Yeah I know. Seems like my internet has some problems, but it should be up within 5 min. I'll refund downtime. |
|
|
|
sell old machines? really. for foot warmers? there must be some computational application for a hashing device...  No, there isn't. ASICs are designed to mine bitcoins, and can only do that (or other sha-256 coins). |
|
|
|
https://anxbtc.com just went up a lot in volume ( http://www.bitcoinity.org/markets/list?currency=ALL&span=24h). Their KYC policy states no need for verification if people don't do transactions in fiat. But this isn't clear if refers only to deposit/withdraw in fiat or someone depositing bitcoins and trading it for fiat, but only withdrawing in bitcoin or another alt coin, must also verify. Hi, ANXPRO here. Let me explain. If you want to trade Bitcoin for altcoins, then no verification is needed. However, if you want to trade Bitcoin for fiat currencies, even if you don't deposit/withdraw in fiat, verification is needed. |
|
|
|
my personal account worth 150$ if you sold it, it may worth 70$ at least
i will pay you back for sure as its my personal
i have
left4dead 1 & 2 40$ for both
CS go 15$
cs 1.6 10$
medal of honor
call of duty 2
dead space
red orcestra
and little more i have almost 19 games
Why ask for a loan right after you sold some btc? |
|
|
|
I actually got a problem with a wallet of mine. I'm using Armory Bitcoin Wallet and have two wallets in it.
In one of these wallets i got 4 addresses, two of them have been counting some amounts of BTC. I had like 0,2 (Address 1) on one adress, and 0,003 (Address 2) on another.
Now i bought about 0,1 btc to the address with the 0,003 in it but they dont appear in the wallet. they have been confirmed on blockchain already and i updated the transactions and resetted all databases.
please help me!
thank you
astrix
EDIT:
Forgot to tell you, that I "tried to update" the address by sending an amount from the address2 to address1. i have been losing another 0,05 btc with it.. -.-
EDIT2: To moderator, i am sorry for posting this thread in the wrong forum!
Export the private key and import it into another client, like Electrum or blockchain.info. |
|
|
|
I'm intrigued by Multipool and exactly how it works, haven't done any scrypt mining yet, still hanging on to Antminers and BTC pointing at ghash.
Anyone comment on Multipools? Will have to look at it more closely.
A multipool directs its hashrate to the most profitable coin at the time, and then exchanges the coins and pays you. When will scrypt cloud mining be available? |
|
|
|
Hmmm... Isn't the current system like this?
Customer > Leaserig > Provider
0.001 for 10 hours > 0.001 > 0.00097/hour
So... If they are 5 hours into the lease and someone cancels.. then Leaserig can pay 0.000485BTC back to the customer, since the fee has already been taken.
So even if the lease gets cancelled, you guys profit. That Okay?
Or, if the customer cancels, then the customer gets paid 0.000485, and if the provider cancels, then the provider gets 0.000015BTC subtracted from the balance.
No. Currently we lose the fee if a lease is cancelled. It has turned us even closer to a non-profit. Currently if a lease is cancelled we lose the fee and the provider loses the last payment. This is why only providers can cancel leases via support. That's not what I meant, I meant that you could make it like that, so that you guys get the fee either way. Also, XMK3, is there any plans for support for the zenController? |
|
|
|
I'd go with The Fury for the higher density. It's difficult to manage all the USB and power connections on the Gridseeds.
I'm just going to buy 2 for now. gsupp, as you might know, The Fury isn't supported for leasing out on Leaserig. |
|
|
|
price, consistent with yield, has actually gone up 61%.
so yield is actually down 61%
as compared to pb price in february, when it was .0107/ghz
so bitcoin out per bitcoin in has dropped drastically
never mind price per ghz, its price per btc yield per time that counts
todays price to equal februarys proportional yield should be about 0.0027btc/ghz
That's correct. If difficulty increases by +15%, price should theoretically go -15%. |
|
|
|
Jesse,
Do you still work with the guys at sevengnomes? I'm looking to have some GS rounds modded.
Chad
Are those guys actually legit? |
|
|
|
Can I send let's say 100 workers to clevermining with 1 BTC address? Is there a limit to how many I can send and/or does it break any efficiency and returns?
Just wondering thanks.
You can add as many workers to CM as you like, with multiple or one btc address. Just make sure that the username is the address only, nothing else. |
|
|
|
i had the bitcoins in my QT wallet stolen. here is how it happened: it was during the November bubble and some guy posted an altcoin miner (i think YAC) but it was really a virus and it drained my BTC wallet. that was a huge bummer!
Meh. Have antimalware and antivirus, and be careful when downloading random stuff. |
|
|
|
dude shut the fuck up with your emotional outbursts i asked a guy a question and you flipped out and made it last all day, god damn i would have liked to been in 3 or for 4 posts trying to get some input but you took offense when none was made  Are you trying to talk to yourself? Have you realized that what you are talking about is what you have done? All we did is make reasonable statements with evidence, and all you did was rage and insult people. Awesome. By the way, the one that has "emotional outbursts" is you, we haven't raged at people, you have. |
|
|
|
Generate a paper wallet from a offline linux computer that has never and will never touch the internet. and never use an offchain/third-party wallet, always have full access to your coins.
-ranochigo
I do this. I boot up Ubuntu via a USB key using "try it now" instead of a full installation. I have a local copy of bitaddress.org saved. Then I generate some addresses and save to a USB key. Copy public addresses then stash away the USB key. This way, the private addresses never gets online. Someone brought up BIOS-based viruses, though. Would it be possible for someone to have the key snagged and stored in the BIOS somehow, then when you load up the computer normally and go online, it would send in the information? I've been pretty amazed at the tricks people have come up with in the past... I did. The BIOS has no memory, but however, it does not need to have so. It can just transmit the data from the USB stick to the hard drive, and then upload it to the hacker whenever the PC is online. Is this a legitimate fear, though, or just something that may or may not actually be possible? I'm not familiar enough with the BIOS to know how this all works. And you can short it out to reset it prior to running any wallet generator on the system, right? To be on the safe side, you can download the stock BIOS and flash it before turning it into a cold wallet. As far as I know, the malware can be flashed into the BIOS, and it will execute commands made by a hacker. It probably will keylog everything and save that into your hard drive, and it will upload it once it has an internet connection, so the OS doesn't make a difference. It's a fear, but it's highly unlikely to happen, to be honest. I'm just suggesting 100% protection here. |
|
|
|
i click on the hire button but nothing happens  i have funds on the site. i put the pool information but the hire button doesn't work. I don't understand why  That's probably because you are using Internet Explorer. nope. I've tried firefox, chrome, safari, opera - > the same  That's definitely strange. Rigs are still getting hired. Which rig was it that had that issue? And is there an issue with hiring rigs in IE? Yes, is there an issue hiring rigs in IE? I don't think we have a dev using IE (or windows for that matter) mostly because even multiple world governments have advised against using IE for any reason whatsoever. There most likely will be problems with IE, since it's the crappiest browser, and it actually somehow lags and does not send queries to the website when you press a button. Is it bad if my opinion is that IE users should be banished from the internet altogether? I think that's an awesome idea. Microsoft also should discontinue IE, and implement Google Chrome. Can't you just display a big red notice saying "PLEASE DO NOT USE INTERNET EXPLORER, IT IS CRAPPY. DOWNLOAD GOOGLE CHROME HERE." if customers are using ie? lol. That would be awesome! I would. But then, this is one of the reasons I'm not allowed to deploy production websites  Meh, it's not good for us providers anyway. So, miaviator, what do you think about my cancellation proposal? |
|
|
|
Generate a paper wallet from a offline linux computer that has never and will never touch the internet. and never use an offchain/third-party wallet, always have full access to your coins.
-ranochigo
I do this. I boot up Ubuntu via a USB key using "try it now" instead of a full installation. I have a local copy of bitaddress.org saved. Then I generate some addresses and save to a USB key. Copy public addresses then stash away the USB key. This way, the private addresses never gets online. Someone brought up BIOS-based viruses, though. Would it be possible for someone to have the key snagged and stored in the BIOS somehow, then when you load up the computer normally and go online, it would send in the information? I've been pretty amazed at the tricks people have come up with in the past... I did. The BIOS has no memory, but however, it does not need to have so. It can just transmit the data from the USB stick to the hard drive, and then upload it to the hacker whenever the PC is online. |
|
|
|
Are there any plans for CM to support X11?
Or perhaps a separate X11 CM pool? Guys, I'm sure Terk has his plans. Please wait for his official confirmation, but don't pester them with questions. I don't think that clever is so clever - I ran my hash through them for 24 hours and a ltc pool I use that's also 'clever' outperformed them  Variance. As you might see, the altcoin market is lacking extremely profitable coins, and we are mostly on LTC due to that. Also, since CM has a lower hashrate compared to other huge LTC pools, there is more variance. |
|
|
|
Our price drops have nothing to do with the price of a Bitcoin in USD. We drop the cost in relation to the difficulty factor and an increasing maintenance cost. It's all relative. If you have mining hardware worth $100, and Bitcoin doubles, it should now be worth $200 since it is capable of mining Bitcoins which have doubled in value. Of course the BTC price of the hardware has stayed the same the whole time. You will see this in a fiat based marketplace, such as eBay -- people will hold onto their miners much tighter and sell higher when Bitcoin goes up. They would rather do this than lose potential profits to you over an increasing Bitcoin value. We choose to value our hardware higher (in USD, not BTC) as Bitcoin goes up, just as anyone else would. To counteract this, you will see the market flooded even more aggressively with ASIC hardware. Supply and demand. We feel our price is fair and very competitive, and remains to stay that way. I feel that the price is extremely fair. It is a lot lower compared to other companies like cex.io or PeerNove (CloudHashing). |
|
|
|
Are there any plans for CM to support X11?
Or perhaps a separate X11 CM pool? Guys, I'm sure Terk has his plans. Please wait for his official confirmation, but don't pester them with questions. |
|
|
|
I have 3 addresses with large amounts of Bitcoin, that all belong in the same wallet.
On the rich list they appear as 3 different addresses.
I want to spend Bitcoin from my wallet. Can I force the QT wallet to make it look like the Bitcoin I send comes from only one of those 3 addresses?
The addresses hold roughly equal amounts.
Thanks.
If you mean make it spend from the 3 addresses and "camouflage" it so that it looks like from one, that is impossible. If you mean send from 1, I think that is, but I dunno how bitcoin-qt works. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
