Fixed that for you.

Another newbie account whose only post is this. Seems just a little odd huh 

Just so everyone knows - there is no foolproof system and with martingale it's really only a matter of time till you lose your bankroll. Playing on -EV games in the long term will just result in losses, so I wouldn't personally buy something that'll offer no advantage at all (rather it's a waste of time). There are NO systems, if there were everyone would use them and dice sites would be broke. It's simply mathematics.

I'm sorry bud but with that clause you pretty much denied any chance you remotely had of doing some kind of deal with anyone here. It's basically a requirement of most here that if your using PP you send first and even that that's not a guarantee - BTC is irreversible, PP isn't.

Just out of reference if you were really truly in want of making sure you were secure, you could run armory offline, use vanitygen to generate addresses and import those addresses into your cold storage/air gapped device. From there you could create transactions on your internet connected device, then move that transaction to the offline device and have it signed then move that back to the online device to be broadcast. It's a lot of work, but it pretty much guarantees that it's impossible for your keys to be stolen. It's simply a matter of how lazy you are.

Just delete the vanity address and never use it again. The rest should be fine provided you generated them yourself using your own client. Delete all the vanity ones you made with this site.

I dunno about you guys, but I never pay attention to the ad spots that theymos sells, I just scroll down past them. Comparatively, when I see like 5 PD/Bitmixer/Zoomhash sigs in a row I tend to remember them a little bit more. And in general, I would prefer to use the sites that are willing to give back a little to their users (hence why I'm jumping ship once PD3 is out - had some issues with PD2).

Well let's be honest - there aren't many people nice enough in the world to refund 10K of losses unless your a bigtime player or a big business. There are really just two scenarios:

a) Not hacked, instead maliciously edited code to steal coins. Then logic tells you that he would never refund your losses, but possibly only the cost of the addresses themselves in order to maintain some respectability for his account
b) Hacked, and refunding because it's the least he could do. Still can't give you a full refund because he doesn't have the funds necessary to cover it.

Both cases make sense with his actions so you can't really tell. The lesson to be learned with all of this is that is your going to make addresses do so yourself and don't trust it to any external party at all.

I'm pretty sure currently that something like that isn't supported by Bitcoin itself. However, you could probably implement something like that using a Blockchain wallet and its API.

It depends on how much you post in general on a monthly basis. For example, for someone who makes 200 posts a month Stunna's offer is better (as the cap is far higher and he's paying per post). Comparatively if you only make 50 posts the GAW campaign is a better fit. Basically, if you make more than 133 posts a month then Stunna's current offer is the best on the subforum at the moment.

EDIT: Haha, didn't see your edit until after I'd already posted. Woops.

Haha, I registered in late 2010 and I'm still behind you in activity. I have a tendency to lurk lol :/

Anyways, as to the argument that Hero members don't generally rent out their signatures - it's entirely up to them - I personally don't mind getting a few bucks on the side for something I already do as well as advertising for something that I consider to be ethical (hence the reason I'm not going with Ritz atm). Some of them, however, have enough holdings not to even bother as most Hero's come from an age when Bitcoin was cheap and so I'm not surprised that most have at least 50-100 and some of the oldest a good 1000+.

Nice to see some fightback from Stunna here. I'll be interested in seeing how the 'loyalty program' will work - probably will move over to PD once my term ends with my current advertiser.

For once a lender that isn't completely blind to the scams. I wish you luck in finding the people who have real needs (and are truly willing to pay back) out of the minefield of scammers

Entry. Much appreciated.

First off all, if your using the Qt client then the wallet will have at least 100 pregenerated addresses for each of your transactions, so don't panic about that. Before I bother with anything else have you tried importing each and every single private key into Qt or whatever client you're now using?

@Evil: May I switch over to this campaign and resign my position in the Zoomhash campaign? Details are as follows:

Posts: 793
Address: 1Light1BN9Lu38Jab9iqVmJXt4Rc66WAoB

BTW: Nice to see you managing these sig campaigns properly

I too wish to be paid for this week - 792 posts thus far. Please send the BTC to the above address. Thanks.

Interesting game, would prefer if you could implement an instant deposit system that only paid withdrawals on 1 confirm as well as the option to speed up the scratching animation.
Username: Nilashoc

BTW: On your "limited offer" you spelled access wrongly ('acces').

I'm not sure what you've got because I've beer had to deal with a file called calc address. Personally I used the one from here: http://lifeboat.com/oclvanitygen. I haven't had an issue with it so far.

You wouldn't turn them into BTC for the same reason your wouldn't sell your house to pay your monthly electricity bill. If it is necessary for you to keep ownership of them or you believe the collaterals value will increase relative to your cost now then you may go for a loan using that object as collateral so you can still pay your bill without having to sell your house.

Nearly anything can be used as collateral provided it is agreed upon by both parties. In general, most people use altcoins (low shipping costs - easy selling) but you can ship physical goods to an escrow.

Whether or not the former seed you used would have won or not is irrelevant. You knowingly took the risk to gamble with your money - and you lost. All that matters is that Stunna did not intentionally cheat you of a win (ie faking results/using known server and client combinations). Unless your claiming that he is not probably fair (ie that the rolls are correct given a specific client and server seed) then you don't have legs to stand on in this argument.