777coin Username: Nilashoc Thanks!  |
|
|
|
1BpWPbfTnsuPdDNdD63ee6vEZabuXKqzoN Very much appreciated!  This address is specific to this transaction, so I can rate you once it's sent! Thanks! |
|
|
|
you cant get it down to -12.5?
What he means is that they just don't exist, those odds have been removed from the site. For example, if you look now, there is no option for either: Cincinnati Reds -1.5 Denver Broncos -12.5 Considering this would I be fine with a Cincinnati and Bronco ML? |
|
|
|
User ID: 12634 It seems to be working intermittently at the moment for me. Thanks! |
|
|
|
Unfortunately right after posting this we're under another attack it seems. Not even sure how they got ip this time.
Gosh darn it, I was just hoping it was something on my end. Oh well, looks like I'm going to have to wait. |
|
|
|
|
@Stunna: Would it be possible for me to reserve this space until I can get my ID? For some reason I'm still getting a 500 - Internal Server Error at the moment.
|
|
|
|
So does anyone know if this software is safe?
There is no confirmation on either side so far, although we do have a user that claims there is a keylogger. I would advise that you don't use it until we know for a fact it is safe. |
|
|
|
WARNING
DO NOT INSTALL THE PLUGIN! I unpacked it and found that it contains code that tracks URL's, titles, and KEYSTROKES and sends them to their server.
This is probably a bad attempt on hacking!
Does anything even need to be said after this quote? Until we hear from the admin of the site, I wouldn't do anything. |
|
|
|
Here for the free BTC. Account: Nilashoc Thanks! |
|
|
|
Here for the promotion! Nilashoc Thanks!  |
|
|
|
|
It is possible that it could have been obfuscated, but the real question is why would the creator obfuscate the code if they had nothing to hide at all? You could argue that it is against competitors, but there are none.
|
|
|
|
|
PM me with more details. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Quoting from the wiki: A transaction may be safely sent without fees if these conditions are met: - It is smaller than 10,000 bytes.
- All outputs are 0.01 BTC or larger.
- Its priority is large enough (see the Technical Info section below)
Otherwise, the reference implementation will round up the transaction size to the nearest thousand bytes and then add a fee of 0.0001 BTC per thousand bytes[1]. Users may increase the default 0.0001 BTC/kB fee setting, but cannot control transaction fees for each transaction. Bitcoin-Qt does prompt the user to accept the fee before the transaction is sent (they may cancel the transaction if they are not willing to pay the fee). Note that a typical transaction is 500 bytes, so the typical transaction fee for low-priority transactions is 0.0001 BTC, regardless of the number of bitcoins sent. If you want to ensure that you send the minimal amount of transactions fees you can enable the a "frugal" fee policy. To do this: 1) Login to your blockchain.info account 2) Click on the button on "Wallet Home" screen which states "Account Settings" which is on the middle right hand side. 3) Press "Continue" 4) Click on the "General" tab on the left hand side and scroll down 5) Select "Frugal" to minimise the transaction fees you send. WARNING: You may have significantly slower transaction confirmation time although it should eventually get a confirmation. |
|
|
|
Are you on version 1.0.5?
Well, considering I thought it was a scam, I obviously uninstalled it. As far as I know it was the newest version up until about ~ 3 hours ago. I have redacted my post following the confirmation received from TradeFortress. |
|
|
|
You may have surfed a variety of sites (I don't know), however none of them passed the anti spam algorithm. A suggestion would be don't browse web pages too fast. I spent a good one hour surfing on sites that I usually do, Bitcointalk, Pandora, Bitbook, CoinChat etc at a normal pace to ensure that I was giving your extension a fair go to actually credit. I don't believe the issue to be on my end (unless ABP or Hola has something to do with it) so you may want to look into that as well. Thus far I have temporarily redacted my post. |
|
|
|
The check is > 0.03, you had exactly 0.03 which is why it said not enough balance.
But since you had exactly 0.03, it means you didn't actually browse any paying pages. That's not the intended purpose of the extension, we don't get any referrals / affiliate payouts that way.
All cash outs are manual, and if you sign up, use a code, and refer two people 2 minutes to each other, both of them who abandoned their account, one of them from a VPN, you are not going to get paid.
We do pay, we've already done a cash out to someone who isn't trying to game the system like you, and I've tipped 100 MBTC to random people last night.
First off you might want to consider the fact that you infer from your initial post that you get paid for surfing on any site. If there are specific paying pages I would appreciate it if you could note that down on your initial post that only a set few pages actually pay, seeing as I tested your extension on a wide variety of sites. Secondly, the whole purpose of this exercise is to confirm that your site actually pays and does not instead waste people's time. If you could provide proof of at least a single payment I am more than happy to redact my post and apologize for jumping to conclusions. EDIT: And you might want to mention that the check is > 3 instead of giving the impression that it is a minimum of 3. |
|
|
|
|
Considering the fact that your not actually dead yet, you'd be better off simply encrypting your private keys and giving them the password and drilling it into them until they remember. If you go bottom up before you can achieve that, you're probably not going to be able to set up a complex legal will with all the parameters required to ensure that they get it anyway, so basically just too bad.
|
|
|
|
Yep... If you want return on investment your going to have to put 5-10 grand on the table...
I'm not even sure whether that will actually give you a ROI within a reasonable time frame. Your going to need a lot of hashing power and get it cheaply in order to profit considering the current difficulty and the fact that it is skyrocketing. You'd probably be better off simply investing when BTC is low and selling off when it is high or shoving it in a bank and getting interest. |
|
|
|
marcrotheminer has been disqualified for having all referrals coming from the same IP..
That was kind of expected, he seems to me to be a user who will abuse rules in order to gain BTC. Clearly he's not that much of a bright light, if he was going to referral spam at least use a VPN. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
