|
|
|
|
I never understood why there is resistance? I dont get it, can somebody explain? 10k will break. Why are people building walls to hold it sub 10k as long as possible?
Stupid people: "when the price gets to $10k I can buy...X...so I'll sell at $10k" |
|
|
|
|
Looks like 10k will have to wait until tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
And that slob wonders why he had a massive heart attack recently. Seriously. Also he's a shit director that gets WAY more credit than he deserves. But...long fast dialogues about the state of humanity right now... and Star Wars references... |
|
|
|
|
10000.gif^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H
|
|
|
|
Now Btc $98xx, when its $6xxx-7xxx I thought its a joke. So I didn’t buy any, now its hitting 10k soon. What should I do ?
Do not buy bitcoins. Keep your fiat money. Bitcoin is still as much of a joke as it was when it was $6k. Move along. |
|
|
|
In 2 Weeks from now, the daily MA 50 Would be @ around 10.500$.
From the starting of this pump, from 6700$, the daily MA 50 Was the real support.
So for the coming 2 Weeks from now, bitcoin gonna do those 2 Steps:
1/ crossing 10K to go around 10.600$ then the support would be the daily EMA 20 @10.000$.
From there, you never ever in your life gonna saw bitcoin @ 4digits unless a big disasters happend.
Then bitcoin gonna zigzag between 10.100$ and 10.500$ for 1 Week max.
2/ Crossing 11.000$ in the second week and go around 11.300$.
Then the new support would be the daily MA50 @ Around 10.700$.
Thats my prediction.
But...vegeta...  |
|
|
|
Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.
So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars. Can't do that with crappy science. Did the government want the end result to be a rover on Mars? Does the government want the end result of climate change studies to show the public that they need more government? |
|
|
|
INstead computer models with no basis in reality are endlessly tweaked to give the needed result.
This. I once did a division level battle scenario simulating all of the network traffic and wireless traffic with moving troops and terrain. We had drones flying in the air acting as range extenders for people on the ground to get over hills and other things blocking line of sight. It took us a very very long time to get the simulation running...the thing kept crashing due to the amount of information we were throwing through it. We had to extrapolate as much as we could to get it to run. I stayed up all night one time to get it to run all the way through for the first time. The results showed that the drones were bottle necked with traffic and hardly anything was getting through. Knowing this wouldn't sit well with the green suits we extrapolated some of the models differently so that we could get better results. Who knows what the reality was. I was just glad we were on the research end of things. When I started working in real world environments it wasn't as fun. One time I was working on a system being used in Iraq but it was down for a few days while we worked on some broken code. During that time 10 marines died and one of my frustrated co-workers blamed me for their deaths due to our system being down (the reality was that even with a perfectly working system they would have still died). Research is much better. Throwing wild numbers out that don't matter for a long time is easy. |
|
|
|
Interesting that we have been in that middle channel for so long. Even if we followed the lower channel we'd be in decent shape long term. |
|
|
|
There have been five mass extinction events on Earth that we know about. During each one, 75% of all species on the planet died. Most of these extinctions were caused directly or indirectly by climate change. During what palaeontologist have nicknamed The Great Dying, 95% of the species on the planet was wiped out by super volcanoes that erupted for centuries, slowly turning the atmosphere to poison. Another became know as the Oxygen Explosion, during which primitive bacteria covered the planet and oops ate up all the CO2. Humans will probably be the catalyst for the sixth mass extinction, if not the driving force.
What kind of cars caused the first five extinction events? If they had Teslas would they have been prevented? The Oxygen Extinction was caused by cyanobacteria, the first and so far only life-form that has successfully kicked off a global apocalypse. We could be the second with that attitude. I think humans can strive to be better than cyanobacteria. Our global apocalypse will be better. |
|
|
|
There have been five mass extinction events on Earth that we know about. During each one, 75% of all species on the planet died. Most of these extinctions were caused directly or indirectly by climate change. During what palaeontologist have nicknamed The Great Dying, 95% of the species on the planet was wiped out by super volcanoes that erupted for centuries, slowly turning the atmosphere to poison. Another became know as the Oxygen Explosion, during which primitive bacteria covered the planet and oops ate up all the CO2. Humans will probably be the catalyst for the sixth mass extinction, if not the driving force.
What kind of cars caused the first five extinction events? If they had Teslas would they have been prevented? |
|
|
|
|
Looking to hit a conference somewhere in Asia while I am here. Preferably around May 20th.
|
|
|
|
|
History deniers still believe that socialism can solve things.
|
|
|
|
|
As someone who worked as a defense contractor for over 20 years I will say that there is little science being done when working for the government.
It's mostly "what answer does the customer want?" followed by tweaking the numbers in the models to meet their expectations so that when the time comes they will continue to give you contracts. (eg. this Colonel is in the pocket of Harris Corp so when we do the side by side comparison of a Lockheed and Harris radio we need to make sure the Harris radio comes out as the superior radio). If we don't give them the numbers they expect then they claim that we have faulty models and don't know how to do simulations so they will find someone with more "realistic" numbers. So you play their game.
The amount of tweaking that could be done for wireless radio simulations was endless. I can only imagine what the global temperature models are like.
|
|
|
|
When it doesn't directly benefit the government who funds the "scientific" research I will be more open to looking further into it. Until then it's like believing Hitler's scientists when they say that the aryan race is superior.  If the scientists at the time were like "it appears that the aryan race is superior but there is no reason to try to eliminate other races and try to prop up the aryan race, if they are so superior that will happen over time naturally with absolutely no intervention by the government" then I might be like...hmm, that science seems like it might be legit. Maybe I'll look into it further and check the numbers. There is no coincidence that the fall of communism coincided with the rise in global warming fears...rats fleeing the sinking ship found a new vessel. |
|
|
|
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?
I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first. Or a prohibition to breed if you have an IQ less than XYZ In before: Or a prohibition based on race.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
